#general gaming
1 messages · Page 78 of 1
To be fair I did expect it to sell a bit more as well
And it probably would have if it didn't drop in one of the busiest period for great games to come out
That said I don't think Square expectations would have been just a "bit" more
No wait, reading headlines they are dumb
It sold a bit less than FF7 Remake on launch, why would they expect it'd sell a lot more?
FF7 remake had the nostalgia boost too
Do they think they are pre FFXIII? they destroyed their own franchise with 3 titles one worse than the last, if they want big numbers they have to build their fanbase back up.
No I mean the 3 FFXIII games
Agreed FFXV was okay, that said that finale was pretty bad, they should release games that actually finish and not cliffhanger in my opinion
I mean yeah, but FFXV's development was apparently the worst thing ever, so.
I think you're agreeing again 
Also they did build a decent core fanbase with FFXIV, a MMO which is mainly on PC, then they release their next game as a PS5 exclusive...
Hope the bag was worth it, but then they can't complain when they sell their game not on their main platform
Yeah I'm not disagreeing with Justice, I'm just constantly flabbergasted by Square incompetence
it is very weird
but all of this is ultimately summing up why non-"fans" like me got drawn into a game like TotK and not into FF16, both franchises I've historically played and liked some of but overall have mixed feelings about
I'm a final fantasy fan, I just didn't buy 16 because it doesn't look good

i saw a clip where you used Ifrit as a mount
||I fucking love the kaiju fights, they’re incredibly epic||
that's all i need to know to want to play the game one day
YoshiP knows what he’s doing
yeah i could tell YoshiP had involvement from the designs
almost like they took the concept from a critically acclaimed MMORPG...
Much of the FFXIV team is involved. 
Which just makes me want an Ifrit mount in FFXIV now
Heh
Didn’t they announce one? I might’ve hallucinated that
But that would be awesome
Give me a Torgal mount/pet
Torgal is love 🐺
got to ride the car exactly O N C E
Did you not get your own?
I DON'T KNOW HOW
Also I started way too late to get it prolly
Oof
Isn't that the casino?
Yeah it was a limited time thing
It might be available through the Gold Saucer? I dunno
Tara strong game is getting a remake
But there was a limited time quest that gave it to you
Meanwhile, me
Yeah I have it too 
I also had the car.
It’s so ridiculously out of place thematically
Nah, just stolen from a noble of the Empire? 
Heh
Ah but did you get the true ending? Or the true true ending?
no i yeeted a chip out of 2B and instakilled her
Or the True true true ending? 
IN THE TUTORIAL

Heh yep you can do that

I was fucking around in the menus and I was like "Oh cool I can remove HUD UI if I want- wait, removal means death?
He wouldn't, would he?
does it anyway
MOTHERFUCKER LMAO"
What game HC?
it looks like da Batmobile
Neir automata
Is this saints row?

Ah right.
What difficulty did you play it on
Am, Normal
I got one of the joke endings in the tutorial
So I technically beat the game! Got an ending!
Nice.
god i'm so good at this game, already beaten it twice
Are you doing all the stupid endings or are you just doing it casually
After my friend told me there's an ending for failing the tutorial I had to do it
and Ending T was just me fucking around and finding out
You give me an option to kill myself in a stupid way and I'll fuckin do it
uuh
don't take that out of context
Rule of Thumb
"Do whatever they don't want you to do, do whatever they tell you not to do"
trusting Yoko Taro, lmao
look i finished all 5 endings of Replicant, I'm already traumatised
half of my playtime so far is going
"HEY I KNOW THIS FROM REPLICANT/FFXIV RAIDS"
and then promptly having PTSD kick in, lmao

From unique new rage mechanics to some groovy dance moves, check out all the new things Squidward brings to #NASB2 in his character breakdown below!
@Nickelodeon @SpongeBob
Check out https://t.co/qODMMmdIbc for more info! https://t.co/cLXiDIcssF
I think it looks good but I'm not buying a playstation for it.
They should release their games on the platforms where people want to buy them, so they don't have to complain about people not buying them

BEST GAME EVER
FFXVI is amazing
I'm so far out of their loop it hadn't even occurred to me that I don't want to play anything on a console any more 
Alright so here's how Mega-Rayquaza looks like in Pokemon BDSP with my new animations and battle cameras.
💖 3441
Final Fantasy games are always decisive because they're mechanically different from each other.
You mean divisive?
Yeah ipad autocorrected it for some reason.
I agree with this in the case of ff13 since it was so dramatically different but 1-9 were all very similar
2 and 5 were different in the way they handled leveling though
2s system just kinda sucked though
I looooove FF2's leveling system
And the first game was heavily influenced by DnD.
It's my favorite because it's so easy to exploit
did i mention best game ever?
GUNDAAAAAAAAAM
The protagonist seems like a very generic white guy hero character
I had no interest in ff16 either until I saw the demo, which was mindblowing
Can you even play as any of the companions or is it just that guy?
you could play as the kid for a little in the demo
Not what i mean
Well you can swap to your party members at any time during combat, what else did you mean?
In FF15 you spend a majority of timr as noctis rsther than jump around between characters like in the ff7 remake
I spent most of my time in combat as Prompto
I dont remember ever being able to change characters at any time in ff15
It's an unlockable skill in the skill tree for each companion that allows you to switch to them at any time during combat. They each have their own unique gameplay mechanics.
I see
Out of combat stuff will still be done as Noctis but that didn't really bother me since there's no unique mechanics involved in walking around
Thats why, i never went for that 
I beelined straight for it. It's very fun to play as the other guys.
Well ive not heard about the ability to do thst in ff16
I'm not really surprised. The marketing of the game was very focused on main guy.
Yeah you can only play as Clive in FFXVI but the combat is very fun
yeah they got some dmc guys to work on the combat
the development of ff16 was almost like a crossover of all the japanese devs
I am shocked at how accurate this is recreated
Once i heard he was working on it i knew the combat would be good
shocked i say
ITS 3D WHAT

There are...other reasons. 
bap no

they didn't have to make the Stubbys non-hostile
Man people are not letting up on ow2 now they can review it
but i like them
they're cute
Bandwagoning of hate~
Tbh. After them canceling the advertised pve mode. I find it hard not to be mad
Also new south park game
An all-new South Park game is coming… in 3D. Join Cartman, Stan, Kyle and Kenny, in three-dimensional glory, to celebrate the most magical day in any young child’s life - a snow day! Grab up to three friends and battle your way through the snow-piled streets of South Park on a quest to save the world and enjoy a day without school.
SOUTH PARK:...
LIke what was said earlier. People are not wrong to be disappointed. But the numbers/magnitude is an extreme that is less "i'm dissapointed" and more "dogpiling to shit on the game becasuse i'm disappointed and oh everyone else is doing it too lol"
The gameplay itself is fun from everything I've heard. The monetization is pretty bad, but not the worst in the industry by a long shot. Is this a 1/10 game? Not in the slightest
like so many internet freakouts, the reaction is more about the gap between promises and reality than how the product compares to other real products

the only real solution is to categorically refuse to buy into hype culture for anything that's not finished yet
Good luck getting gamers to do that~
The problem is that overwatch 2 is literally overwatch 1
The differences are minor at best
They promised a bunch of features that not only weren't delivered, were never actually planned to be delivered
That's not accurate
the "never planned" part?
Yeah
Blizzard was close to redemption with diablo 4
But then they over nerfed everyones stuff

