#💬|general-chat
1 messages · Page 10 of 1
oh boo hoo cry about it, artists need to get over it and move on
I don't see the greatest value as replacing what human artists can do but rather entirely new things that were never possible before. Generation on the fly.
Asset libraries that can encompass anything you can imagine
Effectively infinite compression for certain types of "it doesn't need to look the same it just needs to look good" assets
a lot of game art is really mundane. Making "leafy ground textures" and such. I hope the part of the process that is just matching reality goes away so we can focus on aesthetics
i heard that there is now a notebook with weighted prompts, is that true?
I’m already doing that
what's your approach?
Well this is specifically for dnd characters but I as an example
Have it generate 3
It gives me 3
I say focus on 2 and does so
I then say. “Condense this down into adjectives and nouns separated by a ,
Then I say, make sure to give me a few prompts for (insert art style)
I did something recently like that. Had it generate me scps, then had it generate me prompts based off those scps. There's a lot of room for interactivity between the two, but I really wish we had an opensource chatgpt
@naive ember I try not to ping mods but I think we got a spambot that needs to be banned
Oh and how did that go
Sent my most resent generation cause I don’t think images are allowed here
Fairly well. Piling on embeddings definitely helped but somethings they were too strong content wise
how mch time to take install SD cmd
What is this server about?
is there a recommended amount of images to use to train for embedding? is 15 too many?
i was using like 15-20 for hypernetwork and it worked fine. but training in embedding produces weird results, doesnt look anything like the person
Hello guys
We're all waiting for the distilled model, which is supposed to be ~20x faster
Don't know about the quality, and if it will be better in a strict sense, but speed is already a huge plus
ohhh yeah i remember that announcement
can u use the 20x faster on the 1.5 model still?
and will there also be a mobile version now ?
local?
No, it's a seperate model
aw man but 1.5 is so good
distilled models .. are those a tradeoff - variety vs speed?
e.g. distill a faster model to generate specific things?
I don't think we're there just yet, but we're getting there
but iphone can run a local one, if speed is 20x i think it can run on android
idk i see pruned vs unpruned models, idk if ones better or not
Distilled models are optimised and have a huge increase in speed/less steps needed, with the tradeoff being slightly worse quality, according to the paper
Maybe, it depends on a lot of things- SD can run on an iPhone thanks to apple's chips primarily, I don't know too much about ARM chips and how well they would fare with SD but seeing as how cpu-based stable diffusion on desktops is absurdly slow right now, it might take a bit more than just the distilled model
but are we going to need 20x more VRAM for that? 🤔
also what about 20x faster training? or is it going to be 20x slower 🤔
absolutely not 
I have no idea about training, I'm not enough of a scientist to extract that information from the paper
I hope it's true about that distilled version, but I fear it'll just be a mini version with less data. Which, by luck/chance, decrease the creation time as well. But I haven't read any info on this so I'm just speculating. :P
i'd say it is better to have separate models with less data, than one model with all the garbage they threw into it 😐
@peak orchid what settings and sampler did you use with your cat scarfs? 😄
like, i'm pretty sure that feeding models with random grids of comics/etc not split into several images is the reason for why the damn thing can generate multiple different horizons separated by any separation line(s)
one big model with everything would give the maximum variety for blending ideas.. i think we need both
i wonder if you could do something like 'mixture of experts' ... have a model trained just on lineart to be better at planning scenes.. feed that into narrower models on subsets of the image for each scene element (figures, faces, hands, buildings) .. then something that focusses on light and texture running over the whole thing
It's not less data if I understand it correctly, just a different method of getting your image from that data
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2210.03142.pdf Here's the paper for anyone interested, but be warned, it's technical
Sadly, you do not currently appear to have permission to access https://arxiv.org/pdf/2210.03142.pdf
🤷
In Netscape try Edit -> Preferences -> Navigator -> Applications
lol Netscape? 👴
Thanks, I'll read it in a little while. And thanks for warning me about it being technical, it's my kryptonite!
from my reading so far it seems to be about having to use less steps than to reduce the time. Technically, having less steps will also reduce the time but from the stuff I read so far it still takes the same amount of time as before for each step. But I might be missing something and/or haven't read enough of it :P
I also fear bias every time I read stuff like "…a state-of-the-art sampler that requires no additional training and has achieved
good results for…" being used, but that is also probably just a sort of pet peeve of mine :P
I've noticed that specifying 1024x1024 size results in significantly clearer faces and more detail (SD 1.5, auto1111 ui). Is it supposed to be like that? Like with a standard 512 size I usually get blurry mess of a face while in 1024 it's pretty clear.
yeah we could probably see what is the problem if we knew wtf these samplers actually sample 😕 i kind of expected them to converge on some common "solution" a-la newton method, but they seem to be quite inconsistent between each other
the time/step is the same, but it will get much more results- as far as I know, the quality of 2 steps would be comparable to way more in a non-distilled model
the original SD models aren't all that great on their own. The best thing they bring with new versions is updated tech(or backend or whatever...dunno what to call it) to train on
better guidance + better/more trained datasets
usually
we'll have to see what the future brings though
I hope so as well, I wonder if all details will be there or if there'll be less "fine" stuff
thank you, yeah it's always nice with better guidance, especially towards larger trained resolutions
we'll see in a few weeks
it will be very useful to test prompts at the very least I imagine
Yeah, seems their new thing is mostly a new way to calculate something so it should be usable for everything I hope :D
and if nothing else, I think it doesn't remove stuff, you can still get the same result by increasing the steps... I think, I can't understand most of that document :P
Euler A is known for changing images almost entirely within just a few steps
I also find it interesting by some of the choices of prompt words for their tests >:D
anyone knows why most values we use seem to have only like 1-2 significant decimal digits? is this an fp16 precision problem?
My img2img tends to return black or white images whenever the image is longer than 768 * 512. Is this a known problem?
ai generatiing discord srver where u can give command to bot and it will generate images based on your command text
20 iterations of Karras DPM++ SDE with a CFG of 7
And how can I do that?
You would go first at #1014939219904450590 to read all about the server. The first message at top is explaining about it. 🙂
Oh thank you valentine
Where are you from?
@gleaming lotus
I am gonna give you a food hint , hopefully you can find it 😄 Feta and Gyros/Kebab
North America
?
Too far 😄 I am from Greece 🙂
What you do?
That's nice! 🙂 Welcome here and hopefully you enjoy! But I would not like to chat like that, it might be a bit spam for others 🙂
I don't get it?
I think they mean that having 'smalltalk' conversations in a big server like this might come across as spammy
But it's a general chat right?
Here people talk about casual things
It's just my interpretation of their words, not my personal opinion
Ah okay where are you from?

Sorry, don't know that flag
I don't get what a chat is for if not to chat
Yeah hahah
I'm Dutch 🙂 it's the flag of the Netherlands
I know Netherland by name
Wow you are a dutch
What does cryonicus mean?
Might be a bit counterintuitive, calling people from the Netherlands not Netherlanders but Dutch, but it's just how it is
The first part is self-explanatory, the rest just sounded to me like it would make the name stand out
Sorry, hahah i don't about it
So you like to cry? Crying is good for health
ok apparently it's not self-explanatory
Where are you from cry?
