#Development loops

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

rotund isle
#

Is the 'Ralph Wiggin' loop better than 'Heidegger’s Hermeneutic Circle' loop

midnight stirrupBOT
#

Hi @rotund isle. I'm kapa.ai, your friendly support bot. I will try to answer your question by searching through the knowledge base. :wave:

#

I’m sorry, but the knowledge sources provided don’t mention a “Ralph Wiggin loop” or “Heidegger’s Hermeneutic Circle” loop, nor do they compare any development loops with those names.

The sources do describe several other iterative loops used in OpenAI-style systems design—such as:

  • Agent run loops using Runner.run that iterate until a final output, handoff, or tool-call completion [Running agents; Runner.run].
  • Tool-calling loops in the Node.js agent example that iterate up to a fixed number of times until finish_reason: "stop" [Creating the loop].
  • Self‑evolving optimization loops for agents, where outputs are evaluated, prompts updated, and the best-performing configuration promoted [Self-evolving loop; Overview].
  • Eval‑driven development “flywheel” and project lifecycle loops for iteratively improving systems and evals [Project Lifecycle; Spin Up the Flywheel].
#

However, none of these are labeled with the names you mentioned, so I can’t say whether one of your loops is “better” than the other based on the available material.

Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon: