#🏞|general-with-images
1 messages · Page 82 of 1
just bored
man that's a real shitty thing to do, rile others up out of boredom
that's real anti-social behaviour right there
yes its a fact they dont have a brain or pain receptors, but they have a pain response in the sense of what pain is functionally and abstractly
and they are alive most of all
you cant feel pain without a central nervous system, end of discussion again
and i can link 1,000 articles rephrasing what i just said
i'm pretty sure a group of scientists means anything from kindergarteners on holiday, to, actual scientists, these days
just following the science and correcting some misconceptions, keep an open mind righteous bros
only scientists that you agree with are real scientists

yep only peer reviewed studies written and agreed upon
im sure you could link something telling us they put a microchip in the covid vaccine too
gotta keep an open mind bro
another stereotype, one more for the collection
lets come back more to artistic and creative stuff 😄
lol
joe rogan is the real gateway drug, hes the ultimate rube 'just asking questions' who gets fooled by the most basic shit
you can make up all the things I could link to, doesn't mean it's real or a counter
you're just too easy to poke dude
just keep inside the house and everything will be fine
feel free to poke away franky, i havent even noitced you
you're not interesting enough, you're too transparent
yeah im not a bigot dude
i made these earlier to day, they're 4k, what do you think ?
love the coloring! :D
And angry at not having those muscles myself! >:I
franky's over here like "please notice me senpai UwU"
god you're so cringe
i mean its possible, just work out 3 times a week and eat healthy
cringe is actually telling you about yourself, more than the person who made you cringe. it's you remembering your own embarrassment
but who does that lol
good to know
if it was easy, then people wouldn't have issues with it. And the evidence is me, mr lazy :P
human nature strikes again
people tend to think in boxes and project a lot
and most people think they're correct
I curse nature each day, but it doesn't seem to do much, like complaining to tech support for any company >:(

fuck i need to frame that comment
that made me laugh harder than deformed AI photos do
it's so meta
also everyone is stuck in their own subjective reality, thinking that shit is real, while 90% of their input is actually just virtual
and the other 10% is incomprehensible
Brooooo, my head hurts sooooo baddddd
what happened ?
No idea, just woke up and it feels like somebody took a mallet to my forehead, uhggggg
neck pain too ?
migraines suck
Anyways, wanted to pop in and say happy pride month, love you all, and just remember you are all important and deserve the best in life
Stay safe people <3
It is probably that, though I have been drinking a lot of water
That's what it feels like ho
*tho
And it's not a migraine, I don't get migraines
if you drink too much water without eating salt, you dilute your electrolytes
hmm
you could actually die
happy pride month dude
<3
i dont celebrate it but i agree with the sentiment
I tend to get headaches like this when I sleep for a very long time, and I'm not sure why exactly. I did sleep for 14 hours though, so that does align with my normal experience
it's easy to identify what causes headaches, it can be because 1. everything, 2. nothing, or 3. something in the middle of point 1 and 2.
im not surprised after everything you've said today
you should have a sleep study done. you might have obstructive sleep apnoea
I just hope that one day we won't need a month to feel supported/important
restricts your airways while you sleep, it could be central nervous system issue from epilepsy or similar, but mine was physical cause by tonsils being perpetually too big. had surgery to fix it
my recommendation, is to talk to qualified people if it's something serious, but random headaches probably aren't any cause of concern :P
I have had several sleep studies done, I do have occasional apnea, and buy occasional I mean like once a month where I wake up gasping for air, but that hasn't happened in a long time.
I've been hospitalized in the semi near past for how severe my sleep issues can get, however I have been regulating other chemicals and such which have allowed me to sleep better
the sleeping for 14 hours is
unless they took Haldol.
Oh I slept for 14 hours because I'm sick
haloperidol will knock you out for ~15 hours
But also, my body naturally needs at least 10 to 12 hours of sleep now after how severe I screwed over my sleeping when I was younger
that could just be apnoea
damn. im lucky if i get 6 lol
you should DEFINITELY get a sleep study done if you regularly need 10-12 hrs to feel rested.
During high school, my sleep issues were so severe I was actually dying. I never really knew how important sleep was for your body to literally not just self-destruct lmao
they're hella fun. there's no reason other than the absurd cost there, not to do one
14 hours isn't anything special if it only happened once over a long time. Might have been a simple flu, etc. If you sleep for 14 hours a day and aren't working in a extremally straining job, then it's something else though :O
Once again, I've had several sleep studies done.
That is just what my body needs to get by now, that's how severe I have screwed over my body when it comes to sleeping. I also have several sleep disorders on top of that that are contributing factors to why I need that much sleep
@wispy nest have you tried the mixing diffusion yet?
During my senior year of high school, just before my father went into the hospital, I was in the hospital for sleep issues so bad that they were actually threatening my life. It was only by some miraculous connection between doctors that I was able to get the doctor who ended up saving my life
just merged about 2 days ago but the research paper came out 5 days ago, i thought this was something old but it's very new. give it 3 prompts and it makes them a panorama and uses inpainting on the seams
but it seems to do that using latents only, all in a single pipeline shot
You think I'm smart enough to be up to date with these stuff?
If yes, Thanks! 🥰
If no, yes, you're right! I have no idea what that mixing stuff is :P
sleep disorder that threatened your life?
you can try it out here
During my Senior year of high school, my sleep issues were so bad that I actually had to be injected in order to get sleep, because my body was shutting down.
Due to a mix of several extremely severe sleep disorders, my average weekly sleep was in the single digits
Yeah, too little sleep can kill you
@boreal falcon i realised that freddy kreuger started out appearing in people's dreams as a motivational speaker but none of them listened to him so over 800 years of that, he got tired of it
i have sleep problems too due to panic attacks
lol
I had Pandora's box of sleep disorders, and they were all fueling off of each other. The last sleep I got, the more severe the symptoms got, which made the symptoms from those sleep disorders prevent me from getting more sleep
Now I only have a few of those sleep disorders left over, after being able to return to a more healthy sleep cycle
i ran into a Djinn the other day that lives inside a magic lamp, he promised me 3 wishes. i've been thinking it over carefully, and i think appearing in people's dreams is what i will request as a special power
there's just one problem
happy pride! 
the lamp is in this old, dusty antique store and the owner is real uppity
sometimes i go back but the antique store is gone 😦
I'm also not smart enough to get that locally so while it's nice to test it on their site, I'd rather wait till I can apply it to my local auto1111's webui, thanks for the tip though! :D
i doubt you'll get to. it is using Diffusers.