D4 has other problems than that - it's still at the moment a minimum viable product, so to speak. An extremely well polished one, mind you, but at the moment it feels somewhat bare bones
Though comparing it to D3 which is what, 10+ years old now, and POE that had a lot of time to be worked on, it's hard to compare
They did promise to deliver things. They just changed their minds afterwards.
To quote what I said earlier:
The entire point of OW2 was defeated by that change though
"The Overwatch team, especially at its inception, considered itself an MMO development team. As we transitioned away from that original concept and started creating Overwatch, we included plans to one day return to that scope. We had a crawl, walk, run plan. Overwatch was the crawl, a dedicated version of PvE was the walk, and an MMO was the run. It was built into the DNA of the team early on, and some of us considered that final game a true realization of the original vision of Project Titan."
The scrapped titan just slimmed down to the OW part, and they wanted OW 2 (with the pve stuff that was initially announced) to be the Walk stage, basically attempting the plan again. But I believe they just couldn't justify the cost and just couldn't get it where they wanted in the time they had```
But it was also a free in-place changeover, no? Feels hard to be too upset that a thing you didn't pay for didn't achieve what it set out to do.
id probably get into OW2 if the monetization wasnt so bad tbh lol
Says the person who buys everything in Fortnite? 
Yeah I’m pretty sure they gave everyone OW2 for free if you already owned OW1
the expectations gap here reminds me of Mass Effect 3 and No Man's Sky (in that they promised something massive and revolutionary but delivered something utterly ordinary), though I believe those generated much more outrage at the time
well yeah i buy mostly everything in fort but with OW2 its much worse with its MTX's
So in practice it was just an update
oh yeah, that would explain the reaction being merely some review bombing

Didn’t they put a paywall in front of some characters who were previously accessible?
Ah
I mean, it's both. It definitely deserves a mediocre score but not 10%. That's pure review bombing there for the sake of bombing
Sounds like gamers being gamers 
Not really
I think we're all agreeing again
There's also the simple fact the company itself is terrible
People stealing breastmilk for some fucking reason
tf??????
Oh yeah
See, that's the problem with the review system in general being yes or no
Rating the game on its own, the gameplay aspect, it would have a decent score. Then you could score the monetization (bad), the company itself (bad), etc etc
it is hard to beat the intuitiveness of thumbs up or down, but I would prefer a 5 or at least 3 point scale for this
Review bombing is just by far the easiest way to do things
Monetization and gameplay are inextricable parts of the overall experience of the game
Both are relevant to the game. The company is not
True, but we all know that it would just end up being 1 star or 4-5 and nothing in between
right, one of the reasons I avoid number scores for anything is that you often can't separate a game into components with individual rankings without grossly misrepresenting something
I'd almost rather see surveys, like "strongly agree/strongly disagree" for various points (graphics, gameplay, monetization, blah)
This very problem is why the downvotes on YouTube were hidden from the general public, incidentally.
admittedly I never post Steam reviews myself
Being able to see the immediate effects of review bombing is part of what incentivizes review bombing campaigns
Me neither
And ultimately I find that reviews aren’t super useful to me anyway
The trouble is that review bombing is one of the only ways to talk to companies in a way that matters
I wouldn't agree that it "matters"
but I agree that it's a desperation move due to a broken system with no better options
I reviewed 0.6% of my games
How can you tell? 
since we all know "just don't buy it" never works
1.3% here!
It matters because it's incredibly obvious that something is wrong
We're talking about it, people are dissuaded from buying the game because of it
It's having an effect
It's hard to ignore
eh? it just dissuades me from ever looking at user reviews
we know many review bombing campaigns have nothing to do with the game's quality
In cases when it’s a game quality issue, it can and often does get patched. But the review bomb history remains, which skews the review score.
rate my not!vault hunter
Reviewing a game poorly because the game maker is a scumbag is, in my opinion, fine considering the limited ways to warn potential customers of such a fact
image isnt great but it is what it is
It took until what, a month or two ago for Cyberpunk to be reviewed as mostly positive?
If there was better methods, then it wouldn't be, but there isnt
Ah, very

