#retired-patch-6-3-discussion
1 messages · Page 261 of 1
True
That was a suicide
Save the queen
Suicide-By-WoLs
No she...really wasn't. She was trying to die a villain
Because she couldn't live as Tsuyu
Are the other dead Ascians raging hardcore in the lifestream at fandanial going: "DUDE, WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU DOING!?!"
Save the Queen is a little bit different since it's more a mechanized ritual, whereas other Hosted Primals don't necessarily need such artifacts to be summoned
though granted, quite a few Hosted Primals do use Artifacts in their summoning
Cough tsukuyomi
Ya she was trying to kill us she didn't throw the fight
Shiva didn't though, and presumably Thordan became King Thordan at some point before we saw him do so using the Eye, since the Heavens' Ward were able to enter their Primal-Blessed forms before then
just because she didn't throw the fight doesn't mean her aim wasn't to die
"Tsuyu must live"
it was effectively a suicide by cop situation
I imagine at least Emet Selch and Elidibus are raging so fucking hard rn at Fandanial in the Lifestream, if not the rest of the dead convocation as well, while the comfortably play Triple Triad in the life stream
Literally saying she is going to die here
I really feel bad for her
Is she saying that when she's almost dead
Good enough for me
Like it's not even hard to realise this from a narrative standpoint. Didn't think I needed to drop the dialogue itself
I thought it was pretty clear that she wanted to die as a villain, given that whole intermission phase lol
Also the fact she tried to kill herself already and also the ENTIRE nightblossom symbolism
Could've just thrown herself off a cliff to save everyone the trouble but whatever works for her
It fits her well to chose to die but not without fighting for it
i thought it was pretty clear when she kills her parents tbh
I might get flak for this, but I actually really liked Lahabrea's ARR Voice, especially with that cool voice effect that he gets in the Praetorium.
she wasn't going to just lay down and die, c'mon
Her parents deserved it
not gonna disagree with that
Also sorry for the ping
not only is that not appropriate to her character it'd be shitty writing
I'm glad she got to kill Asahi too should've done a worse job so his corpse wouldn't be usable
like she might've done that (and was TRYING TO DO THAT) when her parents interrupted her
Meh, that just means we get to kill "Asahi" twice, and that Asahi's voice actor has more good work to do!
then shitlords interrupt everything and she's like...you know what. fuck it, i'm a villian and i'm going down fighting
I miss the ARR ascian tounge
That is still there, there just isnt a scene where it needs to be used, like scenes with Ascians where we arent there to see them
Did Zenos die from blood loss or did he became headless nick from HP when he killed himself
Honestly fucking same
Why not both?
define we, because we as the WoL havent killed him at all, tsuyu killed him
Headless Nick wasn't entirely headless right? Or was that just from the movies?
he had the little tether of skin in the books too
Lahabrea isnt the only one who gets a cool voice modifier when he uses his glyph, right?
I think Hades got one, too
Hades has done it with modified voice and without
everyone else I don't really remember
Man, I want to get hit with another Ultima to see what happens. I'm not talking about Werlyt Ultima, either, I'm talking the big huge Praetorium Ultima.
Hades gets half a modifier when he announces his true name, then gets really distorted in Phase 2
didnt elidibus do it too when he got all pissy b4 transforming 
Kinda, that was just half Ardbert voice IIRC
Isnt it implied through Hades' transformation that the other unsundered can also transform into abominations or is that just Emet Selch's specialty with his brand of creation magic?
It's said in the side story that the shit Emet pulls is very unique to him
I am Hadesss, he who shall deliver their brethren from their dark slumbaaaaa
Through the thrum of gathering aether, he heard Hythlodaeus remark, "Never ceases to impress me..."
He knew well what his friend beheld─the unbridled power of the Underworld, pouring forth into his being. In such moments, he felt as if he was one with its flow. Though mages were plentiful, not even among the rest of the Fourteen could one find another capable of wielding such power.
Ere long, his transformation was complete, and Hythlodaeus was left to crane his neck up at him. "Indeed, there is no better candidate. Allow me to congratulate you again, Emet-Selch."
He let out a quiet breath, a sigh mingled with laughter. Then he faced the bird and set about his task.```
Jeez that was quick
She keeps that Thang on her
Kael must have these copy pastas on text files
So we're probably not going to see Lahabrea turn into a giant darkness dragon/eldritch abomination in Pandaemonium, most likely?
are we even sure we are going to see laheebread lol
easy enough to get to when its in the browser history lmao
I'm never going to say never, also going to say "Lahabrea" because I'm not even sure if this will be the real Lahabrea and not a copy
considering primal boi ate him
theres no way its the real one, specially when Elidibus also confirms both emet and him have died
I want it to be the real Lahabrea because we already fought a copy of Lahabrea in Hades EX (I know EXs are not canon, but still)
Shut it, Hades EX is canon in my heart. Is thematic perfection
Did Triple Triad exist in Amarout?
nooooooouuuu
It fucking better not
it did
i played 6.0 and Fandaniel caused the final days cause Elidibus, Azem and Emet beat him in triple triad non stop
Do you have FF8 Junction PTSD or something?
No just stop making everything fucking ancient shit. Let humanity create one thing by itself
good point
i personally predict it'll be revealed that whatever fragment is left of Lahabrea's soul emerged from Nidhogg's eyes after they were destroyed in Royal Menagerie, and that he then possessed an old Primal design of his in Pandaemonium
so he's still "dead" but lingering
how about we stop thinking just cause X event happend on X FF game, it means it will happen in XIV too 
In Pandaemonium dead Lahabrea lay dreaming
Would you count the ancients warbles as ascian tounge
so... Red Girl from nier automata, the sort of like, interface the machines have, is the same as the Watchers from Drakengard, given the story from Dark Apocalypse?
if that's the case I guess that can make sense, if drakengards watcher's leading into the "human world" of nier, adding magic and machinery that come from the Watchers, I can see the Watchers being a key plot point in nier
I'm not sure but for the sake of Ascian tongue not being written out I'm going to say yes
the red girl is the machine networks ego
Didn't Drakengard's world leaking into ours kind of cause NieR's world to happen in the first place
right, that part is very important, yeah
yeah pretty much, the red eye disease and the concept of magic is what led to nier's whole shenanigans
Or, Lahabrea has just been chilling in Pandaemonium with Emperor Mateus, watching as the WoL fucks his plans up throughout SB and ShB and utterly ruin them. Actually, would Lahabrea and Emperor Mateus get along very well?
im pretty sure of that at least. i only really know what i deep dived in relation to automata, and everything up to like, act 2 of replicant
I mean Nier's world is "our world" but yes
Ye; sorry, didn't mean to imply otherwise
Just making sure
What's this about Nier's world
You're correct
Drakengard and Nier are in a time loop. I guess Dark Apocalypse is implying that the time loop goes even further, with the Machines giving rise to the Watchers themselves?
Which...sure, I guess. Why not.
that's... interesting. i mean, isn't a character from drakengard 3 a distant, distant direct relative of a drakengard 1 character?
ded game
Emet-Selch would be cool as a character in Dissidia but also a massive spoiler for a very recent game
actually, how far did they go into Ardyn's backstory in Dissidia?
Emet would be lame. There are other characters from XIV that should be in Dissidia first. Alisaie for example because FOR SOME REASON DISSIDIA HAS 0 RED MAGES WTF
Ardyn didn't have any story in Dissidia
Unless you count Terra or some shit idk
but Cal
for his neutral special
he has a gun
Make a spinoff where we play as Emet
Zenos is honestly a solid-ass choice for a fighting game.
....okay you are making a good case
Man is basically already operating on Street Fighter villain logic.
