what is 9+5

[bronze umbra]

It's gotta be at least 6 right?

[ocean gull]

14, but it may be different if you use mods

[bronze umbra]

ok thanks

[wide current]

i think it's 16

[ocean gull]

Isn't that what it is in RSS

[limber pollen]

0
I took the derivative of it :/

[bronze umbra]

I got -4 my second time Imma check my math

[quaint marlin]

That is one hard math question, but I think it is 3.7416573867739413...

[limber pollen]

3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445923078164062862089986280348253421170679

[last lark]

well, since 9+10 = 21, and 5 is 5 less than 10, that means it equals to 21 minus 5, which the answer is 16

[bronze umbra]

I see your logic but I use graphics overhaul so it's probably more

[remote juniper]

dude this is rocket science, but rocket math, i think the answer will be revealed on 1st april 69420

[keen current]

I think the answer is 14

[dreamy echo]

e

[ocean gull]

ln

Get logaritmed L+bozo+ratio

[bronze umbra]

Got him

[sharp forum]

actually im pretty sure its 14!

wait actually that might be too high

[bronze umbra]

Yeah I'm using mods

[last lark]

well, since i have stock, i realised it might be lower than my original answer, so maybe 15

[bronze umbra]

so, so far we know it is between 3.14159265358979 and 15

[covert bane]

maybe turn kerbin in a overall-mathunit and try to solve this, or the answer can be found somewhere between the stars i guess

[limber pollen]

Actually, someone said "e"
2.718281828459

[bronze umbra]

ahhhhh

so between 2.718281828459 and 15

[keen current]

9 + 5 = E

[bronze umbra]

I think it's e^e

[ocean gull]

Nah it's e^ln(π)+i

[bronze umbra]

What does i =?

[ocean gull]

¥+¢^Ω

[bronze umbra]

[keen current]

E in hex

[ocean gull]

Well it's somewhere between 2.71 and e^(e^ln(π)+(¥+¢^Ω))

[limber pollen]

Sqrt(-1)

[bronze umbra]

now we only need to graph this, and then look at where y=2.71 intercepts with e^(e^ln(π)+(¥+¢^Ω)), then we can find the solution to 9+5

for simplicity,
¥=T

¢=c

Ω=o

[ocean gull]

Just gotta get out my 5 dimensional graphing paper

[bronze umbra]

wait how do i adjust the equation to also include x and y?

so does T,c, or o equal x

?

if t = x the 9+15= somewhere between 0 and -infinity

so 9+15 in negative

[sharp forum]

Real

[ocean gull]

T in for time which is often on the x axis

[bronze umbra]

thats why i used to calculate for the x

[ocean gull]

Exactly

[bronze umbra]

so the answer MUST be nagative

it could be anything tho

[cosmic drum]

there are people who actually needs help with the game, then there is That KSP Guy

[bronze umbra]

i actually need help

plus we just had a breakthrough

[limber pollen]

Ask ChatGTP

It is "omniscient"

[limber pollen]

Therefore, it can graph in 5 dimensions

[limber pollen]

What if we took the integral of 9+5?
We'd then grt 9x+5x... we have to then find out what x equals, so if we set a upper and lower bounds of 0 and this equation when set to x, we should get our answer... plus a few other variables.

[bronze umbra]

yeah so then we can finaly know what 9+5 is

[ocean gull]

After long hours of calculation I may have finally found the answer

I may need to double check

But

It's 14

[sharp forum]

Huge if true

The calculation of a life time

[limber pollen]

Soothsayer here.

Ban

[limber pollen]

Spreading false information with no claim

[sharp forum]

We need the proof

[bronze umbra]

proof

show us your equations

[ocean gull]

9+5=14

[bronze umbra]

im not convinced

that looks fake

[ocean gull]

It was actually a lot simpler than I thought

I was really surprised

All the variables (¥,¢,e,i) cancelled out

[bronze umbra]

no

because Y=t

and t=x

it creates a range of logorithmic curves

using the equation e^(e^ln(π)+(¥+¢^Ω))

[limber pollen]

Owie

[limber pollen]

Well, what does chatgpt say about it?

