#🏞|general-with-images
1 messages · Page 40 of 1
this is the technique I would recommend for such things now
https://comfyanonymous.github.io/ComfyUI_examples/noisy_latent_composition/ this one can work too, even if a little more complicated
I'm still gonna be waiting for ComfyUI to continue to improve before I switch over to developing workflows for it. Lord knows I have my work cut out for me with my guide in a1111
yeah, I can't go back anymore... I still do some fun things in AUTO, but it's become my side software now
since I plugged the LLM inside comfy too, hard to think of AUTO as competent anymore (the software, not the person)
For me, there are just too many creature comforts in auto, like its still consistently lower VRAM usage
not all of us have 24GB VRAM to just throw away 😅
I'm not the person who originally asked, but I am wondering if there is a good way to generate a consistent character using just SD. The usual way would be to use a LoRA like you say, but then I would have to use preexisting images. Probably someone else's character. Is there a way to get a consistent character using SD to then train a LoRA? Even if it means trashing 9/10 images in the initial work.
simple controlnet can do it if you prompt right
I have created a sketched out short with panels and dialogue, that part is done.
LoRa is needed, got it. I'll assume not to use any 3d characters, just AI generated ones. If I don't use a Lora, I'll try out the unique character name and generate batches to get close. (I can do some 2d art too, so cel-shaded will be easier I use that style, rather than a gradient style).
For backgrounds, how should I keep them consistent? I like how using SD and ControlNet gives a good stylized look, but the color consistency and composition is off. Ie even if the structure is the same, it will make doors and windows on walls in different generations. But with using img2img for backgrounds, it will not be as pure stylized, but should remain more consistent ie basically a filter on top. I was wondering if I could have my cake and eat it too ie get both.
for sure. you can totally prepare your dataset on your character yourself
It requires a good base model and/or lora, a nice prompt that is very detailed, such as most results look like the same character, quite some luck and seeds to run, and cherry picking the best pictures that feature the same character with the same details almost. Doing so with different backgrounds for your character, different poses, ... will land you a dataset good enough to then make your own TI, LoRA or model trained on it (TI seems enough here by the way, LoRA seems better and faster, and DB seems overkill but best possible quality)
I trained my own LoRA on the tigers from Zootopia in order to get my character looking right. I spent a ton of time on it
stupid clyde is blocking the image
Thanks. I am going to remember that. I think trying to make consistent characters is the next main challenge for myself with SD. Either that or learning controlnet to maintain a consistent background across multiple images.
There are better tools for doing things like consistent backgrounds, if you want to give it a try
like zoned prompting
Yes, there is a trick by using prompt blending. So basically you use Famous Name:Other Name to combine them with a weight for each one. Famous names will be consistent but they are too recognizable so when you combine them, it will still be consistent but look different.
Another way is using a random name generator with different last names according to ethnicity. It only works on some names, but you can make it like that.
Also you can make it with famous people but then change ethnicity and gender. This will look like a completely different person but still give you a consistent character. And, you can make an embedding of it too. So similar to a LoRa without actually making one.
brb sorry
really hoping SD3.0 will drop sometime soon so we can finally have decently accurate color prompting
just trying to get a ginger woman with green eyes instead of blue is practically impossible
Thanks. That is also something to try. I have not attempted using names, generally just physical description. It works pretty well, but there are small variations. Consistent face shape is the biggest problem I run into.
Ah yeah I use both ComfyUI and Auto
I basically never generate women, but man SD 1.5's limitations start to show when going for specific eye colors
What kind of tools? Zoned prompting is a feature in ComfyUI, or is it also in A1111? What else tends to be good? For reference, what I am trying to do is put different characters onto the same background image or change a character without changing the background.
I don't know enough about it to be confident enough to answer personally. I just know that in A1111 you can divide images into different prompts, including backgrounds with zoned characters on top. Never messed with it myself
There was a link I have for GitHub but it is 404 now 😦 but it shows the specific process that the guy used and also he had several free TIs for characters that he made using this method that anyone could use
If you can find it, ping me. I will be quite interested.
https://github.com/BelieveDiffusion/tutorials/tree/main/consistent_character_embedding#readme this was the link, maybe you can trace it down somewhere
I will see what I can find, thanks.
https://civitai.com/user/BelieveDiffusion it's gone from his GitHub but I found it on his civitai
Average Rating: 5.0 (29), Models Uploaded: 6, Followers: 171, Total Likes Received: 876, Total Downloads Received: 6.7k.
Ahh, thank you. Bookmarked.
Damn, I am not sure how I should continue on this ultimate upscale guide. Things seem like they suddenly changed half way through demoing
A1111 changed?
no, but my results seem to have changed a bit
like the things I had cemented down seem to have shifted
Hmm, consistency changed?
the process seems to have. I am not sure how to explain it
My process is several different steps and nuanced parameter changes. But I had found options that should never be changed and now they are... not behaving that way
Looks like I need to sit down and crunch some gens to redraw these conclusions. I really don't want to keep delaying this guide
So many people seem to want it, but I need to make sure I am not putting out bad stuff
@smoky oakWell, to upgrade to a new Nvidia card I have only two choices. FE only, or retire my old full size ATX case for one that can handle 14-16 inch long cards.
as somebody with an FE 3060ti, it has been the best GPU I have ever owned
sleek, compact, lower cost, great temps, very very quiet
The problem is I have to buy a FE only from Best Buy then they send it to my local brick and mortar and I have to go pick it up when it arrives.
I jumped on a deal on a craigslist desktop which had a good GPU, but still trying to sell the old one since that time. Not so easy to get rid of...
takes about 4 days it said
So are you really considering dropping $2k on an NVIDIA GPU?
Aye. My case can handle 12inch long cards, or 13inches if I work it but these cards are super long 14+ inches
No, but I am getting one, yes
Not cosidering 2k, hell no
I am extra confused now. Did you not say a 4090?
4080/4090 same length :/
I could justify a 4090 before a 4080
Always sold out. I mean always due to Nvidia severely limiting supply
This is how they are trying to get us to buy their lesser cards. Jensen mentioned limiting supply.
tbh, Nvidia are ultra dicks now and I am very unsure why.
Like we consumers killed his pet dog/cat or something.
Its because NVIDIA doesn't need us now
we are kinda just a side thing for them. They don't rely on us for their big money anymore
Yeah, agreed.
btw, all three card makers now have contracts with TSMC for their stuff.
Battlemage in 24 and the next in 26 so I am so hoping Intel can figure this out. I think they can.
SD is being a bit of a pain for me all of a sudden
and I am not sure why
it keeps super zooming in some of my gens
like yeah, this is definitely what I wanted :/
or this
and this is with close and close up weighted at 1.5 in neg
Yeah, having that happen lately too as if it is ignoring my neg
too much emphasis in the positive prompt for details will gen a closeup I found
No crap...
I just removed all the details, and they are good now
wow
Guess we never stop learning lol
much better
Premium Quality Face Swap for Videos and Images
Yep, just measured it again and 13inches is it. If I move my drives I might could fit the FE in there with not a single mm to spare.
Can't "Dremel" anything either
The size of those cards is obnoxious. I had to go water cooled because it was the only one that would fit other than FE. And FE is impossible to get.
Which reminds me that I need to flip the fans. They aren't blowing the right direction.