I wonder if Valve ever considered the idea of reviews for developer and publisher profiles on Steam. Those profiles exist, after all.
That can only go poorly lol
On the other hand, would that even be useful?
Yeah it’s not like people feel incentivized to post positive reviews
Steam provides good tools for a user to judge whether reviews are valid or not for their purpose
Only negative
I agree it would help but only as a method for more abuse
Yeah, not a good idea
You can include or exclude a date range, periods can be marked as off-topic, and you can exclude reviews from people who haven't played the game long enough to judge it
If that was exposed by default then that might be handy
How many people know of that?
I didn’t
it's been fun watching my wife play Dark Souls as a Robin Hood character. She's ever only attuned one spell (flash sweat, to get through some lava) and is all bow and balder side sword and willing to do things like kill Patches the first time he shows up.
It is exposed by default but you have to scroll down to read the reviews
Doesn't Steam actually consider review bombing to be generally off-topic? In which case I might expect these to be cleaned up at some point.
Or was that someone else? I only vaguely recall.
Yeah, it does!
I'm pretty sure they've cleaned some up in the past
They do attempt to moderate review bomb campaigns sometimes
Not always
Only when it becomes majorly publicized, really
I think for some very high profile stuff. I suspect this might be a target at some point
Off-topic periods get erased from the scores up top, but the scores at the bottom allow you to choose to include them back
I'm not sure what "the" solution is to all this, but I'm pretty sure part of it is that we need user submitted opinions(?) to get aggregated into something just a little more nuanced than a single yes/no or 1-10 score
but I understand why the general trend so far has been to go in the exact opposite direction; too few incentives for people to input their normal, non-extreme opinions in any comprehensive fashion
I like what Steam does and think part of the solution is to allow people access to as much information as they need in order to judge for themselves
I don't think there's anything wrong or any problem to be solved here, just like there wasn't anything inherently wrong with YT dislikes at all
If people review bomb or massively dislike it's a problem of people doing it not the system itself
right, as a single consumer within the current system, you have to read textual reviews from humans you know, even if only a few sentences long; there's just no other sensible move
Review bombs are important information tho
If a large group of people have to say something about a game, it's important to know that if you plan to buy it
It is, but it's important to also know why, and luckily in Steam you can just scroll down to the reviews and check to see whether people review bombing are having legitimate concerns that may concern you as a customer or are just being petty assholes
the reason behind the review bomb might be, but as often as not it just means the game made [rule 2 stuff] angry, or had wildly inaccurate marketing
Maybe why they are complaining has nothing to do with you but I feel people need a voice
Both are valid things to complain about!
well, sure, but not there
I do think it's important that there is a visible change in people's reception of a game if the game screws up, changed way too much in a way customers didn't like, didn't deliver, or whatever other legitimate reason
whether a game's marketing was accurate has nothing to do with whether I'll enjoy buying the thing now
If not there then where else?
I think we're just going in circles now
I don't think making review scores even more meaningless is a productive expression of consumer grievances
I think that's super important info, even years down the line! If z game was promised with 100 features but only give 10, at launch I would want to know that and a year later I'd still want to know that
I mean it's fun historical trivia sometimes, but as far as my purchase decision I'd rather know what's actually in the game
I think it's pretty harmless from the perspective of a brand new customer
Skullgirls' situation comes to mind, where the game recently underwent pretty big censorship changes to content people had already paid for, a lot of stuff removed or completely changed, and... well, of course people who payed money for it are upset about it, because the content they paid for either isn't there anymore or is completely changed now
but a new customer or new player may not care about that maybe
I'd want to know if it improved, yes
The worst that having this option could do is just make a new customer read some reviews, notice that people are complaining about stuff that may not affect their experience, and just say ''oh well this won't affect me'' and just buy the game if it was interesting enough for them
and to be fair nowadays it's so easy to check whenever a game has a big controversy like this whether or not the game has improved or whether or not that controversy or reason for review bombing it's something you care about or whatever may be happening
Well the worst thing is it would stop people from reading reviews altogether because they now think it's a waste of time
Sucks for those people I guess
It sucks for the platform and the publishers too
An economical environment where there's less trust is one where money is exchanged less
That's why Valve is incentivized to give people the idea that reviews are good and helpful
I learned a long time ago that reviews often don’t align with my own opinions of games anyway, so ultimately they exceptionally rarely provide any useful insight to me. I just ignore them unless a game’s rating is overwhelmingly negative.
Of course it sucks for the platform but what can you really do if people go around life with that black and white logic rather than thinking ''oh people in this specific game in this specific moment right now are review bombing''
And honestly this basically works for online reviews of just about anything
Reviews will, at absolute best, weigh in as 10% of my decision to buy something
You already have all the reviews people write so you can check whether they're bs or not, a timeline of the review score to check if it's suffering a massive review bombing right now, the only other ''solution'' to making sure these people don't think reviews are a waste of time is to carefully select what reviews are shown and at that point I think I don't even have to mention why that's a bad idea
Yeah, ideally reviews would align with your opinion of games, but now you're basically forced to find a subset of reviewers whom you align with.
loll Toad saying "i don't even know how i got down here" at the bottom of the big long water pipe in Lake Kingdom is so funny
Like I said this is a problem of people reviewing or reading reviews not of a system inherently
Alas, I’ve not found any that do.
So it’s a waste of time for me and I just form my own opinion
No professional critics or friends?
Not really, no.
that... that was always the case?
pretty much
any review aggregation system is inherently flawed
part of the reason numerical scores are silly is that most people don't want the same stuff out of their entertainment
It was always the case but it doesn't necessarily have to be.
For me, reviews tend to be a very good indicator of quality.
i still sometimes watch Zero Punctuation even though i disagree with a lot of his video game opinions
I’m pretty much always the first person in my friend group to try something. My friends whose media preferences align with mine just check with me rather than the other way around.
I often find value in reviewers I disagree with, because once you're familiar with them knowing why they liked or disliked a thing still allows you to infer certain things about how you'd react to a game
you have people who dont like that genre and never would being mixed with people who are super into the genre
if you dont like, say, city builders those reviews are unhelpful and if you love city builders yo have the same problem
His opinions are amusing more than anything. I often disagree with his actual assessments but I like watching him sometimes.
but ZP specifically I just stopped finding funny after a while, and found he'd zero in too much on the parts of a game that are easy to make fun of
...I didn't even use "zero" on purpose there lol
same problem why rotten tomatoes is an unhelpful review site
Heh
other than ZP i don't really watch many game reviews
I am my favorite game reviewer
based
Your reviews are not helpful to you at all because they introduce no information new to you
I used to seek out reviewers to see if I found them useful but for the last several years I keep hearing about games through ordinary word of mouth faster than I could ever play them, so an actual source of reviews has become superfluous for me personally
Unless you happen to have retrograde amnesia
my reviews are helpful to me because i know best what kind of video games i want to play
You don't need to review things to know what kind of games you want to play
You already know
Also it’s just that I have unusual tastes. Like I absolutely adore certain games that universally did not review well.
yes i came out of the womb knowing i didn't like rpgs /j
Or plenty of games that are universally acclaimed I simply dislike, like Skyrim
Skyrim is universally acclaimed ?
well
Yeah
Ixrec — Yesterday at 8:30 PM
the discourse around Skyrim almost immediately convinced me I would hate it lol
i love Skyrim
Considered one of the greatest games ever
theres a reason "skyrim on a smart fridge" is a joke
(I've never heard that one)
thats why i hate it
ngl ive always preferred morrowind more than skyrim
i don't know how something can be "universally acclaimed" if everyone just complains about it 
personally found morrowind clunky and confusing and preferred oblivion but id would LOVE a modern morrowind remake with better UI and such
People complain about Minecraft constantly but it’s one of the two most popular video games in world history 
Morrowind has a nice setting
People can complain about things that they love
i don't understand this at all lol
also unrelated but
https://www.dexerto.com/roblox/roblox-gets-hamilton-crossover-no-one-asked-for-2246321/
things we love we see the flaws in more
I once watched some very long video essays on all of the Elder Scrollses, which I'm glad I did since now I know for certain I would not enjoy any of them, but at least I understand why Morrowind and Skyrim in particular are favorites for so many
i don't
It’s entirely possible and typical to see the possibilities in things you love
And be frustrated when those possibilities can’t be met
yeah i don't get it sorry
thats not a positive trait i think
everything has flaws
Like I absolutely love Apple’s products in nearly every dimension but I’ll happily bash on them for their bullshit decisions
Because they could make better decisions which makes their products even better
Like supporting Vulkan
Grumble grumble
to be clear, I'm not "complaining" about Skyrim in the sense that I have any ill will towards it or any emotional damage suffered from it
Yeah it’s unhealthy to have blind faith in anything
it's very firmly in the "not my thing /shrug" category, like most strategy genres, most multiplayer stuff, etc; since I know upfront I won't like it I just don't engage with it and other people enjoy it and we all win
In my case I just don’t like the game feel or the setting
Most fun games
now everyone's just misinterpreting what i meant. im not saying that everything is perfect, i'm saying i don't see the reason in focusing on the cons over the pros
I just don't like fun games. I want my games to be tedious and tiring
thats literally not what anyone said
the complete opposite in fact

