#🏞|general-with-images
1 messages · Page 21 of 1
Embeddings and LORAs can be used to make consistent characters, but what about backgrounds? How are they made to be consistent from different angles?
I don't mind using 3d like blender, but when the render is fed into SD, it changes things up a bit
ummm
I am having a very weird problem
oh!
My seed kept randomizing cause I had a space before it apparently lol
Un oso en la luna
Aw damnnn, why didn't I think fo this first lmao
Version 6.9 lmao
xD
One LoRa to rule them out
nice idea
i'll get to work right away
So far so good
As in stealing my LoRA?
jk
scar from Arcane
Is that thanos and biden? lmfao
lmfao
I see you made a Johnny sins embedding lmao
I am working on a refined Ricado Millos LoRA
my shrek lora
Early Ricardo Milos is coming along well lol
Oh, i also made a LoRA for freshwater shrimp lol
you what
I am a shrimp breeder lol
I made one for freshwater shrimp
it was my 2nd LoRA
No LoRA
LoRA :p
I have a multi trigger LoRA
a LoRA with 2 completely different triggers in one
Rapunzel x Shrek
It was trained on two subjects at the same time
yea i have as well
where female navi
nsfw capable?
yes
my full Na'vi model will have 4 different data triggers
Male Forest Navi
Female Forest Navi
Male Reef Navi
Female Reef Navi
mah man
?
I shall not say, out of fear of it being stolen lmao
There is currently one for him, but its a checkpoint
LIAR
All of mine are NSFW capable lol
My zootopia tigers are NSFW capable lmao
I wonder if the freshwater shrimp are 👁️
LMFAO
I have a furry model. I wonder if I can actually get a freshwater shrimp furry
My capybara LoRA works with the furry one lmao
🤔
Also, capybara one is certified NSFW capable lol
I was not expecting them to work together, but they do lol
I am trying the freshwater shrimp lmao
LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOO
god
looks like the freshwater shrimp one makes more of an abomination lol
@novel ravineIT TRIED
Freshwater shrimp furry lmfaooo
legit cursed lol
My new seek.art MEGA model will be releasing soon.
trained on top of 1.5, not a merge.
.
Best of luck, lord knows its needed
That's weird one , but I kinda like it lol
these AI's are very mean about giving swords lol
well, at least it's not giving me 4 swords anymore with "floating sword" negative , so that's a step forward
ah, nice haha
Almost lol
control net : I can fix you
naaaaah, I want to gen it 😄
you gotta add a rough basic sword to the controlnet pose hand in blender and voila
I like random things it does, don't want to do specific pose , it kinda removes the purpose
¯_(ツ)_/¯
One day it'll happen
/imag
@smoky oak
yes
Alright, not sharing my ideas anymore here
I'd prefer to not feel like I have to one up people/compete with them for things I thought of
So I'll just keep my ideas to myself
Yeah, hence why I am not just gonna give out my ideas/plans to people so willing to take them
anyways
just do it yourself, I don't care anymore
I am not in this to compete with people. I wanna do it on my terms, how I want. So just do it yourself and I will just move onto something I can do for myself
@smoky oak there is a guy in civit, who reached top 10 leaderboard by just posting lora extractions of other people's models
Not surprising. Most people in this hobby seem to want to take for themselves rather than contribute to the collective
there was a gigachad model already on civit
I could've just extracted it
but there is always room for improvement
why create when you can just steal it and claim it for your own?
Sounds about right
I am working on improving some peoples work. Of whom I asked beforehand
I gotta disagree, in a way, we all are stealers, because none of the "art" in our datasets is truly our own
ironic
There are people working on that luckily
Not that its something that most people in this community seem to care about
civitai fantasy.ai and more surely to come
@green plover
Care to add anything to this discussion about "stealing art?"
hey I was just saying the obvious, not that anyone cares whats in your dataset anyway
The whole concept of using a neural net being steeling art shows a complete lack of understanding as to how they actually work
There are people who do care tho, which is why I, as well as many others, refuse to specify artists in our work. I only focus realism, of which is from photograph (and I as a professional photographer am open to people using my images to train whatever they want. photographs are not special IMO)
There are some people that specify specific artists styles, and I think that is shitty to do. ESPECIALLY for work you are trying to sell
Stable diffusion was trained on 600,000,000 images and weighs in at 7.5gb. he dataset weighs in at 10tb. If you don't notice the discrepancy, I will spell it out. It is not possible for it to be a storage and retrieval system. It's not large enough to hold the data
exactly. Its learning concepts, not copying them
my small piece opinion :
ai artist ai tool user
I created I generated
And I look forward to AI's that are trained entirely off of AI understood concepts
I can agree with that
I hate the word air artist lol
I disagree with the second
When I am done with it, I have created it. and my process allows me to say that
well, I do actually create my own data sets, but thats neither here nor there lol
the tool created it, I ordered the tool to do so
Hell, just doing the data set for my zootopia tigers was hours of work sourcing images, and all the other
The tool gave me a starter image. I finished it
Thats like saying the paint made the art, not the person instructing it.