[bronze umbra]

im banned from chatgpt after i programed it to be able to use a mechanical hand

[limber pollen]

.

...

Buh

[bronze umbra]

[sharp forum]

Prove it

[sharp forum]

Dear god

[wide current]

what is this black magic

[ocean gull]

Casio

[sharp forum]

Not a Texas instruments, might be incorrect

[ocean gull]

Checked with google

Il put it in a ti84 in a few hours to be sure

Alr you couldn't possibly doubt this

I used TALLY MARKS

[wide current]

you know humanity wouldn't get anywhere if we didn't question the facts

[ocean gull]

True

[sharp forum]

i accept this

[limber pollen]

But these aren't the facts!

This is falsified information

[limber pollen]

Doubt

It's obviously faked, just as faked as the moon landing (jk)

[limber pollen]

This was also done at school, has to be fake, just like every news station (actually kinda true, each news station has some amount of truth as well as un-backed claims)

[limber pollen]

"Thr internet is not always correct"

[limber pollen]

There still can be an amount of human error. You see, there is actually 1 significant figure, therefore, you overstated the accuracy of the problem. The correct answer would actually be 10.

[ocean gull]

Ok close enough

[limber pollen]

Not when you're in a space ship, you don't say "close enough"
You overstated the accuracy.
You have false information.
Stop spreading as many lies as politicians on election campaigns

We should banish you from this thread

[ocean gull]

And why is there only one significant figure

[last lark]

[bronze umbra]

gentelmen

we did it

the answer is probably 14

[sharp forum]

14+- 1

[last lark]

i estimate about 14.0002345635756856975967

[sharp forum]

round up to 15

[bronze umbra]

yeah because thats how that works

[sharp forum]

[ocean gull]

Yay

[bronze umbra]

so our final equation:

9+5 ~ 15

solved

[last lark]

✅

[wide current]

i disagree

if you do 9+5 and get 15 you have to add the 2 for ksp 2

so then it'll be......

what's 15+2

[limber pollen]

Because 9 has one sig fig and 5 has one sig fig

[main fern]

its 152 obviously

it proves itself

[bronze umbra]

Hmmmmm

can I see a logarithmic graph to prove this

[main fern]

my proof is that logarithms suck

[limber pollen]

log(15+2)

log15+log2

idk after that

[ocean gull]

Wait no you can't do that

[main fern]

log15+log2 = log^2 + log2 + log15 + (15*2)

[ocean gull]

Log5+log2=log(5*2)

[main fern]

log = 10*9

10*9 = 90

90=9*0=0

Thus log15+log2 = log^2 + log2 + log15 + (15* 2) = 1* 5 * 2 = 10 = 1*0 = 0

THUS 9+5 = 0 (plus or minus 0.000000000001i)

[bronze umbra]

well is it plus or minus

(difinataly possible to tell)

[main fern]

Both, it has 2.0001 possible answers

[bronze umbra]

ik

im just like to be stupid

like roleplaying

[main fern]

[vale condor]

its 1 idiots

[craggy prairie]

guys

i have the answer

its -9

[thin sluice]

thanks

01

[cursive bone]

easy one, 3.1415926535...

[spark salmon]

Legend has it, the answer to this question is still unknown to this day…

[last lark]

Real

[dire grove]

ITS WINDOW

🪟

[viral fog]

Abbott & Costello 7 x 13 = 28 | Colorized https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIDenK8IWmQ

[cold tide]

It's 14.495978707

[main fern]

it's most likely 14

[dire umbra]

9+5?
Last time I checked, adding a 5 to the end of a 9 made 95

[fresh thorn]

14

[main fern]

14