If they do put an Ascian in a theoretical 4th Dissidia game, who would it be? Lahabrea?
oh i agree, Zenos is a good choice for fighting game rep
i'm just saying that Emet could also be cool
Emet as a playable character feels weird
Zenos would fit well in Street Fighter or like
Soul Calibur
I wouldn't mind Emet if it had to be an Ascian
Zenos would love it in Soulcalibur
until he got bored, anyway
then he'd move to Blazblue
Fuckin'
Zenos shows up looking for a new sword
Finds two
My picks are Alphinaud (Sage), Alisaie (Red Mage), Gaius, and Zenos (Samurai or Reaper)
and then we just lock Zenos and Azrael in a pocket dimension to fight each other forever
Dissidia has enough mages
No, Dissidia has enough swordsmen.
so does smash 
I feel like Zenos would be the only one to wield Soul Calibur and not get possessed by it.
At least mages can get creative with it.
So question
Is YoRHa in a loop (IE being reset by the machines) or not
Because I remember seeing that mentioned here, but then I went and looked up NieR's timeline and like half the responses to a few reddit posts about that were like "no, the screenplay makes it ~very clear~ it's actually just a straight line"
And before I started looking into this I wasn't even aware there was a screenplay
The only problem here is I just dunno about having both twins, you only need one. Add in...fuck idk ||Lyse /s||
I think both are distinct enough from one another to warrant it.
The side of the loop from Nier back to Drakengard is completed before Replicant takes place
Add Zenos to smash, they love sword chars
There's a lot of non game things that add to draken nier story
Only drakengard world is in a loop iirc ||at least based on Accord's comments in DOD3||
as the android caretakers of humanity cleaned up maso and the initial flow of magic, shoved it into Tokyo's ruins, and launched it into another dimension
which is implied to be the origin of the Cathedral City from Drakengard 3, whose appearance in the middle of Spain was the divergence point from real life history
isn't accord also mentioned in nier's story too?
i thought i remember reading the name pop up in one of those loading screen lore bits
Automata
Accord ||isn't mentioned in the original Nier AFAIK. Not sure about the new version||
She's not technically in Automata, but she's mentioned owning one of the weapons shops, I think?
Yeah
also oof sorry about nier talk, i know it's not ffxiv but i was shooketh seeing the convergence of the entire nier story and drakengard in a single raid, and so far yoko taro's work is a subject of obsession for me lmao
It's a sin we don't get more accord appearances
||Accord presumably came from Nier world as the androids are studying how the world turned out into that and ended up DOD3 as a result, since that's the origin of things going into shit||
proprietor of the business or something
It's basically FFXIV talk, at least for this patch.
Yes
Yes
Would you say nier is worse then kh in terms of lore

i... no, i would say kh is worse, only because i personally adore a darker story more than a disney story
Nier is less complicated but Nier has no disregard for it's plot
There are no FFXIV characters in KH so I can safely judge people for talking about it here.
No
Nier story works without having to know all the extra details
not that i'd say kh lore is bad, but nier feels so purposefully built while kh just kinda, does stuff that can work
NT would have been great if it didn't change so much from the PSP games which basically decimated the potential sales they would have got
Nier lore deep-diving is just an Easter egg hunt for extra fun.
As far as i know nier lore is "logic", i can't say the same for KH after DDD
Actually I'm the opposite, KH feels more purposefully built, Nier is literally just "haha okay timeline hop!" "haha aliens" "haha lets just go to Tokyo looooooool"
Not all complicated works has to be compared to KH
Is it also there's like a stage play for the canonical ending of automata
Yoko Taro and Nomura have totally different styles so would be a bit weird to compare them
Was that a stage play or a novella
All endings are canonical
Even the one where you eat a fish
well, i can maybe refute that, kh seems like it's built as the games come out but at least nier, from what i can tell while it started with a "haha the fantasy world isekai'd to the real world", taro totally examined that path in more detail and designed it that way
What a shit idea to make the important bit of lore about A2 in a book
Nier appears to be less 'this is some tight lore and the lore matters and this is an exploration of world building' and more 'the world was designed to explore different ideas and philosophies and world-building cohesion takes a backseat to this necessity.'
A2 most important lore is in the stage play
I think that vwas a stage play
Hmm gonna check it
KH and Nier are both shitstorms when it comes to tight storytelling and lore but at least Nier isn't trying to.
It goes somewhere else with it, and that is defensible.
Is it a safe assumption to make that the moment Lahabrea "died" in HW, Eli woke up Emet, and then Emet immediately went to the first and started fucking around there for a while before post 4.3 kicked off
Probably
Yeah probably
Hmmm there is this "short story long" with A2 but that's all
He'd pretty much have to, if it were the other way around he'd have had to have made Vauthry AFTER Thancred arrived.
Look up rekka alexiel, she makes summaries for the stage plays
Emet says in 4.4 that it’s because of Lahabrea’s “crowning act of idiocy” that he’s active now
Question is, how much time passed in the first between post HW and before post 4.3?
from what it sounded like in the cutscene is that emet was only awakened sometime after ghimlyt or shortly before
Dude just wanted a nap and shake off his solus persona
"an amount of time less than a year" as it always is
this bubble universe is ass
Like even as somebody who loves pointless things it is like give up trying to come up with an explanation for time Passage
In the First Cal 
And i think it was 100 year
Oh the first yeah its been 100
Thancred spent 5 years on the First
Oh ok. The First was already pretty fucked before Emet came there, thanks to Mitron and Loghrif, Emet just fucked with it a bit more.
oh about 95 years First time
personally i dont think emet was awakened any time before 4.0 or even before 4.2
So 95 ish
Sathona, can you explain yourself for this..... thing ? 
I recalled a short story made it seem like he was just about to shut his eyes for the nap and that he was called
Makes sense since the XIV MSQ takes place all in one day 
I think its also a safe assumption to make that Vauthry did not exist back when Ardbert was still doing his "MSQ" on the first
Yes Vauthry is not 100 years old lol
Emet prob didn't even exsist as a character yet
In fact I wonder how far back he was conceived as a concept sound of a fireplace
of course he did
Vauthry's like 25
I mean like not in univerde like as they are writing the story
From what Ardbert said, when they killed Mitron and Loghrif, things didnt immediately go to shit.
?
I mean....define "immediately"
the second Mitron and Loghrif died
Because it seemed to have happened like, soon after
^^^
For most of the 100-year-period after the Flood, Eulmore was a bastion against the Sin-Eaters; Vauthry's ascension was a big part of what changed that.
This gif is disturbing to say the least
i know
Honestly I give them a month tops before they killed themselves
Didn't they go like and then after shadowkeeper they went and killed the final Ascian for them and that's when stuff went down
That's when Eden was created and the beginning of the end happened yes
Yes
"The beginning of the end" i love the sound of it 
If they had just killed Mitron OR Loghrif, would the flood of light still happen?
If they just killed them without one turning into Eden seemingly no?
The First still would have been pretty skewed towards light though but just without the catalyst to end it all
"I am Elidibus. So long as I remember my duty, that is enough. Aught else I would only lose again in the course of this timeless struggle...and if these memories are truly so precious, pray do not ask that I forget them twice."
Forgot about this line; this is a good line
If they didn't kill Mitron it might've not happened
I think it's kind of interesting that fan Daniel also said his final knowledge days is secondhand I always thought they got it through the memory crystals so it's more like they would directly know it themselves not be secondhand information
Ye
Believe it or not but using a "blade of light" in a world excedently tipped toward umbral could turn ugly
but elidibus lost anyway hah loser
I mean, memories of another person's life is secondhand tbh
Dayum, I just realized, The First is a death trap for Ascians. Loghrif died there Mitron died there, Emet Selch died there, and then finally Elidibus. FOUR whole ascians died on the first, yikes.
except only 2 were whole 
Is that better than the Source? Emmer, Laha, Nab, Ige, MAYBE the ones Gaius got
how many red masks did gaius have? 2-3?
side note, do we have any guesses as to which red masks gaius killed?
