main ruin
Hello,
So IRL the crew always board first, they then do their checks, briefings etc. This then leads to boarding which could be 10-20mins after the crews boarded. I've noticed GSX boards crews then passengers straight after which isn't correct (at my airline anyway). Is their a chance we could manually select when to start passengers boarding? Or a timer of somesort?
tight kraken
That's a great idea.
The Boarding of the passengers after the CREW boarding is to fast.
Refueling is still busy and the passengers are already boarding etc..
Would be nice to see a separate option to start boarding the passengers and Crew.
-Boarding Crew
-Boarding Passengers
But with de-boarding those are already separate ?
Or am I mistaken ...
tight kraken
Hello,
So IRL the crew always board first, they then do their checks, briefing...
Did you hear anything is this will be implemented in the future ?
The passengers are coming way to fast/early
main ruin
I honestly dunno, it's down to Umberto
tight kraken
I honestly dunno, it's down to Umberto
I really hope so.
The cockpit is still starting up and the passengers are already boarding🫣
tight kraken
Make boarding passengers a separate option ?
real berry
Please don't repeat posting if you don't have new information/details to add. Repeating it won't make the feature being implemented faster.
craggy umbra
Absolutley with you on this. Would be amazing to be abled to control when the PAX board and when the Crew/Pilots board.
ruby stirrup
i axtualy posted about this today #support-general message so im all for it 100%
drowsy rose
As long as it is implemented without additional prompts. Actually would like to see the current prompt eliminated.
ruby stirrup
@drowsy rose you could use a countdown from the original prompts to load the pax.. with a slider setting in gsx settings for how long u want to wait between crew and pax loading with notifications on how long you have to wait
drowsy rose
<@266682643171639297> you could use a countdown from the original prompts to loa...
Anything is technologically feasible (including push forward), but it all depends on if/how the dev wants to implement it.
ruby stirrup
Anything is technologically feasible (including push forward), but it all depend...
well lets hope they go in favour of adding the function in some kind of way.. time will tell but i think its a popular request from the users