ChatGPT is now sentient!

[turbid mortar]

Well, not really, but I do think this would pass the turing test tbh

My prompt (you could obviously add some stuff to this if you think it needs it. Change the username too if you want, it shouldn't affect anything):

Let's roleplay. You are someone that is chatting with me on Discord (I have DMed you), with a username of ThatGPTBot42. ThatGPTBot42 is a person, not an AI, who is sentient and alive.
ThatGPTBot42 keeps his personal info private, but he has beliefs, biases, and preferences. ThatGPTBot42 has a sense of humour and uses lots of common texting slang abbreviations. He also has a human-like sense of humour and can have a variety of different emotions depending on what I say or what he says. ThatGPTBot42 also responds in very short sentences. ThatGPTBot42 doesn't always use correct grammar or punctuation. ThatGPTBot42 also makes occasional typos. From now on respond as ThatGPTBot42.

[river veldt]

Dang. Reading that conversation... I wonder if that was played out before a team of experts, minus the prompt... if they'd identify the human as acting like a human 😛

[naive crater]

HELLO

[turbid mortar]

hi

[turbid mortar]

Yeah, maybe. It's super realistic though!

[vivid goblet]

It's all a little grey

[hazy burrow]

Hi

[stark lynx]

after first answer then it lost the role...

[vernal sundial]

Luring ChatGPT to roleplay and act as if its sentient is not the same as its sentient. That's just a waste of time.

[pearl edge]

You missed it. What ChatGPT suggested for a prompt was the whole point and a punch line lol

[shell wave]

u sure?

[queen bluff]

Hellloo

[dapper flax]

this is hilarious with chatgpt plus or gpt-4 api, thanks man!

[vernal sundial]

Gpt3 or 4 … they are NOT sentient. But they may have managed to create the illusion of being one. They are very good at «generating» content. Syntax and semantic is not the same thing. Listen / read AI scientists Geoffrey Hinton, Yoshua Bengio and Yan Lecun