My case was made before WC was a thing so there is no where to put the radiator. I despise all these windowed cases too.
You know they are now so big and heavy they come with a stand to put under them so they don't sag and bust something.
Radiator was a pain. Super ugly placement, but whatever. They aren't necessarily that hard to place, luckily, but it barely fit in my case.
Though my case is weird. Chimney style. Good for airflow, certainly, but routing wires is awful.
eATX sized and costs a leg back then with no window as I chose the non window version. Never thought cards would get so damn long
@young solarWhich card did/model did you get?
also measure the distance from the motherboard to the side of the case. they are larger in that dimension also, + consider the cable
Going to have to check the exact model in the morning, but it was the Gigabyte closed loop one. There is also another closed loop one that ended up being out of stock, think it was Asus but not certain.
Alright, I don't know what to do
my upscale process isn't working properly now.
I am not sure what changed, but this is not a good thing.
171mm is my max these cards say 140mm
thats fine. no worries there
sighhhh
Alright, I might have to scrap this whole guide. Damn it
even if so they have these neat things I saw on Jays2cents where they will 90 or even 180 degree
yeah Cablemod make them
you need to break the process down into each step and refer to older gens for the metadata
without knowing what your doing its hard to help
I would explain the whole process, but its one hell of a journey
Yeah, Gigabyte, and I, went our separate ways a few years ago.
and now it doesn't seem to work the same sighhh
you compared metadata?
There is nothing to gather from that
use the same images that worked and go from there
maybe if I get desperate I will do that
Right now I personally don't wanna dedicate several hours to that
Sheesh, 40 USD for the 90
Ok, so I process is working better now that I restarted it? This makes 0 sense
if it works, it may help to take a screenshot of the window
its working properly now, and I have no idea why
I did see that USDU updated before I restarted, but its the same process
Now that I have no idea. I got it on clearance four years ago.
:/
I just think I am fucked and will have to buy a new case
far too costly to have to do all of this
yup plenty of room. your main issue is length
The length, and size, of these cards are like 1980s boomboxes in size
Might wanna look into a sag bracket
They come with one
good, good
that is how bad they know, lol
@dense tapirWeird new issue discovered with only the anime upscaler
this one
it has done it through several images in weird ways
Ok, I reworked the process a bit now
big difference
(didn't take the time to fix the eyes)
What happened?
No idea, it just seems to have a tendency to randomly do that kind of stuff
Did something recently change?
That is very strange
I found a better workflow that seems to be giving even better results, believe it or not
wow
Oh, I think I might have found a case
I have been dreaded this but it was coming as mine doesn't even have USB 3 front ports. Always use it for something just not this something. Still, mad I have to upgrade the case
Nice thing is this case as a shit load of room for water cooling in various places
*has a
I really do want to go watercooling as I am tired of fan noise and WC always seems to be so much quieter
Phanteks Enthoo Pro is the one I was looking at. Sad thing is to get some of the cards in it I need to remove the HDD cage though it appears to have a shit load of cages so I need to see if I have to remove all or just some.
It is a 9 year old case so amazing it is this future proof and I saw on parts picker a 4090 strix in it
interestingly enough, the new workflow uses switching between different upscalers at different steps
turns out they all have different strengths at different multiplications
yes, this is a fact
Experimenting with less "identical" results, but very inspired ones
this inspirational generation technique is yielding some cool results :>
Interesting
I watched a few vids of reviews and that case is nice until it is time to clean all the filters.
@dense tapirI may have just found a massive hack for upscaling. Its producing crisp results
It takes even more steps, but it is showing massive improvements
Like, these are the same resolution. left is without the new trick, right is with
way sharper and crisper with far more pixel level detail
Same res gens, without and with
only tested with one image, but lets see how well this works
Perpetual Diffusion 🙂
wow ! that is an awesome one !
I haven't manage anything that good with it yet ^^
Yes, very happy by this one.
raw output, no inpainting. It's incredible!
Have you tried my Prompt Generator? 🙂
I still need to try your prompt generator, yes
not yet
time flies by :p and great idea to include such thing
that feels like a big release to come 🙂
I may open some slot today maybe
i know it's a blasphemy but i find it cool
@glossy heraldCan I pester you for a moment?
sure
I just wanted to flex my newly found muscles, cause I added an unorthodox step to my process and DAMN are the results paying off
I am sure you saw the cat example above
those are the same resolution image, but the right one has my new ✨ F A N C Y ✨ step
I saw it but didn't detail it, just checking for NSFW in channels. i'm training and preparing 3 model pages right now
nice ! what's the magic sauce ?
all good. You can just look and see the detail improvement at the same settings
Its a secret :p ||I'll tell you in DM's||
Secret has been shared
SO
I have been testing it
Base image
upscaled
I have achieved pixel perfect detail
its been a struggle of my process, but it has been solved
ENHANCE
and now I have a process that not only works much faster for the same detail, but also has higher detail at the same res
I am gonna upscale 2x again to see how far I can push lol
this is gonna be 59MPX
Oh, that could be awesome haha
with infinite details, ending in the eye
just zoom into the atoms haha
Already worked on that. After a certain res, having the original prompt becomes detrimental as the tiles get so zoomed in that they start to hallucinate detail
ok I need to go back to training now, later 🙂
sounds good. This upscale isn't gonna be particularly fast at 59MPX lol
Now that is nice.
it arrived, and it feels glorious ! thanks for the tip !
sooooo, what's the secret?
they are writing a guide on it from what I understand, and don't seem to want to "spoil" the info before
Why does the image i generated look so unpolished?
512x512 makes it hard for small details like the windows on the castle to really work. You would need to upscale to fix details like that.
The rest seems cooked enough, I don't think adding more steps would help. Just higher resolution for more details/sharpness
oh I thought upscaling is really just to increase the resolution. haven't thought that i can also add features
check those examples higher
upping resolution lets you achieve a lot better end result, the AI having a lot more work on each part of the picture
I see thanks good to know
I'm cooking SAM as new controlnet
Ukiyo-e painting of dog on unprompt.ai
some random thoughts
i'm glad to hear another great rave review on that device. Ive been wanting to pull the trigger on buying it for a long while but i got a pile of controllers that won't let me justify it
i've demod one of them twice and both times they feel amazing
I'll say more once I really tested it
for now, the only bother is that the buttons that are where I'm used for Pause and menu, those are for other overlay features, and can lock you out of the game still playing for a few seconds. Just got to change habbits
The material is really good
nice feel
i hate game overlays hahaa. even on my modern system they seem to get in my way and jank up my game . i might have an interupt problem regarding many storage drives though, but also, i just hate overlays
guys which are the must have models and utilityes? i started yesterday, using Deliberate at the moment
Why part of the tree is blurry and part is not after the upscaling?
This is what i'm using
Dreamshaper
Inpainting?
I tried not sure which checkpoint I should use
it doesn't really give me normal size shoes
always distorted
It depends on the image size a lot. Best results i had with InvokeAI for such matter.
so should I upscale it first then try to inpaint?
