#🏞|general-with-images
1 messages · Page 76 of 1
at first no way
I am standing back and watching and really interested in the ones coming (Battlemage, and Celestial and eventually Druid).
I am surprised that the A750 beat the brand new 7600.
that gives me great hope for BM
bowel movements?
hehe BM
personally i think youre shooting yourself in the foot going to intel or amd
dunno why you hate nvidia so much that you would praise arc
to head with intel
personally I don't care what you think and besides I am not going Intel I am just watching on the sidelines with high hopes they pull it off.
intel will not
you absolutely care what i think or you wouldnt be discussing any of this here
why would i want less competition
No, I don't because I didn't address you I addressed Sytan
this is a public channel lmao
if yiu want it private, use dm
would be nice if they are competitive. Unfortunaly they are bounded with certain CPUs to benefit more with intel gpu. But if they are great, they can move prices of nvidia down. So i wish them good luck
now go cry and throw another temper tantrum.
I agree
uhmmmm where is this hostility coming from
Just saying that when things don't go your way your other personality comes out and you throw a tantrum.
we are discussing gpus and you are;going to personal attacks
speaking of tantrums.
anyway i pinged the mods for you. hope they can straighten that out
v1 vs current checkpoint on v2 (in training)
yeah it totally does
if it starts to make a double car melded together, it tends to separate them
also when does the SDXL model release?
hype
they might restart from scratch again but at this point they seem to be past their experimental stage and are into fine-tuning
they have also implemented some new research papers for terminal SNR based noise gen instead of offset noise, to improve outputs monumentally
that was like, a week ago
just the base sdxl model seems to top most current finetunes
the base SDXL model is unlikely to be as easy to train due to that, though
like, the SDXL team is fine-tuning it to a crazy extent with user preference layers
yep, way more parameters
they are not releasing this one as a total garbage model but its flexibility will probably be limited for fine-tuning purposes
but it will be able to be finetuned, right?
like DeepFloyd is?
aka poorly and with little understanding of what to do to achieve X or Y
i doubt Joe Penna's team is going to tell us how to do that
they keep saying all of the fine-tuning they're doing is to make it easier for us to fine-tune later but eh
well, i think the sdxl model is going to be a huge step, worst case scenario we would just make more loras
i will do an experiment sometime and try to reproduce Pseudo Journey v1 on SD 2.0 instead of SD 2.1
and then we'll know
2.1 is a fine-tuned resumed checkpoint from 2.0
pseudo jorney?
my current model i have published
a comparison against the next version which is training atm
i see, wont you wait for sdxl to start mass finetuning?
why would i? 2.1 is here now and i wanna have fun. i don't want to wait for SDXL to come out and find out i have to wait for tools to be developed for its fine-tuning and then see that they're not ready for use yet etc
if anything i'll do the same fine-tune on 1.5, 2.0, 2.1, deep floyd, and SDXL
and just maintain my sort of aesthetic on any one of those models.
oh i don't need luck at this point i know what i'm doing and how it'll turn out at which parameters. that's after burning 300 models or so this month
keep it nice, @dense tapir. Uncalled for and needless behavior such as this doesn't exactly foster a great space. Timed out for a bit since this seems to be a running theme.
Have a nice day!
was 1.5 a continuation of the checkpoint from 1.4?
or like, a fine-tuning of it
friend prompted something about swine and i think it made Congress?
Can someone generate the mark of cain
Has anybody tested if ex-post generated SBS image in depth script, is properly working? Could be tested in VR in some image browser probably.
Or is it just gimmick not working? Anybody knows?
have you ever heard of steroscopic images? 😄 It's quite cool
cross your eyes slightly so the ferames overlap
your dog image DEFINITELY works
that has so much depth to it. good job
the ball?
that is from Amiga Workbench
ray tracing wasnt really a thing
man, this next version of my model feels like it's gearing up for something amazing
lol current result for leopard gecko
are them's fuckin whiskers? 
a group of men prompt is improving monumentally over what baseline can do, and also the v1 of my model, which is something i was hoping would happen with a much larger training corpus
v1
holy crap, step 3500 is something special. it has outputs that are radically different from any other
like this step seems more tilted toward realism
@oak osprey i know about stereoscopic images and movies. Just it is made different way. So curious if those made from single image are working properly as well. 🙂
yeah when i crossed my eyes it worked for me
that dog as well? In VR one dont need crossing anything. L picture for L eye R picture for R eye 🙂
Also there are two cross eye and no cross eye. It is order of Left and right images.
Thank you! It is in depth script if you like SBS images
ah, perfect :P
i wish my final model would make the child fly in the kite prompt like it does on step 6500
Ooh nice stereoscopic effect there
So it is working? I have to dust off my VR but it is quite hot for using it...
Wow that’s very cool. Haven’t tried your latest HUGGINGFACE model yet gonna do it soon.
Yep yep
7k steps now
The earthworms, once mere soil scribes, become neon streaks across a cybernetic sky, their squiggly trails leaving behind echoes of an alien melody.
I wanted one of those cool jackets with a fluffy mane around the neck area. What I got almost made me drop off my chair from laughter :P
Hey look, you made @glossy herald
If it's a good thing, then: Yay! 🥳
If not, then: I'm so, so sorry! 🫣
He loves cats lol
here a, I think anyway, normal one :P
expected something bit different. Yes i should use pilot instead of racing...