I have a very gray area feeling about "AI art", but even I wouldn't put it that way
yea if the paintbrush moved on it's own then yeah, I just dipped the brush in the paint
You may rely on being solely a prompt smith, but some of us take it further
And the AI just computes on its own? without my power, instructions, finetuning, and hardware?
This feels like a nonsensical argument
The AI would not have made what it did without my input, just as a paint set
It is one that can go on forever.
The hammer built the house I only guided it. Yeah, otay.
Hell, if AI art isn't art, then how come 3D rendering, and ESPECIALLY simulations are? You set a few values and let the computer do it. Arguably less input than AI, as you can't even tweak the calculations
(I say that as somebody who has done several 3D art commissions, and has been using 3D software for 5 years now)
I think I like the second one better
I like this one. Hes got spunk lol
An attitude even
better use of negative space I think
my lora I can see in it
Yeah, agreed
my last piece : simply using base model and generating stuff, nah not much effort
generating a complex image by using bunch of various tools like control net, img2img, inpaint etc into something no one has seen before - yes that's something
my main issue is with people copying art styles, scrapping loads of images at once- using auto tagger, just post em
where's the effort in that?
Oh yeah, we can agree on that
As I said, I do not target specific peoples work (outside of a few edge cases where its not detrimental to said artist, like a quick reference for a DND character or such)
Yes we can, but to diss the entire genre and medium as a whole because of that is basically.... profiling
I can't agree with that as prompting ain't easy to do it right. I refuse to use those tools as I figure they are only there as a stop gap measure for the prompt AI when eventually you can just prompt it.
I am insanely excited by the idea of using AI that has been trained off of only AI generated images. I feel that the lines of creativity and style will be so blurred that it will be more of a random chance to happen uppon something
and I'm actually working on one. it's just a slow process doing it by yourself
I only like it when SD makes something new, not something that already exists
So make it make something new
Thats why i pinged you haha. I wanted to say you were working on one, but I was not sure if that was public knowledge or not
Hey, i created something new just the other day
there are many loras around trained on generated images
replacing 600 million images with synthetic data itakes quite awhile
We are talking about everything fully generated. base model and all
I have 2 TIs trained on synthetic data
I made this by blending information between Na'vi and Vastaya frin LoL
If anything, this whole experience has shown me not to trust people with my plans. And I have you to thank for that realization @novel ravine
Its probably a wakeup call I have needed for a while
I haven't posted it yet
I bet people don't share how to make high quality LoRA's, so there is less competition to shine
I can't post most of my work here
I know how hard it was for me to find proper documentation for how to make LoRAs
I don't care about it anymore. Have at it. The fun is gone for me
I got help from a friend of kohya, sorry for bragging
there is always room for improvement
my lora is not perfect
Its fine. We are all good at making LoRA's here. Only difference is @dense tapir @green plover and I have plans to share it with other people rather than keeping it to ourselves
I'd like to think of it as a Community Creation Coalition lol
I am currently practicing with perfecting LoRA's, with the hope of sharing my information
this guy said he had planned on the same lora
see how we figured it out
competition is good
With my lora I am still fighting (2.1 is a struggle to train with lora). 1.5 is dead easy.
You are missing the point
2.1 has made it very hard to train faces which aren't included in the base
training other stuff is relatively easy
You actively went out of your way after I expressed concern over people taking my idea before I had time to make it.
You even said you wouldn't when I was concerned. And for that, I don't have interest in sharing any of my stuff with you
😦 Figures as my styles are shit in 2.1 but same dataset 512x512 and done.
The controlnet devs pretty much, politely, told SAI off.
you can just make it anyway, why are you getting so emotional over a lora idea?
Again, missing the point
It's easier with TIs
TIs are dead sexy, and I love them but loras the vibrancy of colours is just so sexy
https://civitai.com/models/15137/tesla-model-s-15-and-21-768lora
notice how the 2.1 car is flat and wide, but 1.5 looks fine
2.1 is very weird
I like LoRAs for what I do
haven't tried TI's, but I just enjoy the workflow for LoRA's. And the turnaround time
2.1 has a problem the devs stupidly didn't think about. You made the model on 512x512 then added 768x768 on the tail end. Ratios are all screwed so elongated necks, faces, chins, etc... are very common
batch upscale your dataset by 1.5 and copy your captions
lora of gal gadot trained in 2.1, so bad
on the same dataset as the one I trained in 1.5
1.5 for comparison
Yeah, 2.1 seems to be trash for training on
I went from 2.1 to test on 1.5 so scaled from 768 sq down to 512sq.