I want to say 3, let me check
is travanchet dead? if we want to count him
I lowkey hope we get to see the remainder of the Ascians in EW and not just Fandaniel. It would be so lame if the game just went "Oh, yeah, Gaius killed the rest of the Ascians offscreen."
2
wasnt travanchet a low ranked ascian
hes important enough to have a name at least, instead of just being called a black mask
so basically 6 dead convocation members on the source
It's unknown
fair enough, keep him dead.
They brought him back for Alex
We dont know if Gaius actually killed those Ascians though, that hasnt been explained yet.
we have 5 red masks unnaccounted for: pashtarot, emmerloth, altima, halmarut, and deudalaphon
Funny. The Replicant remake throws some story curveballs into the third raid
fuck
4.5, Emmer maybe
he gave mide the horn
Still makes him not dead in terms of writing
i know, i only asked how many red masks he carried, nowhere did i say how many red masks he killed
He reappeared in the plot
How would you feel if the game just went "OOPS, Gaius killed the 5 red masks offscreen, FUCK YOU!"
yeah, but tbh until we hear from another ascian that he's dead imma assume he's still around
Is a good idea
ill kill that bish ass myself then 
well we can assume hes dead till he reappears in person properly and not a flashback
Someone ask Koji Fox about this in fanfest
shrug tbh? also as far as we know gaius just kills their forms, doesn't obliterate them like we do so they're not really dead
tbh perma killed or not i personally dont care
I want to fight more than just Fandaniel in EW, I want to fight the others, too
frankly i'm kinda tired of ascians, i don't want to fight all 5 in the last expac
its possible the others could just be stranded on other shards so we might not see them, as im sure the sundered cant travel to other shards
and we're getting another ascian themed raid too like 
Last Expac of this Arc, mind you.
I have Ascian fatugue too but that's also why I look forward to Endwalker. I want to see how the whole ordeal with them ends and how we'll move on
well they said end of hydaelyn and zodiark arc, not quite end of ascians arc but they could go hand in hand so who knows
the arc of Hydaelyn vs Zodiark, doesnt mean ascians wont appear again whatsoever
also the ascians are part of the arc not their own arc
i just dont see them being threatening outside fandaniel and the unsundered
My statement still stands. I think it'd be pretty shit narratively to have all the ascians die in a single patch.
And besides, loghrif and mitron are still around, so it's not like they're dropping the ascians entirely.
mitron is dead
Yes but not really
I swear moose asked and got an answer.
Kind of like Xehanort after KH3, he still appears afterwards
though we for sure will be dealing with some sort of Ascian problem well into 6.4 or so
whats yes but no really 
No, 6.1 starts the new arc
with whatever Lahabrea's deal is
hes in the lifestream right?, so mitron will just be reincarnated, but not uplifted with his memories or powers
I am talking about the raids
Time to look through the lore forums again
hes dead so he will reincarnate like loghrif reincarnated
okay, that does it, apparently sinoalice is canon to nier, drakengard, and by extension, whatever shenanigans dark apocalypse is up to
and nobody can bring him back since those that could are dead
still will have an Ascian relevance
now i have a reason to play a mobile game
not true, loghrif exists
this opens the window for an Emet Selch reincarnation plot btw
ofc its writen by yoko taro
... It's so boring, though
And, like
One of the most unintuitive mobile games I've ever played
i only play it for the lore and stuff
nah his soul got obliterated he's not coming back
well as far as we know only unsundered can bring back the sundered, and loghrif/gaia is sundered though whatever the fuck mitron did, was odd i guess, idk
i mean y e a h it's yoko taro but i didnt't know the extent that man goes for his stories. and that sucks that it's boring, it looks really pretty and also keiichi okabe is amazing so im happy enough with that
logrif got smacked with a blade of light and came back so
Like Emet Selch was able to postpone his death long enough to set up everything in 5.3.
she did get her memories back so u can say she lives now but its done
So it's clear his soul wasn't "obliterated"
also no other ascians can be brought back now anyway so those that are already killed will never return
literally not true, loghrif came back and mitron awakened her

we could futz around with the Crystal Tower to have it spit out Elidibus again
And lost again
all i know is Loghrif reincarnated, he turned into Eden, he influenced her as she was growing up a normal life if thats what u wanna call the first, and restored her memories
Couldn't only unsunderd do that
and then he died cause he got friendzoned for ryne
right so what's to say that can't happen for Emet Selch
she did? 
he'd reincarnate but that's not necessarily to say he'd be similar/same as before
She was never fully 'awakened'
In the sense that she was not returned to being Loghrif
Well yeah...her final conversation with Mitron was literally forgetting his name right at the end after he disappears and was like "Who? What?"
dang
like gaia was manipulated by mitron. unless another ascian does the same to the newly reincarnated emet selch, we're probably not going to see him in a similar fashion
Loghrif didn’t come back to life. A new Loghrif inherited that soul shard, which is how literally all humans get their souls in FFXIV.

Dw according to everyone we are just who we used to be in another life
so cali is an awful monarch in this life too?
Gaia is a different person who has memories of a previous incarnation implanted/recalled in them by Mitron‘s intervention.
this is almost true lmao
I'm queen bitch yes
queen 
yaas queen
If 6.0 is going to be the end of the current storyline, then besides Fandaniel we're going to need to wrap up the other remaining Ascians too, whether through defeat, reconciliation, or some other option. Because as long as Ascians are around they're going to be trying to revive Zodiark, so that storyline won't end until they're all either gone ...
Post 14
yo dawg i have a pinned post demonstrating what ascians are le--oh.
Seto: Of course, you are you, and no one else. We are defined not by the soul we are born with, but the path we walk.
Neat
queue my take on the narrative stance the game takes on this again
I would post a screen shot but idk if I'd get in twubl
Isn't it weird that people owned amaros?
it took until 5.4 for the game to actually back that statement up
Obviously not but dw it's easy to see
so travashit is a black mask 
why so?
Is it weird people own chocobos?
people owned people, so that's not too far out of the question...
or it was lahabrea
Well because some amaros were inteligent so its like owning a inteligent being
laheebread*
I mean, give your chocobo 100 years and I'll become an auspice
Black mask
Travanchet was the name taken by an Ascian possessing an Elezen man. It’s an Elezen name.
keep in mind, that amaros were also created
well...enhanced
we already established that but we have no other way to refer to him 
. Originally created by the mages of ancient Ronka, who selectively bred the flightless cama, present-day beasts carry the seed of their ancestors, which may manifest in the form of superior intellect.
We don’t know who was possessing him, but “Travanchet” is not the Ascian’s actual name.
"horn man"
....
Most random ascian mooks can barely control a lvl 15 golem. Much less a horn that can summon a time god.
I rescind my comment
So we shouldn’t be looking for a “Travanchet” on the Convocation.
Also fuck me Kael you got all the quotes on hand today
It's like Emet Selch taking the name of Solus
You can't find "Solus" on the convocation
🤷♀️ i have no life
Travis kinda had some Nabby vibes.
Nabby freaks me out man ugh god what he does to Minfilia....
