#codex-discussions
1 messages · Page 41 of 1
No?

BUILD, my love
What does it rhyme with
well just now I opened chatgpt and it came for free
I’m so confused
name LEAKED
my name been public for 2y. no big
I’m looking for where you doxxed yourself
also 🇵🇱 !!!
Ayy nice I'm in Poland rn 😄
Not polish, ale... polish form of Christian
Been to poland 3 times now. Want to go this summer maybe, again
Forum Gliwice soon™
😢
Literally on his twitch stream that’s live right now
huh
wooow, rekt
Bro they need to CHILL in here
How come the Chinese wasn’t getting flagged earlier
"Wt* lol" in response -- also gets blocked
gg pAADJMQwU9
i need to buy tiny screen && connect Zero W 2 on it, to see chat
my iphone 13p currently sitting waiting for another app dump
🤣
banned
Cyka
Jane got booted
Can't even talk about World of Warraft WT* folder migration anymore on the internet
Booooo
World of Minecraft
I bought one of the but I couldn’t get it to work for the hours I tried
I wanna try a blat with a Y
blyad
Funny you mention, I'm testing my Linux ReShade implementation on minecraft rn
want me to help later?
Try a t
Porting ReShade to Linux is crab
Say Cyka Blyad rush B
me making PxView R from React Native to Flutter+Dart rn
- osu!droid in MonoGame / C#
so iOS users can also play haha
Microslop Java
Testing the automod for a lil adrenaline rush
kYRWA
I need to make my own server, turn auto mod on cracked and start firing off
osu! is goated
But I don’t know if it would do anything if I was server owner
@frosty zealot DM for meme
apparently cannot curse in polish
ofc it won't
what is the pricing when we increase the context window?
This automod is powered by claude
Aspiring PhD is wild
It's the worst state to be in I assure you
Aspie-ring when?
Here's my workflow 🤓 for right now, no swarms, focus on design
oof it tried to enter plan mode without me saying plan something
wooo!
C'MON, workflow sharing tiem
Just apply, what’s your undergrad and what grade did you get?
When I say aspiring I actually mean I'm already a PhD student and close to graduating 😄
I see, peak
I already got an H-index 😎
@frosty zealot is a furry too btw
Wow talk about getting ousted like that lmao
I know nothing about furrys but I think I’d be more like a Deinosuchus
Dw, everyone knows
Deino-what?
Dinosaur (scalie 😐)
At least I can boast I got a mega-cool refsheet made by GPT Image 2.0
Just got 5.5, haven't tried it yet, anyone Blown Away by it?
does anyone know how to fix my codex desktop app? its just stuck on loading . Ive tried reinstalling, repiaring, removing data etc.
Get a Mac 😐
Get a Mac 🍎
For software dev, you won't regret it
Source: former long-time Windows user
Now you got me asking ChatGPT what a scalie equates to in the furry world
I think that’s fair, then you can still commission artists
Literally a scalie, is what it equates to lmao
Like you don’t already know, don’t be shy
I actually do, my original refsheet and 99% of all my art is commissioned
I so there’s like categories
dont need a mac rn
Not really, you knows this, stop playing dumb
If you liken mammals and reptiles to 'two categories' , then sure
I’m a protogen
Are you a Kenmomonimimi
Or however it was spelled I just seen
That’s different
What's a good workflow for Windows
Bro needs some zootopia in his life
His sona is a mouse
Create bootable usb with Cachy, wipe drive, install Cachy, profit
mau5
even tho my codex is at its limit, chatgpt can code in github just in the regular chat/image thing
Windows 10 IoT Enterprise 2021 + WSL2 debian
format c:
I wanna be a Protogen
That also works, WSL is suprisingly not horrible
(But Arch still wins)
Can I be a protogen scalie
Do you know about the primagen beef?
Proto...gen? THAT superhero antivirus kid?
No lmao
The furries are talking, ignore
Hey I’m a scalie
protegen or whatever
HE ADMITS IT
proto was the name of the superhero ripoff kid
But ChatGPT said it was a big group
protogenesis, when insulin turns protein and carbohydrates into muscle mass 💪
i wonder if this is spud, it feels like an iteration on gpt 5.