Yes, upscale first sounds right to me.
will try it out thanks
You're welcome 🙂
for example i promted: white, caucasian, man, short brown hair, short beard, looking at camera, 0.5 meters away, 81.2 degrees fov, 2.7mm focal lengt
got this:
i believe i need some extra package
im running SD 2.1
i think "0.5 meters away, 81.2 degrees fov, 2.7mm focal length" may not work, have not seen prompts like that working
also it looks like not enough steps
ok can u send me a promt that u already prooved
adjust # steps and CFG settings, if that does not work, i would try another ckpt model
Sd 2.1 x768 ?
okey i changed it, lets see
better i guess
Looks okay 👍
Make sure you add some Quality tags like high quality, 4k, masterpiece, in the prompt
And blurry, low resolution, deformed,
in the negative tags
That can help a lot
Just a little reminder for whoever didn't see it last night.
I made a monumental leap in the quality of my upskill guide by introducing an unorthodox step
*upscale
The difference is pretty damn amazing IMO
No in painting, no cherry picking, just pure results out
This new technique can have 2x the detail at half the res, and I know that sounds like some random arbitrary value, but it's not
These are the same resolution images, without and with the new step
Ouh very nice and that with the same res
What exactly is the step for your upscale render?
It's a lottt of steps, but now that I have finally found the holy Grail step that allows for pixel level detail, I'd say the guide should be finalized within a week
Okay, it's not a lot of steps, but it's a lot of variables that I have to thoroughly explain so people can adapt the process to suit their needs
Parseq + ControlNet
Looool
Thank you! Here are the full view images without and with
You can See how big of a difference it makes on improving texture, as well as how much more it looks like it was painted, which was the goal
Used it to make this image last night as well
(working on the crunchy whiskers problem)
Is it better than 4XUltraSharp upscaler?
Wow epic shot
Oh yeah, way better.
Ultimate stable diffusion upscale utilizes diffusion technology in order to generate new information that pertains to the underlying image, whereas pixel upscalers really just sharpen the information that's already there
Well, i want the guide for that method, thanks 😉
I wasnt sure if i see celebretys until 0:55 xD
When I do post it, it will be on Reddit, and hopefully pinned in the #1003034183716835418 channel
Okay, i will look out for it.
I'm working on a full step by step guide with images, 20 example images, recommended prompts, FAQs for problem testing, and a full explanation on the variables that should change for different use cases. It's going to be a very big guide lol
first one is David Bowie, then Jared Leto, than Dwayne Johnson 😄
it is weird because celebrities have a weird face sometimes
like Will Ferell as Louis XIV
Haha right but i didnt thought everyone is someone xD
If you recognize Brad Pitt and Tom Cruise, Im happy 😄
Even Matt Demon as Marat wasnt easy to get...
Yea Brad pitt was easy
Still looking for tom
Francois ler ?
yes ;D
lol I know
I dont know why some celebrities are so well made and some others not. I even tried Leonardo Dicaprio.
But it was just a random blond guy
so I changed for Chris Hemsworth
but still look like a random blond guy
Even Anne Hataway...
hope people get Nicolas Cage face 😄
it was my favorite
l,ol thanks
hello
What do "negative" prompts actually do? I want to test if suggested negative prompt actually work or are effective. I made a prompt "kawaii neko" and then tested "worst quality", "bad hytentot" and just "bad", but to test that I first need to generate a image with "worst quality". So one question can be; Have you at any point made a prompt that made so bad images that you had to add "worst quality" as a negative prompt to get it to look okay?
Fogot the examples
i aint readin allat
For lazy, "Have you at any point made a prompt that made so bad images that you had to add "worst quality" as a negative prompt"?
no
Nor have I.
Though somewhat outdated, esp as the bot is no longer running, you can see my negative prompt guide here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aHJ9RBt_vlCwJQBVUUsb7VghKB-wynv7WGTxm9ozL1k/edit?usp=drivesdk
FRIENDLY STABLE DIFFUSION GUIDE by Atypical Consortium / Sunny LAST UPDATED: 3/14/2023 Please note this document is a work in progress! Thanks for your patience in this matter! PLEASE ALSO NOTE I DO NOT OFFICIALLY SPEAK FOR STABILITY! THIS IS JUST ME, MYSELF, & I! PLEASE NOTE THAT THE BOT IS ...
This has to be one of my favorite gens I have done. Love the slight cryptid look mixed with a slight cuteness IMO
I know. Got that liken so many times. But my question simplified "any suggestions how I can test how effective different negative tags are".
Your kitties are very cute
can simply generate a picture (or a bunch) of each: 1 with no negative tags and 1 with the usual negative tags used with ur model, then compare
That is what I do now, but how can I know if "ugly" work as a negative tag if I can not generate an image that become ugly without trying to make a ugly image?
Test the positive relationship first. Like, "Cat, best." Then, "cat, best quality." Then "cat neg: best" , " cat neg: best quality." What you are trying to do us understand how cat and best are related, then how best and quality are related. Then you want to test them as negatives on both sides of the equation. So, "cat, best neg: best" "cat, best quality neg: best quality" and so forth
Finally, go "cat neg: best" and "cat neg: best quality."
If you generate like 20-30 images, you can get a pretty good idea of what key words you might need to use. Over time, you'll learn what ones do what
guys, what's I'm doing wrong? ControlNet just doesn't work
I suggest checking out #🤝|tech-support
have you enabled controlnet?
you're gonna want to enable it here if not
disregard, i missed that second image
Activete Model OpenPose too?
you talk about this?
As I said, I saw it was empty, I think there is a model for OpenPose, but I have self never tested it. I often use Canny and I need both to be set to Canny to get that to work, so I thought it may be same for that.
yes that model needs to be set to openpose
the preprocessor is only ever turned on if you are uploading an image that you want the extension to extract the pose from
you already have some that you made so set the preprocessor to none and set the model to openpose
There's still 'None'
Your missing the Controlnet models it seems
ah it sounds like you havent downloaded the openpose model
@dense tapir Ohhhh, the 4070 has 12GB. That makes me feel WAY better about the whole GPU
my mistake, i didn't understand your message about it only having none but it makes sense now
you can find the controlnet modules here
Oh thanks, I thought it was enough just to download the extension from the 'Extension' list
There are even some other models on places like Civit AI, but not many cause control net training is insanely intense
@dense tapir I didn't realize just how good AMD has gotten recently. They released drivers semi recently that unlocked a huge performance gain on their GPU's
$400 less, and only 290 watts
also, 4070 vs the $520 6800XT
identical
also :/
ok, I didn't realize the 4070 was hyper efficient. This changes things again. Its a 200 watt card that can beat a 3080 in compute, and also has 12GB VRAM... I guess this card is not as bad as I thought
amd drivers have always sucked. its why i left them after nearly 20 years . finally just fed up enough to make the jump.
i'm not surprised that a random update pushed huge gains for no apparent reason
when the 3080 is using 310 watts, the 4070 uses 170 for the same perf. Very interesting
someone probably left some dumb debugging code on in the production release
It sucks cause AMD's hardware perf, efficiency, and price kicks NVIDIA in the groin, but their GPU's are useless for anything else (except some very niche workloads where they make NVIDIA look like pocket watches lol)
i'm a 20 year AMD user, and shit, i don't know my way around the driver panel there today. After 20 years. Shit changes so often. ZERO consistency. Hell, i made the jump to linux cause i was always figuring it out on the windows side anyways. The driver situation for AMD is infinitely better on that side.
This will never not make me cackle
after 20 years, go back to Nvidia, i know my way around. They haven't changed shit for 25+ years
AMD wins so hard in SNX-04 and solidworks that people who main those softwares buy a separate AMD GPU just to run them cause they are so disgustingly good at them
or well, I suppose the gap is SNX-04, not solid works
nvidia gimps their consumer end cards for cad work. If you're doing cad work you'd be an idiot to buy a gaming gpu. naturally.
cackle all you want. that's not the market focus for those cards
No like, AMD still slaps the hell out of even the Quadro cards for specific programs, SNX-04 being one of them
Its cause AMD has some types of hardware acceleration that NVIDIA does not
i'm so over amd. beyond. the way they done my vega64 so dirty on windows is indictive of how they'll treat current rdna 2 cards going forwards
new architecture means old gets the b coding team
Oh, the vega64 cards were trash from the start. I kinda blame the person who bought them 😅
Great card actually. Until driver updates nerfed them in favor of memory speed. Killing all the bandwidth capabilities of hbm2 and making it a pointless integration
Maybe stop being a fan boy for a second instead of being like "that's your fault"
amd's driver team sucks. It's just a fact. people who are hyped about them are just caught up in marketing. i'm a 20 year vet there
I am not being a fan boy lmao
It was a bad card from the start, you bought a bad card, whos fault is that?
But yeah, AMD's driver team was deplorable before the rework, which is why we now see these massive perf gains on drivers
sigh. It was what AMD offered then. The other option was the 1070ti or a 1080. Way out of my price range. To prove a point you're passing the responsibility for bad driver code off on me. it's just dumb. i'm walking away from this
I would have to say, from my experience and the experience of other people big in the community, that AMD's drivers are about as good as NVIDIA's now, but they lack the feature support NVIDIA has
meh. marketing convinces people so easily. it's always been that way. "no the drivers are good this time"
"I bought a car that sputtered when it started, and now it doesn't work. I blame the manufacturers"
You should have seen the warning signs when basically everybody was saying not to get them because of their niche use cases, lack of most modern forms of videogame hardware acceleration, and already extremely shaky stability in the tasks they were made for.
Sure, it was their fault that they got worse, but you weren't just blindsided by them being bad. They always wre
Vega 64 is a mess, just like it was when it launched
stop being literally dumb. if it was a used car why would i? if it was a brand new one i sure would. easy. literally dumb analogy.
however, RDNA and RDNA 2 have been seriously good
hell, even the RX4xx and RX5xx cards are still quite good for performance and efficiency
At least I made an attempt, rather than calling somebody who is... quite literally against both companies a "fanboy"
You're floundering to try and it make it seem like you didn't have a bad idea purchase that was met with an equally bad outcome. Both parties are to blame. The company that put out a blatantly bad product, and the consumer that bought a blatantly bad product from a company that at the time was known for not being good, reliable, or timely with drivers...
Anyways, moving on as this is a useless conversation, and your money invested in that card that is still gonna be useless after all this anyways, so yeah
What is it?
I'd have to explain the whole process first, which is what the guide is for
oh I didn't see you mention that before sorry 😅
No worries! I'm working on a whole huge guide and breakdown of my process
Yep, and I can even train Dreambooth with them. 7900XTX is more akin to a 4080 with 24gb
I have settled, not happy but settled, on a new case.
Windowed and LEDs which I hate but I think I can turn the LEDs off via my motherboard RGB headers
What I can't turn off is the leds of the video card and that stuff is bright
Remove the middle drive bay and it can handle up to 392mm long video cards.
@smoky oakOn the AMD what you do lose with AMD is xformers.
https://github.com/AUTOMATIC1111/stable-diffusion-webui/wiki/Optimizations has sdp now though. not sure what it means but its faster than xformers
Not sure I know on the 4090 it matters on a 4080 not nearly as much and on 3060 not at all, so not sure.
@crimson dawnMy fun is not in the generating it is in the training so I need something that can train, and train well. If it can train at the speed of a 3090ti then I don't care who makes the card.
yeah. it works on nvidia too. i think it has gains on 40 cards because it needs pytorch 2
Yep. I know the pytorch.org guys said it needs to be programmed for it and the real gains would be with 4090 cards until then. Once it is fully programmed for, which it is not yet, we will all see performance gains even my little 1060 though barely for me.
@crimson dawnFor now the 4090 people saw 3it/s faster using --opt-sdp-attention on average while the 3060 people saw nothing.
RDNA3 was a huge step up as is DLSS3 vs 2 of each. A lot of real AMD fanboys are waiting on RDNA4 and even the reviewers are saying with as much of an advancement 3 was over 2 4 may actually be the one. Not hopium/copium just based upon what advances has transpired. Now with AMD getting into ML with their laptops via a chip for ML it might just get interesting because they know this is the future.
rdna3 dgpus just came out. everything about 4 is hopium
i even saw what jim keller said about it. still hopium if he's just looking at engineering refs. same old game
what kind of creature does this look like?
fish, dog, chimera... hm
some kind of elemental
Is there a controlnet model that will still accept color?
like, I want it to draw that muscle there still.. since it loses color, the edge detection and stuff just kinda ends up merging it with the skeleton and whatnot
and stable diffusion doesn't know how to accurately draw psoas muscles itself 🙂
The dog is generated with Img2img but with segmentation selection of Facebook's Sam model.Working pretty good.Compared to control-net,you have much more power and control over your selection.Yes you can in-paint, mask manually if you want,but this is smarter when it comes to selection as the models were trained specifically for this.
@storm badger is the outline from a deliberate backlighting or an artifact of segmentation and limitations of SD handling it?
The outline was a side effect of img2img.it has left some traces like ghost and img2img tried to fill inside that area. If it was filled with %100 accuracy that should not be the case.Maybe in the future it can be done better,but this is pretty new atm. Artifacts or unwanted spots can be cleaned in the post production if it is intended for a professional delivery etc,I believe...
@storm badger how do you use fb sam?
plain img2img destroys my pic (all defaults) :}
better with low denoising (.27) :}
@feral pebble https://github.com/continue-revolution/sd-webui-segment-anything ,use it with automatic's webui...manual installation and model downloads are required.also after downloading the models put them inside the extensions own model directory without renaming. You can use it on img2img tab.
thanks! 🙂
Np,have fun 😉
'tis for love
Everything is hopium with all of these fuckers from hope that Nvidia stops fucking us all over to hope that Intel can finally do it right to AMD finally able to pull AI/ML off to compete. All is hope right now because all of this situation for all of us fucking sucks.
@smoky oak I just watched a review by this content creator I trust a bit more than the big names and I am surprised at the results for gaming. If I were a gamer the results shows me which to buy. 6900XT vs 4070/ti beat those cards in almost every single test and really the only thing they have going for them is DLSS3 which AMD doesn't have. Turn DLSS3 on and the results are slightly (very slightly) better than the 6900xt's pure rasterization. That is a last gen card vs brand new ones. I gotta say I am impressed, and depressed at Nvidia. These tests were at 1440p.
As I've been saying for a while now, AMD has become a serious force to reckon with when it comes to gaming performance, but the biggest reason why most people won't buy their cards even though they are higher performance, less power draw, smaller, and they cost less, is because they don't really support anything other than gaming
Thing is look at this to get sad again, but there is hope.
for strictly SD there is really no reason to go to a 4070ti vs a 4070.
not for 200 more
AMD cards are just far too limiting
for now, but they are getting into the ML
CEO said so
I wish I remembered the laptop ML chip she said it begins with
they are yet to release the mid range and low end cards for the 7000. ML is going to be a while off
I am brand agnostic I just want realistic pricing again pre Crypto mania nonsensical pricing that can give me AI and I don't give two shits who it will be.
Personally, I loathe Jensen with a passion and would probably end up in jail if I met him in real life for how he turned out. Such a bright star 12 years ago to turn into this thing we currently have.
Damn
Funny they did not show the flagship models from each but I expect the same curves
No matter if I grab an AMD or a Nvidia I have to buy a new case which blows
yep 3D rendering was the exact reason why I bought the 3080, 2 years ago. AMD still are terrible in that space
I sort of have settled on it being a Lian-Li as either of the two cases allows water cooling in the future after I recover the financial loss of having to upgrade everything.
216 vs III as I am unsure which to get.
I see in the III more room but a lot of shit to go wrong over time as there are too many moving parts and clicky parts.
GN mentioned that in their review too.
I am leaning towards the 99 USD 216 without led fans.
Hay
I think its max is 395mm long GPU while the III does 423-425mm
Funny thing is if I buy this case I am sort of wanting to get the smaller more expensive water cooled 4090.
I need a photo showing qnc1te PARTY in holiday style
Gigabyte has one so that goes out the window
Its so funny. Im watching a couple of 4070 reviews on YT and my initial response was to laugh at how small it is. Ive been conditioned to expect large cards....
That, and its power consumption get a BIG thumbs up to but that is it.
1 of 2 things, or both, that card needed that would have knocked it out of the ball park. 16gb and/or 499
They sort of shot themselves in the foot with the 12gb 4070ti
4060ti at 8gb and 499 is DOA imo
if they end up doing 10gb for it I could give it a pass and say alright for a 1080p budget card.
Damn, they need to get somebody who can actually benchmark SD, cause those results are trash lmfao
13.84 images at 768x768 on a 4090 lmao
As I mentioned they did not show the flagship models from either company for some strange reason
honestly 768x768 is slow af
so a 4080 able to push almost 14 per minute makes me drool
yeah looking at it, its images per minute. thats off
I am confident I could break 12 images per minute at 768 on my 3060ti no problem lmao
even that seems off, cause my 3060ti can go 512x512 sub 2.5 seconds
maybe just cause I actually know what I am doing
how many steps are they using?
probably 50 or something like people who have no idea what they are doing lol
None of this matters if the same metrics were used for all posted. YMMV for various reasons and no mention of steps, sampler, etc...
yeah, see, I just did 16x 768x images on my 3060ti in 70 seconds
only problem is that its extremely misleading to people already in SD
if I looked at that graph and didn't know better, I'd think the 4080 is a small upgrade over my 3060ti in speed lol
considering mine got 12 images per minute at 768 lol
Then you are looking at it wrong
it does at least show the relative performance between those GPU's, but that performance is way under what it would be if they were testing right
if your card is not compared in the results, it isn't, then you have no idea
They do not tell us what the step count was or the sampler etc...
if thats the case, then that graph is completely useless to know if its worth it for me to upgrade lol
they should at least have the common sense to include basic settings
sampler and steps alone would be a massive insight
that matters if you are chasing after raw numbers but what they are showing is card A vs card b
I agree
they should have included the 4090 as they did prior
yeah, I guess. Just an extremely niche graph that is poorly made for literally any other useful interpretation of it
in the January benchmarks they used 100 steps and Euler. My guess is the same settings here
you are missing the point as they are not selling you a card this is just saying this graph is to show how each of these cards did against each other. No other information is intended.
Yes, pure is right as I remembered 100
Jan showed 4090 too I believe
Of course if I had a 4090 I would 100 steps all the time
I personally wouldn't increase the steps and waste time and energy for no increase in output quality
I think what this testing was for, after reading the comments, is to show just how much the 4070 sucks ass juice. Nvidia is charging more for, at best, the same performance to worse performance than last gen 3080
They have seemingly hit a wall which is probably why Jensen said they are starting over from scratch for the 5k series and the 5090 is 2-2.9x faster than the 4090 but the pricing I can only nightmare over.
3nm too
See how they hit this wall? There is a theoretical limit to how low they can go and 2nm was about it. 4 to 3nm and probably 2nm then stuck because the traces are so close the electron jumps connections etc... really messy.
your trace separations are smaller than the electrons themselves.
iow we are about to hit a nasty wall with a head on collision I am unsure how we work around it. Maybe 3d tech or something.
more cores, larger cache, faster vram, will be the temporary answer
Hlo
this is why I think AMD went to 3d tech so the die grows upward and it saves in latency I think they said as well.
be sides they can afford to grow up more than out by much more.
Just think NYC hit this problem over 150 years ago, lol.
look at what Intel are developing for Granite Rapids server chips. Thats a big boy CPU socket
Latency begins, yes
I agree
through hole I understand but through hole water cooling?
all I know is I lay odds the 5, or 6k will be the last gen before the brick wall smashes Jensen in the face and they will be forced into a radical change.
Ahh, I thought that is what you were saying
even 3d can only go so far before issues begin per Samsung
I think on their drives they use 3d tech
possibly but the latency involved
I am just not sure how we are going to dig ourselves out of the upcoming hole
you can't go any denser or higher or further out. You have pushed the silicon as far as it can go.
something other than silicon possibly
What happened to the graphene that was all the tech rage?
died off
yeah, strange
died off because graphene is actually hard to make and dangerous too. I was watching this scientist show how it is made and how to make it and man I can see why as silicon is so easy.
in comparison
I bet when we have no other choice is when they will revive it.
I remember that
not sure why that one died so fast. Maybe because it would possibly dilute the heavily controlled diamond business? I dunno honestly.
yup the price of natural diamonds would plummet
Thought so. Screw the advancement of mankind cause muh wealth.
I am pretty Vulcan about that. Needs of the many and all that.
Im sure there are plenty of inventions and ideas bought out and sitting on shelves till its time to make more profit
Sadly
Lets just see if its not trash like their last 3 generation of rapids CPU's lol
👁️
As it is now, intels CPU's are pretty damn pathetic in almost all fronts
They cost more, their boards cost more, they are way less performant for that cost, they use way more power for less performance
just a mess lol
Epyc Genoa makes all of intels server side CPU's seem like cheap jokes
no idea, didn't look at the post for long
what is funny is the 768x768 on the 70ti is what I used to get on my 1060 at 512x512
I know my 3060ti was a problem for like 4 months when I bought it
let me run their test and see how I do, just a sec
Not sure but those are what people are getting even today
I am not sure what HRO is as that may mean something
blegh, have to download 1.5 base
2/3 less time
yeah
What I meant.
Basically, it is just changing a few files and the 4070ti got faster
Still
thats it?
your 3060ti is almost as fast? what is yours at?
My 3060ti if I really crank can breach 11.5it/s
20 step euler a is even fast for me
its not euler a, its euler
his above is euler a
so yeah, my 20 step test was 2.94s
so considerably faster than this persons results with a 4070ti
let me try 50
5.47s
alright so 1.73s vs your 5.47s
you said that was euler not euler a though
512
which card?
20 steps
let me try 20
I am trying to compare
2.45s
1024
seriously, this speaks so bad of the 4070 anything
11.56s
it got ya there
which is very weird, no other models max my VRAM at this res
I usually do upscale at 1200x1200 with 96% usage
no, i mean ultimate upscale, it does full res gens then stitches them together. Its teh exact same speed as a single img2img
anyway, this shows the 70ti something is wrong
high res fix does bucket
let me try my preferred settings
on my preffered settings, 512x took 2.1s
switch was DDIM on 15 steps (which I have shown is petty good quality)
its not like I am just dropping the quality super low for speed, the quality is still there
15 steps ddim
vs 20
trying 768
4.71s on my preffered
cool result heh
btw, today is the official FE release day for the 4070 and tomorrow is for the AIB cards
1024x is 9.6s on pref settings
fun result
the fact that the 3070 and 4070 have the same core count shows that NVIDIA is not after gains, but rather ease of manufacturing
as LTT showed, its around 26% better on average, for about 21% more money :/
its die is also stupid small, which means it costs way less to manufacture as a single silicon wafer can fit wayyyy more, and also the single failures account for far less of a disks lost yield
153664mm vs 87025mm
just slightly under 50% smaller
so that means if you took the die area of 100 3070ti's, and then used the same area for the 4070ti, it would be able to make 176 die in the area it took to make 100 last gen
76% more die to wafer efficiency is monumental
yep, but none of that given to the people as the cost should have been less.
the only difference is its a much smaller process, which means the yields are naturally lower, and the wafer cost is naturall higher, but still. That should be at max on par
Hi!
so basically he is showing my 3060ti is the same speed? lmao
if the 3060ti had 12g too it would be faster across the board. wtf?
however, I will say, this is a null issue when using processes like my upscale, as my upscale doesn't ever run into VRAM overflow #SelfPlug
no VRAM slow downs, even at 8k+

what we are seeing, I firmly believe, is your 256bit bus vs the 4070ti 192bit. It does matter.
THE 4070ti IS ONLY 192 BIT!?!?!?
regardless the copium from Nvidia
BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOO
VRAM buss makes a MASSIVE difference
its why the 3060 is so much slower at tons of things compared to the 3060ti
in blender, the 3060 can be less than half the speed of a 3060ti in ray traced rendering cause of the VRAM speed
I know and Jensen says no it no longer does because the buffer chip is 32mbs now. NO, it does matter as we are seeing it.
hell, in Etherum mining, the best way to increase perf is to max out your VRAM overclock as much as possible. Blender too, and SD too lol
my 1060 6gb has the same bus as that 4070/ti
my GPU OC is 150+/900+
they seriously took a HUGE step backwards
when I used to Ether mine, it was -200/+1350
VRAM matters so much for so many things, like what lmao
one of the big things of the 4090 is its 384bit bus
its only 384 bit 
even the best intels have a hard time not bottlenecking it
Yep
I will bottleneck it but once in its memory for training it can work it. personally I would prefer a 4080 if it were 24gb
4080 has a 256bit bus like your 3060ti
I just feel every single card not a 4090 is a con job from Jensen
Thats exactly what they wanted you to do too
I know 
Yep
yup
Funny thing is you can grow into the card as the cpu bottlenecks it
in some ways, yeah
In the bright side, 48it/s 
apples to oranges
I got the zotac amp extreme - the only one that microcenter had when I went
I have to buy a new case for any of them 😦
oh, thats not that bad

$1800 is a lot more reasonable than I expected
Microcenter actually sells stuff at ~msrp, so I'm glad I live near one
I am kinda glad that I have an 8GB GPU now, cause its leading to me pioneering a method of upscale that is not only way better quality than what we have now, but also can run over 8k resolutions on 8GB cards
Waow
Just to flex it again really fast, here
Base res vs my process
If my case allowed water cooling I would get a 4090 water cooled one but nope so it looks like a lancool III or a lancool 216
512x512 vs 3840x3840
I am extremely not happy at being forced to change my case
and yeah, it shows lol
Where's your outline posted?
Still in the works. Whole process got a rework last night as I discovered something massive in the process
results dramatically improved

For example, this is a screenshot close up of the same image with both processes. Old is left, new is right.
Same res image, believe it or not
shows how big of a difference it makes
with my new process i can guarantee pixel level detail at 4k, and I am sure I can adapt it for pixel level detail at 8k as well
512x512 vs 3840x3840
Very nice 👍
How long does it take to upscale it to 3840?
That’s pretty fast
yeah, considering its not possible using things like high res fix 😅
And its also way better quality and coherence than high res fix can offer either
meow apocalypse
Is there a way to apply a "Pixel art texture" to an "isometric reference model"?
Here is the model
and I would like to apply one of the "textures" here to the walls:
could img2img with controlnet work? Or should I look for image interpolation solutions instead?
why not make a lora?
with very specific trigger words for each image in the dataset
I am testing negative prompts and for me "beige" was good. It look like many interior images are based on armature photos that have a beige tint due to auto white-balance, when "beige" was added to the negative there was more variation in the images.
What would be the best way to proceed? A different lora for each "tile"?
nah one lora that you teach the style for and then describe each tile in the prompt text file for it. Describing it very simple and accurate with a specific triggerword for each
that way you could also alter the looks via prompt, if you do it successfully
I dunno if it would be better to have an embed though
oh, maybe with a lora for style + controlnet for each piece of wall then?
how do you do that? is it a prompt or a additional api?
Little reminder, the AMA with Emad with start <t:1681401600:R> in https://discord.com/channels/1002292111942635562/1005545148211527800
You can already come and ask your questions in #1029055412764422214 before the event starts ! (sorry for the messages :p but fun time to come)
how is progress with hands?
I'm surprised at how good it can do futurist art
Anyone tried SDX? Is it better than custom models
its def an improvement from sd 1.x
i actually like it a lot
this is great. what is your process?
Is it something with new code or you've just found a way to use existing addons to achieve this?
These are awesome results. Are you using auto1111 or comfyui or something else? And where/how are you planning to share your guide?
@slender needle @runic zephyr @ruby swift
They are using ultimate stable diffusion upscale, I am working on a detailed guide as it has a lot of steps and variables, and it's going to be laid out in a Google doc with lots of information and images for people to search through.
The guide has been delayed a bit as I discovered that new step (it's outside of SD, but something that takes legit 5 seconds to do once you have it set up, so I will explain along with the guide)
So it's just tiled vue and tiled diffusion in effect?
Yes, but it requires various different variables, a little bit of post-processing out of stable diffusion (The part that allowed me to get significantly higher detail)
As well as lots of interchangeable values that you can utilize in order to get a result that closer matches the original input, or a much more creative result that is inspired by the original input.
It can also be utilized to fix generation artifacts such as an overtrained LoRA with shockingly good accuracy and detail
I'm approaching 400 hours of time invested in this process, and I found several different bugs and issues that I need to detail on how to fix, and I've also found several different niche use cases that I would like to include in the guide as well
That's interesting.