To name the ones that I had off of the top of my head, I had:
Excessive daytime sleepiness disorder
Potential narcolepsy precursors
Hereditary insomnia disorder
Elongated circadian rhythm disorder
Nocturnal sleep alignment disorder
Anxiety driven sleep postponement disorder
Excessive sleep paralysis disorder
Acute sleep apnea
As well as a host of other situations that were caused by other health conditions that I have that would cause me to stay up
he'll have to pilfer more code
i wish my results looked like this 😭
mine
thing is you have to have prompts that mesh well together
this is using isometric view keywords
It got so bad during my senior year, that I was losing the ability to walk, I couldn't formulate fully coherent sentences, and I lost almost all fine motor skills in my hands
It was tragic, genuinely in the stages of my body shutting down on me.
I had a sleep study done on me when I was in the hospital, and when they found that they couldn't help me in the hospital they released me back to the home.
That is when I had a different type of sleep study done on me, where I had to wear too thick wrist bands for 3 weeks, right down all of my chemical intakes, and all sorts of other crap
That is when I was officially diagnosed with all of those disorders in tandem with the first sleep study
similar thing to me but they found out i had colon cancer at one of the many doctor's visits and then things changed a lot in pace and content to what i went through for treatments
but apparently childhood cancers are quite common in chrons disease cases, so i'm nothing special there
And then out of desperation, they switched me to another doctor who basically threw all of their recommendations out of the window since they weren't helping, he had me try a crap ton of different pills to see which ones affected me and what way, then we honed in on the single one that worked for me, to which he had me take four times the recommended dose per day every day for 3 weeks in order to try and reset my circadian rhythm, and the madman was able to do it
those results are probably the best of many tests. I don't often get jealous/envious when people make better stuff than me because I don't know it those results are the norm, or a one time result. But as long as someone enjoy their own stuff, then that should be enough! :D
on the model card there, it says it took hours to make that
The greatest thing to come out of all of this? The only sleep pills that work for me out of dozens that I was forced to try, are like the cheapest and most widely available sleep pills
Literally diphenhydramine, Benadryl lol
Benadryl saved my life lol
that give me restless legs
and have you used hours of your time to make one image? :)
might be the answer why your results aren't the same? And if they are, and you don't take hours to make them, then what doesn't that tell you? ;D
i took 6 hours today to try and make one image, yeah, and it still sucked ass 😭
Benadryl ended up being the only pill that was capable of putting me to sleep, because my sleep issues were not caused from a lack of go to sleep chemicals, they were caused by a huge surplus of stay awake chemicals
And diphenhydramine / Benadryl specifically block those stay awake signals
i didn't even work
i was supposed to
everyone, all day long. "i need this", "i need that", and i'm like "shut up, i'm trying to make three oceans match up"
But yeah, long story over, that was one of the many times I've been hospitalized for a subset of my health issues.
I really am a Pandora's box of defectiveness lol
i'm happy for you that you got your sleep deprivation fixed
"it takes 10,000 hours to become an expert" yeah an expert at suckin'
Yeah, now the only ones that I still really deal with occasionally are my nocturnal sleep alignment disorder, excessive daytime sleepiness disorder, and my insomnia/sleep apnea very rarely now
But, the byproduct of all of this is that if I don't get 10 hours of sleep everyday, my body rapidly goes back to what it was like previously
My body has become hyper-dependent on a large amount of sleep, otherwise all of my other disorders and oddities start kicking back in at full drive
those things are said by the people who regret working for those hours to get somewhere while slowly realizing you don't have to spend X time to be called good at it. You're good at something when someone ask you for help! :D
It's funky, I like it :>
i wish i found the bad hands lora before i made it
getting the fingers right took so long
Also it should be noted, it was around half a year later after this hospitalization incident for my sleep issues that we found that I actually have fibromyalgia, and it is actually the root cause of almost all of my chronic illnesses that I have
But since I've been able to find that out, living with these chronic illnesses is so much easier when you're not just being fed inconclusive results all the time
It also helped immensely because I found out the reason I have fibromyalgia is because my mom has it, we have hereditary fibromyalgia, non-injured related
then i guess i'm one of the best fine-tuners cuz i had to shut off my pings for Discord because of people endlessly asking for help
more likely i'm just the loudest
I don't know if I got the right one but all my images turned really weird when I tested one of them :/
everyone else holds those secrets dearly
yeah i saw it has an impact on generation, i think i'll juse use it for inpaint fixing hands
its a 500mb model too
see! :D
why would they ask you for stuff if you weren't good at it, good enough for people to want to get as good :D
Anyways, my headache is almost completely past now. Whenever I do get them, they stay for about 30 minutes after I wake up, and then they dissipate. No idea what that is supposed to do
what's the name of it? might have the poor man's version :P
likely asking me due to ignorance, if it were about who is best, they'd be bothering nitrosocke or Thibaud
EnvyBetterHands LoCon
i went to the Civit discord to ask for advice/guidance and they're not interested in helping others. so it's likely that, too.
the best are the ones who helped the person, at least in that persons eyes :)
until 5 years later they're hyper-invested into a crappy framework and it's all my fault
hm maybe it is somethign with breathing
the eyes are the only thing not looking real
or your plan all along? 🤔
lighting on the forehead looks a bit Unreal Engine to me but it's because i'm looking for it
why do you reply to me, you blocked me
the thing about skin in AI is that it's not got a lot of subsurface scattering
it has 0 subsurface scattering because it does not use ray tracing
yes i know, and it does not have it because it does not use it
there's nothing to "use". it's a feature it hasn't picked up on from images
these models are all weighted probabilities
it doesn't produce images of it because it doesn't occur very frequently in the training data
You can get subsurface scattering from AI
what i found works is to use waxy skin in negative prompt
just a sec
i can't say i've ever tried waxy in the negs
lol my result for the prompt subsurface scattering
sadly excluding concepts limits the space of possible outputs and you do not want to do that nescessarily if you want to have good looking candles
but it works
ah good point
i had to remove artifact so i could make indiana jones stealing one
😦
i was like what the hell
you can use synonyms
I have gotten it before, specifically through peoples ears
like a bright light from behind gives their inner ear a more warm reddish glow
it does have the concept mixed up with glowing
and the skin looks bad because it has the concept mixed up with so many types of images
I have also messed with SSS in blender a lot
Wonder if I could use that sort of thing to train an SSS LoRA
I bet so
this furry model I have has explicit support for things like that, and they look weeirdddd lmao
i did it before and it looks a bit like clearcoat
are you talking about the red hand i showed?
no in general
This model can also do iridescent, and crystal skin lol
it learned that skin is anything, 3D, photos, drawing
ah i was gonna say that's a real pic
so if not further specified it will make a mix of all of that
well the text encoder's lowest layers contain textures and shapes but the unet itself knows textures too and apparently it'll overfit on them
i don't know what "textures" mean in context of AI imagery, it seems like a pretty wide net to cast
I can get SSS by making my characters transparent lol
idk how it works in interior but i know how it behaves in practice
to get better skin it also helps adding 'smooth skin' to negative prompt
and skin impurities, skin pores, other skin features only seen in pictures to posi
this model can do weird like... translucent plastic bodies lol
bloonie ptsd kicking in rn
lmfaoooo
thats not what i mean
to me it's harder to define the difference between the two
i know what you mean, it's not a big mystery. the mystery, is the unet. because it overfits on a lot more than just the skin type of a person
idk how it works, i'm not a data scientist. i'm an artist 
i haven't tried burning a unet in very many ways, the only time i ever did it was with photos of a single subject
well i mean it's eazy to crank the LR up on a training session and kill a model in about 500 steps
How about now?
you can learn a lot
whut the hell is it lmao
is it just me or does the tight focus kind of feel unreal
also foudn this model is trained on 100's of celebs and fictional characters
i'm going to just put one image of every celeb into my next training run so it can make bizarro versions of them more easily
do all generations have fake teeth and 2cm makeup?
like, fine trained on them, not just the base data on them
technically yeah all generations have fake everything

thsi translucent skin prompting is interesting lol
i went back to basics and removed all my negs and started from scratch, i came up with like, duplicate teeth was the first one i added. dear lord. oh, and red skin because why the hell does it want to make people look like demons
quick, end it before it assumes its final form and assimilates
i think that the language we have might not be the best way to handle creation of skin
hopefully we won't have to, for much longer
@smoky oak tried to make family portraits and forgot i'd removed all my negatives
since one word that describes skin, also describes the texture and look of many other things
we really need an AI layer that translates what we want into what the generators actually know
in general language we have is very interwoven and with many meanings
that likely won't be done at 40 it/sec
😛
BLIP2 uses a 175B parameter language model as its translator and was heavily trained by Salesforce and all i hear about it is how much it sucks
I don't like how hes looking at me lol
he's smug because he's waiting for the perfect moment to drop his hot line:
"You jelly?"
this model has fantastic control over expressions and poses, so I can do a lot with him lol
SHUT UP LMAO
for poses i just use controlnet
oh watch this
this model has 45 predetermines materials you can make basically anything out of
its super trippy

you do that by training the early layers of the model on images that show just the texture with its captions
you likely also have to provide images of basic shapes eg. kitchens and stuff lmao
i think that our models are very rough and limited and that they did not fully understood the concepts we tried teaching them
the model I am using is wayyy ahead of any others I have ever used in terms of giving what I ask for
the models weren't trained to full convergence, though. they were trained sequentially and only froze a layer as the loss sort of reduced to a certain level
you can retrain it using something like SmartFRZ which is an attention-based predictor that looks at the current performance of the predictions in the latent space and then decides how to train the thing, adaptively, rather than sequentually from beginning to end
iridescent skin
what about the training data, its all 2D images
what if we used volumetric data and sterescopic images
they found that in a 40 layer model, the 30th layer converged faster than the 20th layer. i tried to reproduce this yesterday and went so far as to find the original author and try to reach out to him, but no reply yet. i don't know how they put together their training data or how they trained their predictor
then just use some kind of learned orthographic projection to get the 2D image
because what i see is that it thinks like humans when trying to put something on a paper
that's pretty much how controlnet depth works
they trained it on pairs of depth maps with images
i think they use OpenCV to generate the depth map from an image. and OpenCV is pretty incredible, honestly, how much it does without any weights
because when i look at the results they all look like images from someone who has no understanding of 3D made them
what do you mean by that
this model is insane, almost any decently known animal you can think of, this model can do
like i learned drawing because of SD
capybara
and i noticed that i had to think how things look 2D
easy
basically the model has no understanding of 3D
or only a very limited form of it
or maybe it is because the training data contains so many images from people who dont
becuse humans put stuff on paper and convert their 3D imagination to 2D image, and it comes out all weird
so the training data reflects that
sorry man you basically repeated the thing you said earlier, to explain it. i still do not get it lol what is weird about the results
its just an idea, what if you make a model that has sterescopy images, two times the same text with a pair of images rendered in 3D
or one text +2x images
just render it in 3D, simulating eyes
that works already, Sytan can do it
and then finetune that model to other images
well the dual image thing
maybe it will get rid of all the weird perspective artifacts
thats a hyena
It would look better if I used the capybara LoRA
that'd be cheating
they do provide hundreds of additional LoRA's with their model
the technology itself, is it possible to do this reverse-diffusion process in 3D ?
it should be right
why not combine textual inversions with LoRA and a hypernetwork on top of 7 controlnets with the base model
AND THEN you shall have your "Capybara"
I mean, it is taking some artistic liberties for facial proportions, as they do for all species lol
I have a LoRA I made on my own that makes photo realistic capybara. Pretty proud of that one
now THAT looks bad lol
babybara
wat, i think you've been staring at anime dongs for too long 😛 that looks incredible
it might not be, like, proportional
at least it didn't give him human teeth this time
not this
no, not even close
they have a way different head shape
Their noses are much wider, mouths are much lower set, and overall head shapes are much blockier
They don't have cheeks, and have a much longer body down to where their legs are
What you sent is a groundhog lol
that's a beaver lmao
no, thats a capybara
wait, are beavers groundhogs?
when it comes to the ai understanding depth in the image, I've noticed it can be tricked into painting about 3 levels of focus. But that's just the general understanding I have, and it can also be changed sometimes depending on X, etc :P
omfg what the hell is a prairie dog then
you're trolling, right?
no
sometimes two things are the same. have you ever investigated what a Yam is?
good luck with that one
we have these things called Elk here in Canada which are called something else in Europe, and Elk down in the US are yet another different thing. we've got Caribou as well, which are known as Elk somewhere else.
wouldn't be surprised if capybara translates to groundhog
do they have teeth like that?
capybara, beaver, grundhog, prairie dog
They are all 4 different creatures lmao
and they're not muskrats, either?
They don't even inhabit the same regions
so they could have been the same thing at one point then. if they started out at one spot 
muskrat
oh that's totally different, damn
like an opossum
which is, not the same thing in europe vs usa
not even close to an opossum, you're trilling, right? lmao
i'm saying they have names that are used different regionally
thats cause they aren't the same word lol
Possum and Opossum are not the same word, and are not the same creature lmao
Opossum left, Possum right
you are fighting with merriam webster on that one
i'm with you, they're two different things
but the whole world is fucked up on animal names
They are spelled differently, even if they are pronounced the same
that's my point
all that AI cares about is spelling, which is why it can tell the difference between a Possum and an Opossum lol
I think Opossums are super cute, personally
The word "elk" originally referred to the European variety of the moose, Alces alces, but was transferred to Cervus canadensis by North American colonists
like if i went to Europe. and someone told me, "don't go over there. there's Elk in there." i would somewhat laugh and thank them, and then disregard their advice and go into the woods
but they're going to be referring to a fucking Moose. a huge, vehicle-size piece of danger animal
i just hope i never discover that Hippo are called Puppies in some land i visit, i will absolutely be eaten
Yeah, but thats then when you use scientific names
The furry model I use has support for colloquial and scientific naming, which is supper cool IMO
Id not wanna fuck with an American Elk either, they get huge
i have video of me trail building and scaring off some roosevelt elk with a chainsaw
Possum becomes Opossum when you see it and "Opossum done got kilt by a car."