sometimes people talk as if they unironically want tedious and tiring games and I'm never sure how seriously to take that 
We should play monopoly then
Oh I see. The thing is that people can complain about the cons at length because the pros may not need to be discussed further or are already understood. So it can be redundant to focus too much on the positives. It’s dependent on the context.
I don't think the point is focusing on what's bad on a game you love vs what you really liked, though it's a proven fact that people focus more on negative aspects
Sometimes the negatives are the context
It's more the simple fact that you CAN and people DO critique stuff they love
Highlighting negatives does not inherently detect from what makes something great
It’s critique
I'm honestly not sure what Cap was going for but I don't think much of this conversation was about any specific thing Cap said
cap i LOVE totk
but i complain about the small things i dont like because of that love
i dont need to repete the fact that the fuse mechanic is amazing, or that ultrahand gives you fun options, or that the dungeons are great, because everyone already knows that, i dont need to repeat it or only talk about it
i wasn't even thinking of TotK 
The more you think about something the easier it is to notice all the details about it, good and bad ones
i have more to SAY about the stuff i dont like
It was just an example
for Skyrim specifically people tend to have a bunch of critiques for pretty much every aspect of that game and yet people still seem to be very charmed and drawn to the world and atmosphere and just the feel of that game in general despite all that stuff
i know but its the easy example
the community and modding aspect of Skyrim also helped a bunch in keeping the game alive
i just don't understand it i guess. ive never felt any need to critique anything i love before. different mindset i guess
Because even stuff we love has flaws
when I was first getting deep enough into gaming to hear of Skyrim, I pretty much immediately heard the "wide as an ocean, shallow as a puddle" take (pretty sure it was those exact words from multiple sources) and that was more or less all I heard for many years
In my case , critique forms after I’ve completely and thoroughly enjoyed something and continued to obsess over it. Over time I get a deeper understanding of the thing and gradually gain ideas on how the thing can be improved.
(because its true lol)
i wasn't saying the things i love don't have flaws !
Yeah that’s the same take I heard and it’s my take as well
there IS good stuff in skyrim but its butter spread over too much bread
But yes it is a different mindset. I didn’t used to critique anything I was obsessed with when I was much younger. I do these days though, partly as an exercise, partly as a result of broader perspective, partly as a desire to learn more.
which is why people mod the SHIT out of Skyrim
the point is that you're allowed to dislike aspects of things you love, and critique is voicing those complaints in a meaningful way
I didn’t get the critique mindset for a while either
i don't get it all, but whatever
it shows a depper understanding of why everything else works too, once you know where it falls short
it helps you understand yourself and the things you like and why you like them
Honestly it’s fine if you don’t get it. Not everyone cares for it and that’s fine.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBnUcETsxxs
the game that features a X on the first level's building (and takes place in 2023 too :P) now has a PC port
This is Perfect Dark running natively on Windows thanks to the decompilation project. This is the work of "fgsfdsfgs" on GitHub, the repository can be found here: https://github.com/fgsfdsfgs/perfect_dark
To play this, you must follow the instructions from the link above and compile it with a copy of Perfect Dark N64 that you already own.
As y...
interesting, I see a different thumbnail in the Discord embed than on other sites or on YouTube itself
oh f
k I haven’t played that yet
if ever there was a way to play it for the first time tho…
I hear it was innovative at the time
Man
woman
I remember hearing about Perfect Dark Zero when that came out, but never got around to reading up on it or the original
My wishlist has so many garbage games. What was I thinking when I added them?
I’ve heard nothing but praise for it but I don’t know anything about it
PD is pretty ahead of its time in a lot of ways
right now, I would still recommend 1964GEPD to play it (also for GoldenEye), but the PC port is promising
I’ve played some of Goldeneye and had fun with it, though what I think would be my personal definitive way of going about playing it is unavailable for my GPU 
the issue with PD is that it ran like ass on N64, but this is a non-issue with emulation nowadays
that being Xenia with the mouse hook and a certain mystery version of Goldeneye that AMD doesn’t seem to like
there is also a Xbox 360 remaster of Perfect Dark, but it has some issues (especially if playing with a controller due to the huge deadzone which you can't tweak)
it was made by 4J Studios, the same studio that handled Minecraft's first console port on the same platform
aye that’s the one, someone made a unique Xenia so you can play it with keyboard & mouse
whoa
reminding me I’ve got this, though not in the best shape
I've played the XBLA version on Xenia (I defeated Xenia using Xenia), it's pretty good but visuals are a bit dark due to the textures themselves. I also had an issue where the game crashed whenever I switched to the grenade launcher, which doesn't prevent completion but makes it a bit fiddly
absolute classic
never been able to unsee the gun in Bond’s elongated mouth
it's annoying that old games came in cardboard boxes
Ah yes, the giant mouth
though iirc most manuals encouraged you to throw away the box and just keep the cartridge back then lol
also is the only Bond movie I’ve seen
I haven't seen any, but if I had to watch one, I would surely pick GoldenEye
I've seen several Bonds over the years, but don't remember a lot of them
I saw some excerpts because it was on TV a few weeks ago, funny how I can recognize the game scenes when they occur
it was alright but didn't hit me too hard considering i hadn't seen any others 
I was disappointed that Bond didn't complete Facility using speedrun strats. 
IIRC the dam level is only like the first minute or so of the actual movie
the ones I do remember are the recent Craig era, and the original Connery era because I rewatched some of those; of those ~10 I'd recommend From Russia With Love and Skyfall
one could call the game an extended cut
wel the whole game is slightly longer than a bond movie
i tried playing Goldeneye on the N64 emulator on Switch and i forgot that the N64 controller had one analog stick so aiming and moving was weird
(but I don't think Bond movies and Bond games have much to do with each other as far as recommendations go, it was never the most plot-focused franchise)
i remember playing splitscreen MP in one of the original Xbox 007 games with my brother
not sure which it was, vaguely remember a docks map I think?
remember the island that people thought you could go to
but it was just set dressing
I know I played a 007 game (not Goldeneye) at some point but I'm not sure which one, I think it just faded into the background along with most other okay shooters of the era
Nightfire? That one is quite popular in its console version, specifically GameCube as it's 60 FPS
(PC version however…)
Nightfire sounds familiar
Everything or Nothing is also quite well-regarded
i didn't even know there were other James Bond games besides Goldeneye
there are a lot more, many of them are worth checking out
Please support this channel on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/Nick930
A full documentary - style history of the "James Bond 007" video game franchise. From the original series of games in the 1980s, up to the most recent fan-remake of GoldenEye set to release in 2022.
Celebrate the (delayed) release of the upcoming "No Time to Die" film, by...
there was a few on the ps1
one of them i remember had a snowy type level on the multiplayer mode
Oh oh I found it
it was Agent Under Fire, specifically this map
https://youtu.be/98OIyIB9GuM
lol, I had no idea there was a Bond text adventure
i remember at the end of No Time To Die i was convinced that Bond was somehow going to make it off the island and survive
I liked that part yeah
another loose memory shaken, so glad I have the opportunity to share the most zany version of the Bond theme I know
https://youtu.be/B7Nfj2Yj6G8
The Spy Who Loved Me (1990) main theme by Matt Furniss.
Dolby Headphone version:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMMby9npifY&hd=1
Visit my channel for more Amiga music.
I tried out Fade to Black this evening, it does the creepy atmosphere pretty well but the janky controls and confusing level design are too much for me 😦
it's also one of those games whose PS1 version is arguably the best, but it renders level geometry as lines (because it was perspective-correct on original hardware)… which doesn't play well with upscaling in emulation
this is the dumbest version of the bond theme i've ever heard
why is there random "aw yeahs" and "hit its"
the character's animation is top-notch for a 1995 game though
i don’t know but it’s stuck in my head now
Sounds like the 80s happened 
omg they took the "aw" in the "aw yeah" soundclip and set it to the bond theme
amazing
good lord
Tf
OMG THE "AW YEAH" IS USED HERE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-QUNwXd_QeQ
Thank you Patreons!: https://www.patreon.com/dankpods
My livestreams: https://www.floatplane.com/channel/GarbageStream/home
My gaming thing: https://www.youtube.com/@HelloImGaming
My car thing: https://www.youtube.com/@GarbageTime420
My drum thing: https://www.youtube.com/@the.drum.thing.
Frank the snake: https://www.instagram.com/biteyfrank/
A ...
its the same sound bite
id never spend that much on a figurine ngl lol
awwww shit
https://youtu.be/7k7P8HOW7rc
A brand new Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles game has been teased today during THQ Nordiq's Summer Showcase from Black Forest Games. Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles The Last Ronin is currently in development.
#tmnt #thqnordic #gaming
watching this Bond series history made me realize I haven't played a shooter since... RE4 remake I guess?
not sure there are any I've been wanting to try though
ive played Doom Eternal 😎
