ChatGPT Website seems much more advanced than the API.

[midnight bone]

I've been playing around with the API using 'text-davinci-003'
I've use the same prompt through code with the API and with the website (chat.openai.com)

Prompt: Write a poem about how Jameson and Heineken are like peanut butter and jelly

Output of API:

Jameson and Heineken, two drinks that go together,
just like peanut butter and jelly!

One has a strong bite and one is light and smooth,
both making you feel like you've got something to prove.

Jameson is a whiskey, a strong and bold flavor,
Heineken brings a crisp and refreshing flavor.

Peanut butter and jelly, a classic sandwich treat,
Both Jameson and Heineken, it's hard to compete.

Both drinks are great, no matter your choice,
Jameson and Heineken, a great pairing rejoice!

Output of Website:

Jameson, smooth and warm,
Heineken, crisp and cold,
Like peanut butter and jelly,
Together, stories they're told.

One for sipping, one for shots,
But both with a story to share,
Like peanut butter and jelly,
They complement, they repair.

Jameson, the whiskey of the Irish,
Heineken, a brew from the Dutch,
Like peanut butter and jelly,
Their origins, a story to clutch.

So here's to Jameson and Heineken,
Two delicious treats,
Like peanut butter and jelly,
They make life a little sweeter, a little more complete.

As you can see the website is able to create a much more creative and descriptive poem. Is the website running a different engine?

Here is a snippet of my python code:

prompt = ("Write a poem about how Jameson and Heineken are like peanut butter and jelly")

completions = openai.Completion.create(
engine="text-davinci-003",
prompt=prompt,
max_tokens=2048,
n=1,
stop=None,
temperature=0.7,
)

Any insight/advice would be appreciated.

[high shadow]

I second that. ChatGPT is giving much better and accurate results than davinci 2 and 3.

[oblique igloo]

indeed

[pastel warren]

I already said this. I dont like davinci 2 3 or what ever. The API is not good against ChatGPT. The AI need much more training like ChatGPT did. But i guess, GPT-3 get not really much updates i guess. And this is the reason why GPT-3 is not trained well.

[sharp barn]

ChatGPT is a final result. Davinci is a general purpose suited for adjustment. By design it's not meant to be better than ChatGPT. It's like comparing a completely decked out Honda Civic meant for racing to a stock model. It's not exactly like that, but I think it's a decent comparison

[honest nebula]

You can do a lot of basic and good stuffs using APIs, mainly if the context are based on Old concepts, Old data......you can do tons of interest projects anyway. Hope they publish new model soon....