#Looks like Images 2.0 lost transparent backgrounds. Seems like a regression.
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
wait I can't do transparent background any more?
It's super touchy now
It seems very much dependent on the training data. If the type of image you're generating usually has a fake background then it gives it a transparent background. But if the type of image you're generating usually has a real transparent background, then it does it.
It really does seem like a regression of some sort.
Because I'm pretty sure this worked much better before.
I wonder if it has anything to do with the fact that there’s graininess and static in the images now. I wonder if it has difficulty making it transparent because of it.
Most things I try now seem like very regresed lol
No that's definitely not it, because we're talking about original image generation.
It generates the image with a fake transparency in the first place.
From what I understand, it's about the training data.
There's so many images online with fake transparent backgrounds so that they look like they are PNGs.
I really wouldn't expect it to fall for that, but if special care wasn't taken, I can see it being a weird problem.
Especially given that it is inconsistent.
Sometimes you will get a real transparent background.