#should there be only one language
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
The argument would be that diversity and culture is good , a language is a key aspect of a culture, but I agree and I believe most people agree, the question is which language should be the sole language? I can't see anyone being able to agree on that
according to what though
thats of course not the way it is, but according to what would it even be changed
like how would that at all be practical
Personally English
Fairly the most spoken language OR the easiest to learn
easiest to learn to english speakers
its probably as hard to learn english to chinese speakers as it is for english speakers to learn mandarin
I think a new and efficient language should be created
i mean to countries closely related to english
This may be bias, but English is probably the best choice as it's spoken all around the world
Easy to learn
And top 3 most spoken
Mandarin isn't spoken around the world
again easy to learn, to countries closely related to english
I don't think I'd like a world where there were only one language actually
It would be dull and boring
yeah
You think having many languages is fun?
i think it wouldnt be practical or make sense to even impliment though, even though its whole merit is practicality
Actually if we split the world into 2 languages, everyone could learn the both
plus if you instantly zapped everyone into english speakers, surely non mutually intelligible dialects would develop, like arabic
and mandarin/cantonese
True
it's more beautiful, I'm going to Europe and one thing I'm looking forward to is hearing all the languages
sometimes you need to sacrifice aesthetic and culture for practicality
like, ionic columns may not be practical (use more materials than doric columns) but they're more prettier so we use em
i think diversity for a lot of things are good
if worldwide standards were the default thing (in a universe that just works fundementally different where diversity was the exception)
and you just had a few things that were diverse, if we still had the same brains as here, then we would go crazy
standards are good somewhere like with USB ports, power grids, whether somewhere uses summertime or not
or with screws, etc
i dont think language is one of them
Too much isn't tho
How about a language per continent
Because there are farrrr too many
maybe having one language that everyone speaks as a second language like for example english
on top of all the ones we have
that would probably serve both practicality and diversity
Yes, you'd have to learn your cultured language and English
Brilliant
But most people who know a niche languaeg also know a common tongue
so if everyone spoke their current language and then english second
exactly
so i guess the world has in a way already corrected towards this in a lot of ways
Problem with that is that if you live in an area where everyone speaks a cultured language, people will continue to speak taht cultuted langauge so they wouldn't want to learn English and if they did, they would never practice it
aside from the occasional tourist
thats not true
india is exhibit A
everyone there speaks their local language which is in the 100s, plus english
i also speak my native tongue and english
Also there's no need to be fluent, just to prevent misunderstandings and make kif easier
Same, on top of that I speak Italian
I guess mainly because of the internet?
Why would they learn English?
Are you familiar with Esperanto?
This has been tried
I am actually
there's an xkcd for this I think
oh yeah this is true!
The best argument for a universal language is efficiency.
The best agrument against is that there is value in seeing the same thing from fundamentally different perspectives.
so that just repeats what i said at the start that this would never actually be practical
like youd have to have something akin to a powerful world government for this to feasibly be able to exist with the current ways the world works, regardless of how good and effective it actually is
in my opinion
Which is why we came up with a mix, your own language plus a new efficient language
there already is one, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esperanto
Esperanto (, ) is the world's most widely spoken constructed international auxiliary language. Created by L. L. Zamenhof in 1887, it is intended to be a universal second language for international communication, or "the international language" (la Lingvo Internacia). Zamenhof first described the language in Dr. Esperanto's International Language...
oh @magic spindle already mentioned it
this also already is a thing. Many former colonies speak a creole language
My answer : nah.
There are some cultures that have more words for more phenomena, I believe the Alaskans or Inuit people have like 6 different words for snow. USA has a lot of focus on self victory (can’t think of the term rn). But we have a lot of words that start with self, self-esteem, selfish, self-aware. Cultures develop language separately having one language for how different places are is silly
its actually 400 words for snow! (or a bit lower depending who you ask but wayyyyy above 6)
actually, with regards to this xkcd, Unicode (specifically UTF-8) won. Obviously there are still a million different character encoding standards, but UTF-8 is what almost everyone uses these days, except for severely memory limited applications (like some embedded use cases), but those are niche.
and that's probably the only documented example of someone developing a new standard that quite literally covers everyone's use cases (it's also the reason why we have emoji -- Japanese encodings had them, and the purpose of unicode was to cover everything), that prevailed
10 years ago when I started as a software dev, I still routinely saw a variety of different character encodings used, but now I can't even remember the last time I saw anything other than UTF-8 used.
Yet, from my personal experience, not being fluent in a language can create more misunderstandings than 2 people that do not even speak the same language trying to have a conversation.
Specifically, specific words and phrasing in the English language can be interpreted in different ways across English speaking countries as well as between regional dialects.