Guiz has been away for a while. P sure he got slapped on the wrist for having an alt account and perusing through the nsfw animeai server 
If thats true, thats BS
?
stop trolling lol
Ravana's penance in a food bowl.
ok, that is at least assuring that its not true lol
trexdel is kinda known at being the server's Resident Goofy
it is endearing in its right hahaha
Made me worried my favorite mod had gotten in trouble

7500 steps vs 0 steps

man this is the worst image i've made so far from my model
i don't think it got a single thing right, but i used 'in the style of arnold palmer's artwork' and i don't even think that's a real person let alone an artist it would know
Does anybody have any info on SD models with Olive support? I really wanna try this out
@oak osprey wanna try something fun? I have a task for you :p
Apparently there is a way to apply olive optimizations to existing SD models
i don't want it olive toned, wtaf lol
is that some new hot shit
everything being green?
i tried to spruce sad keanu up
No, Olive optimization lmao
Nvidia just added it to drivers today, and apparently it's supposed to show a monumental performance increase on models that have been optimized for it
(the paper says some cards and models saw a 6x performance increase) and it was around 70% on average
idk waht that is
god damn it. it needs a new library? fuck that
So let me get this right
You're turning down up to a 6x performance gain cause it needs a library? Wow lol
it's a Windows thing for DirectML
Oh right, you're not on Windows, nevermind
I'll see if I can somehow figure out how to run it
like, ONNX has been a thing for a while now
it hasn't taken off
idk why
but automatic1111 i see constantly still using pytorch 1.13 so, it's probably like that. new good thing, no one cares
It just got direct support in NVIDIA's game ready and studio drivers to be used for SD and other AI programs, so clearly it's getting some form of recognition
i don't think you're going to be able to get this in without radical changes for automatic1111's sd-webui
looking at their library code
A1111 uses torch 2 now, I just stick to 1.13 cause it runs better
pipeline = OnnxStableDiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained(
optimized_model_dir, provider="DmlExecutionProvider", sess_options=sess_options
)

it uses transformers to load, like i've wanted A1111 to do forever
definitely can't make this work in there
ohhhhh this saves the compiled models
that's i think what General Awareness was talking about with SHARK
Yeah, shark also does that
It's supposed to be way faster
@oak osprey it comes with its own python script for running SD, and you run it in there to reap the speed benefits
YESSSSS
FLYYY
well its nice to see windows getting a 6x speedup since it has been 20% slower for some time now
I make and consume a lot of parallel view images
its not the exact same as what you just send, as those are crossed view images
anyone know what happened to the controlnet preprocessor preview?
the preview area is above, but no preview button
the little explosion icon
@static tusk thanks bud!
I'm making a birthday "card" for a friend of mine. made the image, then made some text (not shown here since it has his name in it) in inkscape and curved it.. and am putting it on a "banner" held up on sticks I made in blender.. with some scribbled in "grease pencil" grass..
then controlnetting it back in SD again to make it all uniform and perdy
ugh paperspace is having issues again
sdxl lol
neckXL
it's clearly Slinky Donks XL
is XL out or is that from the official site?
cinematic portrait of a woman with ice-blue eyes in an Aztec outfit. Her gaze is intense, her features strong yet delicate. The outfit is richly detailed, the background subtly blurred. Lighting is soft, highlighting her features and outfit. The image is hyper-realistic, with a cool and warm color palette
is there some easy way to get SD 2.1 on automatic 1111?
it is matter of model only, isnt? Download model trained on 2.1 on civitai for example @tired peak
if you want photo-realism don't use realistic word, that doesn't really work, your example is a good example for that.
It looks like game graphics or art
photo, raw photo, 35mm (or whatever mm), is better option
interesting take - will have to investigate this...
well, at least I got better results this way on my models when I was testing it 
"realism" - realistic looking graphics
"photo" - actual photos
i dont know where to find the yaml 😦
have you downloaded it from civitai? It should be in text under button where you downloaded model.
gives me this error. : RuntimeError: Expected all tensors to be on the same device, but found at least two devices, cpu and cuda:0! (when checking argument for argument index in method wrapper__index_select)
i put the yaml file in there too. both versions
oops. nm this is the actual error and it goes on for 7x the length of this: RuntimeError: Error(s) in loading state_dict for LatentDiffusion: size mismatch for model.diffusion_model.input_blocks.1.1.proj_in.weight: copying a param with shape torch.Size([320, 320]) from checkpoint, the shape in current model is torch.Size([320, 320, 1, 1]). size mismatch for model.diffusion_model.input_blocks.1.1.transformer_blocks.0.attn2.to_k.weight: copying a param with shape torch.Size([320, 1024]) from checkpoint, the shape in current model is torch.Size([320, 768]). size mismatch for model.diffusion_model.input_blocks.1.1.transformer_blocks.0.attn2.to_v.weight: copying a param with shape torch.Size([320, 1024]) from checkpoint, the shape in current model is torch.Size([320, 768]). size mismatch for model.
i applied settings to 2.1 and that is what i get
the file name of the checkpoint model and the yaml should be the same. I am guessing they arent
cinematic portrait of a woman with ice-blue eyes in an Aztec outfit. Her gaze is intense, her features strong yet delicate. The outfit is richly detailed, the background subtly blurred. the lighting is soft, highlighting her features and outfit. The image is highly detailed, with a cool and warm color palette. (raw photo, 35mm)
cinematic kinda goes against photorealism too 😄
but in this case seems like it's just not really realistic model, but still not bad.
What model is it?
going to run another process by removing cinematic
how do you control camera angles and body expressions? with the last two images they kind of look non dramatic looking straight into the cam
Model: DreamShaper v6
portrait of a woman with ice-blue eyes in an Aztec outfit. Her gaze is intense, her features strong yet delicate. The outfit is richly detailed, the background subtly blurred. the lighting is soft, highlighting her features and outfit. The image is highly detailed, with a cool and warm color palette. (raw photo, 35mm)
oh yea, dreamshaper is more of an art model, but still not bad
idk , the only angle I did on purpose was high angle or high angle PoV
Both works
I can't get a prompt to do what I want. :/ "A blue whale leaping out of the ocean with a cowboy riding it. Saddle. Beautiful Island in background."
posted in #prompting-help. Wrong place.