the main shooters i play are pretty much just fort zero build, pubg occasionally, and halo 5
there's the Quake 2 remaster 👀
I played it a bit with my father today, but he struggles with finding his way in the levels and figuring out where he's attacked from (even with the damage indicator)
yeah, I can't explain why, but the Quakes just don't seem like the kind of shooter I'd enjoy
(partly since people almost always talk about the multiplayer part)
i might replay Quake 1
yeah, you can feel it throughout the game
it's a spiritial successor
(TimeSplitters did that too, after Perfect Dark)
and somehow I ended up playing none of these 
I didn't try any of the TimeSplitters games yet
who remembers this game lol
I feel like I've seen this somewhere but the name rings zero bells
the cover reminds me of Haze
you're right, that's what I'm thinking of
it was a shooter game for 360 and ps3 and pc where you could stop time, slow down time, and rewind time
it was super fun on the multiplayer mode
it was by Saber Interactive
that feels like a whole subgenre of shooters at this point
I might've missed all the shooters with a straight-up time manipulation power though
it came out in like 2007
Yeah back in the whole. Cod clone craze
lol
oooh, I think Everything or Nothing might be the one Bond I played
I'm about 90% sure I played only the first few levels of it though, the only footage that feels familiar is this part where Bond grapples down a wall into a snowy stone courtyard where a fighter jet crashes and enemies trickle in from all sides
do you only play games on Switch these days?
just because Arkham's been several on other platforms
oh yeah
its an old game series
I think I played Asylum and City on whichever Xbox they were first on?
but switch is probably the most convenient wayt o play it now, that or steam deck
City was so good
it's hard for me to play my games on my computer because i don't like not having my games portably
As a person who rarely plays the tower based open world collectathon genre, I've enjoyed every game I played
just like
buy a steam deck
thats totally and afforable and reasonable solution
refurbished Steam decks are available now too
i do kind of want one but im saving my next big console purchase for the Switch successor
which is hopefully portable/hybrid agaiin 
smart tbh probably
oh yeah, I don't think that was a genre yet back when Arkham City did it
if it takes years to come out you will have a small pile of cash for games
It was not
It was strange and unique
It still is because I refuse to play AAA games unless they're cheap as shit and universally acclaimed
yeah if you've never played those before you'll have a blast
i know that Barbara is Oracle instead of Batgirl which is 😔
the next nintendo console needs to be called the super nintendo switch ngl
if not its a missed opportunity lol
they're... the same person?
or Barbara was A bat girl
oh, are you not familiar with the Oracle/Batgirl distinction?
apparently not?
in most continuities, Oracle is the codename that Barbara adopts (usually after a paralyzing injury) when she takes on the role of tech wizard back at HQ talking to everyone through earpieces, instead of one of the costumed crimefighters on the scene punching people
yee
yeah thats what i meant
and she's often cited as one of comics' best representations of a disabled character
im familiar with Oracle's origin being Killing Joke (cuz that's when Joker shot and paralysed her) but she probably has others i don't know
yeah
though this put her in a weird schrodinger's canon state where everyone wants to see both Oracle and Batgirl so the franchise's various reboots and adaptations keep waffling on her status 
I'm pretty sure the aftermath of Killing Joke is when the whole Oracle thing first started, yeah
well there's always Stephanie or Cassandra to take up the Batgirl mantle
indeed
i just randomly remmebred how Barbara was Alfred's neice in "Batman and Robin" instead of Jim's daughter which was a weird change
well I've thought of dozens of shooters I haven't played but still nothing grabs me, maybe I'm just not in the mood for them after all
have you tried DUSK
(nearly finished this Bond game video) it's a little funny and sad how many of the later games get the "feels like Call of Duty" comment from this creator
Cap I can't believe you played dusk but didn't like ultrakill
Ultrakill is basically Twilight
With or without the sparkle?
Yeah
well
idk lol
Look what you made me do, @unreal idol 🚦
omg
Dune
Hell yes, 61 is right
Dune ????
I have no idea what this is
I chose a random map for mine
It's Sim City
oh
On the SNES
huh, I always thought that was a PC series
But I like saying it's Dune because of an inside joke
oh i see
yeah this is a port of the original PC version
iirc Nintendo themselves did it
yep Nintendo EAD did the port to SNES
anyway, finally made up my mind: I'm going to play Kentucky Route Zero next
oo
I'm still feeling too low energy for a twitchy or complicated game so another narrative atmospheric one seems about right
I... don't have that many unplayed narrative atmospheric games on me atm? 
or did you have something specific in mind
wow I lucked out with those tags
(The other two are bad)
gtk
it is but they released it on some consoles
lol
Mode 7 is the pinnacle of graphics
Typing Chronicles sounds like an educational game…
It's a normal game
You just have to do everything by means of typing and this doesn't help the core gameplay loop
The core gameplay loop is "typing fast".
Though IIRC that one somewhat weirdly supports controller input, which throws the whole typing concept out the window
Yeah. I should specify it's bad for Ixrec who wants slow atmospheric narrative games.
typing like the old Space Quest games ?
have you played KRZ, or was this backlog comment I accidentally stumbled onto just now based on reputation alone?
Less like the old Space Quest game and more like that one Pokemon typing game
Things have labels; you type the words on the labels to target them
But I would definitely describe it more "frantic typing" than "atmospheric narrative"
lol okay this is pretty funny. I built an airport. It immediently caught on fire 😡
But, this tiny bit survived the fire and I guess is good enough??? There go new airplanes
LOL
gotta love small-town rural directions like this
"turn left at the ugly tree that's always on fire"
Launch trailer for all-new point-and-click adventure featuring world-renowned private eye/crooked cop Dangeresque! Available on Steam and itch.io
Steam:
https://store.steampowered.com/app/2442020/Dangeresque_The_Roomisode_Triungulate/
itch:
https://videlectrix.itch.io/dangeresque-the-roomisode-triungulate
I haven't played it, no, I've just heard about it and I know it's one of those type of indie games
it is certainly those and that's what I'm looking for right now
after binging through like 4 Zelda games and other of your indie games you've played a chill laid back experience like this is best 
considering how quickly it's making me doubt the reality of everything, it is pretty chill actually
if anyone is familiar with KRZ: ||I just got to Act I, Scene IV, my current best guess is we've been talking to a lot of ghosts||
Damn you are just flying through it lol
ooo a fountain
Very low
tough choice
Each floor in order
wow post war
So, something I hadn't thought of before, occurring to me now that I'm playing AC Odyssey again.
Is the common fictional portrayal of the spartans standing up against the evil persian hordes kind of racist?
This is based on the Battle of Thermopylae, in which the legend goes that 300 spartans held off against hundreds of thousands of persians in a last stand
This is the intro of AC Odyssey and the focus of the film 300
Now I say legend because although there were probably around 300 spartan hoplites, they were supported by a few thousand more greek soldiers
Additonally, the battle was situated on a narrow width in Thermopylae, which made defending it easier
they only lost because some guy told the persians that there existed another route behind them but not before the rest of the greek alliance could prepare for a defense
Cause at the time, Greece wasn't really a unified country, it was made of different city states, like Sparta, Athens, Corinth, and I think that is somewhat touched upon in the game
they united to defend against the Achaemenid Empire (Persia)
some western sources see it as crucial for the survival of "democracy" and "western culture", and while somewhat true, I think more historians would say that ironically, Persia was actually a way better and moral place to live lol
Right but I was specifically thinking about the depiction of the Persians as this evil, brutal horde ala the orcs in LOTR or something
This depiction comes through the most in like, the movie 300
This is why I don't like their portrayal in the film 300, which was crucially made in 2007, where because of a few factors going on at the time... which you can guess where I am going with this
They made the persians look kinda stupid
Did 300 start that portrayal of them?
I feel like most of the time I see this battle recreated in media it depicts the Persians similarly
Maybe of this specific battle, because how else do you portray such a disproportionate battle
It didn’t exactly start this portrayal of them because the Greeks and Romans had negative views of the Persians as well as being decadent and weak.
Though at the same time they respected them as a dangerous opponent.
300 also portrayed the Persians as gay, which is fucking hilarious when you consider the protagonists of that movie are the Spartans
And you gotta remember that Persia today is literally just Iran
and being made in 2007... yeah
"Persians fuck men! We'd never do that! We fuck boys instead!" - Spartans in 300 probably
So yeah, to answer your original question, I do think in the specific case of the film 300, there were some iranophobic undertones and was somewhat politically motivated in portraying the manly western looking guys vs a massive army from persia lead by a relatively effeminate guy
the wiki article touches on this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/300_(film)
300 is a 2007 American epic historical action film loosely based on the 1998 comic series of the same name by Frank Miller and Lynn Varley. Both are fictionalized retellings of the Battle of Thermopylae in the Greco-Persian Wars. The film was co-written and directed by Zack Snyder, while Miller served as executive producer and consultant. It was...