Sorry I don't respond to that moniker
Oh i am sorry where are you from sir/ma'am
Sweden. I'm not one for smalltalk though, I'm Swedish. We have no idea how to smalltalk
I just learnt there's a mob of angry dudes who don't like AI art and are trying to actively cancel it. lol
yeah it's a thing- I understand where they're coming from but I hate that movement so much
Okay
apparently, some of them aren't even artists, but more likely come from the "cancel culture" movement
in a way- for people who don't understand AI, how it works, what it actually does, it's really easy to spin their view to 'AI is theft' 'AI isn't real art'
I feel like it's based on ignorance and fear, mostly
there's not a lot of difference between AI and an artist that learns how to draw from few of his favorite artists
one of the differences, for example, is that AI would be trained on much many more artists
but who am I trying to convince here... xD
I mean, I'm with you there, but it's hard to explain the sentiment to someone who does not want to understand or even discuss it- people are just scared of losing relevance because a computer can learn something they spent years on in hours and spit out an absurd amount of images for next to no cost
yea, one thing these guys could do is actually create annotated datasets
these would have a lot of value
they could use it to their advantage instead of being enraged, yet most of the time the rage still wins lol
there's no going back on the tech, and progress won't be stopped- what they can do is drag companies like stability through nonsense legal battles and try to kill freely available models/training
except that people are training their own models, or at least fine tuning existing models
yes, that can't be stopped, but training one of the 'main' checkpoints takes an absurd amount of computing power and a gigantic dataset
yep, but when I see the difference between 1.5 and some fine tuned models... I can't stop thinking that we pretty much already have all that we need
(yea, I have some issues with 2.1, like a lot of people, I think)
that's like people in 2002 saying 'game graphics can't get anymore realistic' 
I love 2.1, haven't used 1.x in a bit tbh
not sure why, but I have a lot of difficulties getting good results in 2.1
in particular with a textual inversion of a character
I have about 2k 1024x1024 hires photos of her portrait, but... it doesn't work as good as in 1.5
if it's actual portraits, sure, but that's what DB/Lora is for
TI is absurdly good with styles in 2.x
it's pretty much all I've been doing for the last few weeks
It's always about what you want that's important. I've seen a lot more people say they can't get what they want with 2.x than with 1.5. With 1.5 most people seem to ask how to get the same results as midjourney, that's about it. I've seen very little dedication for 2.x anywhere. Even on this very channel I'd say the info is lacking. But for anything in 1.5 you can find it somewhere. That's from my experience anyway, I might just be bad at searching for stuff :P
but db/lora is more limited than ti, right ?
i mean you're limited to 1
to be more clear, if I wanted, I could create two TI for two different portraits, and then mix them together in the same prompt
can't do that with DB
don't know much about lora yet
Hey, maybe someone know the answer. AUTOMATIC1111 gui have ability to generate grid of different checkpoints, is there any way to rename legend values? I mean, right now it's hash string like 325e66c, instead of this i prefer to see something like Stable-Diffusion-v2. Maybe someone knows and can help? 🥲
another example would be : with TI I can train it once and then change the model to have different styles of the same character
I think you can name your grids just like how you name your images themselves, and you can name your images with the name of the model used
Can u show me an example please? I have tried something like "e52ec3c(Anything 3.0)" but failed
Can I use my own drawing as an inspiration for this I want it to create a realistic tattoo
no, I think he means changing the name of the models on the axis
what have you in your Images filename pattern box?
so instead of the guid, it shows the filename of the model
to do that you'd need to change the code
sounds easy enough though
Can I use my own drawing as an inspiration for this I want it to create a realistic tattoo
A little confused about ur question because i dont know where is this box but let me show you what i mean
https://imgur.com/a/PuvfSKE
This imgur.com page can’t be found
sorry, edited, now is right one
totally, I've done that already
Yep, you are right
So, only option is to change code?
I think so
How do I do it, I guess would be a more appropriate question then
img2img and then it depends on what you want to do exactly
hover your mouse on the "checkpoint X box" and it'll tell you how to use it
the most difficult is turning a monochrome picture to a colored one I think
I'm new to this and need a guide to figure it out how do I get it to look at my image I've put it up and I get weird stuff not related to the image
Can you walk me through the procedure
and I'm not sure, but if you don't have a range from->to on your Y axis, then it'll either not work, or it'll never stop creating images. But I haven't tested it, too scared that it'll run forever! :P
Or point me in the direction where I can figure it out how to do it
you can put models on axis
Yeah, you are right, just wanted to check and didn't fixed back 😄
yeah, I know that, but in their image, they used seed on their Y axis, and I'm not sure you can have no "end point" for it.
once you've started the ui, you need to go into the img2img tab, here you upload your image, and select crop or resize and fill, otherwise the result with be distorted
then you can try to generate an image to see what you get. if it's too far from your prompt, you increase the CFG scale, if it's too far from your image you can either decrease CFG scale or denoising strength (start with denoising strength)
did you get what I said before with the model name?
usually, if you want to keep most of your image then a denoising strength between 0.4 and 0.55 does the job
but then it really depends what you want to do
To check it on mouse hover?
yes, if you hover your mouse over the X axis when you've selected the checkpoint then you can get a small box on hover that tells you how to use it, and in it, it says that you can also use it's file name. Haven't used it myself so I'm not sure how to work it more than that tho
Idk why but all my hovers broken, dont have them at all in web gui, need to fix it later.
As far as i have tried i can't use name of file :c
Oh, wait, nvm, i think i had name typo, now its working, thanks a lot!
for example, if you want to do a face swap but keep the same gender, denoising strength of 0.2 is enough
in fact sometimes it's even too much
they also recommend you to have checkpoint as the Y AXIS as it will not switch as often then if you use both X and Y
Seems logical, i will use ur advice, thanks mate 🙂
I don't recall exactly, but I think I keep 8 models in memory :p
Did anyone try one of the photoshop plugins? https://medium.com/geekculture/ai-for-photoshop-work-smarter-and-faster-7f66d930208a
I'll be interested to get some feedback on those
btw, what's everyone opinion on outpainting scripts in 1111 ?
it has its limits. I've done some cool stuff with it but eventually it starts creating frames and can't go further
I was using it at first but then I realized you can get equivalent or better results with a png with an alpha channel
I can send you a sample of what I did on general-with-images https://discord.com/channels/1002292111942635562/1004159122335354970
what are your views on people using others artwork for img2img?
I'm using my art on img2img, what do you think ?
I can't figure it out
I think people should atleast credit the original artist and mention whether an img is generated from img2img or not, otherwise it overestimates the capabilities of the AI
I have a drawing where do I start
use command image_init to upload a picture, only in dreambot channels, example:
"/dream prompt: a house in fire image_init"
I got that far
Ok finally getting somewhere thank you so much
How do I use thsi
use command "/dream prompt:" and then describe the image you want to generate, but only in the channels between #1047760914008522782 to #1047760279267721236
uhm can someone help me setting up ai art
Are you trying to install it locally?
If you're having trouble with something, such as an error, you can post it in #🤝|tech-support
I would make sure you first have the computer specs
You can post screenshots and get help; there's no problem
though it's totally understandable to take a break
or whatever you need to, of course!
But we're here if you change your mind
turning sketches into something more complete and colorized, also requires a good prompt describing the final product
That's certainly true.
Iteration and effort.
And.....well, if you're me, understanding the relationships between words.
and how you can change shapes, textures, and colors within SD
Wtf, for the first time played a bit longer with SD: and it's just 5 hours later. 😅 🤣
I remember those days of being enthralled like that.
And I don't even know what I'm doing, just trying some prompts, pushing the result in img2img, doing something else or the same again, and just keep getting amazed by the results.
Yep, those were the days for me too. The more I learned the more I burnt out now meh. I moved on to making models, and embeddings, etc... which zap even more time.
What kind of models? For image rendering, for games, or for 3d printing?
for SD
I am just waiting for the new tools so I can get back to making more for 2.x, but until then I have been doing embeddings, and hypernetworks.
what is gpt4
a text based AI/language model, probably releasing somewhere in 2023
who devs it google ?
OpenAI, same company that is behind DALL-E
they also already have a public GPT-3.5 for people to play with- it can explain things to you, remember things from earlier in the conversation and use those, write code, essays, etcetera
if you'd like to try it, just google ChatGPT
So another question, is there a way to get it to morph multiple images?
Guys can someone make for me a digital painting of a Cat wearing the little jewish skullcap on a top of head ? I was trying so many times and I cant
If there were a models to have list what would you include?
Id put 1.5 2.0(depth2img) and base 2.1
Creating venv in directory venv using python "C:\Users\╨єёырэ-╧ъ\AppData\Local\Programs\Python\Python310\python.exe"
Unable to create venv in directory venv
exit code: 3
stderr:
Системе не удается найти указанный путь.
help me
The default outpainting in automatic feels real bad. Anything to fix it?
nope

Does anyone know where to find the full docs for SD? I've read all the stuff on Stability but nada for what I need. I'm talking every parameter explain kinda docs...
Anywhere that explains how to train?
What exactly is training, and how to do it mainly
One question. my Automatic1111 webui changed a few days and now my resolution options can be increased in smaller steps, like by 8pixels, it used to be biggersincrements, like by 64 pixels, how can I configure it again to use resolution in steps of 64 pixels?
Like it was from 512 to 576, now I can setup 512, 520, 528, 536, etc
ui-config.json
this one? "txt2img/Width/step": 8,
yeah, I think so. will be another for img2img
thanks a lot
8 is insane
Are there any notebooks with prompt weights yet?
@naive ember @thorny depot can one of you ban @hallow sage they are impersonating @indigo meadow by using unicode to appear as if they have the same name and discord discrim number to scam people.
