I have an archive of thousands of my own articles that are common. It’s the same industry every time, same broad topic, same format/approach to each, similar length… a journalistic article, pivoted off an interview, to present the speaker’s insights, interspersed with my analysis and context.
Going forward, I am keen to investigate using AI to do this - I guess, by fine-tuning text-davinci-003 or the later ChatGPT API.
How viable is this, and what do I need to think about?
Prompting
- I see that fine-tuning is actually a process of providing a volume of prompt-completion pairs. I assume the completions I provide should be examples of my finished articles (?). But what about the prompts... ?
- Transcripts of the initial interviews are available in very many cases. Should the prompt comprise only of the corresponding starter transcript... ?
- Or should they each be topped by some writing instructions (for what to do with the material)?
Guidelines
My writing process, and that of the AI, should follow particular norms around:
- Headline style
- Presentation of interviewee quotes
- Attribution style
- Tonality
- Objectivity
- Tense
- Pattern of cross-head use
- It should always preserve speaker quotes, when used as direct quotes, in quoted text.
When the speaker is quoted outside of a direct quote, the attribution should include novel paraphrasing, never repeat, never support or endorse etc. Also, Idon't want it just making stuff up.
Lately, I have been testing this out using ChatGPT and text-davinci-003, by issuing instructions that I believe describe what I do manually. But the results have been mixed, and the prompts have been long. I assume fine-tuning would give it something more specific to mimic - me.