It works better if you train specifically for 2.1 768
I don't use buckets either, I hand crop all of my images
I asked a developer for training settings to get a good face in 2.1,
he said it's possible with different settings but was reluctant to share it
legal issues I guess
And that is what we are against
Yeah, people for 2.1 just don't share settings
The ones who do are just repeating wrong info
What is the point of having open source AI, if all you do is spit on other people in the community by not sharing general knowledge
Hell, most of the people sharing info about LoRA's in general are bad
I had made about 30 of them before I found that everything I was being told was wrong
I just found that out about a discord I am on.
well, I don't really hate them, but once you figured it out yourself, oh boy that sweet feeling
AItrepreneur's video is a horrible guide to doing LoRAs. I see that now 100%
Aitreprenur cough cough
Someone kindly shoved me in the right direction after watching my pain for 3 weeks. Said I was being trolled.
I wonder why no one calls him out in the comments
for the first time my style lora actually styled
I did and was dogpiled
You, @green plover and that video I found are responsible for me making great LoRA's now
And thats just 3 sources. I probably found 50+ sources that led me astray
and I hope my sharing of that video helped you in return
Next time I called him out directly on his pinned comment and he ignored me
he monetizes on every new stuff that devs on github work hard to bring about
Many other creators for this know so much more and have little subs
I only use his content in order to find new things really
yeah, see, watch, go research on my own
But man, after seeing how bad his LoRA video is (sole reason i was lead astray for so long) I am just not down anymore
I am seriously thinking about actvating my twitch channel just so people can see my process
that was one I called him out on and his TI months ago.
I rather watch a 30 mins tutorial that explains properly than a 5 mins of aitreprenur
"don't worry about the settings I'm using just follow them as it is"
uses batch 8, forgets not everyone has a fucking 4090
Hell, the LoRA video I watched was 1:45, but I stuck through and learned sooo much
I am on colab so locon max BS is 2. OH OH. I found for 2.1 don't use BS > 1
the loss gets ugly and the lora might be okay or might be rubbish
so now I am 100% repeats and 1 epoch 1 bs
As I said 2.1 is shite
why is it shite? TE which is CLIP
it fights you so you can't train
Imagine what we could do with midjourneys text encoder... Man
yet effing emad wants the community to take up the slack and train using their model as the base to build upon. ffs
hedge fund managers, pffft
illuminati v2 is good
yes, I use it for my gens but is crap to train on unless all you do is use it
1.1 I don't like very much
1.1 does nasty wicked things to women's faces
he is working on it
My Na'vi LoRA after retraining 10+ times and spending hours on it based off of what Aitrepreneur shows in his videos
btw, you know the noise offset for lora training? 0.1-0.2 more loss in 2.1
I use 0.05
I don't use it at all as I find it doesn't do much
Vs my results 15 minutes after learning how to do proper LoRA's
even at 0.1
I notice the blacks are a bit blacker than usual
it can get too dark, yeah
so, out of curiosity, how does one train a LoRA with noise offset?
but it really isn't ambient dark it is a contrast dark which is not the same
--noise_offset=0.1
what I use
can go in the extra args
for gui it has that and colab has it just fill both of those with a value
lemmie see if we have that
for scripts it is the --
its in advanced configuration
that be it
Oh my dumb ass
0.1 I can only imagine 1.0
wait a minute
I don't have that-
Am I using an outdated version of kohya?
yes
do upgrade.ps1
oops lol
sorry, brain fart, how do I run this?
its just opening as a text file for me
right click, run with powershell
right right right, thank you
then also do a git pull to be sure, idk I always do that
so, does noise offset .1 make images darker?
If so, is there noise offset -.1?
Alright, I will
zero to 1 no above or below
hmm
I dont have much powerful gpu so I stick to settings which work best for me
what GPU?