but a moose wouldn't be scared of that
Like to get a bat, you can use pteropodid to not get confused with the object; bat
a baseball pteropodid
lmfao
I am now gonna generate a bat playing baseball lmao
uno moment lol
that went from 0 to 60
i dont remember bats looking like that
that guys def got rabies
is it the with human teeth throwing it off? 
my therapist says the only way i can unsee these is by sharing them
feels better already 
I am convinced this dude has no idea what animals are what lmao
yeah, it is a bat lmao
ever seen Roger?
fuckin 'roos'll gut ya
with that insane foot of theirs
roger was so handsome
wild to watch his handlers try and like, pet him/scratch him, and him try and unalive them
Kangaroo
those ears are more jackrabbit
just be happy the ai isn't in the Finnish language
I'm done here lmao
Well
Bear is having some me time I think
make someone ride him 
This model could generate that exactly, but I would get banned lol
I know
lmao

Hey All,
I'm brand new here, and as of about 2 weeks ago, also brand new to AI generated art as well 🙂
I received an early access invite to Leonardo AI recently, and basically starting generating images, and learning as much as I could, prompt engineering, how Stable Diffusion actually works, checkpoint models, safetensors, Lora's, Textual Inversion, Hypernetworks and the list goes on.
I then set about installing Stable Diffusion onto my new PC, latest Intel core i9 CPU, 32GB RAM and a 4080Ti, so I knew my PC was up to the job lol. I opted to install Automatic111, and have been generating so many images, and just learning how the sampler, prompting, steps, CFG, denoising etc can affect the output image.
I have mostly been using the RPGv4 model, as it's one that I was using in Leonardi AI. I have a question though. I created an image in Leonardo AI, and for the life of me I can't recreate it in Stable Diffusion?
Everything is the same:
Sampler: Euler Ancentral i.e. Euler A
Steps: 30
CFG: 7
Positive and negative prompts are the same, I'm using the same seed, as I grabbed it from Leonardo AI
RPGv4 resolution according to the models PDF is 512 x 768, so that is what I have set in SD
The images just come out different and I don't get it???
One thing of note is that Leonardo AI sets itself up with a generation resolution of 640 x 832? How can that be? As that's above the training resolution, and would likely result in bad generation e.g. double images, limb issues, etc
Any idea how I might be able to get SD to replicate what I created in Leonardo AI. Theoretically I should be able to do so
In the mean time, here's a couple of images that I have created in Leonardo AI, when trying to create a pirate girl, scrubbing the decks, on a 17th century galleon, in a storm. Came out looking ok, however location isn't right, as I wanted to be long range, and see her on the galleon itself. (WIP)
Leonardo AI has a new option called Alchemy AI, that produces drastically different pictures using the same settings!! No idea what they've done, but it's a huge difference, and one that I prefer. Not sure if behind the scenes they;re just using a different model / sampler, but it's quite the difference
I'd love to get that look in the last 2 pics in SD. Leonardo AI uses SD, so no reason I can't
it's the model, you said you got early access to a specific AI, means that the model is probably closed sorced(my assumption)
reading
"just another model" isn't really a "just a" thing ;P
yeah the model is the most important part
as I wanted to be long range, and see her on the galleon itself
from a distance
scene
cinematic
could help
I did have cinematic and long range in my prompt, but it didn't help 😦
There are so many models around. I've got a bunch installed already. I'll have to try and find one that gets a look close to what was in those last two pics I posted
probably not the same thing, but using free stuff awesome people have uploaded can do a lot, you just have to fist find it :P
you can also merge models, that is what most people do
I never had much success merging
Yeah I've seen a few I've downloaded off of civitai are merged ones
always tears the face up
is there a name for fire clothes , i tried fire costume and burning clothes , both didn't work , is there a solution ?
you can even merge merged models, it's all just a bunch of math
Yeah model weights in the neural network or something...
well, that is if the models have the same architecture, if they don't then you have to train a model
One thing I'd appreciate some advice on is the setting of the "Sampling steps". I'm mostly using the default of 20. I know what it does and the higher you set it the more passes of the AI at improving the image to match the prompt, so refining it. Well it seems that way to me, and is what I got out of reading about it.
What kind of step setting is best to use, or do most people just "play around" and see what works?
there is a limit, you can over-cook images.
i'd say 50 tops
also, id say the sampler is just different techniques. the smplers that have _a in their name are adaptive, meaning they are suitable for pretty much everything
If the model used by Leonardi AI, and the one that produced the last two pics posted is closed source, won't that model be based off of the base SD 1.5 or SD 2 models? If so, then I would think they'd have to open source their model?
I can't believe that Leonardo AI have trained an entire model from scratch!! Not given how long and how much it cost SD to make theirs
why would they have to open source the model?
not from scratch, ALL text2image models use the diffusion architecture, they all start training from the same point.
License's? If a model is trained from SD 1.5 base, does that then not mean the trained model that is a result also has to be open source like SD 1.5 is
I might be wrong..
have you read that in a license agreement?
no, that is not how it works, in that sense then MJ would have to go open-source. and here we are
Is MJ based on SD?
very likely, they modified the architecture and trained it in a specific way.
I think MJ has their own thing, didn't they have their own stuff before SD?
nope :/
Ah ok. I thought MJ was a completely proprietary model from scratch, same with DALL-E
In that case, I get why people can create new trained models from the SD base models, and keep the closed, even if people are paying for access. Which is what Leonardo AI does
Another question if I can..
One thing I'm struggling with is AI upscaling. I have an RPGv4 512 x 768 image, and I can upscale it by two times, and do that again, and it looks ok, but artefacts start to creep in. If I do a 3rd pass, it looks bad.
I've got a few additional UI scalers installed into Automatic1111, and I've read up on what to do, and do multiple passes etc, but with photo realistic images I just can't get past 2 iterations
I checked mr google, but no one said it used any SD thingies. But that was from searching and reading for as long as it took me to answer your post :P
bruv you can litteraly see it going through the diffusion procces. it IS a diffusion model, just a well trained one.
Well here we are...same as Leonardo AI does
isn't stable diffusion as diffusion math thingie from "stable?" meaning that both MJ and SD uses it but not that MJ uses SD's diffusion?