I think that the public image of this battle is unfortunately heavily taken from this movie and depictions like it
so I think that might have done some lasting damage to the public conscious but idk
I completely agree
the film put the Battle of Thermopylae in the spotlight of the public conciousness and is what most people think of when they think of that battle and Sparta in general
Same here. I do think it’s worth knowing that the depiction there didn’t really come out of the blue, though.
and the game put it as the intro, because everyone knew what it was, and everyone knew what it was because of the film
While the specific package is new, many individual elements are pretty old (Herodotus literally ends with the Persians being explicitly and then implicitly criticized for decadence, for instance)
I mean, to be fair, Serse was fucking awesome, absolutely gorgeus and like 8 feet tall.
Definitely gay coded but also I wouldn't call it super negative as portrayal.
I had more problems with the portrayal of the more "freakshow" style of persians in the movie.
But yeah 300 is a bit much.
while Herodotus was the father of history, he has a reputation for being very dramatic and overembellishing a lot of things
Oh yeah I agree, Xerxes was awesome
I mean, his name is probably my favourite name in history
But I think at the time it was released, it could bring some negative perceptions to him and the persians in general
I had more problems with Xerxes being portrayed as a hilariously evil dude when he was anything but that
I think the film can be excused if you read it as more of folklore, and it's what it portrays itself.
As in, at the end you learn it's the one eyed dude that it's telling the story in front of the army before the big battle.
But yeah, even under that reasoning it's not great.
Like, of course the story makes the spartan looks awesome and the persians evil.
It's a spartan telling it.
It's like, the one time Zack Snyder kinda used a storytelling device properly, I don't want to take it from him.
oh snyder...
unfortunately, the public consciousness of the spartans and the persians will be only seen as that
much to the disdain of anyone who actually studied ancient history
I literally only remember this movie for the memes and the era of “this is sparta” remixes on youtube
For some people, thats all they think of when sparta is mentioned
I know it was for me for the longest time 
Zack Snyder certainly makes movies
I despise him for his take on batman alone
and superman honestly
he doesn't get either
yeah like, batman not killing is the whole point of his character and his relationship with his archenemy, the joker
People trying not to make Superman evil challenge (impossible)
at least the new cartoon returns him to his wholesome self
Yeh, one of my favorite renditions of superman
Bats and Supe are not dark or nihilistic characters and presenting edgy stories with them as their default canon is wrong and bad
Evil Superman is supposed to be a deviation from the norm because Clark is normally incredibly good
can't say I'm surprised he went in the direction that he went with with Batman considering I'm 99% sure he only really read The Dark Knight Returns if anything
300 was also originally a Frank Miller book too so I guess he likes Frank Miller which I wouldn't be surprised if he did
He's said before he doesn't like comic books
This fucking person should not be allowed within the same building as a comic to movie adaptation let alone in the directors chair
lmao bruh
I guarantee you he did not get Watchmen
he's the type of person to play Warhammer 40k and think the Imperium are super cool
"no one is killing each other"
makes batman kill
I'm glad DC seems to be going with James Gunn instead of Snyder from now on
Gun's Suicide Squad in 2021 was fantastic
shame the video game got delayed
I hope it's good when it comes out.
the video game turned out to be live service, and then everyone started hating on it
guessing that's why it got delayed
Well unless the delay is to remove the live service aspect, which I don't expect it to be, people are just gonna need to make their peace with that or not pick it up
it's just sad that it's kevin conroy's last performance as batman
Doesn't seem sad to me, the dialogue we've seen so far has been fun.
I mean it's sad Conroy passed obviously I just mean it's not sad this is his last performance compared to anything else.
the one thing I'll give Snyder is that his over the top style of direction translates very well to a character like Batman, when it comes to the feats he performs, the acrobatics, the coreography, the fighting, the overall spectacle is probably to this day my favourite of any Batman live action and it translates the animated and comic version of the character very well, he also makes him a lot spookier whenever we see him from another character's perspective, and the suit is still the best Batman live action suit too
the suit is ok, not my favourite though
in isolation, when you're not really thinking about the context of the character and the writing, it's really good
i like Pattinson's and Keaton's more i think
I don't like how the colour palettes of his movies are always grey and grey
yeah especially for a character like Superman 
Snyder taught me that tiny bat-ears are a big no for me.
heh
yeah
idk i kinda like it
but longer ears are more my preference
the short ears come from TDKR suit
I don't need for the ears to be huge, but I have a minimum acceptable lenght and Snyder suit is below it.
I wasn't aware of it until I saw it.
because as Nire said Zack Snyder has read one Batman comic and that's TDKR
i like the super long ears in the Arkham games
and that one guys art where he makes Batman look like a gargoyle
god i wish i could remember the name
something Kelly i think
my favourite appearance for batman is not technically batman but is technically still batman
I like all length of ears, Jim Lee usually draws them pretty short so I got used to it but the only thing I don't like about the Batfleck suit are the short ears, I guess it reminds me too much of DD, and Pattinson's ears are more like horns and his cowl's head shape is very weird so I never really liked it that much
i like how similar Pattinson's is to West's
the red death had no right to look this cool
The lightning bolt cutting through the bat symbol on his chest as a combination of the logos? stellar
I had to look at Pattinson suit to remind myself of the lenght and I love that just writing "Battinson suit" and google immedialy understood
something something "no capes"
Are you guys familiar with the Dark Nights Metal various Batmen?
because a lot of them are very cool designs
no
oh damn I gotta show you some. Do you know what Dark Nights Metal is or should I give you a two sentence rundown of the premise
two sentence
Dark Nights Metal is a bunch of alternate universe evil batmen being gathered by Barbatos, lead by The Batman Who Laughs, a version of Batman who became the Joker after killing Joker and getting infected with Joker gas.
ooh i think ive heard of this
The previously shown Batman is The Red Death, a version of Batman who strapped the Flash to the hood of the batmobile to time travel to try to save his parents.
it combined Flash & Bats to make that guy
I'm still hoping that some live action or even animated Batman film will use the Rebirth suit design, I think it's my favourite and the perfect modern Batman suit
i just want Pattinson to have da yellow utility belt
he killed the rest of the bat family and keeps the robins chained up like attack dogs
oh
yeah hes kinda gruesome
Another favourite of mine is The Drowned, a female Batman who lived in a timeline where the surface was at war with Atlantis
the Dark Nights Metal run has tons of alternate Batmen and some get pretty goofy. One of them is a monster truck.
lol
tl;dr batman went crazy and put his consciousness in all technology to big-brother style monitor the whole world
people fought back and broke every computer except 1; the machine inside of a big ass monster truck, batman's last vestige of consciousness
pirate female batman? I vibe with it
i always thought the Elseworld where Thomas becomes Batman and Martha becomes the Joker was interesting
Oh yeah that's Flashpoint right?
i think so
here's the Dawnbreaker, a version of Batman who got a green lantern ring the night Joe Chill killed his parents and used it to brutalize Chill
whoa
by the time the lantern core came to get it back years later, Bruce was way too good with the ring and literally solo'd the whole corps
He killed them all with some weird super attack that was never explained or seen again lol
something about unleashing his inner demons.
holy hell
Another one of the main evil Batmen is the war machine. Bruce uploaded Alfred's consciousness to a computer, CPU Alfred decided the best way to keep Batman safe was to turn him into a computer as well
Then there's The Merciless, Batman who usurped Ares to become the god of war
and the last of the "main" villains, The Devastator. Batman with the Doomsday Virus.
wow i didn't know there were so many
There's tons of other minor evil Batmen (one whos a red lantern, one who was combined with Scarecrow, one who uh... he's a house... no better way to explain it),
but the main cast, so to speak, is Dawnbreaker, Drowned, Red Death, War Machine, Batman Who Laughs, Merciless, and Devastator.
I'm sure the lego batman games had some of these right
I don't think so?
The problem is that the most prominent among them, Batman Who Laughs, is a brutal character who I do not think is really fit for the lego games lol. Also the run is entirely non canon afaik
And because these are all alternate timeline Batmen, the whole arching plot deals with a lot of time shenanigans I do not believe are very easy to clear up, so not a lot of attention is given to the run.
I think Batman Who Laughs survived the whole ordeal because Barbatos is protecting him but I think the rest are all ded, either due to dying in the conflict or being erased when their little side timeline ended
I think the Batman comics have one of the best extended casts of any comic series and it makes me sad that most major adaptations just focus on Batman and Joker
The rest of the heroes and villains of gotham are so fucking cool. I love Signal.
look at this guuuuuy I wanna hug him
hes even got the best robin design
You should definitely join the DC thread we have btw
https://discord.com/channels/98609319519453184/1026644106874732594
I assume you'll be interested in some of the discussions that happen there