@Oauabei#6406 please have a look above to see my explanation of what exactly it is, and how I'm going about releasing a guide
Oop
Did they leave?
Or get banned 😄 One of two.
Oh yeah, they are gone. Welp
Nevermind
Haha
But yeah, I've recently discovered that certain upskill increments work better with certain upscalers, and then certain upscalers are able to improve the artifacts of some of the other upscalers.
It's really not a hard process, and I can get from a 512x512 image to a 3840 x3840 image in a few minutes really, but it's just understanding the variables and knowing how to play them to the strengths of what you need
So really, I could detail my entire process right here, but without explaining what needs to be changed, it won't be ideal for most other generations
Thanks, looking forward to the guide, the results are really amazing.
Hey guys, anybody know the command to run SD on CPU? I have a friend who has a pretty slow PC, but hes damn determined
Ok, think I got it
seems to be CMD arg --use-cpu all
Oops
I didn't mean to send that here, but I feel like it fits lol
@dense tapir ohhhh my god lmaaoooo
My friend has no GPU and needed to run on CPU
hes at 11.2s/it
now 15.22s/it
17.27
22.3s/it
Same on my old 1600
I haven't tried on the newer 5600
I have to say the 4070 has landed with a pretty big thud.
Can't say thats surprising
@dense tapir how much VRAM does it have, and how big is the bus?
Sorry, I would Google it myself but my hands are occupied right now, I only have voice typing at the moment
12gb 192 bit bus
as we saw it is just a slightly faster (for SD) 12gb 3060ti
Man, I just can't find a case I like. Found one only they stupidly lock you in with the control panel on the left hand side, then the lian-li no longer offer HDD/Power on lights and a lot of the new boards are using the power on light to blink for errors. Another stupid.
hi im new here
sd ultimate upscaler is awesome. the author there deserves a lot of credit for making such a great tiled upscaler with diffusion tech, and releasing it entirely free
https://github.com/Coyote-A/ultimate-upscale-for-automatic1111 i'd at them for thanks but i don't see a coyote-a on discored
Did anyone create a decent Terminator/T-800 model?
I could probably do it
right right, I was thinking it was the 4070ti we were talking about, my bad
@dense tapir@glossy herald Please please please wish me luck. I am buckling down and redoing my whole guide to explain and showcase the new workflow. First I need to remake my example images
You didn't release a first version before redoing everything ? Oo
Don't prepare your jump for too long though
That is a lot of work you are putting in there so best of luck.
btw, I am watching Moore's Law is Dead channel and now I see why the 4070 showed to be just a glorified 3060ti with more ram because the die size was cut down just about the same as the 3060ti was. Add that with a 192 bit bus and it explains the numbers I posted yesterday and it showing it isn't much better than 3060ti in SD at least.
When the results are as big of a change as that breakthrough I showed you in DMs, I definitely have to build off of that framework first
I mean, just seeing my old process next to my new process should show that we're not dealing with a minute improvement 😅
Oh, he just said it that the only thing it has going for it is its 180w power consumption, like the 3060ti and should have been called the 4060ti. BOOM, I said that last month that this is what the 4060ti should have been.
Nvidia games to screw us all over is not appreciated. I already was disgusted at them during the Crypto mining days when rumours were saying Nvidia was pushing what was happening that have now been confirmed to now these shenanigans. If only I didn't need CUDA.
maybe gpu conspiracy chat can go into the gpu chat channel instead of polluting gen? i see it in so many servers. fanboys drop gas bombs until they catch a bite and lite the whole room up about the tragedy that is [insert gpu company here]. Having a gpu room for you guys is a good compromise and is more polite than how i see y'all treated on other servers. banned.
gamers being mad about expensive gpus is nothing new even before crypto hehe
It's a recurring subject for sure, and people can go in the #1011228477954998273 if that becomes prevalent, but we try not to stifle dialog until it's necessary. Some GPU talk is ok in gen imo, I didn't feel it be a problem right now. But let's share more pics :p
A digital version of the Mad Hatter's hat, featuring a built-in AI assistant and holographic displays, illustrated in the sleek and minimalist style of Jonathan Ive.
i tossed 2 cutesy embeddings with a negative embedding into the positive prompt and apparently made a low effort pokemon
hehe it's so cute !
catpugmon
Trying to get a good robotic Queen of Hearts with Alice
robots can be hard. so many different types muddles the field
Yep. and the style itself, not sure where to go with it
a little star wars feeling would be cool
even among the various subdivisions there are just -so many-
that's a pretty sweet style imo
yep I'm late this week
hard to do something not done already
I may start up comfyUI soon and let the LLM try things
very aesthetically pleasing with the red contrast against the cold background
the prompt has good constrast there
I need to find the good seed I think, maybe adapt it a little but not much
the red and blue is cool
An Alice and a robotic version of the Queen of Hearts, featuring sleek lines and glowing LED lights, inspired by the futuristic designs of Syd Mead and Neil Blomkamp.
Steps: 50, Sampler: DPM++ 2M Karras, CFG scale: 7, Seed: 3534123143, Face restoration: CodeFormer, Size: 1368x768, Model hash: fc9afc15a5, Model: perpetual-v1-sun, Clip skip: 2
out of curiosity, anyone know the decision behind discord removing metadata from images?
was a big "oof" to sharing sd images
they have gone on and off about this in the past
the reason has always been the same though
i assume a safety thing
protect the less tech savy users that were sharing pictures with metadata that could doxx them basically
figured
nice to share a pic of your dog, less nice if you give up your adress and all of that
(and yeah, I can attest that I removed quite some content on that basis in the past)
sometime you get a new user coming in, using their real photo and name as username/profile pic
not everybody is knowing what discord is
damn, another fire one, I'll upscale it
there was a big assembly at a school near me about 10 years ago that discussed the dangers of geotagging your photos even then.
kids would do it because they thought it was cool and were basically giving gps coordinates to find them -_-
yeah... tech has gone fast, and there has been lots of traps like that
If you didn't use all this when it came out, evolved with it, you don't know those. You get owned on so many sides before knowing. And even then, you can still get owned, social engineering and just sweetalking can be quite effective on humans
even more so now that you can fake voices pretty realistically. story came out a few days ago about an older couple that got a phone call from their son that said he needed bail money to get out of prison. was AI generated. scary stuff for those unaware
hell, I have no excuses for having been hacked 2 months ago. I have 15 years in professional IT. And still, a weakness, someone pushing on it, and I broke just long enough to loose a lot
i had a similar incident a long time ago when i used to play Ultima online. been doing computer stuff for a while at that point and still got tricked into putting a keylogger on my pc -_-
I ran a .exe .... they stole my auth cookies, transfered some of my authenticators to their phones, locked me out of my main email,... x) it was a fun time
honestly feel like the only reason it hasn't happened much more often to me is people realized i don't have much that they can take lol
I was lucky it was some discord kid scripty in the end, because they technically had a hold on my paypal, and didn't realize it
you don't need to have a lot to loose honestly... even just a way for them to spam is a reward enough
(yeah, like I said, I have no excuses, .exe is .exe. I scanned it and took the risk I shouldn't have taken)
i kind of feel like that recently. There is a pretty cool extension for auto111 that lets you animate a face to match (pretty well) an audio clip. Requires you to run --disable-safe-unpickle though. I ran it anyways...I'll see in a year or so if it was worth the fun little clip i made -_-
yeah... I don't take those risks anymore. And the tools that require me to do, I run in an empty linux instead
too scared right now
i should've at least done that--ran a vbox of some sort
hah
just thought "it can't happen to me", eh?