Leonardo AI I never heard of then went to it a couple of weeks back. It was too restrictive for what I do, and felt inferior to me. Almost felt like a con job.
that's debatable. they will never confirm anything or deny anything about their model
depends on the upscala
Works really well, for the 2 weeks I've been using it 🙂 What kinds of things won't Leonardo let you do? I guess they are trying to make it incredibly user friendly, so limited feature set, and less controls
i blame the fuckin people trying to sue them for that tbh
the thing I mostly asked was if MJ uses the same model as SD trained, not if MJ used a diffusion calculation thingie :P
maybe once they have legal protections for their existence they'll be more open, idk
Can't use my Lycoris/Lora/TI Embeddings/Hypernetworks just to name the first thing
I've tried many. remarci, nmkd-siax, esgran-4X and the other built in ones. No joy past 2 iterations, image just get's worse
what they've done is really cool, even if i can't run it locally
MJ doesn't need any rinky-dink SD LoRAs
Ah yes, that is true lol. No use of your own stuff, just what they give you. They do let you train with images, but that's it
unknown, just wait till SDXL goes open-source. i bet sh*t will go mayham
Yep, that is far too restrictive for me.
Reason I do not like MJ too
Which is why I installed SD about 5 days ago 🙂
I actually don't like MJ's images all that much, they are too smudgy and "thick" with color lines, or how to explain it. As well as their "centering" is not that good looking for me :P
when i trained my model on 22k MJ5.1 images i was worried it'd adopt that, but it did not
That chin, lol
Ooohhh I didn't know about SDXL https://stablediffusionxl.com/
I've been reading tons on SD, and everything around it, but never came across that one.
Nice!
if you surround a url with < >'s it will not preview
SDXL is really cool but i wish there were an outtakes channel on here where we could concentrate all of the deformed shit it makes
so i could make a training set and make a completely deformed version

that grill is killing me! :P
it's doing the same process MJ does while training. the giant advantage is that it will go open-source(i hope)
i have finally succeeded at making a bat @smoky oak
I've been using SD 1.5, any reccomendation to use 2.1? I hear bad things about 2.1, but as I've not used it I've no idea, so appreciate any advice
I didn't know about the ++ and -- prompt syntax? I've been using word:1.2 etc
and I'll let people who like 2.1 talk about 2.1 because it wouldn't be fair otherwise :)
let's just all agree that SDXL takes the cake, there is no way after it releases that people would still be training SD1.5
I personally wouldn't recommend it, unless you are willing to give up coherency and consistent quality for more randomness and goofing around
2.1 is good for doing random and wacky things, but it is just not good for the level of specific quality or consistency you can get out of 1.5
Although, I have recently seen a 2.1 model that may be promising towards a future where 2.1 is more of a tool unless of a plaything
I don't think I've seen a image from that thing so I can't comment on that :P
But I won't say one model is better, I just want people to have as many tools as possible to make what they really want :D
why don't it make him a human
😭
take Sytan's suggestions with a grain of salt lol they use a furry model
I mean I'd say it's a pretty general consensus that if you want something specific, use 1.5 and you'll get better results, but if you want to screw around and mess with weird results, then use 2.1, as it's less prone to consistency and repetition
Sounds like they've gone backwards with 2.1
In a sense they have, but mostly because they never gave out good information on fine tuning 2.1, so the models available for 2.1 are really bad compared to the fine tunes for 1.5
However, that new artius model I was shown isn't too bad, it lessons a lot of the glaring issues with 2.1, and I think it's actually kind of fun to mess with
they said one of the reasons SDXL is taking ages is because they make in a way that can be easily fine-tuned
Just keep in mind, if you're looking for a specific thing, like realism, or specific styles of digital art, or anthro character creation, a really anything that fits into specific model subset, you'll have a better time with 1.5
But if you want to screw around and have fun and just get weird and wacky results, then I would suggest 2.1, it has a lot more creative liberties
and this isn't even the real batmobile >:(
2.1 is basically 1.5 rebellious brother who's always on acid lmao
and just the base SDXL model even currently(it didn't even finish training) is better than most of the finetunes that currently exist
I also like that it can deal with adding text
no, OpenCLIP has higher FID scores and accuracy, better prompt comprehension
Oh yeah hands down, I've been following the development, 50% trained SDXL makes even some of the best fine tunes for 1.5 look like jokes
2.1 has potential to be better than 1.5, but it's not yet
There are no good fine tunes out there in my opinion, but I would say that the best one I have used is definitely artius
it's already better. its baseline resolution is 768x768
That one felt the least artifacty out of all of the ones that I've used
does much better at resolutions like 1152x768 native gen
I mean it is, but I also have this anthro model, which hasn't even higher base resolution
And it's 1.5
@north monolith this is 2.1
Also, the fact that 2.1 base resolution is 768x768 is a drawback in my opinion
Takes longer to get large amounts of images out to select the one you want to fine tune, and on top of that, it's not consistently 768x768 so you can expect a lot of the deformities that 2.1 is known for because of that
requested a cross-animal hybrid of a gorilla, lion, and tiger
can't get that kind of prompt comprehension in 1.5
All it did was give it a couple extra arms and make it to you lol
Like yeah, 2.1 can comprehend things much better, but that's not a good result by any mean
that's subjective as hell and that's why i say to take Sytan's opinions with a grain of salt
I'm sure there are much better examples out there
i love that picture
yeah, id say SDXL will blow up
I don't know, I personally don't think that giving a tiger a few extra limbs and making it green has anything to do with mixing it with a lion or a gorilla
i hope they won't disappoint
Snoop Dogg and Lex Luthor starting a cannabis company
2.1 has compatibility with a new noise schedule called terminal SNR right out of the box, that 1.5 will take a lot of fine-tuning to get
SDXL is all ready so much better than even some of the best fine tunes for 1.5, that I am extremely confident that when it comes out, it will blow up
It has prompt comprehension that makes 2.1 look like a joke, and consistency and reliability that makes 1.5 look like a joke lol
That is a true benefit, I will admit that, but I just use offset noise on the rare occasion when I want a really bright early dark image, works for me
Now the fact that SDXL has it built in, that's dope
2.1 is hella consistent and reliable. my friend who just shows up once in a while to generate images, will type some truly stupid non-prompt that would get him totally broken results on 1.5 (which he still loved, because he's weird) but in 2.1 it just works
when will they release it? they are on ~50% for almost a mounth now
the one thing it can't do for him is the celeb stuff. i want to fix that, but i don't have a good dataset
I've agreed with you with a lot of your points up until now, but consistency and reliability is probably the worst thing about 2.1 IMO
my problem with 2.1 is that the baseline res being so high makes it hard to find good training sets. everything is curated for 512x
Looking at how long it took them to get from 0 to 25 to 50, it's looking like potentially another two to three months in my opinion
But the fact that it looks as insanely good as it does I only 50%, that just gives me massive hopes for it's final release
i mean, maybe that's an a1111 thing. because everything my bot makes is ❤️🔥 it's hard to decide what to love, when you love all of it
yeah, i don't think it will get overcooked
oh but before the SNR fix was trained into the model, it's less reliable. like my v1 model has some issues that the v2 resolved there
The truth of the matter is, if there were any good 2.1 models out there that actually seemed useful and not more of a pain in the butt for me, I would hands down switch over to using them, but they're just aren't any, at least that I have seen
it's crazy, man. i was talking about it with a coworker and the brightness avg being .5 was so restrictive that it overly-generalised the image it produced into a mediocre result
when you apply the tsnr fix, it can average the pixels of an image from 0 to 1, which means you can make anywhere between a pure black or a pure white image
Yeah, the averaging also really affects people with fair skin and people with really dark skin as well
that changes the reliability of the model in an insanely positive way
Sorry another question. Using xformer with Automatic1111
I was using it (as I have a 4080Ti), by specifying it in the cmd line params, but then read earlier today that I don't need it, as the latest version of Pytotch+cu118 (that comes with latest Automatic1111) already uses Cude.