Looking into it. Thanks for the heads up.
If you have logs of name changes you’ll see they changed their name to impersonate just a few hours ago
were to find other ckpt files? looking for one with cars... n1?
I think he may have misinterpreted the question and his answer is being taken the wrong way.
They asked if they'd put a 'noai' tag on by default but it seems like he's talking about allowing ai at all? Idk how a 'noai' tag by default would be detrimental, tbh.
Oh n/m he clarifies further down the thread.
I don't think that he misinterpreted anything. He says that they don't wanna put "noai" by default because it would "prohibit uses that would fall under copyright law's fair use rules."...
I
Yes I think i actually misread the tweet lol
"To block all generative AI, including AI operating lawfully under fair use rules, use the NoAI tag. See: " I get it, because scraping data to train non-commercial/research models is operating under fair use.
"You don't determine if a generated image using an amalgamation of stolen artwork is fair use."
guess we're still making stuff up
YAY, no more damn gatekeepers as I had enough of that from Apple, and Google, and Mainstream media for a decade plus.
Yeah, I tweeted that idiot too. Showing bias much as the human brain was "trained" on everything it has consciously, and subconsciously, seen to make art and the AI is being shown some of the same things, to a much lesser degree though, so no difference.
Can't copyright a style else everyone would be suing everyone else.
It's frustrating because there's actual points to be made without misrepresenting what's actually happening....
hi, i'm very new to this. can sommeone help me? I ran deforum but can't find the mp4
in civitai, but CarHelper for SD 2.x in #1047197565365538826 gives very good results
they should at least separate it from the rest
and especially force users to label "their" art as AI generative art
and not something that they claim to have made
and/or give users the opportunity to make AI generative art dissapear from their feed etc.
Anyone feel like helping me out real quick?
Apparently Karla Ortiz is pro-NFT lol (many of the anti-AI folks try to lump AI in with NFTs as a derogatory insult, so I wonder how that's going to work out for her): https://twitter.com/kortizart/status/1369419865111597060
yes like a tag, or maybe its already implemented, i dont use artstation
yes, and someone who doesnt label "his" AI art as such should be banned
and some of them deserve to be sued
imo the right answer (for artstation specifically) is to ban unedited generations from midjourney, SD1.4 / 1.5 / 2.0, NAI, DE2, NijiJourney, and the rest of the generators we know or have fairly substantial resons to beleve were trained on unconsenting artist data. Practically, it would have the same effect as banning AI art, while leaving the door open for future models that are trained on open or proprietary data that these companies actually own
Adobe is unironically the good big brother in all of this at this point
as much as those haters cry about Adobe "policy"
not banned but maybe shadowbanned
But even if they all were banned, you still have to identify AI art and enforce the rules. I'm not sure we can do that without a lot of false positives, and false negatives. In such a scenario I can imagine some number of painters getting banned because their work looks like midjourney, which would be its own rather hilarious internet shitstorm
Pretty much every time I’ve come across an AI art page that looks like AI art they always label it in the bio already, across different platforms
usually you can tell the difference, especially if you are a pro
but sure
Are there definitive ways to tell if art is AI?
Hasn’t it gotten to the point where it’s indistinguishable?
no
*sometimes
http://aiorart.com/ Let's see how you do 😏
The mods of r/art on Reddit have an official policy of "fuck you, get banned" if your handmade art looks too much like "AI art"
yeah they usually say when their art is ai assisted
even then you can tell especially if you are skilled
That is pretty annoying
I wish I had this to cheat when I was in school lol.
Definitive, no. But still possible, and there’s most likely quantitative approaches (color space distribution etc) that can be learned from a very simple classifier
What would classify as edited
"Uhh yes I added a smiley in the right corner and my name on the right corner"
this whole AI generative stuff should actually be regulated
and not be let full free
regulate it
Or if you're too good and banned because it's mistaken as AI Art
I got 7/10. 5/10 is placebo / coinflip. Some people are better than me, but even actual concept artists I've shown this to only get around 80-90% accurate. Big error comes in the form of false positives
force the companies to mark the stuff they generate
Hand painted color spaces and frequency distributions aren’t going to be the same as has drawn ones just due to the way the model works
I'd say if you paint on top of MJ that pushes it back into the realm of fair use. Like a photobasher concept artist who paints on top after collaging photo elements
i mean technically you can observe that anyway
develps AI to un-Ai watermark your art
They can't do NSFW deepfakes of folks, there's already certain things you can't do with it.
since AI generative art has "marks" that show that it isnt hand painted
I think we should work even harder at making open source AI for everyone to freely use, so that the AI driven future is more democratic rather than controlled by the rich and powerful.
i know
I’ve heard this exists somewhere already
Good god
that was not the actual point even tho i dont fully agree with you
Also, what about folks who want to incorporate it into professional artworks?
with free i didnt mean financially free
The current watermarking is just metadata and not that good
Like paint over it.
that would be a case that would be debatable, indeed
Some software sees it as a corrupted file
If everything is watermarked, a la Shutterstock with those big semi-transparent ones, you can't use it for professional uses.
i mean you can but not for all cases
For stuff like landscapes, it can probably destroy the whole image
you still can use them for referencing and ideas
I don't tweet much but when I see someone being Kamala Harris and saying stupid shit by throwing out a word salad as that one did it triggers me into tweeting them.
Well, I mean, there's very valid points for Watermarking, but at some point, we're going to hit AI art that is pro grade
We're still at the early stages
People can still improve the tech
wdym by pro grade? 😄
auto1111 itself have a "Do not add watermark to images" option, which is disabled by default
Indistinguishable from anything on Artstation
oh, unless Ai becomes sentient i doubt this will happen + lawsuits are coming
That's not really speculation since we're actually pretty much most of the way.
if anything I think it would be trivially easy to make an AI image detector, from my understanding of adversarial training you get a detector automatically through the training process
the "Adversary" of the generator is literally an AI detector. they can probably do way better than humans
its a speculation actually
Yea and the low vram optimization I was using pre-a1111 had it stripped out by default.
The few things we're missing for AI wise is ironically perspective detection and such
I mean that's the natural progression
AI or real? in #🏞|general-with-images
i mean first of all AI cant achieve some of the big advantages actual artists and especially pro artists have on their workflow
impossible
Yeah, playing hunt the AI will end up like those Photoshop or not detectors image wise
unless sentient AI
Some Depth aware diffusion models work pretty well at perspective/proportion.
imo its too bad that, through their impotent response, artstation is playing into "artists vs AI" narrative. There's no reason it has to be that way. The narrative needs to be spun into "artists vs anti-copyrighted-material-model-training"
Not currently, but later on.
and also AI regulations are coming
Yeah, I wish there's a better way that ML researchers can get permissible datasets
Cause if you use current copyright laws as basis, you can't use 99% of stuff anywhere
It's pretty beeped
I have seen an artist go full pro with AI
Like idk if they weren't an ai before cause of just how much they can draw and the stuff they produce is almost the same
“What is my purpose”
“You make really shit hentai”
“Oh my god”
Adobe could be the saviour anyway in the near future
same with HarmonAI and company. They're still in the tech dev stage where they're saying "look at the cool shit we get when we train a model on Pink Floyd's discography!"
Once their models get really convincingly pink-floyd-y there will be legal and internet mob troubles coming their way too
for artists
Why bother making AI if current copyright laws don't allow you to use most of everything?
Don't bother with medical use either
Current copyright laws don’t prohibit training on copyrighted data
I'm from Russia. Who is this "copyright" guy?
I don't think anyone knows what future AI legislation is going to look like or how the current laws interact with image generation even.
Yeah, but try explaining that to the art crowd
the issue isnt just with training but yeah i dont agree on everything 100% of the critics
You might be totally right, but considering how images created by AI have improved in the last 2 years I find "impossible" a word too strong 😄
I'm sure HarmonAI will try to sell AI music from a band called "Ponk Floode", they will make some startups that lets anyone make Penk Flewd music for free. And then real musicians will clue into the fact that the startups are monetizing unlicensed IP and there will be yet another shitshow
It’s not the art crowd that actually needs to be convinced, only the legislators and judges do
Essentially, if you try to make an AI which detects tumors, you're going to run into using patient X-rays and such folks don't consent to.
the word "impossible" is controversial i know. But unless this AI becomes sentient i dont see any possible way to reach at least some of the advantages of the manual work
Twelve-Inch Nails, the new AI grunge band just dropped their 28 hour progressive album
All the money is on the AI side. So, I think we can reliably predict where things will go.