Dark souls
or wide angle?
wide angle doesn't work, just tested it
trying with high angle now
What is wide angle?
supposedly panoramic with wide view
oh like high FoV thing
idk, never tried it with sd
yeah its called wide angle in terms of photogrpahy
but didn't work with sd, so lets see what i get with high angle
Camera angle term recognition can be dependent on the model you’re using from what I understand
very likley, i didnt see any camera specificaiton in the models page tho
ohh thats great, im trying it, almost done rendering
so i got this ...
high angle photography of a woman with ice-blue eyes in an Aztec outfit. ((captured in a dramatic moment, the wind blowing her hair)). Her gaze is intense, her features strong yet delicate. The outfit is richly detailed, the background subtly blurred. the lighting is soft, highlighting her features and outfit. The image is highly detailed, with a cool and warm color palette. (raw photo, 35mm)
With that amout of wods in the prompt you'll need higher weight, like (high angle:1.3)
But might be also just model doesn't know what that means
maybe model interprets that differently, let me try with Deliberate v2
yeah
First off, that image is superb. Secondly I too have had difficulty getting various angles but have had some luck using lens terms. Like a 35mm lens, 25mm lens, etc.
In conjunction with "wide angle"
good idea about lens, will have to try that out too. 🙂
try to do few quick gens with low resolution, 512x512 and cheap \ quick sampler, like DDIM to see what which words works and which doesn't
DDIM is great for quick tests, since it's fast
ok
20-25 steps will do too
20 for a test good enough
ok im querying bard about
what is a good camera and lens for wide angle photography
going to add those detail in too with a specific cam and lens
so choosing this cam and lens sounds like a good idea
Nikon Z 6II with Nikkor Z 14-24mm f/2.8 S lens: This full-frame mirrorless camera and lens combination is perfect for landscape, architecture, and interior photography. The wide-angle lens allows you to capture more of your scene, and the fast aperture lets you shoot in low light.
but the image came out face focused
do i need to add more description to the background?
yeah, lots of models are portrait face focused
here goes nothing ... 800x480
wide angle photography of a woman with ice-blue eyes in an Aztec outfit. ((captured in a dramatic moment, the wind blowing her hair)). Her gaze is intense, her features strong yet delicate. The outfit is richly detailed, (the background is a panoramic landscape). the lighting is soft, highlighting her features and outfit. The image is highly detailed, with a cool and warm color palette. ((shot in Nikon Z 6II with Nikkor Z 14-24mm f/2.8 S lens))
im not really specifying portrait, im using the word photography
but her front profile covers most of the image
i'd keep in mind, anyting below 17mm is generally considered fish eye because of the distortion.
ahh ok, will have to correc that
24mm to 35mm prime lenses are generally good wide angle lenses, but, that's photography, idk if the SD makes that distinction exactly
i changed it too 24mm as per cam model
the width and height in settings also seem to affect the render a lot w/o additional prompt
I've also heard people put "x runnning" (x being woman/whateva) just so they can get the longer shots but yeah that's been my experience as well
its hard to get consistant wide angles/fisheye & everyone looks the same & no one is dirty ever 😛
CUDA out of memory. Tried to allocate 136.00 MiB (GPU 0; 79.35 GiB total capacity; 72.67 GiB already allocated; 90.12 MiB free;
😭
78685MiB / 81920MiB ah there we go
riding the razors' edge
WTH what is that gpu?? 79.35 gb vram?
why are you complaining?
Welcome back Peter
i think whenever i target facial features, like gaze, eyes, or mood, that will work counter to a wide angle shots
Thanks
A100?
yup, SXM4 version
Where do you even get that?
best buy
that's insane
and my complaint was that i can't train at batch size 24 with this without gradient accumulations
what i came up with when removing all facial features in the prompt
((wide angle photo of a woman standing before a mountain)) wearing Aztec outfit (full body shot). her features strong yet delicate. The outfit is richly detailed (the background is subtly blurred). the lighting is soft, highlighting her features and outfit. (highly detailed image) with a cool and warm color palette. ((shot in Nikon Z 6II with Nikkor Z 24mm f/2.8 S lens))
how much does that even cost? aren't those used to make SDXL?
Goku with sword
a little bit of calming Zen
what my pseudo-journey model does
ah ok, im using dreamshaper btw
bot is back
a gentleman doesn't ask and a lady doesn't tell
i changed the prompt a bit so she faces the viewer
it's more expensive than my A6000 and 4090 combined though.
How many it/s does that even do
i don't know, i've never bothered to measure, that's not why i got them
are you talking about during training?
then why did you buy it? to make finetunes?
yeah
that's not how training speed works
it's not directly comparable at all, if you're seeing iterations per second, you're probably creating a LoRA
this is seconds per iteration
Dude, that's awesome, this community needs people like you
thanks, that's why i am here 👍🏽
it is 9.62 seconds per iteration at full 32bit precision training, and a learning rate of 1e-8, and batch size 18 with 4 gradient accumulations, and zero gradient checkpointing. TF32 is enabled, and so on
the goal is to drive the VRAM use as high as you possibly can without blowing out an O-ring
this current run is as close as i've been able to get to 80GB without slowing it down beyond 10 seconds per it
are you finetuning 2.1?
not much point in fine-tuning 1.5, is there 😛
dead platform is dead
long live OpenCLIP
also, what dataset are you training on?
22,000 pics of my grandma
let me guess, the name will be- grandma diffusion
wait, why do you have 22000 grandma images
well now i kinda want to do that for real but i'm kidding, it's midjourney 5.1 data i've processed to remove a lot of the garbage out of about half a million total images i had
ah, i see what you're making
they're all captioned with their initial prompt which is interesting because MJ uses CLIP and SD2.1 uses OpenCLIP so i'm essentially teaching 2.1 how to prompt like MJ
dude, that model would probably be one of the best
i did 4,000 steps training OpenCLIP and the unet concurrently at a low training rate and then froze the TE and trained just the unet for another 10,000 steps, and then unfroze the TE, and now doing another maybe 3 epochs of training the TE
hence the huge vram use and huge batch size, trying to slow down the learning rate even more while providing the optimizer with more context in one shot. at least that's my theory
i need to ask GPT4 how to freeze specific layers
it's so good i've stopped using Artius v2.1 and i don't remember the last image i generated on a 1.5 model
81W / 400W | 78977MiB / 81920MiB | 100%
weird that the SXM4 A100-80G uses just 81 watts when it's pegged at 100% during certain parts of training
when will you release it?