Maybe Travanchet was Fandaniel
listen i said WE ALREADY ESTABLISHED THATS NOT HIS REAL NAME BUT WE HAVE NO OTHER WAY TO REFER TO HIM
nabriales had a very interesting voice
I'm not going against you just adding to it XD
ure annoying
sath be nice bap
This is literally the first time I've talked to you XD
o.O
well that was an awful first impression

never 
Sorry

Your mom was annoying last night
don't make me bully you, sath. i'll do it
really? thats what urs said about u this morning

i'm not sure the hostility is really needed, sath
wow, Kael, Sath bullying me right now see?
that's ok, its you cal
....
thanks kael

Worst mentor
I think a black mask could still accomplish a lot of awful things, just their durability is significantly weaker than even a sundered overlord. Also weren't Ascian Primes like a regular type of enemy during the server shutdown? Would make sense if they were weaker ones made from amalgamating some black masks, maybe even mixing crews.
instead of being hostile against each other, lets just bully Nabriales for his voice as its very annoying
nah nah, let's talk about how annoying it is that they don't voice raid or trial bosses
Lets bully Valens...... oh wait
Ascian reapers weren’t sighted during the end of 1.0 as far as I know

anyway the convocation isnt like: Eliditardus, Laheebread, Emet Selch, Iggy, Pashtarot, Loghrif, Memetron, Altima, Nab, Danny,Deuda,Halma,emmer and azem?
They voice trial bosses
Bunch of voidsent were though
I believe you got them all yeah
not any of the weapons 
so travashit is just a turd in black mask
That'd be nice
y-yes as we've established 1000 times in the last 30 mins
I'm kinda glad, imagine oversoul. ugh
they could do some cool shit if they voiced the raid bosses, lol - imagine what E10 could sound like
beep boop chicken tenders ready
Edit: god damn it
???
was supposed to tag cali but meh 
hmm speaking of voicing stuff, arent the ivalice raids the only 24 mans to have voiced lines?
Just do your own funny voices for them as you fight
but ivalice stuff sucked
Yep. Matsuno privilege!
They have voice lines
Nier has some but not for bosses
what a budget for that 
Does Who Brings Shadow and To The Edge foreshadow not only ShB, but EW in some of the lyrics?
its called Shadowbringers
Nier PA gibberish sounds barely count
It counts, they got someone to use their voice to make up a speech
Maybe but in the moment it's more about the respective ppl in the fights
Like to the edge is eli and WOL
RtI isnt bad, its a lot to take in, but it isnt bad, + we got bozja out of it, which imo is one of the best pieces of content in the game
Foreshadow Endwalker how? 
This reminds me of when people said that Fiend foreshadowed Shadowbringers
i like the bozja stuff, but i dont like the ivalice story
heh
Answers over here like "I definitely foreshadowed Amaurot guys"
No way to know till we do EW
Answers is so versatile 
Death be relatable like that
Oh.....no
Oh come on.
Answers is versatile for everything but ARR, ironically enough
This is about the Final Days in Amaurot.
Some theorize that
In EndWalker, we walk and its the end of the world.
it wont happen, im just memeing tbh
omg dragonsong is about Fandaniel!?!?!?!?
The end of days is naturally occurring and
well its not a natural occurence in xiv xd
What is this, some Dark Souls First Flame type shit?
You sure about that? Happens way too much to be unnatural 
I mean how do you know for a fact
its just the power of yoko taro tbh

to be fair this is me when i wake up every morning
Yeah, for all we know, The Final Days could be caused by an extra dimensional primal who emmited the sound, causing everyone's creation magic to go crazy, though if they did that, it would kind of feel like Necron.
Fandaniel is frampt
Wait, would it?
you forgot the part he wants to take everything with him
well played
i was sinking in my seat during that moment thinking to myself "man this does not bode well for whatever 6.0 will be"

How so
FUCK 
people got annoyed with fandaniel like why is it so bad to have a not so deep villain? 
I see Fun Daniel as kinda the resulting child of the funny odd-couple thing Kuja and Kefka had going on during Dissidia.
I wonder if we're going to deal with whatever caused the sound in EW, or if that'll be saved for the 7.0-??? Arc (I personally think that the next arc will be 7.0-12.0 because Hyd Zod arc was 5 expacs long, if you count ARR as an expansion)
Ppl are dumb
Which moment?
Usually the X.4 patch does a good job setting up the next expansion.
And it's not as much as Fandaniel is not a simple villain, but that he's not compelling, imo.
Real answer they are used to sympathetic villains
For a counterpoint I was really invested in what would happen to Valens. And he's about as simple as they come and go.
Do you count ARR as an expansion if you're a legacy player?
valens was pathetic but it made his death more satisfying for me
well there is no reason for them to do 4 expac long arcs every time, i think they may just limit it to 1/2 expacs being an arc rather than making everything a 8 year long story
It's a matter of semantics
No it doesn't.
Thordan shows up literally once flanked by Ascians, which is 100% not a good impression of his personality.
Yea but valems is side story and gets the accelerated story shit
I don't think it's a bad bet for me to believe right now that by the end of N'd Wanker I'll feel pity and sadness for Fandaniel at the very least.
Zenos only has one line of dialogue in 3.56 and it doesn't tell you anything about who he is.
zenos one line 'besto friendo'
And Emet-Selch seems to be Fandaniel in 4.4, which he is not.
also i dont remember but the first fanfest for shb was before or after 4.4? 
idk, did Emet Selch blabble on about Amaurot in 4.4?
No.
or announcement w/e
Emet Selch's entire existence in 4.4/4.5 was to be the biggest fucking troll to Varis I have ever seen, and it worked.
Not directly, but what are you trying to say?
When I first saw Solus I was like "get a loada this dollar store Kefka!" to my friend who was running me through the game.
Then by the end of Shadowbringers I was like "I apologize." to them.
That Fandaniel using elements of the plot already revealed is a bad thing?
Fandaniel is tied to the Final Days reveal from 5.0 the way Emet-Selch is tied to the Garlemald working with Ascians reveal from 4.0.
Not really but the writers might have written themselves into a corner revealing his "apparant" motiviation and torching us with a boss we kill in the next patch
Thing about primals
You can summon then multiple times. That's literally been one of the two main traits that make them difficult to deal with.
The story for the expansion is basically planned out two years in advance.
See the thing with Emet Selch's threat with rejoining and the Black Rose is that it would kill us. Fandaniel shows up with his toy and we kill it next patch.
They havent revealed anything about Fandaniel besides the fact that he wants to kill everyone, he still has big cards to play.
A threat we learn about in 5.0, not 4.x.
And Emet-Selch reveals internally that he's the Emperor in 4.4, and that's revealed to the characters next patch.
Lunar Bahamut merely serves to introduce a new concept which will doubtless build to something greater
Didnt Yoshi P say in the EW pres that Fandaniel had an earth shattering secret or something?
This is literally how they always write this. The stinger at the end of the patch is literally ALWAYS given more information the following patch.
No he didn't he actually said he wasn't even the final boss
2.1 ends with us meeting Elidibus, 2.2 has him give a Sahagin the Echo.
He did mention Fandaniel has a secret.
SEE! EAT IT KIDDO
2.2 has us see Teledji plotting "revolution," 2.3 gives us a full skivvy from Raubahn and Nanamo on how/why he's a villain.
And yeah, he also said Fanny's not teh final boss
Steady on, Knight.
2.3 has us glimpse Iceheart, 2.4 reveals who Iceheart is and what her motivations are.
he actually does, and that doesnt mean hes the final boss or anything either.
I still think he'll be the final boss
he wont be
i heard it the first time
but that doesnt stop him from having secrets 
Also not being the final boss doesn't make him unimportant.
yeah basically
Vauthry was the second most important villain in Shadowbringers.
Mm. There's also how the character is framed. They chose Asahi because the players have a reaction to his body. Like the whole point with Fandaniel is that he's not sympathetic.
Wasn't aware sath sees the future 
What? Its not like its Dis and Gabriel arguing or anything.
I'm aware. What I don't understand is why sympathetic = good and unsympathetic = bad.