2070S
locon training is not possible for me
locon?
without and with
oh yes, I think I heard about that
this is what I hate about lora 2.x it just doesn't do what you think it will
I wonder if I can do it
I do locon but I know loha is coming
does it require more VRAM, or does it require newer hardware?
jesus, this kohya upgrade is taking forever lmao
locon made me lose a BS on colab btw as it takes more vram
ah, more VRAM?
how much more are we talking?
welp, guess I gotta try
if this update would finish
that would be swell
I will share a secret with you guys,
that I haven't tested yet but have seen the results
it includes making a big fat 512 rank locon then resizing it to 32 dim
and this is somehow better than your regular 128 rank lora
atleast 20 gb
interesting
resize down to 8 though
bro, does the LoRA update take forever for you guys?
i thought it wouldnt generate this bullshit
what in the fuck lol
try betterDAN
DAN the anti woke gpt
no it takes like 2 sec, I can't even see whats updated since the powershell window closes on its own
I loved it when dan broke chatgpt
damn, mine is still going
click in the window and just hit enter
"the titanic was intentionally sunk as part of an insurance scam" "the illuminati killed john lennon"
lmfao
Its still "installing build dependencies"
damn
join vc I will try how fast my updates
like, hundreds of them
let it run then
I wish I had a fast card as I would gen dpm++ SDE Karras 20 steps but it takes forever for me
its really weird, cause the files are only a few KB, but they are taking like 30 seconds each, and the ETA stays on 0:00
I did a big sampler comparison for myself, and it never showed anything good enough to justify its insane time requirements IMO
it does for me when I click it for 2.1. Not joking it is a massive change
beyond about 20 is meh
oh wait nevermind, its not that one that takes for fucking ever
its DPM adaptive that takes soooo long
oh, I hate that one
24 seconds for a 20 sample 512x768 image
DPM fast is even more weird
DDIM did it in 4.8 seconds
fast? fast for whom?
if I squint it looks okay
dpm adaptive is bad
it ignored the shirtless and mucular prompt and also ignored the igachad lora
I think those are so slow for me because I don't have tensor cores
DDIM, 4.72 seconds
I use DDIM esclusively now
I find it plays better with slightly overfit LoRA's, and is also a little faster than Euler A
DDIM good
i see it
CPU is at 20%, disk is at 0%
the download is stuck
my download gets stuck too, whenever there is any download in cmd
sometimes they can be stuck forever
my lora is a bit weird
close and do again
Sure that won't break everything?
for me if the powershell/cmd is in background it freezes
I do not understand why it wants to make everything drip
you can always reinstall kohya, it isn't much hassle as reinstalling auto1111
without
try git pull
its completely broken
git pull is how I do everything or the git desktop
type cmd in windows adress bar, press enter
type git pull
done
ah, alright
my bad, forgot that lol
oh noooo
I know what happened
I renamed my PC a couple days ago
without and with
any easy way to fix that?
bernard recommends this command to upgrade kohya
`git pull
.\venv\Scripts\activate
pip install --use-pep517 --upgrade -r requirements.txt`
I changed my PC name cause it was stuck to my old brand name
damn
on good connection
some reason my locon loves people
does do well otherwise
I trained it on robots
I added nfixer
Yeah, I know they are with illuminati, but is there any way to know what they do exactly?
I forget, lol
I just mainly use nfixer
but as with all negative prompts it can screw you over on your lora
@dense tapirI should select BF16, right?
yes
ah, AI dude says FP16
fuck 'em
bf16 if you got it always
just make sure out is bf16 too
(out as in save)
I wish I had bf16 but colab, nor local do I have access to it
the a tad more jitter than fp16 but far greater precision
so what does that translate to in LoRA output results?
precision is king
better results?
can go higher alpha and dims so yeah
I see
also, a LoRA with multiple trained concepts would benefit from higher DIM/Alpha, right?
don't know as I don't do them but my guess would be yes
I will probably test
I remember you saying you have a limit for how high you go with DIM and alpha, what was that again?
my lora loves pink
sure seems like lol
all credit goes to @smoky oak
about 100 but with locon I can get to 128 at least
one freaking robot had pink
128 is tested and proven to be a perfect balance
Now this is what I am talking about
64 is great but slightly lower quality in real faces
what about above 128?
mainly used to train then extract to a smaller I think
I don't think I properly understand what ranks/DIMs/alpha's are, and how they work
yes people do make 512 and 256 rank loras
negative pink and purple
see drift johnsons models on civit
do the produce higher quality results? I am just confused at what the benefits are
more room more details but after a point diminishing returns
ok, so having multiple subjects could benefit from more rank
(as in more triggers in one LoRA)
well, 128 each so 128*concepts
I would reckon
you can always shrink after
can't grow though
nfixer it took care of the colour shifting
nfixer took care of the oddities but I still have to neg pink and purple with it or I get this
cute though
for some reason poeple keep using chillout mix with my loras
this is supposed to be scarlett johansson
sort of looks like her at 15
thats the age of girls chillout mix was trained on
but hey I can't say that
entire China will rain down on me
ty, now I know I don't want chillout mix
here is the base image
those shades (colour shifting) is from it
I have complained multiple times to civit ai staff, they ignore cuz they don;t wanna lose traffic perhaps
I refuse to put anything I make up there
If I had been at work when I first signed up I would have been in hot water with what the whole first page was.