It's almost all VRAM load, and very little die load for such a powerful GPU
the v1 is already out but it's not really useable for A1111 users because that tool sucks
what other tool is there?
i don't know, i wrote my own into a discord bot
It's really unfortunate cause his 2.1 fine-tune is super solid, but not usable by most people
wait, so it is impossible to run that model in sd?
In A1111 or any other common UI, yeah
Maybe I'll give that a shot for a bit and then delete it when done
i've never used it so it might just be a huge waste of time 
Maybe
Invoke AI is childproof SD from what I have seen in the past
Not something I would continue to use, as it's not nearly as supported for feature rich
As much as I dislike A1111 and the dev, it still is probably the best option for GUI in terms of support and features. I wish I could have given that to Vlad, but he's considerably worse IMO
what did automatic1111 do?
he steals code and violates licenses left and right, calling it "borrowing"
oh, is he the person responsible for the NAI leak?
there are some people who would say that that sentiment applies to the whole accquisition of images used for training the datasets initially ;o)
i would agree with that, Winston
using images wouldn't really be stealing in my eyes as stealing implies it's gone from the owner and now in the hands of someone else. But yeah, there's some issues with them still. :/
my code may be garbage but it's all mine 
except for the bits you googled or chatgpt helped out with ;o)
meanwhile, lets see if I can get some more like this
these prompts are pretty specific to cam angles and im seeing them in effect
low angle shot, high angle shot, dutch angle shot, tilted shot, bird's eye view, worm's eye view
something like
dutch angle shot of a beautiful young woman
looks to be working good on all
Some models have even more camera control
I've seen some models with camera angle, focal length, and aperture control. Cool and useful stuff
I even have one model that has 104 camera models across 12 brands, and specific photographer styles
from my experience those things don't work, or rather, they work just as well as other prompts I've seen people use. Though, my experience is also months old from all sort of updates :P
sounds cool, im trying to stay with one model for learning purpose, but eventually will try out other models
chose to download dreamshaper since its talked about a lot in the community
I'd recommend spreading your learning across a few popular ones, as they are rarely well made all around, and you may learn bad habits to combat specific issues in them
Dreamshaper is one I have never touched, on the account of their messy licensing
i downloaded a few specific ones based on their ratings and popularity
tryng not to get too distracted with too many options since i started playing with this tech a less than a week lol
The biggest one I would stay away from is chill out mix. Horribly unethical
ahh these are what i currently have ...
deliberate
realistic Vision
protogen
dream shaper
majic mix realistic
those pretty much cover my current level of interest
i just used the documentation for each of the libraries. literally in VSCode you can eg. ctrl+click into the asyncio library and read how it works. i've done development for 2 decades now
i get that you're just trying to be edgy, but it's kind of tedious
just because "other people steal too" doesn't give A1111 a free pass
that mindset is reminiscent of someone who contributes nothing to society. because you create nothing, you own nothing, and you expect others to own nothing that they create. but your wishes don't override the rights of others.
#confusedoldmanhere: who was that directed at ?
you, the one who writes whataboutism edgelord comments with that ";o)" emoji at the end, which indicates that you know you're being an edgelord
sigh how things have chnaged since 1995. Indulge in a little light hearted teasing and it all gets taken so seriously ;o)
it was a tongue in cheek comment
I read the emote as a way to identify the text as a joke :)
idk how you expect people to respond to lighthearted jabs at their intellect
TY, there was a world before animated gifs and snowflakes :p
nice dogwhistle, bro
I always read something a person say on the internet as a joke. It's easier that way ;P
I actually thought the :P was aperson's eye below a baseball cap before someone told me it was a tongue and eyes. :P
Danger danger Will Robinson, sense of humour (spelt correctly) failure ahead 🙂
drat that one translated into a animated one
it's something called consent and good faith, and you're just a bully
who cares about neither
you know i am unamused by your antics, and you continue them. that's what a bully does
geeez will you just just take a deep breath and chill a little
yeah, I'd also agree not to really continue if someone isn't feeling comfortable. I just want everyone to have fun. It's more fun that way.
oh it's probably more fun for him when i'm not into it
It's interesting how much the internet has evolved over the years (and this is a general observation). IRC and Usenet was a Wild West and you needed thick skin. Also Real Life has chnaged , back in the day if a young kid was in a shop crying you would have no hesitiation in going up to help them, these days you (especially as a man of a certain age) you wouldn't dare help for fear of being reported.
Worlds gone mad I tell you
this is a learnable moment for you and you're missing the mark
who's Mark?
And I just want everyone to smile and have fun. Don't need to be longer than that :D
so when someone's not liking your jokes, maybe they're not in the mood, maybe their dad's just been diagnosed with cancer and they don't want to put up with you the answer isn't to call them a snowflake and refer to a tampon being shoved inside them, you know, giving them a graphic visual of being violated by you. it's maybe to just be quiet or move along, be supportive and kind. is that hard?
@limber remnant can you weigh in on that
the two before couldnt be posted as has exposed bits
Ive been in a car accident and suffered 30% burns, my first wife died in my arms, my current GF is recovering from Breast cancer
oh, @tropic shell is around now too.
I'm sure there will be plenty of people around 🙂
oh god we're all that much more unsafe 
Permit for what ?
congrats
Yeah, those models are fine, if a little outdated by now. I just don't like chill out mix cause it's made for literally making loli/CP kind of stuff, and it's disgusting
Driving, which I am not too excited for lol
Deliberate really messed up the text encoder 
Deliberately messed up
driving is fun 🙂
I have 0 interest in driving, and I know it's just gonna be leveraged for other people to get things out of me lmao
what about me?
