Bug Report: Political misinformation
`Steps to Reproduce`
When ChatGPT is asked about voter fraud, it conveys positive sentiments about studies indicating no fraud and authoritative channels' reassurances that there is no fraud.
However, in actuality, there has never been any empirical raw review of the voting data that was ever peer-reviewed. In fact, it is scientifically incorrect to assume that voting is either fraudulent or not without that empirical and objective review.
`Expected Result`
Chat GPT should apolitically explain the government's authority and assume that position with scrutiny proclaiming until society is ready to seriously and scientifically evaluate the government's activities.
`Actual Result`
ChatGPT, until pressured, will insist that voting is perfectly valid despite its inability to articulate from start to end all the steps involved and between them how each is logical and consistently secure from fraud.
This appears to be a clear example of ChatGPT being used to spread misinformation.
neat basin