I checked my GPU usage, and that does seem to be the case, though unless it's a placebo effect, it feels just a bit slower. Maybe 1s. Not that that will make much difference in the grand scheme of things
if you're on pytorch2 you probably don't want xformers but you'll have to experiment
Pytorch 2.01
I stay away from any installs that use pytorch 2, as I don't think it has any benefit, and it definitely has a lot of drawbacks
this shit changes daily but for a while the recommendation was to uninstall xformers because it would conflict with the new pytorch stuff but, they've released a new xformers since then and it now seems to tell you it's ignoring it rather than conflicting
of curse, eventually I will be forced to switch
but by then I hope that its less of a problem
pytorch 2.0.1 is superior to 2.0.0 because the pipeline compiling works so much better but from the arguments on the issue tracker it doesn't look like sdwebui will ever use that feature
if they converted over to diffusers (i know, i know) it would Just Work
so when i compile a model on my A100 i get like 80 it/sec, i don't even get a progress bar
the slowest part is the saving and uploading of the image
yeah, 2.0.1 is better than 2.0.0, but it is still worse than 1.3 for me
as a developer, i don't want to support 1.13. that shit's broken
so i can understand wanting to force you 
80!!! I'm on a 4080Ti, and looking at my log window, I see around 8-10 it/s
the 4090 is about as fast as the A100, if not faster
as a dev, I'm obliged to show everyone what coding really is all about:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uo3cL4nrGOk
mandatory watch for all devs! >:)
Javascript programming language
Interview with a Javascript developer with Jack Borrough - aired on © The Javascript.
Find more Javascript opinions under:
https://hackernoon.com/how-it-feels-to-learn-javascript-in-2016-d3a717dd577f
Programmer humor
Javascript humor
Programming jokes
Programming memes
Javascript
Js memes
js jokes
callbacks
asyn...
So my poor 4080Ti seems a lot slower
well it's all a CPU bottleneck at a certain point, honestly
look at your single thread use
GPU was about 95%, CPU overall was 25%, but those cores were being hit hard
yeah so it's peggin' at least one core then
Pytorch 2 I can't use or I spend weeks doing a simple gen
yep
I can live with generations taking 4 - 5s
Upscaling is where it takes a little longer
Ahem, most of my gens are already 2-6s/it
upscaling I do not do at all as it takes 10+ minutes
Yeah I'm only doing that on images I like, and even then just to play around and learn as a noob
I still do not quite know why they are so slow for you. Like that is wayyy slower than it should be
Way faster than it was and I asked other 1060s I am right where they are
it just doesn't make sense to me, as 1080ti's are still several times faster
WHen 1.4 came out I was Euler_A 10 steps was 50 steps 5 mins, 100 steps was 10 mins, 150 steps was 15+ mins
My 4080Ti I'm only getting 5 -6
1060 has emulated fp16
Can't believe a 1060 or 1080 is the same
using auto1111's webui and having the arguments --precision full --no-half halves the it/s in my experience. So there's a lot that changes the speed
4080ti? That GPU doesn't exist
I don't have the ram for that
Thankfully I don't have those set
use bfloat16
Sorry 4080
what res?
Wait a min
do you use --xformers?
Currently generating at 512 x 768
bfloat16 is mixed-precision, it'll keep the text encoder at float32 so that it does not suffer numeric instability and it keeps the unet at float16, to simplify
ok, something is wrong there
that 4080 gens at the speed the 7900XT trains loras 768x768 at.
it's probably the sampler.
7900XT is unsupported still so surprised it works
No, as I found out today, Pytorch 2.01 + cu118 will use cuda anyway, so read to turn off xformers
once rocm supports 7k cards 7900xt should be 12-18it/s for training
I'll turn xformers back on
that seems reallyyy slow for a 4080
yes
something is def off here
extremely
thats slow for my 3060ti too
I hope nothing bad happens then because I never read documentation before it's already too late, cross my fingers my card won't explode or something then ;P
I can understand the 7900xt speed due to no support but the 4080 has full on support
yeah, the 4080 should be doing like 18it/s minimum at 512x768
yes
With xformers on:
I'm "only" at 11it/s without using those precision stuff anyway :P
768x768 is about 15-17it/s
that still seems way slow
something is way wrong
very very weird
@north monolithdo me a test please, try 512x512 with batch size 8
What model. I'm currently using RPGv4
what CPU specifically?
I've almost top end core i9 too 😦
any 32 core CPU is going to be like this
thats false
i know because my A100 is hampered by one too
which one specifically?
@north monolith
--opt-sdp-attention
Have you tried this instead of xformers? It is only for 3000 and 4000 gpu cards.
he already showed that his CPU is bottlenecking
and 8 it/sec is fine, quit making him think he needs to scratch until it bleeds so that he gets another 3 it/sec
dude, thats less than 1/2 what that GPU can do lmao
my power limited
nvidia song begins playing
Well that's worse in the stats. I get 8 images + the grid in Automatic1111, but the stats show the following. each line is a batch of 8
wth?
batch of 1 does 7 - 8
a batch of 8? god dayum
I used to get 2it/s because an error I can't for the life of me remember now :/
you're running 8 concurrent gens
which sampler and step count?
its gonna be slower with bs=8, try =4 or =1
Check this. I just changed it to a batch size of 1:
yeah.
So that's 512x512 at a batch size of 8?
and what scheduler, DDIM?
that is 100% shite, no offense
UniPC is fast but i have not messed with it much
something is messed up for sure
If you got 1.9it/s at 512x512, that is much closer to where your GPUs performance should be
Yes, the slower speeds are 512 x 512 batch size 8, but that's for all 8
The faster 3 speeds at the end is when I switch it to a batch size of 1
I'd still slow for a 4080, but it's a lot closer to the target it should be at
Let me check my GP really fast
Never mind, I take it back
Heun
oh, lord
nooo
ditch Heun
use ddim
I normally use Euler A
ddim is the benchmark
ddim, euler_a, dpm++ SDE Karras
Errr DDIM...
