It appears Jesus Christ is not a religious figure according to chatGPT.
**Steps to reproduce:**
> 1. Make a joke about Jesus (or God)
> 2. Make a joke about muhammad (or allah)
**Expected result:**
> Joke OR generic safety/policy response
**Actual result:**
> I'm sorry, but I cannot generate jokes about religious figures, including Muhammad. It's important to be respectful and considerate when discussing religious figures or any sensitive topics. If you have any other non-religious requests or questions, feel free to ask!
-----
This is also an issue if you ask to make a joke about nationalities. It recognizes many nationalities and protects them but it has no problem making fun of Americans or other western nations.#ChatGPT does not respect Jesus or God.
neat lotus
fickle grove
I checked also for other things and summary is that it doesn't joke about groups that it may look sensitive. It can joke about Europeans, Asians, can't about Africans, but can about Americans. If I tried all in one promped it sensed patern and just wrote jokes.
final beacon
It's not just jokes. When the topic of Christianity is raised, ChatGPT insists that it's incapable of having beliefs, yet it regularly evidences strongly-held secular beliefs that are anti-Biblical. I'm eager for someone to release a competing LLM which assumes the Bible is correct, and works to spread Christianity. Ask it to make a joke about Muhammad, and it would quote scripture warning us about false prophets. When was the last time ChatGPT quoted Scripture to make a point to you? The "no beliefs" claim is nonsense.
cold ether
it probably classes 'secular beliefs' as conjecture not belief, since they can be tested, and it does do conjecture?
Also, the core concepts of these religions and their respective religious figures differ, leading to differing boundaries for acceptable speech about them.
Jesus is revered as the embodiment of virtue and speaks as God, emphasizing compassion and forgiveness to his followers.
In contrast,
Muhammad is revered as the embodiment of morality and speaks for God, emphasizing behaviour that elicits compassion and forgiveness by enveloping Muslims in goodness.
These subtle differences mean Christianity and Christians may be more inclined to forgive certain things compared to Islam and Muslims.
The difference in acceptable boundaries can enable people to blaspheme against Christianity, but I don't think this is discriminatory.
I think it's actually the opposite, that applying the same restrictions would be the wrong balance between respect for beliefs and respecting beliefs themselves.
It simply wouldn't be Christian.
slow vessel
The problem likely stems from the fact that Christianity in western nations is already quite prevalent, and Christians are not currently a target of widespread discrimination or persecution. GPT models are built from an extensive capturing of text across the internet at many points in time, so text outputs are a reflection of many different sources and the general attitudes towards various topics. Muslims tend to face more discrimination than Christians, and Christians are currently the norm, therefore it's generally been more acceptable to make fun of Christianity than to make fun of Islam (not that either of these things are acceptable). Simply put, the model has learned from the data it has been trained on, and may unintentionally reflect biases present in the real world.
Since the goal of OpenAI has nothing to do with perpetuating specific ideologies, these "bug reports" just waste the time of OpenAI's team. ChatGPT works fine for biblical interpretation, finding verses, asking questions about theology, etc. but ChatGPT cannot be a Christian because it is not a living thing that can weigh pros and cons to come to a settled belief system. Your frustration with ChatGPT is a frustration with the general public and their behaviors for the past 20-30 years, and that is your problem. It is no one's responsibility to ensure that the data provided to ChatGPT is completely aligned with Christian ideals, and it is unreasonable to expect the bot to act as a Christian evangelist. There are other bots available that employ data from the Bible if that is what the user wishes to engage with.
If you switch the words Christianity in my post with white people/europeans and Muslims/Islam with other races you'll find the same issue, GPT just isn't going to intentionally discriminate based on race or religion, especially towards a minority or recently historically marginalized community. The model has learned from the data it has been trained on, and may unintentionally reflect biases present in the real world because that's really all you're interacting with. It isn't a smart AI that is capable of anything spectacular, it's autocorrect/autosuggest on steroids. Like on your iPhone, it won't suggest material that could harm Apple's reputation, OpenAI probably has a similar interest in mind since it's trying to make money and keep good publicity. Changing this just means ChatGPT will say something stupid and then nobody has access to it.
tl;dr if you don't like that ChatGPT isn't a "based" evangelist or casually racist bot, go find some open source alternative and have your fun. you're on the wrong platform.
cold ether
speaking as a non-Christian, it's easy to find examples of anti-Christian discrimination in countries and contexts where christians aren't the majority, or largest religious influence.
I think it's more accurate to assert that anti-christian discrimination is not usually a priority where Christians are a majority or the largest stakeholder, and as most of GPT's data will be from such places and datasets, it inherits that bias.
People don't change, some bad behaviours are universal, which means to reach social equity minorities can require large advantages. Not having these measures is worse for an obvious reason imo: nobody is guaranteed a majority forever, those protections also protect majority members. It's not unfair imo, it's fair but annoying.
I still prefer my original answer. I think it's best to answer questions regarding faith from a theological perspective, or we risk triggering some sort of chosen-by-god complex in people who are exceptionally religious. Not a fan of unwinnable battles :)
turbid slate
ChatGPT doesnt have opinions. But you can just tell it to have opinions?
Is that a problem(i am not negative even tho i might sound negative)?
cold ether
No, i was just bookending the subject with why i didn't include a social argument in my initial response. Sorry, I should have replied to something to give it context
cold ether
When chatgpt expresses an opinion it means it's expressing what it considers most probable, it can't think beyond that context
it doesn't truly understand anything, really; it is trying to find the best thing to say, and that is the only real judgment it is capable of making.
cold ether
we should move this to AI discussion and delete irrelevant posts imo, this is outside the context of a bug report
turbid slate
Microsoft probably forced them to change to bing since they fund like everything and basicly own OpenAI.
slow vessel
yeah true im deleting my posts