If someone feels like a technology is an existential threat to them, they will always find another issue with it to hate it for.
AI assisted is going to be hella grey areas
Y’all ever put the negative prompts in the positive?
but not on the fanatical prompters side
since some prompters and users of AI generative art are already cancerous to the whole art world
Any law is as good as it is enforcible. The more people are using the tools, the more accessible they are, the less likely the nanny state is to have enough cops for everyone.
Like AI is low effort, I can give it that. I don't agree with it being low quality.
I just hope by the time all this gets to that point these 80+ yo politicians are retired either to sunset years or in the grave cause they can't even work a smartphone, so I sure don't want them passing legislation about AI.
I really doubt that new legislation is going to satisfy anyone really, I can't see a future where all copyright material is allowed for any type of training for any purpose, and I can't see a future where image gen models are banned or whatever.
AI art has a big potential, but manual done art and artists becoming obsolete is a whole different thing
I'm sure Disney and Warner Brothers would already have sued da poopoo out of these startups if they weren't also neck deep in ML research
The ban state isn’t actually a real ban, but rather putting it in the same situation as pirating movies.
My biggest fear is the Anti-Art crowd screwing over copyright and fair use over AI training.
Adobe is btw on the way to get into the Ai generative art business too
and we know that
And everyone is going to suffer
Eh, legally speaking this is all extremely young. We aren't even a year in public perception wise.
There are countries where there is already legistlation explicit about allowing to use copyright content for training...
Japan changed it anticipating that there was going to be drama, to make it clear 😄
Fair use has been dead for a while now and dead 100% on Youtube.
any serious legislation win by the artist camp would just be an epic self-own, because then nobody could train models & exploit AI except for IP holders, like disney and warner brothers
Which is where I bet it heads
when artists don't have access to next gen art tools and Disney / WB do, then they're really fucked 😂
Those TDM laws weren't in reference to generative models, I expect that a lot of that is going to change once pressure starts to get applied by countries whos economies have a larger stake in protecting IP
I don’t remember when or how long ago, but I saw someone go on a tirade about how AI art is backbreaking
Yeah, but it's already bad, the Anti-AI art crowd doesn't know what they're wishing for.
Something about making it look nice takes a lot of prompts or something lmao
I agree
It will screw over other industries
Old adage applies (chopping off their nose to spite their face).
A super selfish wish
I'm honestly hoping that the inevitable legislation just targets the most egregious versions of training or something and that copyright doesn't get too many tweaks.
I think it's being led by upper-middle class merch sellers who are pissed that they won't be able to sell junk produced by Chinese kids.
the YouTube copyright strike system is brilliant from a liability and business standpoint (the opposite for users) but it makes copyright takedowns an order of magnitude easier and more abusable. A peer into a world of more draconian Copyright laws
Me too, but again, what that crowd is asking for may ensure their own works are affected
there is no leader in that and also i give them right in this conflict
Russians in chat are going to be the next Hollywood if we legislate ourselves out of the ability to use these tools freely, and they don't because they don't respect american copyright law
i wouldnt want some skillless douchebag to steal my artwork and even identity and sell it under his name on Stock or wherever
maybe I'll immigrate to Russia
pro-ai don't know what they're getting into either though
on the long run AI will only be a tool for actual artists since any1 can write prompts
do russians like english speaking immigrants
Really? Well, let's see.
But if there is legislation that forbids that, what are they going to do with the LLM ? Those are also training in copyrighted material.
No sane country should legislate to stop them, they are probably going to be very important in the next years...
The reason why YT has such a system is, this is why people don't get nice things by breaking the law
I miss days when the worst folks did was host illegal movies
People won’t sue you if you put their hands in your cookie jar
ofc many dont, look up the SD reddit
I mean, good luck to Open AI training GPT-4 only on copyright free text
Yeah, that'd be a pretty worst case scenario, but from my perspective fan art is already completely illegal basically it's not going to become 200% illegal or something.
but i mean the people and their mouth
copyright free text 
Once every couple months I still get recommended a forgotten full movie upload to yt. Like early 2000’s bad ratings production company went defunct type stuff
hilariously absurd
its just so weird lol, i saw some saying that it will open doors for "new jobs" but in reality it will pay worst than someone at a call center if it ever becomes an actual job
How many millions is the Midjourney discord alone up to now? I'll take that as a metric of public support and direct funding contribution to lobbying.
When Popular Commissions Twitter fanartists are anti-AI, but then you bring up the IP infringement of their income with most fandoms. And taxes.
Yep. Write your own song, perform your own song, and someone claims it. It is hell to remove it because they go back to the claimant and ask if them if they are for real (over simplifying). Of course they are going to say they meant it.
Kinda. I literally went to party in style of Prohibition era US yesterday where only speaking in English was allowed, it was crowded.
Also, Baldy really shills for AI.
http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/69927/videos
A lot of fan art can be argued as falling with the statutory requirements for fair use
If anyone wants to call out hypocrisy, I will absolutely do so.
I think LLMs are probably going to get legislated too, they're much more prone to overfitting than generative image models, the direct damage that can be done with them is far higher, and the resources they require almost necessitate centralization at this point, all things that make it easier to legislate.
They fail the transformative portion
Which is the reason why copyright exists
oh yeah and now i see all those scammers and false promise videos on Youtube with those clickbait titles "how you can become rich with AI art"
Copyright protects "likeness"
NFTs all over again
really? Even as a regular human and not as a character in an IP?
A lot of it can't be really, companies are free to sue people who create derivative works of their properties. Almost all fan art that exists exists because companies either don't know about them or tacitly accept it as free advertising.
yeah
also maybe I should google what fair use actually is
Yeah, actors call sell their likenesses, paying royalties
but those comments werent the ones that pissed me most off
What is the state of SD in other non-English speaking communities?
That depends on the country, in the US you own your own likeness, this isn't true everywhere.
All I know about fair use is that h3h3 did some lawsuit about fair use and won, and that set precedent for fair use for something or other
as long as they dont sell them
because as soon as you want to sell your spiderman fan art you will need likely not 1 but 2 licenses from Marve
Marvel
first for character and second for logo i think
im not sure anymore
Fair use is also a defense for when copyright is infringed. If you are being sued for copyright, you need to prove that your works are fair use.
so like how come Midjourney isn't getting sued by the fact that I can make a rocket raccoon eating a hamburger with mickey mouse, which they then sell to me for some very small fee?
I am suing you then I need to prove not the defendant. That is so ass backwards.
BLM should have won.
what
Less popo = less enforcible copyright
AI is transformative, technically speaking
I don't think anyone knows, we don't even know that they aren't being sued right now, this is all new.
Yea I’m aware that’s why I deleted the “transformative isn’t in the ig factors” as soon as I sent it.
If I then make an NFT of my rocket raccoon burger pic and sell it on opensea, how does that work
That being said, IP infringement usually isn't chased unless you profit from it
you could be sued potentially
but MJ already sold the image to me! I'm just the guiltless middleman baby!! an aftermarket merchant, a speculator on mickey mouse images
the litigant in copyright infringement only needs to prove the infringement.
this
or at least until you make enough profit for the company to care*
Just sell em on ebay
Which shows how far out of whack the system is
The other 3 factors are pretty much in favor of most fan art, it gets sticky for the first one: transformative.
Which is why making fanart and fanfiction for free is encouraged, but there's some weird stuff with certain companies like Disney, Nintendo will go after you.
Aka, how different is this from the OG work?
nintendo is so annoying
why so? What do they do?
Maybe I should start making Midjourney Yoshi NFTs to test how that copyright law works
Oh yeah, remember how many Pokémon fan games have been shut down?
I think that it would be pretty weird for litigants to have to speculate about someone elses intentions and process.
but for a good reason?
Disney will sue your bum if you make any fan games
oh
don't remind me, some of them had so much potential even if they weren't planed to be fully playable (some were just testing stuff or for learning purposes)
lol
but thats understandable
i thought you speak about fan art itself
making a game out of something that is protected with licenses and copyright is illegal
I think anti ai artists should just accept change and the technology will only get better by time progresses
Maybe if I burn the evidence prompt data after making 10,000 yoshi images, they can't prove I just typed in a prompt that happens to look very much like yoshi but is in fact a completely different character. Dosh-E. The character that makes me lots of dosh
They're all under the same umbrella, fan games, tournaments, merch, music, etc.
unless you pay or ask for license
You can have something be transformative with less difference if it affects the meaning/understanding and non transformative for something with a larger difference. Tho ig that’s more of how abstract of a line you draw difference at.
