I uploaded an AI generated photo to a subreddit about a game character, to that, a person replied "Can we please NOT post another artificial intelligence "art" here as well but only REAL ART by real human artists spending hours and days on original piece !" AI generated art is not art? What should I have replied?
#Artists vs AI
halcyon merlin
rugged cedar
Calmly responded that you unless specified by the reddit server guidelines / moderates that your AI art is considered appropriate. Encourage the individual to do their own research and outreach to the AI Art community if they wish to learn more.
Be kind and considerate to the users' feelings. But don't let them bully / put you down. You have every right to post your work as it is your own.
Also use this if they start saying you, "stole someone else's art." This clear and to the point doc on how AI art is created.
AI Art is type of visual art form. It is not however the same as traditional or digital artwork. It is own next level work that expands the visual mediums.
From a Traditional Artist who explains the state of traditionalist on AI art. Hope this helps you @halcyon merlin
halcyon merlin
thanks
real crypt
i agree a real artist see's its potential what you can implement it in and how it can be useful. its only a art medium
solemn oriole
yuik
winged remnant
imagine/ la vida es un frenesí y una cosa muy alocada
polar narwhal
imagine/ beautiful girl refresh face model
frail temple
imagine/ beautiful girl refresh face model
stuck wadi
"Human artists" never create from void, but from their perceptions, feelings and memories with an intention to create art, even if that is only conceptual, not visual. AI as a tool let them to implement the same -Art- but amplifying their human capabilities by the use of a kind of "artificial memories" created thanks to a wider "visual" background and maybe using more creative relations. At the end, it is still the human who again establish the feelings communication and message of this art.
remote mauve
images tours
random hinge
school website
wind zenith
imagine/ beautiful girl refresh face model
stray light
naive chasm
imagine/ a dog trying to catch a cat in a tree
idle wharf
imagine/ a dog sphere
shadow cosmos
snap fitness image
cloud sorrel
I uploaded an AI generated photo to a subreddit about a game character, to that,...
Art is the final frontier of freedom. To say one art is not art is to limit that freedom. Comparing AI art and traditional art is like comparing apples and oranges. You are welcome to post on subreddit r/aiArt.
signal lintel
People who claim ai art isn't art is just salty at all the time they wasted. It'd be like me saying they didn't make the art, it was the brush. It's 2023 and essentially the brushes are computers. That's it.
tardy wigeon
Imagine a dazzling dance scene in an unusual location. Structure: "In the heart of the savannah, under the sparkling lights, bewitching music resounded. The dancers, dressed in dazzling costumes, moved with grace and virtuosity. Their bodies seemed to merge with the environment, creating a symbiosis between the movement and space. Each step, each swirl, conveyed intense emotion to the spectators, captivating their gaze and transporting them into a world of beauty and artistic expression." Details: You can describe the specific movements of the dancers, the visual details of the unusual place and the emotions that this scene arouses in the spectators.
junior cliff
People who claim ai art isn't art is just salty at all the time they wasted. It'...
Art is, and always was, a useless thing.
Art was worth something because it took time to 'create'. The amount of intrinsic value that "art" has is precisely 0. There's no reason for one to go and buy art, other than the fact that he can now go and say "I have this, and you don't".
Now, art is easier to get. Because of this, it's value goes down. Art is still art, the small minority of people who enjoy art, mostly the rich, are going to suffer.
true karma
Art is culture and creativity - doesn't matter if it's AI, painted, drawn, printed - and it's for everyone to enjoy. The only people who "suffer" are artists themselves, trying to make a living. The value of good art never goes down only up - eg David Hockney did works via software and got over $1mill each because of his recognition of a lifetime of making art. Bored Apes where original drawn by the artist Seneca before being put into production through an algorithm. You can't put an NFT on your wall unless you print it out and frame it - and it will always be digital art not the same thing as an original painting, but in the artworld anything goes.