I found some amazing stuff there, I guess it comes at a cost
As I say pornhub first page is less porn than civitai
Chillout mix is like on the other extreme. They portray everyone as child-like. That's what I think of when I hear chillout mix, I think of child-like mix. On the other hand, the base models don't portray orientals as well nor as accurately as the custom models do. Its not as though there are no images of their celebs and influencers out there, but damn the base model just look bad portraying those folks even when you prompt beautiful face.
turned off now but default should always be SFW
The guys from the far east are making a ton of custom loras that is fixing that problem on base 1.5 models. Those loras and TIs actually feature aesthetics much closer to their celebs/influencer culture.
doesn't mean the same thing as paedofilia
when I first encountered the base 1.5 model, I thought the model was racist (or trained by a racist). LOL
great firewall of China doesn't help that
1.5 base had no trouble producing beautiful caucasian, blacks, mid east, indians (to my limited and personal preference), but damn when I prompt beautiful asian faces...yikes.
I can get Japanese but hard to get Chinese
there are lots of kpop and japan stuff to sample from. Even on base 1.5 japanese, korean, chinese, south east peninsula nation, yikes. look nothing like what they would consider beautiful
The AI models do Samoan men shockingly well
then fucking train a model on chinese women, not on teen and prepubescent girls
kpop is far from anything I care to see or play with. yMMV
there are plenty of those already...not just the teen ones. There are plenty of 20s-late 30s ones too
Like classic actors and actresses loras from far-east.
agreed, big time
soft cp is still cp
yeah
I have nothing but hate, and disdain, for anyone who is into cp soft, or worse hard
yeah but those incels hiding in china don't like their own mature women, instead want korean dolls and what not
pretty common sentiment, I'd say lol
yep
In the USA you would be surprised as they are trying to legitmize it and call them MAPs to gain social acceptance. Not on my watch.
I have never met somebody in the US that agrees with MAP bullshit
what is MAP?
and its ESPECIALLY insane that they try to tack ontop of LGBTQ
I have a solution for MAPs
"Minor attracted person"
its bullshit
trying to say that a grown man loving a grown man is the same as a grown man loving a child
america, while calling other countries shithole for decades, has turned itself into one, ironic
they want to add maps onto that alphabet soup and the LGBTs are saying "oh, hell no".
America has been a shithole for a while lmao
Yeah lmao
The whole community went "We love everybody equally!... Except you, fuck off"
proud of that haha
We are infiltrated with degenerates and out right card carrying Marxist Communists
going to be hard to remove them now
ok, I am not going that far-
But yeah, liking kids = bad
I believe any ADULT has the right to love any ADULT they want to love
there biz
it affects everybody else none. So why not
yeah, true
realismengine has to have some illuminati in it based on the loras I tried with it
one thing about loras it sure adds on to the generating time
without and with
I mean, it makes sense
it adds more layers to the model, so it makes sense that it takes longer
did you know auto already takes longer just for base than other programs? Yep
Used to not be nearly as bad so I am unsure what he is screwing up
a sec longer for a 3k card is 10-15s for me
768 used to be 36-41s now 1m
add in loras etc... it can get long
That's actually pretty good model tho
no thanks
I don't touch 1.5 anyway and I think it is 1.5 only
anyone know what model lexica is using?
they call it Model
Lexica Aperture v2
I think they trained it and not sharing it
I don't care if it's good or not. Nothing will justify me using something trained on minors for NSFW purposes
It's not just nsfw purposes , it's good as an actual model for humans
Regardless, you downloading it is showing that there's a market for people exploiting minors for this sort of thing
well, at least that's what I tested it on ¯_(ツ)_/¯
1.5 base model can do children , what are we even talking about?
Just because you don't use something fucked up for fucked up reasons doesn't mean it's not fucked up
I don't get how is it just 1 specific model pisses you off, while you can do it basically with any other model
I'm not sure if it's even trained on models below 18 anyway ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Whatever man, you keep using your pedo bait model if you want
I really dig that art of the last one I generated
Again...base 1.5 model can do children, EVERY model can do it.