A litigant could be either party. Fact is the one who is suing should have to prove everything as no defendant should have to prove their innocence. Innocence is presumed in the USA.
that already exists, thats why u can make parodies
but understandable why they crush those
Copyright and fair use is tricky
It depends lol
if it was only about accepting change...that is benefitial for them at all
It always depends
I'm sorry, 'the person who is doing the suing then'
The reason why you don't is fans will understandably stop making content to celebrate their creators and move onto fandoms that are okay with it
The plaintiffs and defendants are called litigants. Ahhh, the plantiff must prove guilt etc...
they dont need such "fans" anyway
It's legally okay, but heartbreaking for the people who want to do it.
this is as usual a very ignorant comment (sorry i don't really mean to be rude)
no "anti - ai" artist is against AI itself, almost every1 sees the potential it has as a tool, breaking copyright infringement is just wrong and since its a new tech it just needs laws and etc etc for the future just as everything we have and use (tech wise)
It's like how if you kill someone in self defense you have to prove that it was self defense
just ask for the license then instead of trying to profit on the back of the company without their consent
Not necessarily in civil court. Not paying your federal taxes is a civil offense but if the IRS takes you to court the burden of proof is on you to prove your innocence.
Actually, they have to prove it was murder
Yeah, you think fans are folks obviously not be able to show any love and should only support folks officially.
Ngl in like 2 or 3 years art and ai art will be even more hard to recognize you won't know which one is which
this will probably wind up being a precedent-based legal ruling unless they actually invent new laws to handle the AI art exception
Yes, 100% which is why it shows how the IRS is really extortion
Like whenever I draw art of any character, I should totally ask permission
"breaking copyright infringement is just wrong" Since when? Copying isn't theft.
I have a feeling some country is gonna ban it for that reason
as soon as you try to commercialise it, yes
like a random country
What the law is, what the law should be, and what the moral course for action is are 3 independent questions
Also Disney
this one thing I feel isn't stressed enough. Most of the artist camp seems to think in zero-sum terms, and not "more goodness for everyone" terms. Is it stealing an apple if you could just copypaste an apple
Still love my ronaldo ai pfp
Look at how many fairy tales they've commercialized lol
and it will become useless as it is, when something is so abundant it loses all value
idk how far it will go though I can see it speeding up stuff for that aritsts themselves (take LoR artworks, its not just about a nice paiting but storytelling) but if someone is gonna win from all of this is not the common folks
i mean thats the difference between fan art and those fan made games, the latter ones are easily for profits
But yeah, I guess public domain is technically fair game.
Fan games that are free lol
people make fan games and then put their Paypal or other stuff in for people to spend money
Only their changes are copyrighted by them tho. Case in point del toros Pinocchio
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Viy3Cu3DLk
this guy explains it better than i could tbh, so there's that if u wanna dig into it
china already banned all AI if i remember correctly?
No they just consolidated it into the state
sell the art on eBay 
Yeah, that is BS right there and shows just how far towards communism "guilty until proven innocent" we have fallen.
I disagree. I already see thousands of Ugandan kids flooding the internet with generated pregnant Sonic fanarts. All they need is some guides in Swahili.
Don't forget stuff like adding lyrics to public domain songs, or how performances by an orchestra is copyrighted, even if the music is from the 17th century
that's crazy, didn't they also make the internet limited for a few hours a day or smth
thats exactly my point though, how much would u pay if u see thousands of those sonics or whatever, any1 can do it every1 can do it, any1 can write prompts
obviously we're at the peak where every1 is interested and into it, it will definitely lose its flavor in a couple of months when it gets even more flooded than it is now
For teens
damn
only for kids
that's still sad
Or recordings of an audio book.
idk they do have a very high % of people being addicted to games though, idk i'm biased, if its for a greater good it might do the trick, after age 18 and when you're an adult you're free to do as you please though
yahhh watching that samdoesarts video, theres a place and a platform for "whatever-AI-Art" but it's not Artstation, right now anyway, and basically every company in the field is making some serious copyright missteps that may cost them down the road. It seems the problem is that there isn't a sufficient open data set. They should probably work together to get on that
Yeah, that's why if we talk face value, if we used only public domain or permissible IP for AI training, many of us who were interested in the first place may not even bother with the tech.
And that's the sad part
don't they lose copyright after certain years? or was this only for cartoons? me watching the new slasher for winnie the pooh lmao
IDK about cartoons.
i do wonder why the double standard when it comes to music and not visual arts
music is so very well protected
Btw, glad it doesn't work like that in my state, and my state does also have "castle doctrine".
I hope midjourney becomes more accessible in the future like free monthly turns
copyright right now is 70 years after artist death in the us
Art is subjective. Music has only 8 notes
midjourneys a great bot
And yeah
But the limited turns n stuff
thats exactly my point though, how much would u pay if u see thousands of those sonics or whatever, any1 can do it every1 can do it, any1 can write prompts
Prompts can't do composition, though.
obviously we're at the peak where every1 is interested and into it
No, we aren't . Currently neural networks are extremely obscure. It's a prerogative of 3.5 white dudes. We are pretty much in 1980s Linux territory, and that's why Windows is happening again.
but music aswell right?
What symbol did you use
For that
i think midjourney is going to be the most fucked of anyone, if they wind up being forced to reveal their training data 😛
It's 7 notes and the human listening range
I have a feeling that music is going to be an absolute nightmare for generative systems copyright wise, overfitting a lick when you already have the style in the same vein will get you sued hard.
also, if AI translation of data through a model winds up not being classified as fair use
Sure rhythms and such exist, but you're going to run into music similarities at some point
It's inevitable
for the first point oh yeah, thats why i said earlier if anything AI will really only be a great tool for artists themselves rather than the general masses that claim they'll get new jobs and "artists are elitist gatekeeping art" (sorry i always laugh at that comment when pencil and paper is cheap)
💀 basically any pop song
yes, besides they cant reach the deepness, vision and control of the actual art and artists
Depends if you can get general pertained diffusion from a licensed dataset. Someone like adobe might be able to train in their own stock image database. Also some social media companies have weird image licensing terms when you sign up that can probably be used to justify it, if training on copyrighted data becomes a problem.
Oh
lol
I'm talking super general case, but essentially, most things on the internet are copyrighted
Remember when quote reply was a thing
I suspect that if a social media company tried to release a generative model people would freak out really hard. Everyone hates how much they use people's data already.
at this point all that data is already sold legitimately lmao, with all those dumb apps and people just give them their face for free to use it
I mean most of the stuff you would train on is copyrighted by default from creation, but you grant the company a license when you upload so it really comes down to the disclaimers of the platform you’re scraping
Yeah, I know lol. The biggest problem is essentially people not understanding what licensing is or what it grants or gives
I'm kind of surprised that pinterest didn't come after these ML companies, isn't scraping against their TOS?
and I know that pinterest is a big part of LAION
Acquire an existing company with a good dataset and the right Eula technicalities. It’s horrible PR but at that point the user base isn’t actually why you’re buying it.
You mean, like Alisa and CharacterAI?
I wish there's just an easier way of doing stuff, so folks that want to give things out do so, and things they don't want to give out, don't.
I don't even use CAI for that reason
For some reason people don't seem to care about language models
I've given enough data, nobody needs to know more about my RP stuff
And I am sick of trackers
@serene hare or their habits,clicks,etc
Adobe already has SD in their beta. Very nice last month but needed a bit more work. WHen Adobe releases it in Photoshop to the masses things will change.
Well, those who care, seem to do it in a creepy way. I already heard some folks being in obsessive parasocial relationships with bots.
I bet a huge part of SD changing their datasets is they're getting commercial partners who are courting them.
I mean they don't seem to care about their data being used to make language models.
I lay odds
Use my text,poems,stories etc to train GPT, no problem, its so cool xD.
Use my habits,clicks,attention data to train things to lock my attention into bad habits, Its col cool xD
Use my art, OMG F U
let's swim to the moon uh huh
google AI chatbot is sentient guy entered chat
Faustian deal.
You get, my deepest, darkest, most blackmailable secrets.
I get, OMG catgirl waifu.
regarding the second point, not it wasn't cool, those some of those models were tracked and law was enforced though
The one thing I drooled over was how you could just change the background or some other stuff. The time savings alone for any workflow will make most artists, and photographers accept this GREATLY. No long will it just be the people rubbing one out over their made up wiafus but mom and pops and others using it in the day to day lives.