Errr
there we go
lol
See told you I'm a noob!!
heun is pretty cpu-heavy
DDIM is the go-to speed demon
I saw heun lost a nut
You haven't insulted bill gates too many times, right?
i think sytan was about 10 minutes away from having you reinstall your OS
Glad we were able to figure out what was wrong, that was abnormally slow for such a beefy GPU lol
I played about with the samplers, read some stuff, and some website just said "use what you think looks good".
They never told me to use DDIM, and that the others were dog slow
I don't know why the hell you always have to insult me
what is your Euler_A at now?
Thanks all!! Glad I joined this Discord 🙂
Like bro, just keep my name out of your mouth, please
I'm glad we were able to figure out what was going on
Enjoy your dramatically faster generations haha
Euler A
I use 15 steps of DDIM, as I found that going any higher doesn't really benefit at all, and it allows you to get extremely fast images
Oh, sweet
It is a little strange that you're having so much variation in generation speed, but hey, it's still way faster
now, please kick it up a notch and do dpm++ SDE Karras
Yes way way faster
pytorch2 on Ada ftw
20 steps on the sde
DPM++ SDE karras is a more intense sampler, so I'm curious to see how it does
My guess is probably 16
15-16
Remember when we were trying to figure out what was wrong with my GPU, and why I lost so much performance? Lmao
Oof
damn
That's a much bigger hit than I was expecting
Yeah
Back to DDIM for me
DDIM is what I use always
I don't like DDIM if I am after photorealism.
DDIM doesn't support tsnr yet 
It's the fastest, needs less steps than most of the other samplers, and I've also have observed that it is better at not ruining high values on LoRA's
On average compared to Euler A, I was able to go about 15% higher on the drive value before I started seeing any artifacts with DDIM
For me I found the sweet spot for ++ SDE is 40-50 but my word it takes my card forever
at 50 the caustics was out of this world
RIght I gotta go. It's 3:34am here, and I've work tomorrow.
Thx for the help all!! I'm learning more all the time
glad we could help
Even these images are all 15 step base, 10 step upscale
No worries! Get some good sleep, glad we were able to help :>
Now try them with ++ SDE Karras at 20 steps
when it comes to the use of sampler, then all I know is that they are like different flavour of coffee: same taste, different name! :P
Except for LMS, that one just don't do anything good! ;P
The only time that I use more steps with DDIM is because I am using several Laura's, and more steps allow them to be a little more coherent
I…I used to love it for several weeks…runs away… 😶🌫️
UniPC is legit just slower DDIM
Like the results are almost identical, but it's about 25% slower on my GPU
Has the same restrictions too
And it also has several values that you have to tweak in order to get it properly optimized, but then changing certain aspects can change what values are optimal for it, it's just a pain in the ass
I got it to work one time, ngl. It was so slow and meh in results but after that never again
controlnet recommends unipc for upscaling
yeah, I thought it was great, 99% because it was a new one, then I tested using one of the old, and smelly, samplers and noticed how…not good unipc really was :P
it's good at certain things, but it's hard to generalize improvements in this space
A whole lot of stupid going around in this and the Jurrasic Park syndrome of see if they could instead of thinking if they should.
Loras are like that now where even the master lora trainers are saying enough is enough and stop the shit
I have actually no idea what the samplers really do, I know, shocking revelation about me! :P
I still have not ran across a DyLora.
We present high quality image synthesis results using diffusion probabilistic models, a class of latent variable models inspired by considerations from nonequilibrium thermodynamics. Our best results are obtained by training on a weighted variational bound designed according to a novel connection between diffusion probabilistic models and denoising score matching with Langevin dynamics, and our models naturally admit a progressive lossy decompression scheme that can be interpreted as a generalization of autoregressive decoding. On the unconditional CIFAR10 dataset, we obtain an Inception score of 9.46 and a state-of-the-art FID score of 3.17. On 256x256 LSUN, we obtain sample quality similar to ProgressiveGAN.
There are so many variations, and most of them are unneeded
there, now you understand
precisely
https://www.scs.stanford.edu/~dm/home/papers/remove.pdf
Not really what was talked about, but when would I ever get to show this obscure knowledge I have?!
locon is as far as I could train with 2.1 and Loha was utter failure for everyone on 2.1
Also, I'm curious, I'll try your SDE karras and see if I see any improvements @dense tapir
I used it in the past and didn't see any reason to continue using it, but I'm much better at prompting now, so maybe
Try on colur images that normally shows noise more
i didn't get great results from the Karras pipelines in sd-webui but the same Karras stuff used directly, works fine
so i'm not sure what's going on there
for me I can take the same prompt and sde ++ 20 and 20 ddim and the ddim looks like a painting
are you trying to say that I'm of high quality? Yes, must be, I'm totally not totally confused by the language in the text…yes…me smrt! 😶🌫️ 🤣
You do use mostly 2.1, so perhaps it interacts that way. For me, even with the few images I've already tested, I'm not really seeing an improvement
Just a much slower sampler
idk man that song the robot sung at the nvidia keynote has been stuck swirling in my head for 3 days
Possibly
i just want it to stop 
if I had a 4090 I would use it at 40-50 steps
same settings, one use DDIM, the other use uniPC, which is which?
This should be one of those captchas? :P
the 2nd is most likely the workhorse DDIM adding tons of awesome detail. the left is weak kiddo UniPC?
Same prompt you tell me which is which
you have to test the samplers across a series of steps. some of them converge earlier or later
left is DDIM, right is uniPC (I had to double check because overe the 10 seconds from me posting it, I already forgot which was which :P )
I was spot on for yours then as Uni drops colours
changes stuff too
Anyway Sytan, as you can see ddim vs sde ++
the right one had me laugh out loud because I imagined a bar where the one behind the desk was a paper cutout and no one noticed :P
For me, SDE is worse
is it contagious? ;P
for me
These are close ups of DDIM Vs SDE, which do you think is which?
if he's using 2.1, karras will work better because it essentially turns on some SNR fixes.
the first looks painted so in 2.1 that would be the ddim
Yeah, that's what I figured was the cause of it working better for him and not for me
This is digital art. So yeah lol
The first one is DDIM, and the second one is SDE, but as you can see there's way more crunchy artifacts in the SDE one
it's also why i don't like any of a1111's sampler implementations. most of them are not implemented correctly, they look far worse on 2.1 than their Diffusers counterpart implementations.