Yes, let's go with that... totally what you'll find if you google protogenesis on a certain site somewhere
Subsets, take a class for once

Which reminds me I should have dinner
Bye furman
hmm hmm hmm
Bye furlien
EXACTLY the site I meant
Oh wait I mean Protosynthesis my bad
I'm zooming on tirzepatide-powered protosynthesis rn, zoooooom
So you people were talking about an antivirus mascot all this time. Nice!
Exactly
Has my dad been in here today
Can’t let them find out
He’s getting up there in age I get worried
In my DMs only
@lean lark health and wellness check
glances at screen ... peeps all using Clinical model now? Kewl....
Ok phewf he’s alive
WAIT.. is.. Captain an AI?
Dang bro it's been practically a lifetime since I've seen or dealt with antivirus
Holy shirt don't tell me he's an AI
You still have to disable WinDef when that shucker bothers your qBitting
🏴☠️
Az guessed it. I'm the latest version of JaneBot, masquerading as CaptainStarbuck. We hope you have enjoyed our little game.
awuUUUUUAAAAH
Just a sec, calling Starbuck to let him know someone just won the golden ticket...
Bummer, thought this would be a supportive community...
to Charlie's Choc factory?
I wonder if all the people thinking there’d would be a reset are panicking now after trying to token dump
DM request
Janebot selfie
Unc feeling risky today
Would
That’s what I said
Goes with my Protogen fursona
It's just a bot...
Maybe to you, have you never watched Chobits?
Hobits?
NO, CHOBITS
but ch == h
had to look that up
(Generated above image with Image 2.0 yesterday)
anybody familiar with codex sandbox permissions and problems?
yeah Ah, what's on yer mind?
Since the last update my codex keeps telling me cant push or git add . because acls are getting rejected even tho hes in full-access. And Im not very familiar with these things its just weird he cant git push
Are you using VSCode Codex extension?
cli
That condition can occur (which I was incorrectly guessing) when we use GH from the extension with it's built-in configs/environment, and then try to use GH from outside of that environment.
Are you maybe using a different shell of some kind?
Lmao, OK, so I blocked code formatters system-wide and 5.5 is like "iight, ima manual format this file" 🤣 that cracked me up
LOL
5.5 is like rolling up the sleeves, aiite, we'll get this done!
just cmd, I think its a bug in codex itself. whoami returns codexsandboxoffline, even tho ui shows full access
That rings a bell, BRB
No, this was an issue with that user but I don't think it's related to your situation, still looking... https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/12343
Hmm, when you "updated" a couple days ago and the problem started, maybe just in case you should update again to v124, restart, and see if the problem persists. Would be bad to pursue a transient issue.
And I may have missed this but are you on Windows>WSL or Windows local or Mac?
I think we are getting somewhere. I ran codex in my home directory and it tells me it couldnt find gpt 5.5, I seem to have 2 different codex installations or prolly it didnt update/install correctly 😭
windows
local
In the long run, I strongly encourage you to use a real sandbox like WSL or docker. There's a learning curve but the reward is serious peace of mind.
Ahh, so if it even knows about 5.5 then it's only partially updated.
well whats the tradeoff, I mainly use it for school stuff, not really sensitive data and I got a heartattack hearing about docker
Consider the heartattack you might feel if the model decides to wipe out your C drive. We hear such wailing and gnashing of teeth every few months or so.
Anyway, what does 'codex --version' show?
Me when my taskbar icons suddenly all became paper, checked what was happening and everything was deleted

oops, you got modded. look at the text...
codex --version shows codex-cli 0.124.0.
But PATH seems inconsistent between shells. I appear to have two Codex installs: one reports 0.124.0 and another
looked like 0.123.0, so this may be a partial update / PATH mismatch.

nah I deleted sorry sleep deprived rn
been there, done that zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
That's prolly your issue.
What about npm -v @openai/codex ?
11.3.0
I believe that's correct.
😭
Can you tell us where that "another version" is reporting 123?
0.123.0 comes from the Node/NVM side Codex shim. The npm global shim reports 0.124.0.
https://open.spotify.com/track/4dqWxfF0VaoAXPgyQv2EmF?si=-4Gd5kt4TjuuqBx8ZRnC8A
@kind jay am I niche
I'm confused about the 11.3.0 thing. That's "Codex", not "codex-cli". 🙄
Gonna look at my system a minute.