Not using photoshop because a feature pisses you off is like switching to Linux: it never lasts that long
to be fair, if there was ever a proveable case that a company like facebook, twitter or google actually blackmailed a person with their specific information, the current data landscape would explode over night.
Yeah, this is why when PS gets it to the masses all of this will change and I mean change fast.
Why wouldn’t they scrub it for “misinformation”
im just glad y can deny cookies now when visiting a webpage
they dont need cookies to track though, fingerprinting is the new rage
they even look at the fonts on your system
because all the social media companies hate each other and are eager to see their competitors taken down a peg?
Imo, I know that AI art is going to make Art itself accessible, which brings down the value.
The biggest benefits imo with AI art is letting people who can't do art for economic/social reasons, or folks who can't draw in any way now, ie. disabilities, tremors, etc.
Just get the tech in enough peoples hands before by the time it enters the public conscience
It's pretty painful when some of my art friends say they care about their own skins over those people
art has always been accessible specially ever since youtube exists
the art panorama of you selling a singles piece for 100k dollars hasn't changed, and it won't even with AI
but thats for another topic
Yes.
Yes and no. There's still plenty of folks that are working 2 jobs that can't afford to go into art time wise. AI art really shines in that department.
They don’t seem to use the ammo to criticize each other when they have controversies.
I can't draw a stick figure but I have images I would love to get to canvas. I can't play a musical instrument, I tried a few times but the instrument gave me perm muscle, and joint damage, but I can make music on a daw. AI to either is a godsend for me.
I hope that some small scope legislation will be able to suppress the most market warping tendencies of this tech while still letting normal people express themselves.
@karmic finch most ppl dont have the time to learn
There are two types of social media companies: large multi billion dollar billion users monoliths and things yet to be acquired
sure if you got tons of free time, you can learn anything
but most ppl dont have enough free time to spend on learning to do art
People forget "starving artist" as most starve requiring a 9 to 5 "regular" job to make ends meet for centuries. Same with acting where 99% of actors have regular jobs to eat with.
yeh thats why it has value, because others have to play the russian roulette and get into art studies
i mean thats fine by me, they can always just get an app or a game app on their phones and get the same joy tbh
Yeah, when you have disruptive tech like this, not saying artists can't be protected, but I wonder how people are going to react these days when affordable gas cars are out and horse buggy manufacturers are out of a job.
This is a very similar parallel
don't really see how AI is gonna change their life though
@narrow sluice its gonna be hitting tons of areas over the next 20 years
truck drivers,farmers,anything that can be automated
Well, Emad himself has aphasia, so he made SD as a way to draw/visualize stuff
with what we have 'now' there is already tons of fields that could get totally transformed, let alone the speed of research these days
I think that a lot of people are going to have a pretty visceral negative reaction when they hear about the data set side of this.
too many exception to take into acounts tbh, specially very low% but good for them i guess if thats a soliud argument to be made
That's the tricky part of things, AI art and stuff is tip of the iceberg
I think that ai dystopias forgot that AI can be useful and replace humans wayy before they are just as smart as us
I’m waiting for chatgpt style generality where I can go and say “draw me a diagram representing the point of this article”
The AI job disruption part is my actual nightmare
Ya, and funny enough, no one thought something creative would of been the tip lol
which is wild
Make a really pretty religious symbol? A propaganda poster for union? A catchy ad for something they are good at? Get dating advice if they didn't have enough time to communicate with opposite gender? Save money on actual gifts by printing generated portraits?
I don't even think that artists are the first on the chopping bloack when it comes to ML automation, LLMs are already good enough to push out a lot of low stake intellectual workers.
Art is consistent, and made enough in large amounts, same with code
People in low stake call centers are going to have a really hard time soon.
chatGPT, my unit test writer 🤣
out of all that garbage i can only rescue the first 2 i guess if u can copyright it lmao
first 3*
Ironically, customer service folks, not the McD ones, are the last to go out. I would argue low cost laborers and childcare workers as well, due to limitations.
They also thought chess would be among the last things AI would figure out before it did. First rule of AI: the last thing you think will be automated because it requires a human touch will be the first
make mcdonalds automated with AI, im tired of getting my order wrong
but a robot that could actually cook, that is gonna be harder than self driving tbh
childcare, laborers and anything high risk will probably be the last if i'm guessing. I just think that a lot of call centers already use pretty horrible bots and ones that are low risk will probably be tempted to hack down their workforce with better ones, especially if they can get a finetune of a LLM doing the job.
@karmic finch but ya, fast food could easily do it, i dont doubt they R&Ding it
Like the cashiers replaced by a touchscreen?
Anything that is hard for the AI to automate is either super human centered, requires expertise, is very ambiguous instructions wise with many edge cases, or in the case of laborers, bipedal robots that are less maintenance and is overall cheaper
things like plumbing and electric might be the last honestly lol
Yeah, cashiers are probably replaceable, but ironically not like ones working in super stressful areas
Retail -_-
Pretty sure dealing with Karens is something one can't just AI through, for now
Retail workers also have the 'advantage' of people wanting to have an employee to complain at
What is the good place to discuss stable diffusion webui docs? I want to do internationalization, but the issue is already off the page 0.
ChatGPT is an advanced language model, i cant not help you with your complaint.
Lol chatbot with good sounding tts and an infinite chain of managers should do the trick
And then you have infinite complaints 🤣
adversarial Karen LLMs
harvest the complaint data and find some way to profit from it
Since some complaints turn from legitimate to Karen when folks wait too long and lose their temper
Honestly, I wonder how hard it is to emulate empathy, AI wise?
Emulate? Exactly As hard as getting the training set for it
The answer is...uh oh
Yeah, that is not going to be easy
Since you have to deal with people in so many different scenarios
Well for GPT models the point of fine tuning is to bias the error in terms of the data type you want rather than give it entirely new capability
That’s why they latch on so fast
i believe openAI is gonna allow some sort of fine-tuning for chatGPT in the future at some point
prob gonna cost an arm and a leg
Looks like entry-level IT folks are going to lose their jobs once that's out
I wonder if zero knowledge computation might be a middle ground between consumer use and not full open source
I wouldn't mind if they can do an data overfitted help desk with very niche topics
i think the true leap will be when we start seeing some useful neural nets built on new types of compute. One of the hardest differences between real neurons and artificial ones, is that real neurons work via spikes. Where as our current mainstream artificial neural networks have all the neurons 'active' during inference.
like anyone see that company that hooked up real bio neurons into chips ?
how long until they rise against us
Actually, has anyone thought about scraping the entire contents of something like StackOverflow and seeing if it can help with certain questions?
I mean we’d all prefer open source and free, but it’s still better than the current status
they got real neurons connected to a chip, to learn how to play pong
the 'punishment' for doing the task wrong, was disconnecting the neuron from the network
Technically, didn't they make that one artificial cell awhile ago?
ya, there is also artifical neurons that act way more like real ones
but also ppl hooking up actual bio neurons
Also, we're in some really spicy areas in terms of bioengineering, so we can do wild stuff
Just your typical AI bioengineering discussion post
I’ve seen real time learning (or training on a sliding window) for algotrading stuff, but not anywhere else. Neurons don’t need a backdrop training only phase.
any of you running StableDiffusion using Google Collab?
Well, I guess the two leaps, imo, making AI integration with people if we're going the artificial neurons and extrapolate with that route. Like how we had smartphones, and then they branched into smartwatches, tablets, AR/VR, that kind of thing.
The other route, and probably the boring one AI development wise is just pushing the envelope, and then once we hit a wall, optimize and make things smaller and easier to use.
The scary thing is if you had a continual AI intelligence/connection enhancement you’d probably adapt to it such that turning it off or removing it would be detrimental to your health
Like muscle atrophy or a drug tolerance.
You know, until you brought up that startup, I forgot how you can integrate AI with other things, both organic and inorganically
Hi
Other guy brought it up I think
There's smart materials, stuff that shrink or changes properties with heat, exposure to light, whatever
Analog neural nets lithographed into nano bots
And then everyone likes to bring up nanobots, which is the progression
Or even stuff for space travel, and more
Actually, imagine how many conditions can be treated by creating nanobots with ai functions (even if they’re static).
Yeah, as they say, this tech can be really good for us...or doom everyone at the same time.
It's kinda crazy to think about, this kind of double-edged tech.