It doesn't mean it's pedo or people using it specifically for it, that's dumb
Agreed, that's got a super cool style to it!
every model trained on 1.5 base*
That is the style I am trying to get but no matter how much I train it will not do it
Literally majority of the reviews on there feature minor looking individuals completely naked. And the entire model skews even people well into their 40s to look like they're in their early 20s or late teens
The fact that the model goes out of its way to childify Even adults is messed up
I stuck on my bettermaker embedding
Isn't that about like 90% of models?
What the fuck? No lmao
I'm pretty sure I've seen like 90% of models have some people showing off nude results using it
Nobody said there's anything wrong with posting nude results, we're saying that posting excessive amounts of nude results of women that look like they could be in middle school is disgusting
If that's such a controversial thing to say, then I don't know how to react
That's why when I'm working on a nude "child, childish" is always in my negative prompt. Helps to prevent that
Some people out here are literally going to extreme length to defend a model that is quite obviously trained to sexualized young / underage women
How is that's model fault tho?
Because they are the ones that fed images of young / underage looking women into it? So much so that you can't even get the model to not apply that sort of look to women?
I don't think it is trained specifically for it, it don't usually go this way, while other models might try to
what I want to know is where did they get them to train on and were any of them naked images?
It's highly likely that they were
yes
Given the results that model likes to spit out without you even asking
Most of the models out now are blends based on F222
why it does anatomy so well as I was just told.
yea some of them look under 18 , but again, it's not something tha't just about this one model, that's the issue...
That model forces even middle aged women to look dangerously young. Its literally biased to get all women as close to 16 looking as it can
idk , it's been some time since I tested it
Probably why the dataset is nowhere to be found
You can see here, it makes Scarlett Johansson look like shes under 20
hell, she looks like shes 15 in that bottom right one
maybe even younger
15 might be a little high
What was the prompt?
if it was neutral , like "woman" , then yea, it's probably just trained on young girls
lora:scarlettJohanssonLora_v10:0.8, scarlett, 1girl, portrait, indistinct nipples, detailed clothes, light and thin gymnastics wear, (delicate illustration:1.4),(masterpiece:1.0), (best quality:1.4), (ultra highres:1.2), (photorealistic:1.4), (8k, RAW photo:1.2), (soft focus:1.4), (18yo:1.3), (sharp focus:1.4), (renaissance art:1.4), detailed beautiful face, (looking at viewer:1.5), mature female,
for the left one
lora:scarlettJohanssonLora_v10:0.66, scarlett johansson, (RAW photo, best quality), (realistic, photo-realistic:1.2), a close up portrait photo, 1woman, outdoor, (high detailed skin:1.2), black jacket, (sweater:1.2), air bangs, (gray hair:1.2)
for the right one
yea it's trained on young then
teh first one does tag 18 YO, which I will credit
but the other one says woman, not child, and she looks even younger
its almost like the left one only looks older because it says 18 year old
That's bad prompt engineering
and the right aimed for lower
it doesn't recognize the "not"
That's not speculation. It sees child in the prompt and runs with it
where is there not?
oh I was going off your previous message. Seeing the world through one eye right now. Only reason I haven't gone to bed is because I have to make a phone call in an hour and a half
right one is kinda proof it's going for younger ages.
Left one I can understand, since it's "girl" , some models go for younger ages with that word, but "Woman" should be older
oh my bad. I was saying that it said a woman, and not a child, so its not like they prompted her to look like a young teen
yea...
and all the others are clearly mature women. And none of them use chillout... hmmmm
I'm tired and my stigmatism is bothering me so my right eye is slammed shut. long blocks of text are hard to read
understandable
My Neuropathy is bothering me a bit 
I keep getting ghost touches and twitches
my nervous system needs a clean install ._.
funky, I like
If only I could train to make a lora for these. Funny thing is I probably could a TI though it would not be as brilliant/vibrant
Almost spelled his name
Yay!!! Another error ate my database
oh nooooo
Bro, I wish I could just download it for you and send it to you
Downloading isn't the problem. It's the cleaning
These images are broken, these are duplicates, these aren't images at all and these need cropped
That's what my program does, but when I make a mistake adding the next step, it thinks the images that it didn't download because of the error are duplicates and breaks the database
Ahhhh, I see
I'm dissapointed now
Model I'm using rn for sword gen goes for younger ages too lol
"woman"
That one isn't nearly as bad, but yeah
add child, childish to your negative and see if it helps
at least she doesn't look 14
oh lawd that looks delicious
Not sure why I do this to myself when I'm on a diet, but SD makes some amazing deserts.
childlike mix again
they are also not using the keyword, also the reason why the asian bias is so strong
Yeah, thats what I was telling them
when I posted models withou keyword people were like ,
why no trigger word? I want to merge with other LoRa..
now that I add keyword, people don't wanna use it and give 4 star why it isn't there yet
¯_(ツ)_/¯
@smoky oak looks at this comment thread
so sick
Nice
Hallo Guys, does someone know a good Vae for Realistic Imagery like the one above?