I provided a Valens counter-point but I'm not sold on Fandaniel yet (or Zenos)
people are used to relateable villains too much 
you don’t need to yell mockingly at people in all caps
fwiw people overstate how sympathetic the literal architect of authoritarianism and genocide is. Emet-Selch is sympathetic because you understand his convictions, not because you're supposed to agree with them.
Thank you!
also Valens ambition given the state of garlemald was pathetic xd
If every villain was sympathetic wouldn't that just become predictable and stale
do you have an example of this
And Elidibus is not only not making any attempt to be understood, he literally blames you for conflicts he caused.
that sound when he got crashed tho
Catharsis is the goal, and sympathy is but one means to that end.
I don't get how you're meant to have examples of this.
Which is why I find that whole instanced battle part of 5.3 off-putting.
Well, that's your take. I found his arc well-done and true to who he's been.
It's a question and you're asking for evidence
While also explaining aspects of his character we've seen up to now.
yes, and thats my fear with ishikawa writing zenos and fandaniel, we saw what happened with the ascians so i feel it will happen with zenos and fandaniel, where they will be made to have players feel bad for them - wrong reply, sorry
But seriously how are you supposed to have "an example" of that? That people sometimes also enjoy straightforward villains?
I was asking for an example where a lot of sympathetic villains was ultimately detrimental to the story and made it stale
Oh, you mean like ones who try for sympathy and fail to reach the audience because they're literally awful? Xehanort.
Thanos in Avengers
/r/thanosdidnothingwrong begs to differ but ok
Yes, Xuan, someone somewhere will like any villain.
thanos was a mistake
Dumb people exist in the world
I might as well use "I like Zenos" as evidence against your point by that logic.
can we count uhh, that super powerful demon from demon slayer, whatever his name is
even death herself and his mom swiped left when they saw him
I mean, any of the villains in Dragon Ball Z.
I think people would actually stop liking Frieza if they made him sympathetic.
Oh god that would suck
people like him more with his development in super xd
Piccolo is the most sympathetic, but he's a reincarnation and didn't do much bad when he was a villain.
tho thats mostly cause he isnt as arrogant as he was in Z 
He blew up an arena with no casualties and kidnapped a child he eventually gave his actual life to save despite it being disadvantageous.
"yeah this super powerful demon who created all the other demons literally genociding humans has a family and isn't all that bad, actually"
I didn't assert that simple villains were bad for the story
you only need to look as far as Thordan for that.
Classic mithos
Thordan has sympathetic motives, though, or at least as sympathetic as Emet-Selch.
He just isn't made to whine about them as often.
what do you mean by that
Thordan wants stability and safety for Ishgard
I mean that the writing treats Emet-Selch like he is the most tragic and lonely person ever.
When he is directly responsible for the plight of countless people, several of whom are ALSO villains and treated LESS sympathetically than him.
Zenos is a great character
Ilberd is framed as a shitty garbage traitor man in the story and that's all the story WANTS you to think of him as.
But when you stop and think about it, Ilberd's entire motivation requires Emet-Selch to fucking destroy his home and family.
I do agree that logically speaking Zenos is the ultimate culmination of both the Empire and the Ascians, but that doesn't make me like him as much as I would want it to.
On two separate, non-consecutive occasions, no less.
He not only invaded Ala Mhigo, he was the architect of the Meteor Project that killed Ilberd's family in the Calamity.
Zenos is:
- Cool to watch do things
- Fun to fight
- One of the best voice-acted characters in the game (In English)
- Is just a cool dude
- Is an allegory for suicidally destructive depression
- Is also just the player
I've ran the numbers and by all accounts Zenos is a good character
And that's not even getting into how he is personally responsible for the suffering of
EVERY. SINGLE. PERSON we meet on the First.
He was the one who gave Loghrif and Mitron their orders, and then he created Vauthry on top of that some 80 years (from the First's perspective) later.
again this goes back to the character framing i pointed out earlier
Okay, no, stop.
Dude didn't even bother looking for Loghrif or Mitron once they disappeared either.
Don't shift the goalpost, the reason I brought this part of the topic up was in response to you asking how Thordan is also sympathetic.
If we want to get into framing, I'd say it's also valid to frame villains in a villainous way, and honestly the framing of Emet-Selch is kind of dishonest despite it being satisfying.
Whereas Fandaniel and Zenos's framing is seemingly honest and straightforward, and that means their effectiveness in 6.0 will rest on their actions not the story telling us to feel bad because of their backstories.
@bold condor unironically as someone who likes dragon ball, frieza staying evil is what made him so good in super. You have such a dangerous wild card that who knows if he would turn traitor for his own selfishness
yee
which is why I sometimes like the unrepentantly evil characters if done well. Theres only so much "I understand my bad guy and feel for them" u can do
It's ultimately personal taste but I honestly kind of agree.
And people have a tendency to conflate "I feel bad for them" with "they're good, actually"
Especially because I personally feel FFXIV has a bad habit of just... being REALLY explicit about when it wants you to give a fuck and when it doesn't.
ngl I got a weird thought about how Elidibus mirrors the player who skips story
Granted, part of that is noticeably that Ishikawa always gives a fuck.
Emet and Elidibus in ShB had the backup of being characters that havent had the "feel bad for them" trope done well until...well ShB
So when she writes these characters, their framing is noticeably different because she's writing them.
The likes of Yotsuyu and Fordola were more "victims gone bad" which is it's own can of worms but isnt necessarily the same boat
tbf to the writing there
Fordola is treated sympathetically, she just looks like she's treated harsher because Gaius managed to get off scot-free.
And Yotsuyu kind of chose evil.
The tragedy of her character being that she felt trapped by her past and unable to change.
Rest her soul
Gaius's punishment is having dead children 
Basically, yeah, Manpain van Baelsar.
Gaius punishment is his children dying because of his old mantra
The writing seems to be that villains receive 'justice' based on what their current intent is, not as much of what they did in the past
More or less, yes.
Yotsuyu: OH GOD I REMEMBER EVERYTHING! AND I ACTUALLY FEEL KINDA BAD I CHOOSE DEATH
parents
Yotsuyu: oh sorry I didn't see the choose evil and become tsukuyomi option
idk why it was decided to go for the "feel bad for them" approach for the ascians, they had done so much evil shit that i feel its impossible to feel bad for them in any respect as what they have done since the sundering far outweighs any sort of redemption/sympathy/empathy
I disagree with this.
Because they never elaborated on the why
Emet even says it himself more or less
They never tried to understand each others views
As harsh as I am on the Ascians' actual actions, I think the story for them was told well. My gripe is I don't think it's the only way to tell a story and that other characters weren't given the same kind of treatment in the past where they could've had it.
And perhaps through this understanding maybe SOMETHING profitable on both sides could happen
I am wondering what Ishikawa will hit on when it comes to Zenos's character.
Of course in the end they could never come to an agreement beyond understanding the plight of the ascians
If you lose the ability to empathize with even the most awful monsters, like
Fair enough, but you're not going to be useful fighting against them.
She does loneliness really well and prior to Stormblood, Zenos was seemingly the loneliest fucker in Garlemald.
Then he met us. I've mentioned this before but we ironically liberated Zenos from imperial control the same way we did Ala Mhigo and Doma.
eh, doesnt matter how well its told, which i agree its told well, but i dont think they deserve the "feel bad for them" approach due to their actions, or at least it shouldnt have been leaned on in as heavily as it was
Dude was miserable just doing what his daddy told him to do.
It's a bit messed up but in zenos's head
A friend is someone who is there for you and helps you out and even brings joy to you
WoL has fought Zenos 4 times alone
WoL brought the only joy Zenos ever knew
They "share" the same interests that is glorious battle
Honestly, I can see why he arrived at that conclusion considering he's been taught to respect strength above all else in a society that elevates itself through conquest.