Fallout 4 next gen update delayed indefinitly
what a staggeringly unhelpful post.
wow I missed the whole #1026644106874732594 leaking into #1032716748887179434 thing 
fwiw it has pretty strong bursts of activity whenever one of us (particularly me, Nire or Cap) watches/plays/reads a DC thing, especially since Nire and I have read many Batman comics in the past (I'm almost certain Cap recognized Metal when you brought it up because I referenced it a few times)
We're proud to announce mod.io is partnering with @Ubisoft to bring mod support to Anno 1800 on PC!
Welcome to the dawn of the Industrial Age. Experience one of the most exciting & fast-changing periods of all time in a rich city-building experience.
For more details, head to our blog: https://blog.mod.io/ubisoft-powers-official-mod-support-fo...
NEW PINS!: https://carbotanimations.creator-spring.com/
Help Support the Cartoons: https://www.patreon.com/carbotanimations
Join us on Discord: https://discord.gg/bNCfw2JnNH
http://www.carbotanimations.com
Follow on Twitter: https://twitter.com/CarbotAnimation
Follow on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/carbotanimat...
Follow on Instagram:...
YOOOOO
It's the canon weapon from NieR Replicant!
I understand that BG3 is a good game but I find it baffling how many people go "omg bg3 metacritics 97!!!1!!!! higher than zelda!!111!!!!"
I think more than anything it's unexpected for a CRGP, and for anything to dethrone zelda in the first place
yeah it’s both
TotK has 145, and also it is known since BotW that there are reviews that solely exist to shit with the score
the aggregate number being higher clearly doesn’t mean anything once you compare things like the review count, but most people aren’t naturally skeptical of that
which is why I keep saying a single numerical score is a really bad way to describe a video game, often to the point of being worse than no information at all; that’s clearly not common sense yet
TotK has 5 mixed reviews. It has 3 70s and 2 60s
It's definitely not a game that deserve 60
Anyway it is so unfortunate to see people doing that, and journalism, yes you, especially you, journalists
I'd give it a 60 probably.
I mean I'm not against giving 60 personally
But giving 60 as a critics score is different with "Oh I don't like this game"
greatest game ever made
I'd give it a 60 as a critics score. I think the way it does stamina, consumables, energy cells, and the limiting of the machine parts is anti-experimentation and feels like someone is standing over you hitting you with a pillow whenever you try to have fun
Durability too, almost forgot the most important one.
It limits any exploration of the actual mechanics so much I feel like I never get to interact with them
Skill Issue
if you have everything maxed at the start theres nothing to progress which wouldnt be very fun
Not being able to use weapons, build machines, climb anything, or use items isn't very fun either.
I don't think I was ever able to shield surf for more than 3 seconds in BOTW because everything breaks so easily
wut
I mean I do find some of the system to be quite annoying here and there, the game is often surprisingly difficult, but I don't think it's 60 bad
nier automata is the best game ever made send tweet
I never even learned shield surfing was a thing in BotW, and by the time I was aware of it in TotK I could go down a whole mountain easily
shield sufring is so much fun
Will I give 100/100? Maybe not, probably not. Will I give 60/100? No
finding a bigass hill and surfing down it there's nothing like it
Its a 110/100 message approved by the Penn fan club
true !
I shield surfed the first rail I saw in TotK and my friend was like "Oh...you could do that I didn't realize"
"Well you know...it was in the trailer..."
ah, well, I don't watch trailers
experimenting is so fun and the best part is most of the time wacky experiments work it's great
I shouldn't have to unlock the basic concept of fun
also I did progress, it didn't change
the durability is always too low
the stamina is always too low
the machine parts are always too limited
I never felt like I had enough to do anything
the only balance problem I had in TotK is that silver enemies are too spongy, but even that never rose above a nuisance
I always had plenty of all of those things to do much of the stuff I wanted to do
BOTW had the same problem and TOTK made it worse by adding the machine parts, energy cells, and limiting bombs now
and the stuff I wasn't yet ready for I came back later when I had more of everything
Want to ask, what kind of game do you personally think that deserves 100, or like at least 95?
(to Justice)
Super Mario Galaxy 100000/100
anyway, this is a perfect example of why no score or review means anything without knowing the author/source it's coming from
super mario galaxy is prett good if you play it on the switch (the wiimote sucks ass)
Well they don't sell it anymore
i haven't touched a Wiimote in almost 10 years
i don't really remmeber how it controlled on Wii
I tried to play galaxy 2 on my Wii this year because they didnt put it on switch
it was so unplayable
same, closest I've gotten since the Wii was new is some motion control emulation to an analog stick
yeah that worked pretty well
no its ass
oh yeah that was the one reason I had to keep detaching the sides of my Switch to play Odyssey
that was annoying
i don't remember it being bad at all
I mean it's not a big deal if the move is infrequent
but a button press is just better
Me neither but after having a button do it in Galaxy 1 I can never go back
infrequent 😹
ah the Odyssey move I needed to shake for was infrequent
rolling
what about rolling
You shake to roll in Odyssey
you can just mash Y
no you cant, this was the #1 complaint about speedrunning odyssey
you have to shake the controller constantly
I don't think I'd give any game a 100 but a 95 would probably be I Was a Teenage Exocolonist
im literally playing the game right now yes you can
I've already forgotten the details of the Odyssey controls
Interesting, never heard of that game, what kind of game is it?
you can do almost any move (except for hat tossup or down) without motion controls
oooh the hat toss
"The biggest and most obvious one is the roll boost. Getting around as Mario is fastest while in a roll, and by pressing the Y button or shaking the right Joy-Con, he does a little “hop” that also gives a tiny speed boost. Except you only get this speed boost once every second or two when you use the Y button, and get the speed boost every time when shaking the Joy-Con."
(fwiw I did hear briefly of Exocolonist, but it's not my genre)
Visual novel with exploration + card game elements
so it works like the other motion controls in odyssey, better version of pressing the button
i don't think a casual player cares about the brief second where you can't press Y to go faster in a roll
no
its obviously way better than in galaxy 1-2
but doing the cat throw up was annoying
cap 🙂
cat throw up
I still don't remember exactly what moves were involved, but I'm pretty sure there were some moons in Odyssey I could not get without motion controls
i can't think of any
I think another game I'd give a 95 to would be Hades. Can't really think of any more.
I can think of plenty of 90s
Crazy Bus