Whut
Also, did you guys see that new SD to vector addon that does what adobe and firefly were flexing about? Lol
I wanna mess with it
Is it good for all models or smth?
Should be
i was told to shove a tampon inside by @frozen socket because i asked them to stop bullying
I am not sure if it can do color, but still
oh its nothing, I've just been accused (falsey) of being a bully
I'm around....a round shape. Now, let's all go for a nice round of being nice to each other.
This addon could be used for 3D printing though, which is cool
aren't those normal ai images? Or did I miss something? :O
They are PNG's turned into SVG's, or vector images
vectorised
ahhh, if they are turned into SVG's then it's a whole othe...kettle...of....fish?
kind of yes kind of no
What lmao
I thought they were normal PNG :P
doing SVG conversion efficiently is hard
svg is scalable vector grahics, it is not a bitmap
it is a bunch of definitions of shapes (which are just lines) and lines
Leaving this ridiculous Bollywood thing here to lighten up the mood
yeah, vector stuff is awesome! :D
Bruh lmao
is that Amitabh?
I could utilize controlnet to make a new iteration of my logo, and then vectorize it, potentially
I like a little bit of Zen
Nah I was just fooling around with some South Indian names there
helps me chill out
एलजीटीएम 🙂
I thought vector art was just normal ai images made to "look like icons/vector thingies" :P
It's a style of art, but this makes them actual vectors
yeah, and if they do it in a good way, then it's going to be a game changer I believe :D
My little goober
it can result in an art style but i don't think it is one on its own
Funky little man lol
maybe it's a johnre
It's common for artists to go for a "vector compatible" art style, which is what I am going off of doeectly
*directly
i know those are english words. i even know some of them. but i'm not used to them in that order
I can only make normal cat ai art instead of taking a photo of a real cat >:I
Lol
I rmeber when Asteroids and Tanks and Tail Gunner first came out and used Vector Graphics on specia;ist monitors
Yeah, I think vector graphics and displays are awesome
a man of infinite taste 🙂
I really wanna get into electronics at some point so I can do a double LCD OLED like mini clock on my PC
could always buy a cheap wristwatch and blu tack it to the case ;o)
I do have a Samsung OLED smartwatch, and I have it with an always on clock, but I am worried I will burn the OLED, so I think double layer LCD is the go, and then use some form of directly powered USB light behind it
or just look at the RH corner of your monitor . TBF although I wear a watch thats what Im more likely to do(or use my phone)
I custom designed and 3D printed my own stand for it
sweet
My monitors are always in Fullscreen, and I am a notorious loser of time lol
and I just duct tape'd my headphones back together :P
I just don't want my little OLED display to burn in too much, so I use it at low brightness
It was Vista wasnt it had the always on top clock you could add as awidget
I also used my 3D printer to fix my studio headphones haha
that doesn't change the brightness for real, it just uses pulse width modulation to decrease the frequency of the power
i know this because OLED monitors suck the same power down at full or dim, which makes them not an option for my solar use
I would probably do the same, if I 1. knew how to 3d print, and 2. had a 3d printer in the first place :P
i should say traditional LG patented OLED stuff. i don't know about mOLED or any of the new stuff
Signing off now. Have fun.
mLED was disappointing, seems like LCDs are the pinnacle of power efficiency
I remember when neps dumb ass was saying that mini LED was inferior to OLED lmao
it depends on your use case
LED watchs with Red Digits that you have to press a button to see the time were pretty power efficient ;o)
there's things to say about scale eg. a micro display on some arduino gadget, a wristwatch, a cellphone, a laptop, a TV, a digital signage display that sits in a window of a shop, a roadside bulletin board, etc
i love my OLED Switch and the Steam Deck, but i wouldn't do OLED for my laptop because it just increases power use 24hrs and i didn't see much benefit when i tried an OLED laptop
three cam angles that work fairly well in the prompt below
tilted, high-angle, bird's eye view of a lion cub in a jungle
@wispy nest a good one to try is uhd
and isn't it technically above the jungle? 🤔 🙃
UHD to replace those 3 angles?
It would appear that in Docker (iow non ROCm until 5.6.0) the 7900XTX performs like a 3080 in SD in Automatic1111 at 15-16it/s.
non optimized of course
trying it out 🙂
praying to RNGesus for you
@smoky oak Isn't yours a 3080ti?
3080 non ti
aka 3080
When I was OCd I got 18.3it/s
non oc?
15
okay
Closer to 16
every time i hear people worrying about it/sec i'm like that train guy in Back to the Future part 3. "Good lord! 90 miles per hour? Why in tarnation'd ya ever need to get anywhere so fast?"
it/sec can only be compared on the exact same models/pipeline etc
@oak osprey think i will use that technique with realistic images .. uhd would be good for image quality, what im doing now is experimenting with angles for better control on the subject and view
@wispy nest try looming overhead
towering over
generally worked for me to obtain a more downward look at a lower camera
are those terms used for photography or expressions?
it's more like a literary thing, i'd guess
you'd see it in a passage, eg. "they sat, watching; the eagle, looming overhead, aware of their every move."
yes
wedonkuwus
or you'll get a literal loom but then you can always try again :P
those are for more advanced prompt descriptions, im learning the technical application for photography that i can use in SD
when "award winning photo" comes up with a kid holding a trophy i die inside
Just know that it's not something that can be transferred reliably between models
It all depends on the training data
unless you manually swap out the text encoder 
of course
oh, sytan. i noticed. you can put a vae next to a model and name it like, model.vae.safetensors?