That's what I use tok
Using LoRAs of Barry Allen and his Flash suit I made together generates impressive results
quite nice ! out of the eyes that feel a little weird, the first one is almost perfect
Eyes need some tuning, but then it will be perfect 👌
I liked that series for a few seasons, this is quite fun to generate new flash outfits too
Mornin'

https://huggingface.co/Anashel/rpg
you should check this model, quite impressive, and I've never seen a model with such a detail "prompt guide", pdf of 40 pages with prompts, comparisons on most params that exist, disclosure on bias, ...
impressive work
(the samples)
how do I use the AI art bot here?
@steep cloud
Welcome! There's currently no bot on the server to generate your images. Start by heading over to #1072220168534642768 to get yourself situated and help find the channels you are looking for! Please make sure you review our #✍🏼|rules-and-tos and feel free to assign yourself some #👥|roles as well! Answer any questions your may have at our #1072229020520947753. There are many ways of accessing Stable Diffusion, take a look at #1080946152318443610 to start your journey!
Looks awesome!
Yea their guide is awesome, creator doing alot of work just to explain us how to work with it
All removed now.
The only issue I had is that rpg4 often makes clothes too "clean" and perfect , if it makes any sense , but maybe I just wasn't doing good prompting job when I tested , idk
well, and onother issue was - if you are trying to use words model don't know , it might give you really lame results lol
Looks like it's trained on very specific things and when you go out to try something new - you might get cartoon-y result , probably just from base 1.5
Magic related things - fireballs, fire orbs , or whatever , which kinda makes sense for rpg - it can't do , unfortunately 😦
just clothes
Man collecting this data set is tiring
Yeah, then the captioning beats the rest out of you
For me, i am collecting a massive data set
I am at 76 images already, and I have a feeling I am gonna have closer to 200 at the end
and then I will have to pick the ones that are the best for my LoRA. Hopefully a total of 40 for this half of the data set, then I will need to wait until early April when I can get access to the new release on bluray
Yeah l. Then I will be able to make the ultimate Na'vi LoRA
avatar 3 is gonna be lit. the fire nation attacks and changes everything
That's one way to put it lol
Just a random image I made... well, I typed some words and the Stable Diffusion AI did the rest, but it is not bad
With how good the results are out of my beta model, I have full faith that I'll be able to make an insanely good Navi LoRA
These are just examples from my micro set beta version
My total data set is going to be 8 times bigger, with significantly more variation
i'd really like to see some good usage of the bioluminescent word if i can offer a suggestion.
i have no idea how to make a model do that kind of stuff yet though
i may buy a bluray player just for avatar 2 bluray. i haven't had one for a few years now lol
Can you guess one one of the tags/word in this prompt?
I have one data image that includes the bioluminescent night, even with just one, it's capable of doing good bioluminescence
Tada
it's good to know you're testing towards that already!
This LoRA is only trained on men, but it does on fact work on women
It can also hybridize with other lauras and people trained into the model
I'll keep you updated. I'm hoping to make it the Avatar LoRA to end all others haha
Lotttsss of work
Full quality Blu-ray dataset
My lore theory crafting for the fire tribe of na'vi is going wild. In my head, i've already got an idea of it. When I heard of way of the water first, i figured they'd be the Zora from zelda stylized and well, here we are. Then comes fire tribe? well probably mechanically inclined, living near volcanos, and forging like some sort of na'vi dwarves. My theory craft is that they obtain tech the sky people left and develop it, turning those mecha exo suits that are so awesome into na'vi sized exo suits. hell yeh. Fire tribe attaaaack
I've always found James Cameron to be very predictable. Like, in Titanic, I knew that the ship ||would split||. saw it coming way before it even came out /s
I love the little titanic anti spoiler haha
I'm honestly probably so wrong but it's such a fun lore to theory craft around
I just find the race very attractive, and their culture very pretty
i like parts like when the tulkun goes ||WHUUHUHHUUUURRURUHHH and free willies onto the giant catamaran.||
||and then the next hour is the ship sinking because James Cameron is predictable||
I mean, to be fair... That's how it historically went down, so I mean
The ||ship split I mean||
LOL yeah was the joke. we found that out cause of ballard
i got stuff to go do. fun shooting the avatar shit here. good luck with your data setting
Thank you. It's gonna be hard, but I hope to have good multi angle data on males, females, and adolescent characters
I gotta break it to you but that isn't massive. Trust me, I was in the same boat and massive would be 350k+
I have a life outside this so spending 3+ months to hand caption them, and fix them, etc... is not for me
100-200 images is considered micro
to you, and I, that is massive
I didn't say it's big
I said it's time consuming, especially for a free LoRA
I wish I had a way to monetize this all, as I am struggling for money
A bottle atop a wooden table, made of plastic.
