#make actual water physics
28 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
I mean, nothing's changed since then
definitely a top 1 priority (!)
I disagree. I would rather have wobbly rockets fixed, science out, and maybe even a few more milestones over water physics
Most of this game is spent in space, not in the water
dude "(!)" means it's ridiculing and sarcastic 😄
i too would obviously rather have wobbly rockets fixed and science out and many other things
That usually doesn’t mean sarcasm, it usually means emphasis.
I've just looked and learned that there are different uses for (!), these may vary between languages. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exclamation_mark
"In English writing and often subtitles, a (!) symbol (an exclamation mark within parentheses) implies that a character has made an obviously sarcastic comment e.g.: "Ooh, a sarcasm detector. That's a really useful invention(!)""
you learn something every day i guess 
English is my first and only language. I just didn't know that (!) meant sarcasm lmao
I guess that's something that I would know if I watched more movies with captions
I didn't know that!
Me neither (!) (there’s no sarcasm in this message I just wanted to use the thing)
Yeah its pretty bad but also its not kerbal boat program all you need it to do is have the craft float on the water after reentry
also ksp 1's system was about as bad
Yeah actually you're right
fr when i saw those water physics it gave me depression
I definitely agree but after they get the base game down without as many bugs
one day
water = trampoline, didnt you know?
yep
That is a prime example of things that are to be expected in early access. Very low priority but it'll happen for sure. It would only reduce performance which at this point the game just can't afford.
a good short term solution would be to just make waves smaller