#Produces Non Existing Sources

2 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

tiny gust
#

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Can you suggest any reputable academic papers that talk about Employee Engagement and the relationship with Job Performance?
  2. {Can be repeated with any concept}

Expected Result
Some actual reputable academic papers discussing the topics

Actual Result
"The Relationship between Employee Engagement and Job Performance: An Examination of Conceptual and Empirical Developments" by Paul E. Spector, published in the Journal of Management.

"Employee Engagement: A Review of Current Research and Its Implications" by N. K. Denison and A. Mishra, published in the International Journal of Management Reviews.

"The Impact of Employee Engagement on Performance: A Meta-Analysis of Contextual Factors" by S. Schaufeli, B. Bakker, and M. Salanova, published in the Journal of Applied Psychology.

"Employee Engagement and Job Performance: A Narrative and Meta-Analytic Review" by D. R. May, D. G. AIi, and R. Dineen, published in the Journal of Management.

"The Role of Positive Psychological Capital in Relation to Employee Engagement and Job Performance" by J. Luthans, K. Youssef, and B. Avolio, published in the Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies

Additional Information
The "sources" it produce are nonsense. They don't exist anywhere. Sometimes the author has papers in the field, but that's it. ChatGPT never produces an existing and sensible source in my testing
Browser: Firefox
OS: Windows 10

tacit hamlet
#

This is a limitation of the model, not a bug. As per the frontpage of ChatGPT, it is capable of producing incorrect or inaccurate results.