It wasn't leaned on
At no point do any major characters even contemplate, as far as I'm aware, even the possibility that they might be in the right. You're just made to understand that they aren't inhuman monsters beyond our understanding.
Which, IMO, is important.
Ye
If garlemald's standards are the strongest is the greatest
Zenos is garlemald's strongest
And he met someone better and gave Zenos the only happiness he knew
Add him naturally being good at everything and boom
Zenos's suicide was a matter of "I will never achieve that happiness ever again. So let's go out on a high note"
I've also mentioned before he kind of epitomizes the Garlean ethic. Selfishly taking what he wants because he wants it, valuing strength and power above all else, no true loyalty to anyone least of all his people, unconcerned with human life beyond being a tool he can use, willing to go to any lengths to accomplish his goal.
Same kind of ethic that excused the Meteor Project.
"I want to take over Eorzea before I die, so let's drop a moon on the continent and kill everyone there so we can conquer what's left."
Wasn't the metor project actually was because of tempering
Not at first and even knowing Emet-Selch was an Ascian, the armies of Garlemald generally supported Meteor.
Nael was tempered, but Nael wasn't the only one responsible for bringing it about.
Man, if Elidibus and Emet Selch were just servants of Zodiark, I dont even want to think about what the fully powered Zodiark is capable of....
Smug got moidered
To the point that even Nael's legion continued to fight to make sure it happened after Nael died.
It's capable of a level 90 trial that is going to be Slaughter because it's story mode
The high legatus who said "yes, this seems like a good idea" to Meteor is the same man who sired Zenos.
Didnt Lahabrea imply in the Praetorium that Zodiark was basically capable of casting Ultima whenever He wanted?
Clutch "Varis is as bad as Emet, if not worse" gamer moment
kek
i forgot about ultima tbh
Zodiark (EX) is going to be fucking insane, I bet.
Varis was, from beginning to end, a short-sighted fool.
well im talking more from myself as a player perspective rather than ingame characters, i feel they leant so much on making players have some empathy/sympathy for the ascians though they dont deserve that due to their actions,
Empathy is not a thing you do because people do or don't deserve it; it's a thing you do to understand people.
ha! you will be punish by someone else dying! mcuh punishment, very bad
Varis: "Alright, Regula, YOU are in charge of securing the Singularity Reactor so we can use it for the glory of the empire! Leaving you alone with your men surely wont backfire at all, nope! Now, I'm going back to Garlemald to....do things and not be a good father to my son!"
i just dont like how they tried to make the ascians sad pretty much, i didnt see the point in it
Watching those who are close to you deeply (like adopted children) die because of actions you caused is a huge punishment dude
TLDR: People bitched and complained that the Ascians were too cartoony, so they gave em what they wanted, blame yourself and the community for that, probably
I like they were able to give Gaius a good redemption
i only started playing the game in late september of 2020 , so i had no influence on shit anyway
Primarily for the people dying
Oh ok, then just blame the community for complaining that "ThE AsCiAnS aRe ToO CaRtOoNiShLy EiVl, mAkE ThEm hAvE hUmAn AsPeCtS!!!!!!!!!1!" I personally love what ShB did with Ascians but you do you dude.
Knight
Are you okay
Primarily for the parent in my example
Yes, people use that shitposty typing style all the time
I think the people dying might be suffering slightly more than their adoptive parent
Find "people you love are dying to allow you to achieveve requisite amount of suffering needed to Atone(TM)" deeply unsatisfying as a plot element, esp. since these children seem to have been introduced specifically to suffer for the sake of redeeming him.
A quick shoutout to Soken, love you big man.
It does nothing to address what he actually did and turns their suffering into something centered on him. Which, IMO, sucks.
and you can love what ShB did im not saying you cant, i just dont like where they went with the ascians, but hey we got SoS out of it so i cant say its all bad tbh
The entire idea of Shadowbringers is to get people to understand that you can empathize, sympathize, and even like someone...and yet still understand that what they are doing is something you must fight against.
That's why Elidibus is coded as a "hero"—in his mind he is a hero, and he's trying to save his people and the world he knew. You understand that and yet oppose him anyway because you have no choice.
You do have a choice; it's just that the choice is to allow him to murder millions of people. Because outside of his mind, he's a monster.
That's why the Japanese name is something like "jet black villains"—you'll be the "villain" if you must in order to protect your world.
That's what I was getting at above. The important thing to understand, and which ShB wants you to understand, is that you can empathize with monsters w/o them ceasing to be monsters.
what's the diff between the ascians are doing and ala mhigo independence except for scale?
its a shame.
if elidibus got his memories back would he still fight us?
oh i saw that, cash me outside
Ala Mhigo isn’t attempting to do anything similar to what the Ascians are though? That’s a false equivalency of the highest order
stuck and trying to restore a past nation after losing, excepting the scale of the nation/lost
Ala Mhigo isn’t attempting to do anything similar to what the Ascians are though? That’s a false equivalency of the highest order
^^^
For the record, I deleted that because I regretted saying it, not because I didn't want you to see it. Had a viscerally negative reaction to "freeing yourself from subjugation by people who are instating forced labour camps and testing chemical weapons on your people is the same as committing genocide on a planetary scale."
yeah well hydaelyn did it first
killed like everybody and everything in the entire world man
I don't think it's that straightforward. The lesson of both Hades and Elidibus is that they'd choose their countrymen, friends, families and lovers over a world of alien strangers. We make that decision every day, by ignoring suffering in people a world away that we wouldn't in our friends and families.
Ala Mhigo are attempting to free themselves from a despotic foreign rule.
even worse than killed, split them apart and made them unwhole at their very soul
Ascians are attempting to destroy others to bring back something gone.
Ala Mhigo were just as bad, if not worse. There's a reason the Gridanians would not let them in.
Ala Mhigans are not trying to enact regressive change to the old ways.
I don't actively plot to murder millions for the sake of my family and neighbours; that's a really weird comparison to make.
ah so garlemald shoulda gone more complete and killed all the ala mhigan then
And his people were willing to care about others around the world, hence half willing to sacrifice themselves for the other half. @still talon
then any descendant wouldn't have a standing to try and restore ala mhigo, got it
No they weren’t. One king over a century ago waged a war of expansion against Gridania.
Unlike the current inhabitants of the source
The elementals are bs.
Until it got to the third round of sacrifices, in which they were willing to sacrifice all the new intelligent life on the planet, without their consent, to bring the people who sacrificed themselves in previous rounds back to life.
The events of Shadowbringers give the lie to this comparison. The people of the First band together. We see more and more of the same from those in the Source also.
You also wouldn't sacrifice yourself for them, either. Remember: the Amourotine did something you'd never, ever do.
Speak for yourself.
.
Before we got there the 1st was completely divided... @wind bough
Yes, by the actions of the Ascians.
🤔
Not really. The Crystarium was already all about that kind of ethos.
Eulmore was literally brainwashed by Ascian machinations.
Eulmore was fighting against the Sin-Eaters before Emet-Selch got involved.
Eulmores change in attitude was recent
Yeah it's telling that without the interventions of the Fourteenth Seat all of these nations would be long destroyed ten times over. Azem is the only reason Eorzea still exists.
Like 50yrs maybe give or take depending on how old ranjit is
Also, for what it's worth, the Amaurotines refused to get involved with fighting the Final Days up until the point where they literally had no choice. It was not something that came on them suddenly; they were receiving reports of bad shit happening in other nations for months, if not longer, before they finally did something. Azem left the Convocation over that.
Virtually all conflicts in the Source are engineered by the Ascians.
The WoL is explicitly not Azem, even though they are the reincarnation of them. The entire message of Eden, and that one tail-end of the MSQ quest, is that you are not the person you were in past lives.