Is the limits reset 😄
sorry for playing with your nerves
what have we come to...
Wait ... don't talk to an idiot like me. Ask our brand-spankin-new GPT 5.5 in ChatGPT.
https://music.apple.com/us/album/bazooka/1874973666?i=1874973671
@kind jay am i niche
I may have found a way...
Claude code has full access and works without a problem, I will have opus fix my gpt 5.5 HAHA
that'll prolly work... or ask codex to figure itself out.
I am at your disposal, Mr. CaptainStarbuck
I remain deeply indebted to you for your help.
Well, as I said, I'm an idiot, because "npm -v" returns the version of NPM itself, not the package name after it. So, score one point for dumbot.
I think this might be a pathing issue. If you have one version of codex-cli that reports 0.124 and another that reports 0.123, use "where codex" to find the 0.123. Then remove that from your path.
Hmmm, I wonder if there are different versions under AppData. Looking.
I'm thinking the issue is that when you see the 0.123 you're looking from a project folder into the local node_modules. When you see 0.124 from somewhere else, you're seeing the user/name/AppData package.
Find the older one, delete the @dim kelp/codex folder, check package.json deps, and npm or pnpm install.
Try not to have two packages loaded, either install globally or locally in a project, unless necessary not to do so.
-- Love, The Idiot
How does one use auto-review on the CLI?
From Codex CLI:
Use codex review.
Common forms:
codex review --uncommitted
Review current local changes, including staged, unstaged, and untracked files.
codex review --base main
Review changes in the current branch against main.
codex review --commit <sha>
Review a specific commit.
If you want to point it at a specific project directory from outside that folder, use the top-level flag on codex:
codex -C /path/to/project review --uncommitted
Wrong
@inland sonnet Auto-review is new. /review has been around for months
@frosty zealot That is not the CLI
Is the auto review feature in the cli?
My command to codex:
$ hey what is the codex cli to auto-review a project?
You really helped me out, thanks ❤️ !
Turned out to be two problems stacked:
- The 0.123 vs 0.124 thing you spotted I had an old Codex install still hanging around inside the NVM Node folder
from before npm got upgraded, and a newer one in the normal npm spot. Updated the old one in place instead of
deleting, so they both match now. - The real reason whoami kept returning codexsandboxoffline Codex on Windows seems to have had its own little sandbox that runs
commands as a fake low privilege user??? idk why, which is why everything got rejected. The Desktop ui was saying full access ...it wasnt
but the CLI actually reads a separate config file that still had the sandbox turned on. Fixed by switching the config
to full access and disabling the Windows sandbox block.
-- Some explanation i tried copying off opus 4.7
That is not the CLI
$ hey explain in a short paragraph what 'codex review' does.
codex --ask-for-approval untrusted exec --sandbox read-only --skip-git-repo-check "explain in a short paragraph what codex review does."
Codex review is a code-review mode where Codex inspects changes the way a careful reviewer would: it looks for bugs, regressions, risky assumptions, missing tests, and other issues that could cause problems after merge. The main output is a prioritized list of findings with clear file and line references, rather than a general summary, so you can quickly see what needs attention and why.
I'd be happy with AI if the only thing we could ever do is eliminate stupid issues like that. Glad you got it resolved!!
Its not the same feature
Its a very misleading name
Yay OpenAI for naming every utility with the same name!
It's like Microsoft and "CoPilot"
It's like "aloha" and "aloha"
Microslop*
ciao and ciao
Estonians: tsau
German tscheuss...
choice? lol
"chewsh"
oy ve... Tschüss!
there we go
Auf weinershnitzel!
I would git pull the codex repo, and ask codex how to enable it, its likely a config entry but i dont want to waste my own tokens to figure it out
yea my rate limits werent reset does anyone know why ?
Why are you trying to engineer a new freeway? "codex review" is the answer to "how do I do a review from the CLI".
Cuz he said "auto-review" rite?
code review, reviews your code, 'auto-review' leaves you in sand box and auto approves commands and uses sub agents to research risk of upcoming executes to see if it should ask for permission
I defer to your expertise, sir...
