Where is the automatic mode for final fps?

[sonic coyote]

We've been talking about auto since lsfg first started alpha testing x3 mode. Its not as easy as one would think, even on theory.

[somber trench]

ok..

[somber trench]

But I still believe it's easier than you think

[dark tulip]

Are you a programmer?

[somber trench]

No man, but see how silly a function like this is, the developer managed to make a frame gen program in real time, where there is no program with the same function on the international market, do you think which one is more difficult?

I know it may be difficult, but it's nothing compared to the difficulty it was to make the entire program... I know the developer has the capacity to do it, but he's busy.

[somber trench]

In a few years I will graduate in systems analysis and development and I can answer you.

[dark tulip]

Well I am. Maybe don't tell people what is and isn't easy if you don't have the knowledge base? It's rude and condescending.

[somber trench]

That is, but you may not even have the knowledge base to refute it, from the beginning I made a suggestion, nothing more, besides, as we don't have the knowledge base, we don't know if it's really easy or not, so it's not rude. It's just an enthusiastic suggestion.

[dark tulip]

When you tell someone the work should be "easier than you think" it sounds rude and condescending. Why would you even say such a thing if you have literally no idea what you're talking about?

[sonic coyote]

If it was that easy, it'd be already done. That's all what is needed to be known for now.

[somber trench]

okay brother, I really understand but how can I deduce if it's easy or difficult without having the knowledge you say, this is nothing more than an opinion, I don't know if it is or not, with the knowledge I have today it seems more difficult to make a program of this type, that's why I think a function like this would be easier, the question of being rude is beside the point, because I'm only giving an opinion based on IT knowledge, I'm not criticizing anyone, since I can't do a program like this, as I said, it's just my opinion, I don't put a "price" on anyone's products.

[somber trench]

But don't worry, I know what you mean. and I agree with you, but I don't understand why you think I'm measuring someone's effort...

[somber trench]

Seriously, but I came to this post to make a suggestion and discover something new on the subject. If I wanted to know about the current program's functions, I wouldn't ask about the future.

[somber trench]

I really like how it is today, but as the updates are taking a long time, it's a curiosity.

[dark tulip]

The question of being rude is not beside the point, because that's literally what I was saying to you. Learn to ask questions without being rude and condescending, and don't make comments on the difficulty of feature implementation if you have literally no idea what you're talking about. You don't have to "deduce" whether something is easy or not. If you don't know what you're taking about, just don't talk about how easy you think it should be. Simple.

[somber trench]

right brother, you are absolutely right, since it is not easy as I thought, then it must be difficult as you said.

[somber trench]

but it never crossed my mind that what I said could be rude, at least as you think. remember that there are people whose interest is not in the way they speak but in a simple objective answer.

[dark tulip]

If you just want the answer, don't claim it's easy. That had nothing to do with getting a "simple objective answer" - which contradicts your statement. You should put more thought into how you treat people.

[somber trench]

You're making a big deal out of a teapot

[somber trench]

But I'll follow your advice, sorry

[sonic coyote]

Phew, finally. You can close this thread now.
#🔗│updates message

[waxen musk]

its here now😃