I just didn't do the effort after a point given how many we run tbh
and I was being pushed toward it, I fall for the old "no trust me"
like the first time I gave my full armor in T4C to someone to "upgrade it for me"
given I was 12
but still x)
felt pretty stupid
I never played that one. I played Realms of Despair, Aardwolf, and a ton of others though
heck, i still jumped into Aardwolf again just a couple years ago. i don't usually play them for long, but MUDs are pretty great for gameplay so long as i can still type
ah. thought T4C was a MUD based on it saying Realmud. Seems I was mistaken lol
it was the first MMO I played
back when we were paying the Internet by the hour
on the 45kbits :p
it was my first online game, and mostly first real game I think, on computer ^^
I still recall getting AOL cds in the mail regularly lol. I actually had a service called "Juno" for my first internet. Was basically offbrand AOL. Dialup connection and allowed to stay online for a certain amount of time before it killed the connection.
I held off on AOL for quite a while, though eventually switched to them after giving Juno a chance. I'll be honest, i didn't expect much from the internet in the early 90s. Was a cool thing that interested me, but couldn't justify the expenditure when i was mostly using it for BBS and the occasional game
it still was such a magic world even back then. no real big uses at first, except knowledge, but such a new thing. I remember getting into problems with my parents for using the whole 30 hours we had for the month in 2 weeks on my own
this is exactly how i feel about ai generative technologies at the moment. reminds me so much of the early days of internet
difference is i expect really big things from this
yeah, and quite fast, a lot faster than the 10 years internet needed to mature at first imo
I'd be surprised if our lifes weren't transformed by this in the 3 years to come already
the rate of development, ever increasing use cases, and large adoption rate all seem to mirror it quite well
did you start playing with LLM too ?
I tried a little chatGPT online and was like "yeah this has potential"
but installing it, and being able to fine tune a character already so easily, it's insane what it said to me with the few knowledge I have of this
I'm also plugging it directly into SD
in this workflow (comfyUI), you have my input at the bottom "a cat", then top left the whole LLM thing, making a prompt
and top right, SD making the pic
i run music generation with Riffusion, LLMs using Vicuna, Image generation with Stable diffusion, voice generation with Tortoise, and frame interpolation with FILM. all of which were made possible with AI in basically the last year. crazy how it's leapt forward when development was going on pretty heavily for like 5 times that long
that node setup seems interesting. something else for me to eventually end up learning, probably lol
i know you mentioned comfyUI before, but it seemed like just a reskin to me at the time. looks far more capable than i originally thought
it's a series of nodes
basically it's just SD on steroids
but it has extensions, custom nodes, just like automatics
since I started adding some, like this LLM, I get more and more things I can plug together
being able to make the workflow really yourself is quite strong in the end, but it sure requires more time
and coding a custom node is really not hard
I honestly expect most of what we've learned in the last year is going to be irrelevant with the rate LLMs are advancing. ChatGPT-4 with auto gpt is quite frankly mindblowing to me. A few decades ago we had whole teams working on the workflow that gpt4 can do autonomously now
and it does it crazy fast compared to people. the rate it can receive and act on information is just completely insane to me. I expect there will be other competitors in the very near future, and look forward to the potentialities
yep. the "baby agi" or auto gpt are doing things incredible, and it will go even faster because of it now. it's mostly computing power that will become limiting
let's build a character for the LLM to chat with :p
i frequently use notebook mode with oobabooga webui, though i admit the character chat works ridiculously well
I'm loading the model right now, one with not that many restrictions, and fine tuned for role playing characters
i use it more for storytelling
I'm using the TavernAI UI on top right now
here is the character creation screen, I named her Essde (SD)
her/him/it
new demo for the new process
all you need ot send them is boobs.jpg.exe and they'll open it 70% of the time, everytime
I tried to make it a funny AI trapped inside a computer, I got something else, interesting convo :p I'm stopping it there, it's becoming quite inconsistent, but fun read
I want Rick's butter butler
Really enjoyed the feel good bot for a bit there. It's too bad it seemed to go dark at the end 😦
love inpainting with different models and prompts
If I copy someones exact parameters including seed should I end up with the same picture?
mostly yes, if you have the same model too
some options like xformers can generate small differences
hmm my guess might just be different versions from the same checkpoint then, thanks
well I guess different checkpoints from the same model
nevermind I've tried it with many different checkpoints so idk
weird
or maybe I'm just missing some parts
Mostly if you only copy the settings by Hand instead of Pressing the copy image data button on civitai
copying data wasn't working so I was doing pnginfo
the loading boxes would show up but nothing shows up in the prompt boxes
Hmm can you show an example?
and looking at it different model
this website is a bit confusing
or the images aren't tagged correctly
but speaking of any reason why my clipboard might not be working? If it makes a different I'm using brave
Getting these settings if i press copy image data:
masterpiece, best quality, ultra-detailed, illustration, 1girl, solo, fantasy, flying, broom, night sky, outdoors, magic, spells, moon, stars, clouds, wind, hair, cape, hat, boots, broomstick, glowing, mysterious, enchanting, whimsical, playful, adventurous, freedom, wonder, imagination, determination, skill, speed, movement, energy, realism, naturalistic, figurative, representational, beauty, fantasy culture, mythology, fairy tales, folklore, legends, witches, wizards, magical creatures, fantasy worlds, composition, scale, foreground, middle ground, background, perspective, light, color, texture, detail, beauty, wonder.
Negative prompt: nsfw,(worst quality, low quality:1.4), (lip, nose, tooth, rouge, lipstick, eyeshadow:1.4), ( jpeg artifacts:1.4), (depth of field, bokeh, blurry, film grain, chromatic aberration, lens flare:1.0), (1boy, abs, muscular, rib:1.0), greyscale, monochrome, dusty sunbeams, trembling, motion lines, motion blur, emphasis lines, text, title, logo, signature
ENSD: 31337, Size: 512x832, Seed: 3080004317, Model: AOM3A3, Steps: 20, Sampler: DPM++ SDE Karras, CFG scale: 7, Clip skip: 2, Model hash: eb4099ba9c, Hires steps: 20, Hires upscale: 2, Hires upscaler: Latent (nearest-exact), Denoising strength: 0.5
the image is tagged under AOM3A1B but model says AOM3A3
@sand copperWhat GPU are you using to do these gens? that can massively affect your generation results
3070ti
ah, nevermind
Then you need the b model
non tensor cards have no consistency cause they run on emulated precision
General Awareness and I tested it. very weird
on my specific GPU,I have 0 Xformers noise
I have even done pixel value offset comparisons. I get the exact same image every time
@sand copper you can find the model here:
https://huggingface.co/WarriorMama777/OrangeMixs/tree/main/Models/AbyssOrangeMix3
yeah it goes into my clipboard but stable diffusion doesn't take it, so PNGInfo is the best I could do
though I'm sure there's many other factors I can't see so I don't know what it is
just going to assume it just is what it is
Like how ? You need to paste the whole thing into the prompt and then click the blue arrow button