Quake 2 64 has this map with an ice pool. You know what that means? Quake 2's ice physics put to their full extent
if you think bunnyhopping is ridiculous, it's nothing compared to ice physics
this is like, the biggest reason to play it on PC, can't do that on N64 🙂
you can also do this trick to attack some enemies from behind by performing the rest of the level in reverse
haha let's revive the arena fps genre
as a meme
that will be such a funny joke
can we please get a pve hero shooter 
quake had a remaster or something recently if I'm not mistaken, I wonder why I never seem to hear much fuss about Quake considering how legendary it is
yeah the Quake 2 remaster came out recently
im hoping for some new Quake game news at QuakeCon but it seems unlikely
I usually hear some fuss about it whenever people are getting nostalgic for id-era shooters in general
Quake 1 is extremely good but i haven't pllayed any of the others
obligatory "I just found the BFG" moment
whao
Quake 2's BFG is probably my favorite for a few reasons, the Quake 3 BFG is boring but also effective (it's just a sped up rocket launcher)
the fun starts now
compared Doom, the Quake 2 BFG traces enemies continuously and it also allows you to BFG-jump with it
(costs a lot of health, but it gets you pretty far)
I remember seeing a video about the original BFG's design which was pretty much just a faster plasma rifle iirc
We need a quake reboot like what they did with doom
Calinou cratered.
a new quake or a new arena fps would be fun I think
though something tells me maybe people don't like this type of shooter that much if that genre of shooter hasn't been too big exactly
ULTRAKILL enters the chat
there's been a whole "boomer shooter" revival in recent years
it's not my thing, but there's enough of them now that I've seen top 5 or top 10 lists
Doom Eternal is basivally an arena shooter
I love boomer shooters
I've never actually played Ultrakill... I only really saw stuff about it, but I don't remember if it was online or not
I played the Ultrakill demo and it was super fun
It's singleplayer but extremely good and definitely worth playing
they need to bring the Lovecraftian theming back
really? like which ones? 
all I can think of right now is Dusk which I remember people really liked
DUSK is excellent
Quake Champions is still playable today, but the skill floor is quite high (not as high as Quake Live though)
one issue with arena shooters is keeping them fun for casual players. I don't think that aspect has really been mastered in the last 10 years
forgot about Champions
since I don't follow this genre at all you're probably better off googling it
I am bad at Quake
looking through the names that pop up when I google it, I've heard of Dusk, Ultrakill, Ion Fury, Amid Evil, and of course the actual Dooms/Quakes/etc, but aside from the modern Dooms I haven't played any of this
arena shooters tend to be at their best when played competitively, with strategies such as timing items, trickjumping, etc. The difference between a skilled player and a casual player is very, very high, and there isn't always teamplay to save you like in Counter-Strike
Quake 1 rocket launcher best video game rocket launcher ever
in a team game, if you play poorly, your team might carry you anyway. The larger the team, the more likely this is to be the case
(Battlefield-style games work very well for this purpose)
yeah, arena shooters are the epitome of what I do not want to play 
Quake 3 has a very nice rocket launcher, but it's technically nerfed compared to Q1. Still very useful as a daily driver, the main meta weapons in that game are rocket/lightning/railgun
Never stopped fighting games.
One of the biggest struggles fot fighting games is retaining casual audiences and making the games fun and learnable for casuals
yeah, I am a bit scared of playing something like TFH online
i'd be concerned if a Quake game didn't have a good rocker launcher
rocket
That's why virtually every new fighting game is trying some new mechanics to help new or casual players
I don't spend time learning fighting game strageties, etc. I probably could but it's a time investment
(same for Smash :P)
fighting games lost me when I was a teenager and I haven't even looked since lol
even Smash I couldn't make heads or tails of
It is, fighting games is something that, just like with Quake I imagine, you have to really really like and enjoy if you want to get good
Not that you can't enjoy it casually but there's a lot to learn and it just takes time and practice
...and a lot of reading in forums and watching videos
or well at least that's what you used to do
SF6 has some pretty excellent tutorials even going in depth about fighting game mechanics that as crazy as it may sound, not that many fighting games even have
good tutorials have always been a bit of a struggle in fighting games until very recent
learning strategies probably became more important in the last 10 years with the rise of esports, competitive gaming, etc
I remember some random video I watched years ago praising Skullgirls for having tutorials that went into more depth than which button is jump and which is punch, and how this should not be a rarity
if I wanted to play Smash at my local esports bar (even "casually"), I'd have to play the game the way it's played competitively
Fighting game is one of the worst genres in term of new player retention
The way how it is structured is inherently anti-newbie
And it gets worse as higher skill level players get better
Yeah but that's just how the genre is, the fighting game community itself seems to be against the idea of changing that
so I guess thats never going to improve.
not wrong 
it really was that bad
and that's without even going into more abstract and complex fighting game concepts like the ever elusive footsies
L-canceling is when you cancel your opponent on Twitter for picking Luigi. 
I think at the base level fighting games need more simple control options and auto combos
beyond all the technical game knowledge, the mechanical skill and practice required to even play at a really low level in fighting games is unreasonable to ask someone who does not want to play it as their main game, or at least main genre
I'm pretty sure I'm just physically incapable of playing a fighting game even if I did attempt to put the time into it
my hand-eye coordination or reflexes or whatever the fancy term is has just never been good enough to hit precise timing windows in any genre
Same, but I'm also actually blind.
there's a reason I keep saying that I suck at parries in every game that has a parry button; so far it's just empirically true



kinda had the itch to just go ham