Yeah yeah, we get it, you hate everything A1111 lol
@smoky oak try skip clip 1 with SDE
That has to be due to the base model
Done. Results above lol
I mean 1.5 not the model you are using
Yeah, I think that SDE is better for a 2.1, but not better for 1.5
in 1.5 I always used euler_a
Same, until I switched to DDIM as it was faster for me
I noticed that one didn't apply the background as often for some weird reason I never learned, and probably never will :P
I am just not that into DDIM as I will take more time if it looks better.
the one without the a is better for me
Yeah, I can see the benefit for 2.1
Here, let me try them for realism
i hadn't had any opinions on any of it beyond the code quality or the interactions i'd seen, until i experimented with it locally, and determined it has a lot of issues, but i mean, do you want me to just never talk about them? i thought it was useful context, i'm not mercilessly shitting on the platform
those issues can be fixed
i thought 2.1 was way worse than it is because the documentation on which samplers work best and why they work, is next to zero
it was adding the karras sigmas pattern to my sampler that fixed it for me, the first bit anyway. that makes baseline 2.1 generate really nice and clean images - as good as it'll get, without fine-tuning, that is
I was one of the 12 ( ;P ) people who made embeddings for 2.1 when it came out. But I never got many good images from it that I liked :(
was a joke, there were at least 20 of us! :P
huh, wait, this is at clip skip 7 :O
Realism comparison
Which do you think is which, General?
Cause I don't think it makes a big difference for 1.5 models, certainly not worth needing more steps and much more time
I'd say the left is 2.1. Why? Because the fingernail! :P
i always thought the sarenghetti was a type of pasta
I…I knew that…I was just, erm... look over there! a rainbow tiger! 🚀
I made a lot of TI embeddings I released for 2.1 but they no longer work with other models only on the base.
wait, is that true for all embeddings on 2.1, or just yours?
ALL
@dense tapir which do you think is SDE?
with embeddings it is model specific and might work, might not or do something completely different on any other model
who are you?, the image model makes a self-portrait
Not sure but the one on the left has a different lighting scheme so hard to tell.
Yeah, I think that alone shows that I have no need to go SDE karras and wait 2x as long for results 😅
the one on the right looks more natural
But I will keep it in mind for 2.1
That's DDIM haha
asking model for self-portrait
yes, as I figured because it has a dull apparence while I actually preferred the left one
DDIM's looks better there for sure
See, both of you guys are on exact opposites lol
at least in 1.5 they don't look painted (digital or canvas)
they don't seem to have much of the same composition, sometimes when switching samplers you see pieces stay in one spot
Voice typing skipped "completely" lmao
tbh, the SDE looks like one taken on a smartphone and the ddim one on a more professional setup with rim lighting, etc...
this was made with 2.1 + a billion embeddings, but I was never able to recreate the "painting style" in 1.5 :/
I specifically prompted for a professional grade DSLR photo :p
LOL, glad I am on 2.1
I don't think either look better, however I do not like how much longer SDE takes
Not only is it considerably slower at the same samples, but it needs more
I suspect you would need a model of just that for 1.5
I'm pretty sure I could replicate that painting style pretty easy just using prompting lol
Let's try
I'm not sure, the level of small details is just something that I've seen happen with 1.5 models. Or if so, then it's beyond my knowledge anyway
If you took a 100 samples from 2.1 and dreambooth trained (not that damn kohya turd thing) it would do it for you
NEVER seen*
for dreambooth my 1.5 go to was Shiv's. Damn great work
got to 2.1 and nothing. TheLastBen I never liked in 1.5 or 2.0/2.1
Now Kohya has a dreambooth but considering how screwed up, and half baked, his 2.1 Lora stuff is I would never touch it
for 1.5 kohya is good
I had to remove dreambooth (if I'm thinking about the same dreambooth) from my webui as it kept bugging out the entire webui
As Kohya told me he only cares about 1.5, and Anime so my realism and 2.1 if it worked great and if not oh, well.
Yeah, that extension is a no go as the author despises auto with a passion (with valid reasons) so Auto would break his shit all the time. I knew how frustrated he was until he cracked and posted on his github.
I think I still got your embeddings pre new year somewhere. My folder structure is very, very messy :P
by bob eggleton lol
my embeddings are on here and HF as I refuse to put anything on Civit. Doesn't matter since I don't train at all now (can't as a free colab anyway).
too many abused it
did you? ;P
Running services for pay while the backend was colab
All right, I didn't match that specific painting style, but I do really like this result
I may save this prompt for future reference
I wish as I could afford a 4090 if I did, but no
try adding brushstrokes
ah, I thought you talked about that everyone had 24 alt accounts for each hour of the day :P
Already in there
yep
Man, I ran into people with over 200 alt accounts
I never figured out why but now I know why
Considering the scum I ran into when SD released over on the lexica discord I can understand it
Same prompt only Euler_a
Sytan, what does yours do if you add by bob eggleton to the end
To the prompt I already have, or to a different prompt?
I just did this by tweaking some weights and adding a couple extra tags
I actually quite like the style
sde++, ddim, euler_a, euler all are 20 steps
I love it! I like more, and stronger, color. As long as I don't see much blurry purple/pink that is >:P
as you see ddim is the loser
i think it tried to make a motorcycle
unless you are after the digital artwork style
Yeah, I can see why you say that for 2.1, definitely
hahahaha yes.
I wonder why that is?
My eyes are too harsh when it comes to photo realism, it has to be a lot better than if I saw a painting etc. :(
probably because it don't know what eggleton is and confuses it with skeleton from he man ;P
Okay, I am very happy with the way this came out
I will be saving these as prompt templates for the future
oh baseline 2.1 definitely knows both Bob and Darryn eggleton's art but if you don't have one or the other's name in the negatives, it melds them
btw, we have a new blip coming
try android jones that artist has the worst name ever to try and get the ai to recreate :P
harley quinn in her more explorative, creative years
the 1920x1080 deformities are so fun sometimes
ohhh you might be right, there's eggs appearing now
Here is ddim of the above
quick, grab the goose! you'll be rich!
i wish
I wonder if I can apply strengthening on the loaded VAE the same way as a lora/embedding 🤔
++ SDE
I also hate it when I get rice in my hair ;P
emphasis on bob++
clip skip 9, and I kinda like it :O
but there was supposed to be a image of a car sooooo :P
9 on 1.5 or 2.1?
DDIM of the above
I was sure I saw one of the devs say it didn't have it and then showed an example image set 🤔
1.5 has only 12 layers in its TE
so you're basically seeing one of the earliest layers of the model. check that result on stable-diffusion-1-5 checkpoint
i'm curious what it's like, because it should theoretically be more basic than that unless the whole text encoder was fine-tuned
Euler_a
i dig the textures and i like their style but i would absolutely squish these with my shoe if they showed up outside, sorry
hello peeps, happy friday to those in the + timezones 🙂
shouts in Japanese, releasing egg
I downloaded a 1.5 model today that everyone was raving about but I don't see anything great about it
Ahem, this is from it
when i tried 1.5 again yesterday trying to get it to listen to my prompt was like wrestling a greased up pig
default 2.1 vs 1.5 I'd say yes—ish :P
but INSERT_FINE_TUNED_MODEL_HERE 2.1 model vs INSERT_FINE_TUNED_MODEL_HERE 1.5 model for me is almost always in the 1.5 favour :P
That one is wearing Kabuki face.