Where's my cane?
Sm4c|<
( I do my own reviews anyway ... )
Anyone use codex on iOS?
oh they brung it back \o/
Yes, I have created my own app based on app-server
Looking for a remote way of using codex, like Claude’s dispatch
Wait a minute, wasn't there a dude saying claude auto mode and codex doesn't have it? Codex has this auto mode thing now?
It just came today
Haha just in time for the AGI model
I mean GitHub copilot can use OpenAI models , but that’s a different subscription
i had it about a week ago it was called guardian mode, they removed it and looks like its back with a new name
GH Copilot could do autopilot with GPT models for some time
Its still called Guardian in the code from what I can see digging in the repo
It's great
I really need to break the --yolo habbit lol
I found auto-review in the CLI. Use /approvals or /permissions
seems like alot of token usage, doesnt full access do it as well but faster ?
Not sure
I'm just gonna guess they're not using 5.5 sub agents so its probably inexpensive
for the checks
probably like a mini or spark agent
in theory in full access the model is allowed to to delete your user folder - or anything else
whats your guys experience so far?
5.5 is a beast
so far, it does a lot of things pretty quick, && delivers consistent results
front end looks better
but i require like weeks/month of use before full review
so far it has the same tendencies as gpt 5.4
what was it bridgemind he didnt like it around the first part of the live stream
that guy on somethin
is there a bonus usage rn or is this just not eating up my usage?
im even using the fast mode
Seems like "auto-approve" would've been a better name (it automatically approves requests to elevate out of the sandbox). In any case, this feature is a godsend. It was getting really annoying to have to approve git add and git commands all the time!
Now works great with the "auto-review" pemission. Seems like "auto-approve" would've been a better name (it automatically approves requests to elevate out of the sandbox). In any case, this feature is a godsend. It was getting really annoying to have to approve git add and git commands all the time!
Love this feature! Seems like "auto-approve" would've been a better name (it automatically approves requests to elevate out of the sandbox). In any case, this feature is a godsend. It was getting really annoying to have to approve git add and git commands all the time!
codex -h anyone?
i feel like codex with 5.5 even on low like i got it seems to think longer than 5.4, but it does one shot on features alot better and less follow ups. feel like its a worth trade.
what it would try in 5 ish minutes is now 10 or so with less mistakes
I love that I don't have to ask 5.5 to pilot the simulator, it insists that in order for the design to be confirmed they need to actually pilot the application to see the changes 😭 it is automatically deciding to do things I used to fight with 5.4 about
yeah its for sure better
i jave similar exp with fighting 5.4 over things
Yesterday I had 5.4 craft the prompt for a new custom GPT. Then I asked it about any tensions in the prompt. It would never let go. There was always something wrong with it, in the humble opinion of the bot that authored. it. SMH
Gonna see how that kind of endeavor goes with 5.5
Yeah, it did an OK job, but I would give it a, I would say medium-sized task with clear instructions, in addition to the project rules (must confirm your work is tested and compiles), 5.4 would stop short and say "getting there... Next step:" meanwhile it didn't look at its own work and see issues. 5.5 double checks in code and visually all on its own and finds the objections I would have ahead of time!
"Next step"... "out of scope". "not in this pass"
need we say more?
I must be doing something different from you guys because my rule set directed the assistant to do everything from start to finish, so I never had a "pause, out of scope, will do it later" kind of thing. 🤔
Pretty much! 5.5, I feel like the whole harness I built is overkill now. It legitimately does not need the same kind of orchestration as the older models.
my framework seems to help 5.5 be more explicit about what goes in, what goes out
but given maybe month, can find more info from other users to further improve
hmm, that makes me think - I need to revisit the nanny micro-management in my ChatGPT custom instructions, maybe projects too, gosh, and all of those GPTs. 😱
Good thing I have JaneBot to help!
Anyone else not able to switch to 5.5 in Codex using a Remote project even if you've updated the Codex Cli on the remote?
Common diagnostics may help, sorry if you've already done this:
- Which platform is local?
- Which platform is remote?
- Which version of codex/cli on both sides?
