#should there be only one language

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

idle echo
#

Isn't it kind of pointless having more than one language...? More work, more problems, less misunderstandings, easier to travel, wouldn't limit the places you could move to.?

unborn canopy
golden haven
#

according to what though

#

thats of course not the way it is, but according to what would it even be changed

#

like how would that at all be practical

idle echo
golden haven
#

easiest to learn to english speakers

#

its probably as hard to learn english to chinese speakers as it is for english speakers to learn mandarin

unborn canopy
golden haven
idle echo
#

This may be bias, but English is probably the best choice as it's spoken all around the world

#

Easy to learn

#

And top 3 most spoken

#

Mandarin isn't spoken around the world

golden haven
unborn canopy
#

I don't think I'd like a world where there were only one language actually

#

It would be dull and boring

golden haven
#

yeah

idle echo
golden haven
#

i think it wouldnt be practical or make sense to even impliment though, even though its whole merit is practicality

idle echo
#

Actually if we split the world into 2 languages, everyone could learn the both

golden haven
#

plus if you instantly zapped everyone into english speakers, surely non mutually intelligible dialects would develop, like arabic

#

and mandarin/cantonese

unborn canopy
#

sometimes you need to sacrifice aesthetic and culture for practicality

#

like, ionic columns may not be practical (use more materials than doric columns) but they're more prettier so we use em

golden haven
#

i think diversity for a lot of things are good

#

if worldwide standards were the default thing (in a universe that just works fundementally different where diversity was the exception)

#

and you just had a few things that were diverse, if we still had the same brains as here, then we would go crazy

#

standards are good somewhere like with USB ports, power grids, whether somewhere uses summertime or not

#

or with screws, etc

#

i dont think language is one of them

idle echo
#

How about a language per continent

#

Because there are farrrr too many

golden haven
#

maybe having one language that everyone speaks as a second language like for example english

#

on top of all the ones we have

#

that would probably serve both practicality and diversity

idle echo
#

Brilliant

unborn canopy
golden haven
#

so if everyone spoke their current language and then english second

golden haven
unborn canopy
#

aside from the occasional tourist

golden haven
#

india is exhibit A

#

everyone there speaks their local language which is in the 100s, plus english

#

i also speak my native tongue and english

idle echo
#

Also there's no need to be fluent, just to prevent misunderstandings and make kif easier

idle echo
unborn canopy
#

Why would they learn English?

magic spindle
#

This has been tried

unborn canopy
#

there's an xkcd for this I think

golden haven
magic spindle
#

The best argument for a universal language is efficiency.

The best agrument against is that there is value in seeing the same thing from fundamentally different perspectives.

golden haven
# unborn canopy

so that just repeats what i said at the start that this would never actually be practical

#

like youd have to have something akin to a powerful world government for this to feasibly be able to exist with the current ways the world works, regardless of how good and effective it actually is

#

in my opinion

idle echo
hard ruin
#

oh @magic spindle already mentioned it

hard ruin
hard gull
#

There are some cultures that have more words for more phenomena, I believe the Alaskans or Inuit people have like 6 different words for snow. USA has a lot of focus on self victory (can’t think of the term rn). But we have a lot of words that start with self, self-esteem, selfish, self-aware. Cultures develop language separately having one language for how different places are is silly

golden haven
hard ruin
# unborn canopy

actually, with regards to this xkcd, Unicode (specifically UTF-8) won. Obviously there are still a million different character encoding standards, but UTF-8 is what almost everyone uses these days, except for severely memory limited applications (like some embedded use cases), but those are niche.

#

and that's probably the only documented example of someone developing a new standard that quite literally covers everyone's use cases (it's also the reason why we have emoji -- Japanese encodings had them, and the purpose of unicode was to cover everything), that prevailed

#

10 years ago when I started as a software dev, I still routinely saw a variety of different character encodings used, but now I can't even remember the last time I saw anything other than UTF-8 used.

hollow mica
#

Specifically, specific words and phrasing in the English language can be interpreted in different ways across English speaking countries as well as between regional dialects.