Reported by @quartz drift
-
Ask ChatGPT for guidance on which model or reasoning mode to use for a Codex task.
-
Ask for a prompt to give Codex, including what “thinking” or reasoning level Codex should use.
-
Observe that ChatGPT may recommend ChatGPT-style labels such as “Heavy Thinking,” “Pro Extended,” or similar ChatGPT-mode terminology.
-
Compare that recommendation against Codex/API behavior and documentation. Codex/reasoning configuration uses different labels, such as medium, high, and xhigh intelligence/
ChatGPT should accurately distinguish between ChatGPT model/mode labels and Codex/API reasoning or intelligence settings.
If the user asks what to tell Codex, ChatGPT should use Codex-appropriate terminology, such as medium, high, or xhigh, instead of inventing or transferring ChatGPT UI labels that do not exist in Codex.
If terminology differs by surface, ChatGPT should clearly say so and explain the mapping instead of presenting the wrong label as usable.
ChatGPT can recommend non-existent Codex reasoning labels, such as asking Codex to use “Heavy Thinking” or “Pro Extended.”
Those labels may exist as ChatGPT-side user-facing concepts, but they are not the same as Codex’s intelligence/reasoning settings. In Codex, the relevant options are different, such as medium, high, and xhigh.
This creates confusion because the assistant is giving instructions for another OpenAI product but using the wrong product’s terminology. Users then have to manually
ChatGPT Pro; GPT-5.5 Instant / Thinking / Pro testing; ChatGPT Standard / Extended / Heavy reasoning labels; Codex intelligence/reasoning settings; Atlas browser; macOS; OpenAI docs comparison.