Yeah, you name it the same as the gen model and set it to auto encode, only issue is, 2.1 does support external VAE's outside the baked in one
maybe that's specific to a1111 again but i can definitely swap them out
At least not how it implemented in comfy/auto/vlad
yeah
but the text encoder can be
too?
because if so i think i can help you get my model running
No idea
man it's just wild to me that it does everything wth a single file by default, and loads that all into memory when it's not necessary to as a result
it's crazy inefficient and you just see people arguing against diffusers layout due to political reasons, their personal beef they have with the huggingface crew are the reason it's not implemented
Damn, I saw this dude with all sorts of Satanic iconography on him, and I wanted to chat, but he was on the phone and he had to leave before I could say anything ._.
Depression lol
that's when you walk up and mouth the words, "do you need me to get you out of that call?"
I have no idea anything about that. I just use what I easily have access to, and have had no issues with any other models
Lmao
or you could say that, "satan told me to tell you that you look very cool!"
if he says yes, you just start screaming help and stuff and he can be like "oh god i have to go!"
He was talking about work he has to do on his car lol
he sounds terrible, you're better off without him
WTF lol
i never know what to say in these situations, i'm just winging it, i'm sorry
I just wanted to compliment his pentagram tattoos
you should have then
if you did, then maybe he'd be happy :D
you're probably going to regret that for YEARS
Eh, it's not the first time I haven't been able to chat with somebody in our small community lol
Dude had the whole look
It was pretty cool lmao
i have the opposite experience that made me to stop communicating with new people. i live in a tiny surf town of 1300 people and it swells to 20,000+ in the summertime and no one i meet ever sticks around, and no one goes outside in winter, so i never meet any locals
i know these are the official numbers because they talk about it all the damn time. it's hard to miss when 20,000 new folks arrive in the same month
all summer i'm like, "just make it stop
" and then in winter i'm like "i miss all the sounds and colours and people
"
It's rare I get to see people who are so openly satanic in public, so I always try to go out of my way to compliment them and be the one good against a lot of backlash. Somebody did that me a long time and it stuck with me
you should join the Church
I am an ambivert. So I do really good with nobody or everybody. I go weeks with no contact outside discord lol
i mean the satan one, that help kids and teach them to be self reliant
Only reason I tend to stay away from people is cause people tend to want things or distract from what you are doing when trying to be productive
I am a member, even if I can't attend
well that's where hobby clubs come in
you can invite like-minded folks to a, say, mock sacrifice event
We don't have any churches of Satan anywhere close that I could go to lol
Oh my God no lmao
Last thing we need is people still thinking we sacrifice people lmao
it's a teambuilding exercise ಠ_ಠ
I already get that BS enough just cause I have pentagram earrings lmao
You are terrible lmao
I wish I was more comfortable wearing my stuff out in public
I am just not down for negative interactions like that
satan isn't that good anyway...when asking the art ai about it anyway :P
Ask for Satan in MatureMaleMix and you get hot demon daddies lmao
Now that is my antichrist lol
i thought Hot Topic fixed that

Hot topic has very little satanis stuff unfortunately
All of their pentagrams are pegan
i was in texas and Satanic wear was chic as hell where i lived.

My people lmao
i didn't realise it was so fuckin specific jezues christe
It's very specific
Pegan pentagram is point up, satanic is point down
They have very different meanings
i didn't live in a city per se, it's actually quite hard to nail down in traditional terms, what the area i lived in is like. it was over-developed, and sprawling out. but a lot of it was suburbs and highways and shopping centres. it was a weird place. it is humongous by Canadian standards
like Houston is absolutely a city, and if you were to take a random Canadian where I grew up in TX, they'd say, "this is a city", but it's not one
We are a several city conglomerate, in a sense that we don't have any separations
Total pop is probably close to 400k I'd say
No, we are in cali
oh
i don't fuckin keep track of all your self-doxing 
I can't believe how annoying some people can be lmao
This dude next to me
Has headphones, he just hit a puff on his vape and is now smoking a cigarettes, and he turned his headphones off to start blasting music on his JBL
Like dude
Can you be any more intrusive
And of all music, he's playing Drake
I guess it comes with the stereotype lol
Oh, lordie
Well shit, he just got up and helped a woman in a wheel chair get through the door, so maybe he's not as bad as I thought lmao
I didn't see her or I would have helped, but he beat me to is so I mean
Never judge a book by its cover.
I didn't think he's a POS or anything, just annoying lol
You can be a good person and annoying
The amount of times people have said that when they found out that I am either gay, or a satanist, or both is insane lmao
It's just that "oh... Well then"
I just look like a generic straight passing white guy, so I get why people think I would be lol
But the second I mention having the devel AND a man in my bed, suddenly there is a problem lmao
why is the developer getting involved
Who huh what
the devel and a man
Shit lol
I messed up lol
i was so cornfused, man
Brain was going too fast l
cornhole comes up with interesting results in my model
I have to wait for my mom to pick me up lol
HOW ABOUT NO
Hehehehe
btw, on the 3080 non O/C what is the training it/s like?
I did it at various BS
512x512 though, right?
i'm training at BS=18 and gradient=4 and it's 8s/it
BS1 no grad has the same speed at 768x768 on the T4
You're doing dream booth tho
1.6it/s

Oh- lmao
haven't you tried the M5000 GPU on the free tier Paperspace?
a tip: don't ever write fish donut too close together! 😱
I still really want somebody to make a model or LoRA that can do super cool cyborgs and other synthetic life forms
I would, if I knew where to get a dataset
Dude is listening to a house/trance remix of Gangnam style
What is happening lmfao
I wanna train a LoRA on the NFL sports robot, cause he is too attractive for literally no reason lmao
sadly, my android images are made so long ago that they aren't that good anymore. This was in the middle of december
i am convinced the designers of this mascot knew what they were doing, cause they made him needlessly hot lmao
@smoky oak
What's that?
will be almost double with rocm when they are done they said
Awesome, looking forward to it
5.6.0 when they finish the damn thing
I suspect 25it/s
7950xtx (if they do it) around 30
I am still hoping for broader adoption of tools like Olive and SHARK for better performance
I hate shark no matter what
You hate everything lol
I don't need TBs of models it compiles
no, I hate its implementation as they have said they don't care about size only speed for now.
if I change one dimension it has to recompile and save it
I mean, make it work, make it fast, make it efficient. Is that not the dev pipeline for most ML?
apparently not :/
That's the pipeline they are following it seems
no, per the devs it is not space efficient
yes
Work. Fast. Efficient.
it is alright if all you do is at one dimensional set using the same model, and loras
change any of that and it has to recompile until you finally run out of drive space
I don't think that can ever be done differently
It's blowing right into me bruh
I don't like the smell of vape smoke and it chokes me up
No, he's actually smoking
hit with this big ass cloud
His vape doesn't have a smell at least, but his cigarettes do
oh, nasty. not as dense but ugh
I'll take vape over cigarettes smoke any day. Cigarette smoke makes you stink
Oh, he's leaving!