We don't know why Azem left, do we? We don't even know how they felt about the Hydelyn thing
ascians: the new people of the world are irredeemable garbage who constantly give in to their worst impulses and repeat the same mistakes over and over
also ascians: play off of peoples' worst impulses, engineer entire societies to be violent and oppressive, and destroy historical records so people can't learn from the past
we've consistently seen that even in situations where ascians weren't the direct cause, they frequently get involved to make things worse
okay
Ascians to humans: grabs their hands and makes them hit themselves Stop hitting yourself! We noble Ancients would never hit ourselves!
Again the Ascians did give the world a chance by having lived thousands of years as normal people and having families.
No they didn’t.
Citation needed
I'm pretty sure that was never said
Because we've had calamities pretty much for as long as we've had recorded history.
Emet says he did but he was ultimately too emotionally involved
Man lotta people here are scared of empathizing with "bad guys"
Emet saying he sired many many children and walked the same path over and over again
Calamities have been happening since the sundering
It was said. Very clearly.
Well if the ascian are able to make people doing the worse, they prove their point
No one’s scared of that. Don’t come here with straw man bs.
How is thar giving them a chance
Because he didn't create calamities during that period?
That was Hades and it was his whole big speech before opening the door
Yeah
Empathising with someone isn’t the same as supporting their actions.
Literally my argument about ShB was that you were supposed to learn it was okay to emphasize with them; the fact that I don't agree the Ascians were in the right, and that I don't agree fucking... Ala Mhigo is doing the same thing as the Ascians are, what?, does not suggest that I'm afraid to do the thing I said I was doing.
not really? if they're the ones causing those things to happen, it's not fair to blame them on us
if i accidentally leave my house unlocked and someone steals all my stuff, they're still a thief
You can empathize with them which is the point of Emet but at the same time not agree with their methods.
Hades ultimately concedes to us.
Or with their goals.
ShB themes be like:
Bad comparison and you know it
I can agree with the goal of bringing their people back because I would want the same. Problem is their methods of returning their people.
The whole point of ShB is that empathy is important to understand people, and that it isn't a weakness, but that being able to empathize with someone does not make them a good person.
If you want to make a example, make it like this: they give you the possibility to do a crime, if you do it then they are right
The fact that somebody sees themself as a good person doesn't make them right.
it's really not. if someone does something wrong, it's their fault. the only thing the ascians prove when they get other people to do horrible things is that the ascians themselves are manipulative pieces of shit
Its really a play on morality. Had we been in their situation we would likely want the same. That's what they were trying to say with the story telling of Emet.
I guarantee you that, barring tempering, I would not.
You have the luxury of saying that cause you don't know the pain lol
Yeaaaaah sure
I'm willing to cop to wanting a lot of bad shit. Mass genocide for the sake of reviving my dead loved ones has never been one of them.
The fact that a faction of Ancients directly opposed them says otherwise.
Half of them supported it @wind bough
You just accept death? If FFXIV just poofed the next day and DQ:MMO2 popped up and was significant shittier... you'd just... live with it?
I think it's more complex than sorting out the "good guys" from the "bad guys". The Ascians were an extreme example, to get you to sympathize with the worst of the worst... but everything from the Pixies to the NieR series to Eulmore to the patch content about the beast tribes is about questioning those easy categorizations.
So accordingly, to say that such a position is an inevitable consequence of their circumstances is false.
I probably wouldn't murder somebody else to save myself, and, like... Yes; games I've loved have gone offline before. It would not be the first time, and it will not be the last.
And to tell people they would make the same decision in their situation is presumptive and not accurate.
Never did I say it was inevitable? Like what are you trying to accomplish arguing in bad faith like you are? @wind bough
.
Are the Pixies "good guys"? The dwarves in the Limsa quest? The tempered Kobolds?
They that to the officer after the thing done 
We would likely
What
Literally read what I'm saying, stop acting in bad faith
Your intended meaning is clear, but we have evidence to the contrary.
Hi, it's that day of the week again
Every day?
Yep
So please don’t tell people what they believe, and don’t throw around the words “bad faith” meaninglessly to try and deflect criticism.
Hell Werlyt features a lot of sympathetic former Imperials. We've killed (murderered?) thousands of Imperials.
Wow I love seeing that gif for the 5000th time
Hey my number is in the millions 
Alright fuck you too 
Would you kill a stranger to save your children
@wind bough its entirely ignorant to say that you wouldn't do the same or not since you don't have the perspective of the other side. Stop acting in bad faith and come back when you know how to comprehend and understand what people are talking about. Stop defending ignorant statements.
Depends; is the stranger actively pointing a gun at them and threatening to pull the trigger? Do I have literally any other option?
The sundered are arguably the children of the Ancients in this scenario.
Or is this trolley problem bullshit?
e-eh....not really?
No they aren't
Which part are we saying is "what I would do in the same situation"?
It's entirely ignorant to say that you would, given you lack experience of the other side, so what is the point of your argument
Werlyt was really awkward considering you're the one killing all these idealistic kids who are themselves trying to bring down the empire. But that was the point of it.
I can place myself in that situation just fine, and we have examples of those that did not approve of the Convocation‘s actions so do not presume.
Sacrificing innocents against their will to bring back my family? I certainly wouldn't do that.
I’ve lost people in my life, and I wouldn’t take such actions to bring them back. What’s gone is gone. Don’t tell me what I would do.
Like the fact that y'all seem so willing to believe that everyone would sacrifice other people's lives to save their family members says more about you than it does about us, I think.
The ancients that made Hydelyn maybe, but an Amourotine mom who lost her kids during the last days? I don't think she'd agree.
Oh ya and which Scion said they would do the same? Oh ya Alisaie. A dumb kid and probably the most irrational Scion.
The meaning of "innocent" can change quickly under the right circumstance you know 
My point has always been arguing the moralty of the decision. I said that you can agree with their goal but disagree with their methods. I'm literally saying that neither side truly understands the other so making a definitive statement is ignorant and misses the point entirely of the story. I'm not choosing sides here but apparently you think I am despite my argument always having been talking about empathizing not meaning agreeing with methods used. @mighty light @wind bough
If literally everyone you're arguing against is misunderstanding your point, regularly, that suggests you're doing a bad job of presenting it, dude.
All you’ve been doing is being contrarian.
No it means you are directing a biased and argumentive viewpoint by trying to label an argument made by someone else as opposed to your view.
That is what is happening.
I suggest you take a break and come back later.
This isn't the first time where I've quoted what you've said directly, word for word, and you've ended up saying "no I don't actually believe this I was just stating it impartially as someone who doesn't believe it to explain the viewpoint of somebody who does believe it and you're arguing against me in bad faith."
It's getting really old.
Except this time at the start I explicitly said my point regarding a neutral statement.
Alrighty
But we are in ffxiv dear
not to have a pissing match of who's right or wrong
i knew it! anime is real
Given it was a exchange about the morality presented to us in the game and that morality is purely subjective, when did this thing could be right or wrong ? 
uh oh gist showed up.
Literally what I said lol @pastel coyote but it doesn't matter anymore
Its better to not argue about pointless things like that

Morales bad,
Too much swagger
IDK, I really liked Into the Spiderverse
i was gonna see about joining the discord that has that emote gist, but lkast time i was in there I was bullied lmao
Swagger walk when?
Same
maybe one day.
when EW's out or something
An admin afking? Impossible
are we on final step of skysteel tools now
We have 
Yeah I think we have been since 5.45
The glowy ones i believe are the end of the quest line
Tfw you are still on level 70 crafters and gatherers scrip gear
Not looking forward to leveling all the crafters to 90 and then having to pentameld again
Hmmm
I know we have some of the more stable summons are whatever in ffxiv..
what else from ffx could we probably get for terminus/lunar shit?(magus sisters, anima)
Yojimbo but we already used that. Sin I guess?