Or both.
tech will be really good only if the wealthy allows us to no longer need money (iow, a job). Wealthy getting rid of a need for money? GL with that.
The weirdest part is that money will still exist, even if jobs don't.
Yes, so tech will end up bad
Which is kinda the headscratching moment.
Average income will grow enough to support the average bills and subscriptions costs for consumer applications, leading to a similar amount of disposable income.
wealth = power and control. wealth needs the impoverished. Tech isn't going to help us in the end until we no longer need money to survive, and thrive.
That's usually the point where everyone transitions to a post-scarcity society. Heck, the Victorians predicted that we should have reached it around the Industrial Revolution, but things haven't gotten better.
a lot of jobs were lost then as well
a lot of manual labour jobs but now comes the time when manual labour as well as brainiac jobs go bye bye
Things haven’t gotten better since Victorian England?
Pretty much the reason why it didn't work is the same reason AI is not going to help the average Joe, it's the market makers holding onto the wealth from the human savings.
I hope people programmers are still going to be around and not just AI programmers
a lot of things should already have been more automated by now but people have fought back harder so there's is truth in that statement
Nope
Why should an AI do all of the programming work
No, what that meant is that machines could have automated so much more, but people pushed back.
I want to write my own programs
Does it faster, and cost next to nothing.
So we create the world we live in
AI is a tool like everything else, in that sense.
You don't program the holodeck you give it the parameters to run within.
Same thing will happen here
I hope Codecademy will still be around
No need
Codecademy is not going away anytime soon
tbh, I am surprised it still is around. I remember them from 20 years ago
Codecademy is awesome
How effective was the pushback long term though? The Luddite’s failed, and I’m not convinced there were many options where it would be more efficient to automate and they didn’t solely because of push back
I am taking a computer science career path using Codecademy
I am also working on an AI programming course using Codecademy
I predict programming will turn into writing specs rather than algorithms
Actually, if you think about it, folks using computers back in the 80/90s needed to know how the computer worked, inside and out, to make them do stuff.
Kids these days may have similar resources, and even more tools, but you ask them what a save button icon is, and they give you a blank stare.
As long as AI does not become Skynet and 1984 Big Brother, everything should be fine with AI. Oh wait, AI already is 1984 Big Brother.
wat
left an h off there
You don’t need a panopticon with AI, which was half the point of the 1984 surveillance
its scary to think 10 years from now at this rate
Twitter censored posts
Don't need it, I went full slang cause that gave me a brain fart
Twitter used AI to censor the posts
upload my consciousness to be part of the AI cloud and make me inmortal
No fucking thanks
AI is a tool like everything else
for now
The Terminator movies taught me to not trust AI
If they go sentient, I mean, yeah.
“Upload your consciousness” you mean making a copy that infers what you would do and then killing the real you?
I don't want to be immortal unless I had the ability of flight to other planets, solar systems and galaxies so I could get away from people.
thats the only scary part, hopefully i won't be alive to live it
for the greater good
At least Stable Diffusion is not like Skynet.
The Terminator movies and real AI are probably nothing alike.
It's like Hollywood hacking vs real hacking.
The greater good is a lie
Stable Diffusion UI is annoying trying to block every NSFW image
I want to block every NSFW image from generating
The negative prompt has a limit
I have to balance the negative prompt with the input prompt
Hollywood hacking - major database hacked in seconds.
Real hacking - get a clipboard and walk into the HQ and get the source code
Wasn’t there an NSFW filter by default
There was
NSFW still got through
My head cannon for Hollywood hacking is that it’s already hacked and they’re just typing in a ridiculous long ssh password
Because a certain type of illegal NSFW was generated and they had to put on the filters
Yea SAI got on that real quick
I have been working on a better negative prompt list
(A) I really didn’t need to read some of that shit in a sequence
(B) the :10 needs to be within the parenthesis to weight afaik
Sorry. I did mention it was a NSFW prompt. I apologize for posting it.
Thank you, @halcyon moat !!!
I aim to be thorough with scammers!
Not blaming you, I knew it was an nsfw prompt and it was spoilered. Just that a laundry list of stuff that should be avoided in images is bit jarring change of tone. No worries; it’s life.
I’ve been using anything v3 to develop my solo visual novel project, and I’ve been thinking about training the model to preferred to output characters that use my eye style and make it output less shitty fingers? Do you think it’s worth the time?

As amazing as Stable Diffusion, Midjourney, and others are, there is so much it can't do. I constantly find myself trying to work around its limitations when possible, but even that isn't possible for some things. Like for example earlier today I tried to create SCP-3008 (the infinite IKEA interior where people have the survive in), and I couldn't get anything satisfactory. There are plenty of other examples too, but I can't help but feel like we are still a ways off truly unlocking the full human creative potential in AI and this saddens me.
dewd
I’m working on a project that specifically takes advantage of what it CAN do. I agree with you and I think you have to include SD in your ideation process. There’s a lot it CAN do right now, so let it be. If you could try to coerce it you just get burned
Glass onion among us
have u messed with Training? Also consider how far SD alone has come in the last 3 months. These next few years are going to be mind blowing, I guarantee it
when training in dreambooth extension , can you add your captions to the image instead of creating text files ... for example the first image that I would be training on would be called " photo of (randomname) wearing an orange hoodie" and image two would be " photo of (randomname) wearing a black shirt in front of tall bushes
can you give an example of how you use it?
sucks when you were planning on getting a 4060 only to see that a 4070 is less than what a 4060 was supposed to be so 4060 will be rubbish. I hope AMD get's their drivers fixed but they have always had rubbish drivers.
what CPU would be good with the 4090?
Is it OK to mix AMD/nVIDIA?
I’m doing a visual novel with Anything v3. It doesn’t understand how to have a girl sleep on the lap of another girl, but it’s good at having them fall asleep on each other’s shoulders. So I let sd generate what it likes and I adjust my story to it
I plan to do a dress-up party too
I found it to be the perfect combo for years and mix AMD gpu with Intel always seemed to be the best combo though these days they all work fine together.
What about 4090 with 13900k?
Sure, I just don't like wasting my money on Intel, and the 7900X is like the 13700k.
If say a gpu costs 2.5k usd today, how much do you guys think it will cost in a year? Just wondering how much prices drop for top end GPUs vs normal ones
Nowadays I throw my hands up with greed, the impending global recession, chip shortages, etc...
Lockdowns
Supply chain issues too, and just when you thought it was over new strains have risen.
It will never be over
hello all hows everything
when using the dreambooth extension , where do the preview images save ? i dont see them in my outputs folder & they dont pop up in the webui. can someone help me please, i am trying to track my progress
nevermind, it had to do with the Use Lifetime Steps checkbox. i found them
does anyone have a site that lists all the cool open source image models ?
I think huggingface is probably a good place to start
i need some models that will generate good images for small brands , any idea?
I would say most have the potential to accomplish that. Each model has its strengths and weaknesses as well as a wide range of plugins that can dramatically change the output. Whether or not you are able to accomplish your goal may depend on what exactly the customer requirements are.
for instance, I would like a meme generator… but no way there is a working model for that… would have to input text and I know how hard that is
The primary challenge with that application is probably more along the lines of translating the user input of plain English into a prompt engineered input that's usually required to get high quality output.
China? Don’t other countries that don’t have lockdowns make chips too?
Taiwan but they are having issues as well
Taiwan doesn’t have lockdowns right? The roller skaters there practice without masks now
Yeah, none there that I know of but the silicon comes from China
this is the problem with a global economy where we rely upon one, or two, countries for every damn thing.
Just think about it that if Covid really had become what they feared and 4 billion lay dead and their entire country was just gone. Yeah, the whole world would be screwed EVEN if the virus never managed to escape their country in that scenario.
How do you block someone who is just spamming soft porn in a thread
right click their name block
what is the difference really?
I thought I was blocking an individual and apparently I blocked dreambot need help to undo that move
I thought I was blocking them and I ended up blocking dreambot how do I undo that
How do I use this algorithm
I open the webpage but it’s a grey page
It has nothing
I see dope anime works but I can’t do a thing
How do I use it
It won't unblock dreambot.. help!
I had a prompt include focus on face and the generated image was just ass and legs. Just funny to me.
I just realize that I've been staring at hands the whole time I've been watching this anime. thanks to sd i now feel deep satisfaction looking at perfectly drawn hands..
What GPU should I buy next?