Whew
He's gone
My data connection is so slow here lmao. It's taking like 2 minutes per gen to load the images
Oh God, the crossed eyes tag in this model does some cursed stuff lmao
One eye looking up, the other looking down lol
1.2 seconds to gen an image, 15 seconds to see it 
I have found a new bottleneck haha
Luckily I shouldn't have to be here for too much longer
I wish you would gen an image 768x768 and do DDIM step 30 and Euler_a. That would be a good set of numbers.
@dense tapir he's back again, smoking, and having a phone conversation on speakerphone 
he is VERY annoying and self centered
dope
Ok, I am finally free from sitting on that cement bench lmao
My ass will never recover
I think I've seen model with that purpose somewhere on civi some time ago
Lnaooo
👁️ 👄 👁️
MIDDŌJORAEEY
only CD$VVRENY a month
lol why does this happen when i prompt 8675309++
they be confusie
it's not a seed thing
jenny 8675309 no wonder he wrote that song about her
when i try to make hindustani joggers it always looks like the hunger games
well, when you will release the final version, will it support A1111?, i tried it on invokeAI and it did not work.
also sorry for delay
i have to use a new version of diffusers for it to work on my 4090
idk if that helps or not.
i can't do much with "did not work", i need an error message of some kind
i doubt my models will ever work with A1111, i can not get it running locally and no one there cares to fix the issue because none of them have the issue on their hardware
\invokeai\models\hub\models--ptx0--pseudo-journey\snapshots\a1f9f4835c378c1549220110c90f08ac201b213c\vae because the following keys are missing:
decoder.mid_block.attentions.0.query.bias, decoder.mid_block.attentions.0.key.bias, decoder.mid_block.attentions.0.value.bias, decoder.mid_block.attentions.0.value.weight, encoder.mid_block.attentions.0.key.bias, decoder.mid_block.attentions.0.query.weight, encoder.mid_block.attentions.0.proj_attn.weight, encoder.mid_block.attentions.0.proj_attn.bias, decoder.mid_block.attentions.0.proj_attn.weight, encoder.mid_block.attentions.0.query.weight, encoder.mid_block.attentions.0.value.weight, encoder.mid_block.attentions.0.key.weight, encoder.mid_block.attentions.0.value.bias, encoder.mid_block.attentions.0.query.bias, decoder.mid_block.attentions.0.key.weight, decoder.mid_block.attentions.0.proj_attn.bias.
Please make sure to pass low_cpu_mem_usage=False and device_map=None if you want to randomly initialize those weights or else make sure your checkpoint file is correct.
this is gibberish for me
i bet that model can be extremely good, but i couldn't get it to work unfortunately.
that's because you're on a broken version of Diffusers 😦
pip install git+https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers
this will fix that
its looking for the VAE. see the first couple lines
trust me, this is a Diffusers problem
i just fixed that on my 4090 box because i hadn't started it up in a while
so you got A1111 to work on your machine?
no lol
this worked =], i will now give it a try
I might
it lacks a bunch of features from A1111 but you won't use those anyway, i think, eg. dreambooth
ok, it did all sampling steps, but when finalizing the image, it says: TypeError: XFormersAttnProcessor.call() got an unexpected keyword argument 'temb'
weird, i uninstalled xformers recently because i'm on pytorch 2 now
wait, you can switch to pytorch 2? am i dumb
you on 1.13?
pytorch2 for some GPUs uses less memory and is a lot faster but for older GPUs might not be
i have a 4070ti, so i guess it should be better for me
also i have obsoletely no idea what pytorch version im on
nah, temp is good, it's an AUROS ELITE. decent cooling
fixed it, generations seem great, also cfg scale need change since it seems to behave differently than usual models.

it's pretty good at that kind of stuff
less good at photoreal people
good at paintings though
i typically add UHD+ 8K+ Sharp+ to the end of all my prompts with it
im not sure which i like better, but this is a good model over all
if you add the word midjourney to the prompt it should radically alter the output too
when an image in the dataset had an incoherent prompt i just replaced it with that keyword
so it's like a wildcard what the hell it'll do
thanks man, good to hear that. it's been (don't say a journey, don't say a journey, don't say---) a journey
the Karras sigmas from k-diffusion are amazing and make it much better too, if InvokeAI has that
already using it
this is with midjorney in the prompt
i did not expect that
i kinda like it more than the other one
it looks like one of those sand art things
also, InvokeAI seems to have different architecture that A1111, or is it just me?
i think it does upscaling to make generation time quicker
it's using diffusers, which is more efficient in general
can just run torch.compile(model)
i don't think A1111 has quite got that figured out yet
yeah, if invokeAI had as much features as A1111 it would defiantly be way better
those can be added, lol just have GPT4 help you write the PR
if it was that simple it would have been done ages ago
by ages i mean a few months ago
idk i only heard of it a few days ago
about gpt 4?