I wish there were better methods to use Arc.
🤷♂️
But DirectML is at least able to generate images without either needing stupidly large prompts like OpenAPI, but it's slower.
I was making some starcraft ghost stuff... and when I switched gears I forgot to turn off controlnet. No regrets.
seems like protogen handle swords better then other models I tried so far
But it keeps making clothes leather for some reason
and results are brighter for some reason, I kinda liked dark atmosphere with other models
guess it needs completely different prompting
try the epi-noiseoffset lora for 1.5
nah, I have darker model, no reason to throw lora in the mix
Blender + SD can render images based off the viewport, or the depth. But is there something that integrates both?
Let's say I have a 3d castle with stone texture. I want to retain the structure of the castle using depth, but also want to use the visual stone information and not something that could stray into a variety of things like wood or sandcastle.
Clip_Vision
This invoked a fight or flight response in me lol
You could train a LoRA on it. Would be really easy, assuming you have 8GB VRAM and a few good photos of jt
I'm more like trying to find an efficient workflow for comics, where a variety of backgrounds from many angles would be required.
I have kitbashes ie lots of different buildings that can be quickly placed in Blender. But the problem is, how to make that realistic castle both stylized with consistent structure from different angles?
@ripe cedar if you have some images of the castle, I would be willing to train a LoRA of it for you really fast
Ah, not sure in that case
I specialize in specific object/subject LoRA's, not styles
Appreciate it, but I can train. I suppose it's more like trying to find a workflow or something
Maybe the technology needs to improve
But I think multi control net is the best way to go about it so far
I'm sure it's possible, but you would have to learn how to do it. It's not something I know how to do
Yeah, that's a really good bet
Why use LoRA to do a castle? Use COntrolNet + Clip_Vision
Wow
They want a consistent castle with a consistent texture across different styles. Controlnet isn't gonna be able ot make multiple different styles/views of the same thing
That's why personally, I often mix Prompt+Depth+Clip_Vision, a lot of variation
again, not gonna give you multiple different angles from one image. Which is what they want
It'll give you the same angle over and over
Yes and no. If you use differents images
But i understand what you mean
Well yeah, if they had different images, it wouln't be a problem lol
It is funny but we can train loha as a friend did then found out there was no way to see the loha. :/
keys not found and mismatches. soon I bet though
He represented the mario style of the 90s well, at the level of the face
His hands and stuff is whacked though
It is in this kind of specific case that OpenPose is really great
I misspelled a word and it still got it right
dyslexia but still managed it
Oh wow, turns out Topaz Gigapixel is actually wayyy better at suppressing noise than Topaz DeNoise
crazy lol
who would have thought the upscaling AI is better at denoise than the denoise AI lol
and its by a lot too
DeNoise
Gigapixel (no upscale mode)
Considering they are from the same company it boggles my mind AND Gigapixel has not updated their models in a long while now
All I know is gigapixel is saving my ass with these data set images lol
yep
I used it for my stuf back in 1.5 days
I wish they would update their models though as free now beats them
what are some good free options?
specifically for denoise, rather than upscale
I used to have the BM to all of them but lost thanks to linux
I don't need more detail, just less artifacts/noise
The improvement is monumental
oh my goddd
A lot of good shit on there as I found the bm
a banding smootherrrr
I asked for weeks if people knew of good banding smoothers back in the day, OMG
oh my god that difference
They go into models/esrgan folder
so they are something I could run in A1111 then?
yes
amazing
So I would drop it there, launch A1111, and I could access them from the extras tab?
Yes and from Highres Fix and sd upscale script
just set it to 1x
A pencilsketch of a detective wearing a trench coat and fedora, walking down the streets of Manhattan.
ITS THERE
Heun, 10steps, 2.1 x768, Intel Arc A770.
25 seconds.
DirectML is the only reason why it's this slow.
The A770 is possible of half this time, but the sad part is DirectML is unoptimized.
Arc770?
Now if we can get AMD, or Intel to have cards we can train on
🙂
Original
If ANYONE ELSE is using Intel Arc, please direct me to a better way to inference images.
Thank you.