I want a GPU that works well for Stable Diffusion
I already have GTX 1650 Super 4 GB Vram
well whats ur budget
you basically need 8 gb vram minimum to run this thing properly. I'm waiting for rtx 40 series in laptops
3090 or 4090
Why stop there- go straight to the H100
80GB of datacenter goodness
He's floated the idea around on twitter, but afaik SAI hasn't actually formally announced or confirmed anything.
When I download stable diffusion from github, is it just the model alone and I have to train the model with pictures? Or is it a pre-trained model where I can prompt it straight away?
it is pre-trained, and you can also train it yourself. you can download the official 2.x models from here https://huggingface.co/stabilityai
What is the GPU specs for training stable diffusion? I would expect the specs for training is far higher than for running the model, right?
I tried to google for the specs but the specs I found is for running the model, not training it
There's more than one kind of training- training the model with Dreambooth (so adding actual information to the model) requires more for instance than Textual Inversion (which is guiding the model towards a certain result). TI can be done with as little as 6GB vram, while DB usually requires at least 8-10GB.
TI is great for styles (say, van Gogh or something) while Dreambooth is better at subjects. However, Dreambooth creates files that are multiple GB, while TI are tiny really flexible files of a couple KB
Do you think it’s possible to make something similar to Niji Journey to run on Stable Diffusion?
depends on your resources- SD will probably get there in time but MJ has engineers dedicated to basically making it as easy as possible to get certain results
Not many people know exactly what's behind MJs pipeline but it is speculated that they have tons of ways to improve prompts their users try, and lots of addons/hypernetworks/embeddings/special sauce that make it much harder to have 'ugly' results- but this also comes at the cost of flexibility
I heard of CyberJourneyv4 which was trained with images from Midjourney v4 and runs on Stable Diffusion.
https://huggingface.co/tolerantpancake/CyberJourneyv4/tree/main
It's not hard to train something on images generated by MJ- however, it's nowhere close to actual MJ (no offense @scarlet falcon)
it lacks the pipelines for consistent 'good' results
but using embeddings is a great way to improve your generations
So how do I train Stable Diffusion to use Midjourney to make cool images?
This is what I have found.
A cyberpunk embed trained on images from MidJourney V4, trained on SD2.0 Model
https://huggingface.co/tolerantpancake/CyberJourneyv4/tree/main
CyberJourney for instance is Textual Inversion- so that involved generating images with MJ, (possibly) captioning them, and letting your gpu rip for a bit
I hope someone could do the same with anime images to be just like Niji Journey.
There's a ton of anime embeddings and models out there (google CivitAI, it's a website where people can upload finetunings) but I don't know if those are exactly what you're looking for
Stable Diffusion could barely make anime characters and is limited to making only original if you have anything v3 or just bootleg versions of anime characters.
We also have a #1047197565365538826 channel here where some users upload embeds/models
I have not heard about that.
I'm not at all into anime though so no clue about the specific things out there for that
Man this server grew fast . I remember i came at 1800 members around
hello, can I ask questions about using different SD models here?
I am want to use a trained model like lets say, anything 3.0 with WebUI1111 do I just need the model? Which is the ckpt file? Or are there weights or other files needed with that
the ckpt and yaml
just copy and rename the yaml from anything v3.0's base model (I believe it's the 1.5 base .yaml, you can find it in the configs in the repo for 1.5)
Hi guys, I have only 6gb vRAM, and i tried to train a hypernetwork, but it fails because of low vRAM.
Is there a service online that I can use to train a model? Then import that into my SD and run the model locally
why are all the models not in one place but rather scattered around, ive seen some models on reddit and some on discord which are not yet on civit ai
whos the guy here that owns civit?
On CivitAI.com there's a link to their discord at the bottom of the page, that might be a more direct connection to him
good, thank you.
I'm finally done with my 500,000 step project! :P
it went well, mostly because I never need to do it again! :3
What motivated you to do it in the first place, and what were your goals?
I had to backup 9000 prompts and I wanted them to be in the meta data of the image it created, it was a slow, boring, and very slow and boring task! :P
Now I can get back to the trying to make some fun art again. Need to get more "style" into my merged model :D
How did your project go?
"several?" :O
How about we start creating artwork and share it for training. That way we can create artworks that look like other artist but still could be trained
Yeah!
Now I'll test them lol
It's all trained on my own art
I think I'll hold back on that training stuff myself until we get less new stuff as quick as we do now :3
that and I don't know how to do it :P
how to make img2img picture?
there's several ways to do it, if you mean on this discord, then I don't know 1. how, or 2. if you can. But there's several ai options out there, as well as tutorials for them :#
Is it normal that I tried to train a model using dreambooth for an art style but it only spits out good outputs if I put the name of the style as a negative prompt...
name the free one.
thanks
Most people I know use the Playgroundai for their free ai art, but I haven't tried it myself so I wouldn't know for sure how good it is
Can somebody help me and tell me the best settings for a small section of Dreambooth?
.
guys i generate the picture instead of you
Hi, new here, do the bot generations cost credits ?
as far as I know, no
on the DreamStudio website though, they do
Haters coping so hard...
I started selling AI art, stating that its AI ART. (for less than 1 dollar)
They are like:
"Nooooooooooo that does not draw art that steals others art and copies it noooooooo"
Where does my fucking CUDA compute go then?

I sell it as well, let them hate, technological advancements will fuk them
^ and this is half of why they hate in the first place
All of the software i use, i have the commercial license for
- i sell it for really cheap, and AI is not competent enough (yet).
- I run the models on my own hardware
so
yeah
¯_(ツ)_/¯
Hey guys, I have some questions about merging checkpoints, where should I direct those? I posted it on reddit originally... I can post the link if needed.
I think it's more the attitude
What about attitude
Raise those prices God damn it xD
local pricing for our broken economy
i usually sell around 5$ USD for FHD painting with unlimited revisions
Too many people giving low prices brings the whole thing down. Could definitely make more money than just that.
Also just started, will raise them inshAllah if i start getting demand
I sell prints
going from 70 all the way to 800 depending on size
mainly using midjourney for that
so, whats up with this stable diffusion thing?
can i generate custom graphics for games with it?
absolutely
It is royalty free
cool
When I generate a batch of images in SD auto1111, the model seems to output the images with seeds in numerical order instead of randomizing the seed. are the seeds supposed to be going like ..........2491, ..........2490, ..........2489, etc ?
man, the arguments they give are so invalid..
they say that AI searches for the internet and smashes together parts of readily available pictures to make images ...
yes thats normal
ok thnx
Just let them scream and make money
I want to join forces with other A.I. artists/rebels to create art, animations, and other forms of media. We can work together as a movement to merge art and technology.
If anyone is interested, message me. thanks!
I was in channel on this discord yesterday where people show their models and embedding with really amazing results, but now i can't find it anymore. I don't mean the "models-embeddings" channel, it was definitely a text chat channel like this one. any ideas what channel that was?
Hi
probably #1045349359044280360
Fr
i thought so too, but i can't find the messages anymore. someone posted some really amazing colorful portraits as widescreen wallpapers. and i can't seem to find them anymore or the other awesome messages
anyone have any luck making character turnarounds? Front, side, back?
in a1111, it's not possible to save an image to Favorites after upscaling it in Extras? It's kind of lame, no?
If the AI community reacts this salty to 'normal' artists it doesn't reflect well
Don't get me wrong, I'm guilty of it myself, but it's just an endless ping pong effect of people making each other madder and madder
Ik it doesn't justify any "bad attitudes" towards artists but trust me artists haven't the best attitude towards AI commissioners as well.
I am not calling myself artist anymore, I am referring myself as a commissioner from now on just as fyi
It's a more diplomatic word for in discussions etc
I'm aware, and I have been in verbal disagreements with some artists that came here looking for a fight- but being hostile towards artists in general just because some are unreasonable isn't productive imo
is there really any difference between Batch Count and Batch Size?
If you go in a disagreement with a artists just a piece of advice, start with saying that you're not a artist but a commissioner.
Commissioner means something entirely different though, at least usually
I think (not sure) this will calm down most artists in a discussion, I am not saying they aren't gonna give a hard time.
Yes, but we aren't artists in the first place. We don't have the same skills. We commission a piece of art from the AI using a prompt.
The AI is the artist here.
Not us
That's where I disagree though, depending on how much work you put into whatever you make
I'm not calling myself an artist because of AI, but I would call myself one because of my approach to things and it being a tool in my workflow
You still commission it, you aren't the one making the art. You're only an artist if you actually have painted/created a artwork by hands.
Agree to disagree, I suppose