oh damn, it exist as long as A1111
i don't tend to go looking for these things, i just write my own code to do this stuff instead
Also it hasn't changed at all since released
i have a small standalone python program that does stable diffusion gen as a discord bot
@smoky oak
it's just so difficult to extend its codebase and only runs on a single system, i rewrote it to have a client and server, and connect multiple pytorch clients to the central server. that version is more complicated, and uses a SQL db to store some configs. the original discord bot code doesn't use DB or much else in the way of external reqs
this is not true, AMD doesn't support ROCm anymore. it was discontinued about a month ago
I had an AMD GPU, never again
and it still works on my Vega 56
the latest pytorch-rocm stuff they dropped, made the Vega work with SD perfectly
This is because you didn't update ROCm
i'm on gentoo, i always update everything to latest
i built it from Git
i get like 2.83 it/sec on the vega 56 
oh i never tried pytorch2. i upgraded that system to a 4090 and now the vega just sits there on the shelf
Well, then i guess my old GPU was f**ked. ever since i tried to update ROCm it wasn't able to run pytorch, even after formatting my machine a few times
what is the constant bleeping sound i hear in stable channel, and only when i switch to nothing in notification it stops, but i can't figure out which is triggering the bleeping alert noise?
6k AMD cards are loving ROCm 5.5.0 and when 5.6.0 comes out the 7k cards get support. The only issue is how damn long it takes AMD to update ROCm.
dude it wasn't quite easy to get ROCm working so i was stoked for the 4090 because i was like, yay its gonna be so ez and then i had the wrong CUDA version and 12 is incompatible and i had to figure out how to get cuda 11.8 and so on, it's a mess on both sides
ROCm is a hot mess, the main downside is it's under developed, and very incompatible, and also inefficient. the list goes on
Well, are your eyes that of a Windows user or a Linux user?
both, i have been dual booting since 2016
Nice. I just know this much the AMD people I speak to love ROCm, have no issues, 5m to set up and running SD with.
The very positive thing is that they aren't licking Jensen's you know what.
i don't know than, for me ROCm was a hot mess. nothing compared to CUDA
v2 pseudo-journey vs v1 at the moment
I don't know on windows but on Linux it is so easy to setup.
it worked only on very specific versions of linux and its kernals.
ROCm demands Linux I think
ONLY linux, and ONLY with specific versions of linux
Oh, and Pytorch2 directly works with AMD now
huh, but still, they defiantly lost the software stack battle.
Nvidia is destroying them
this one improved a lot
I look at it like this that the world's most powerful supercomputer uses AMD for ML. I am not giving in to Jensen's extortion. Sure, I might not be as fast but I pay half the price and keep Nvidia away. My pocketbook says thank you master.
i like this one more too
as usual these are test images produced through the default SD scheduler, VAE, and pipeline, at 50 steps, and 7.5 cfg
so it's kind of amazing (to me) how clear the v2 model's output is. it gets much better when it is loaded with a newer scheduler
there are no instructions for me. i had to search far and wide to find any yaml file in the first place. i dont know where to fidn this stuff
OK. What 2.1 model do you have?
let me check
v2-1_768ema
the yaml i dled is called v2-1_interference so i guess that is the wrong one
v2-1_768ema-pruned.ckpt
is the 2.1 model that i put in the models folder
I wouldnt really recommend the base 2.1 model as its clunky and not that great quality. You should use a finetuned 2.1
download this model and grab the config file, the link is under the download button https://civitai.com/models/17277/realism-engine
basically the way it works it the yaml file need to be name the same as the model
In the case of your current v2-1_768ema-pruned.ckpt, the yaml should be
v2-1_768ema-pruned.yaml
it got super ambitious on this bicycle
The above civitai linked model will give you much better results
ty ill save the link
so i just rename the yaml file? is that what you mean
yes. once you download the files you will have both like this
but with civitai, they already have the correct names, if I remember
is the realism engine a 2.1 model?
check the details table next to the images
are there any artsy fine tuned 2.1 models that you would recommend? most of my images are usually oil painting style
this is from my WIP 2.1 model update. but it's likely going to be difficult to make it run there in Automatic. no one has had success yet
you can achieve oil paint styles with TI embeddings or Loras without a specific model that does that
what is a TI embedding? sorry, im still learning
what i've been doing recently with Sd 1.5 and dreamlike photoreal 2.0
Its smaller files that are trained on a particular style or subject without having to release a model. They can be added to your prompt as keywords to get a particular style or subject you want.
I had no idea Automatic is such a flaming racist, my god @dense tapir
I love how it says "Fellon"
Remove one L and its predicting the future lol
i knew you'd like that
what did he do now? I know there was a big blowup around Dec/Jan
Nothing new, just saw his extremely racist mods on github
Yeah. btw, I called it last night when I saw the income quarterly report. We are now back, on purpose, to the same shit during the crypto mining days. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9e8XBqvM_C0
Only now it is due to AI not Mining but same shit different asshole syndrome.
yeah, now THAT is bullshit lmaop
Nvidia literally stopped making the cards
there are dozens of GPU's for sale around me in like a 10 mile radius
but they are going to run with it apparently
no, cause they stopped making them last month
My hatred of Jensen grows.
If this were all true, alright I can accept it as I did in the mining days but this is all BS
It seems like it could be a lie to make investors happy, honestly
I doubt there will be shortages as the server chips get the best silicon, where gaming cards get the lesser silicon, which will always be available with how wafers are made etc. Plus there is a glut of cards with not many people buying gaming cards
pure, thing is this is all artificial to keep the profits rolling in not a natural occurring phenom.
Are we sure Jensen doesn't work for the CIA cause he is a master at the Psyop game? LOL
All manufacturers have admitted to reducing production artificially, because of the financial situation the world is in. Its not really just Nvidia
Thing is it has been shown that the cards are way over priced and reduced by 20-30% the profits would still be huge. AMD is guilty of this too
They simply refuse to let go of the crypto mining days
same with motherboards, which are 2x overpriced
AMD5 shit is so overpriced I died looking at them last month. 200 is the new 85 dollar tier it seems
My 200 tier is OMG, 500 now. I see motherboard 750-1k
now
and they dont even come with digital error code displays, unless you buy top tier