Valefor
I think that's the name of a mob but the design hasn't been used
Correct. it's still useable
Just do ff4 fiends
huh wow there really isnt many other unique ones is there....
what about penance?
we dont have anything like that
Penance doesn't look very Lunar or Terminus-esque, though
more like a Sin-Eater if anything, really
kind of predicting we'll get the FF4 Archfiends as the other Telophoroi, though
then i would say ffx-2's angra mainyu but that names been taken
if they don't end up being the 6.X Trial Series, which i think is the other likely alternative for them
i could see that design showing up with a different name
hmmm, i got tagged in here and read all what happened, i will say i didnt expect what i said to spiral into what just happened
You should feel bad about it
Insert gaius quote
Btw what did you say ?
okay i just scrolled up a bit what on earth
i just came in here to propose my "Fandaniel is Scarmiglione" theory
"idk why it was decided to go for the "feel bad for them" approach for the ascians, they had done so much evil shit that i feel its impossible to feel bad for them in any respect as what they have done since the sundering far outweighs any sort of redemption/sympathy/empathy" - this is what i said, then it was replied too and then that whole thing happened
so yes such devestation was not my intention
you know the Lunar Primals might be meant to be an allusion to FF4 but they do remind me of the Dark Aeons
ye, they look like it in a way
Well, weren't the Dark Aeons also an allusion to FF4's Lunars?
Or such was my impression, given it's X-2 and not just ||Yevon's possessions||
I, forgot about Dark Aeons in X, but yeah esp X-2's since they're fought in the ~spooky subplane~
i hated fioghting the magus sisters
if you didnt kill the little one first they be spamming their ultimate
Oh right, just superbosses in the late game
Isn't Lunars an After Years thing?
https://finalfantasy.fandom.com/wiki/Lunar_Eidolons
the GBA and PSP versions, it seems
FFX came out before those so gottem
is that after X-2 as we-- yes it is
ya'know what tho, does make a heck of a lot of sense they're bringing Anima into 14 with this premise too,
What if zenos is anima
Lunarians are a thing in the original ||Cecil and Golbez father was Lunarian||
Not what Pash was talking about
Yeah, tis was if Dark Aeons are referencing Lunar Eidolons or vice versa
or, ofc, just bein' similar concepts
it originates from the PSP/GBA ports of FF4 as additional "super bosses" and then was further expanded in after years
FFX had a similar idea when they included Dark Aeons as bosses to defeat to unlock the final super boss for the International version of the game
It just seemed like a general concept FF has played with for a bit to add bonus material with minimal work since they're technically just recolors of base summons
gilgamesh.... ON THE MOON!!
The similar color pallette comes from basic color theory. Good things tend to be colored in primary colors. Making things cyan, purple, and such often encodes corruption.
You just see that alot.
Making things tyrian purple or magenta, however, makes them royal.
Making them flesh pink makes them lewd.
Making things yellow makes them diseased, due to its association with jaundice
Green objects are often good and wholesome, but green lighting suggests corruption and abnormality
Esp. common in horror games
Like blue milk
Yeah

... Is blue milk a thing
I have no idea what blue milk entails
Okay, I'm googling it now
{nstructions. Combine milk, ice, fruit punch powder, and vanilla in a blender. Cover and blend until smooth. Stir in a few drops of blue food coloring until desired color is achieved. Poor into glasses and serve immediately}
Star Wars reference I assume
its that stupid star wars shit
Moo
Oh no apparently the Last Jedi one was green milk
Blue milk is something different, which comes from banthas
So a different non-issue
It comes from the Blue Cow
Sorry, yeah, exactly
Now trying to find strawberry cows that's hard
Yeah blue milk is from the original Star Wars
Blue milk and green eggs is the traditional tattoine breakfast iirc
They drink it in the dinner scene with Luke and his family on Tattooine
Do they have some variety of ham
gamorreans
Else its probably wombrats
womprats, not wombrats
ye but green eggs always existed from dr suess xD
Oh is it in a book?
green eggs and ham
this might too lol
Hop on pop is terrifying
it feels like what a sales person does every dayare you surrrrreeeee yopu dont want this?
Would you eat them
In a house?
Would you eat them
With a mouse?
Would you eat them
Here or there?
Would you eat them
Anywhere?
jesusu please no T^T
so i was looking into the Greek Letters used for Diamond Weapon's alternate form, which are Chi-Xi-Stigma
which turns out to be the way the Number of the Beast was written in Greek in the Book of Revelation
so they closed this out with one last Book of Revelation allusion
I heard it's supposed to be some sort of reference to the Evangelion show
Which is also full of christian references.
i wouldn't be surprised if Eva also used it but i cannot remember where
diamond weapon farms hurt my soul
I love how they somehow turned into phase 2 prog
I had one group where we were killing it like right after towrs
they always end up as meteor progs for me
Oh man never do farms on the weekends
since ppl keep DYING THERE FOR SOME REASON
What other book of rev allusions?
I completely missed those, apparently.
i understand getting hit by one laser but HOW DID SO MANY OF YOU DIE
Amaurot. Just, all of Amaurot
which is arguably being repeated now in the present, with Neo Bahamut being a new First Beast
I'm Ehhhhhhhing pretty hard on that now that we know he was nothing special.
But possibly. I guess.
though I've argued that Zenos and Fandaniel feel like they fit the more symbolic interpretations of the First and Second Beasts, where you have the Tyrant Emperor and his False Prophet
i thought amarout was a utopia reference
What's Neo Bahamut
Amaurot the dungeon
lunar baha
Ah okay
oh
Neo Bahamut, you know, the new one that Lahabrea's summoning in Pandaemonium
(this is a joke ignore my mistake)
🤔
there's prob gonna be a shin bahamut at some point
Bahamut but he's made of cancer
bahamut but he's from another world
Is there a up to date lore?
Bahamut, but he's made out of shin-guards.
who wants to play Monster hunter rise with me cuz i havent bought replicant yet and people make me sad in ff14
so a crab party?
that isnt their home world
@sand jetty There's a summary of the lore in #archived-lore-spoilers's pins.
Pashtarot Bahamut
we very well still could, we have a whole Part 2 of the patch and expansion to go
Fuckin comet let's go
I'm pretty sure there's nothing else in Parts 2 other than msq and solo trial?
Love me a good horror-show comet
bozja
iwould have though black rose be wromwood]
Isnt that more like part 1.5
no?
It comes out in between
i was referring to MSQ as that possibly being our Wormwood moment
bozja comes out in .55
though they could also very well have the Seas turning to blood being part of 6.0 proper
wait it's time for me to plug the album again
https://youtu.be/eafmzAwkjLw
Provided to YouTube by The Oh Hellos
Dear Wormwood · The Oh Hellos
Dear Wormwood
℗ 2015 Oh Hellos
Masterer, Mixer: Charlie Kramsky
Performance: The Oh Hellos
Arranger, Writer: Maggie Heath
Arranger, Writer: Tyler Heath
Auto-generated by YouTube.
also were they planning datacenter travel in 5.58?
get me some Egyptian Plague shit man.
wheres Moses?
a accidental realease of whats to come in 5.5x says yes
will it actually come at that time? Most likely but its not certain till they actually say
or if we go with the idea of liberating his people from an imperial power, the Moses analogue happened at some point during Allag
OG Gunnhildr was the Moses
honestly hoping datacenter travel enables PFs of the same regions
and doesnt have a pf restriction
i can understand not being able to go to EU and JP
well more seriously, just because they're alluding to the Book of Revelation for the finale doesn't mean there's suddenly Abrahamic stuff all over
i mean rev is mostly just end of the world stuff anyway.