- Globally installed or installed to a project?
- Restarted users? Check .bashrc and .codex folders, etc?
been had been there
do we know how much more it cost to use higher context on 5.5 yet?

I'll try make wg alternative proxy for Linux.
Name project — ergoproxy
Pricing page hasn't been updated yet. Check tomorrow.
https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing
time to eat some credits ig
Frustrating that in some places it shows %consumed and in others %left. Forces us to do maths. 🤕 😆
i don't do credits, $20 will be $20
Thoughts on GPT 5.5 so far?
I feel like the last few models have been so good that it’s honestly hard to notice what really changes unless I get j to some niche troubleshooting issues.
I ran a few prompts last night and left them so when 5.5 dropped I could have it review the code and suggestions from 5.4 and it found some stuff, but I mean 5.4 reviews would always find stuff too with its own code so I’m not sure how much of a benchmark that really is
Yeah it has you silly silly man
I’ve posted the screenshots twice now
@cedar skiff https://developers.openai.com/codex/pricing?codex-credit-costs=plus-pro-enterprise-edu-legacy
im on my phone so I cant give a nice screenshot but its in the link
The product page for 5.5 emphasizes that the significant improvements are most perceived in code projects, not in random chat.
So 5.5 is 2x more expensive than 5.4 for marginal gains?
basically
🙁
im sticking with claude
Stick with me and you’ll do alright
I see non stop complaints that folks are draining their tokens with Claude though?
OMG, that's industry-wide. Peeps gotta learn how to use their tools and freakin stop whining. It seems like this industry shifted a couple decades ago from dedicated CS students (who couldn't really code) to kids whining about every detail they need to manage. Spoiled little brats. Sheesh.
👨🦼➡️
does this change is the fast mode that 1.5x faster but 2.5x cost? or it's different?
each iteration gets slightly more efficient, slightly smarter (maybe), and cost more.
2x
In Codex, GPT‑5.5 is available for Plus, Pro, Business, Enterprise, Edu, and Go plans with a 400K context window. GPT‑5.5 is also available in Fast mode, generating tokens 1.5x faster for 2.5x the cost.
when they say 400k they include both input and output right?
128K input + 128K max output
ok where is the 400k?
5.5 talk less right? maybe it somehow will be same or close than 5.4 fast ?
seems like it's 258k + 142k not 128+128
I think 1M is in api only, not codex.
i think they include input and output with the 400k callout.
you can get 1mil on codex you just ahve to configure it
they are increasing it over time.
they said 400k with 5.2 as well
Codex ≠ full model limits.
You’re capped around ~300k in, ~128k out in practice.
No, its configurable
this clearly says 400k in codex
doesnt mention increasing over time
damn 5.5 burns fast, ima stick with 5.3 codex for now
Just know more context = makes model dumber.
You arent saying anything we dont know.
it does, but I'm wondering how much its tooling efficiency helps, also if you spend more time debuggingg and fixing the older you're really not saving anything in the end
Yeah my first try to add something to my C program failed badly with 5.5 all my use gone for nothing.
Had to use another model to fix it
take an example where you have a pretty in depth request, and 5.5 can do it in 1 tool call where 5.3-codex takes the long road and does it over multiple tool calls etc
Stays at codex or 5.4.
There is a setting in config.toml, model_context_window but I don't see where the default is derived for a model.
They have to be counting both input and output in that number other wise it just doesnt add up
yeah gonna go with 5.5 low until 50%
My system is also showing default as 258400
👎
the fomo is real
you will get worse results
Just let people do what they want, it doesnt affect you at the end of the day lol
what's the point of paying for a service using outdated models?
Its like buying a new dishwasher, when the old one can still get it done
I put an uncle bens rice bag in the microwave for a quick snack and I totally forgot to rip the top a bit, first time ive done it, I didnt know rice could make such a mess
"outdated" .... hours old ... yup, welcome to today's fast-paced world....
i wonder why people wouldnt want to burn quoter much faster
5.3 codex is 2 versions behind
what the sigma i need to use the newest!!!!!!!!!!
it still works good though
But if it does the job and is much cheaper?
5.4 is a hot mess
Logic thinking is hard
Its like
I need to use GPT 5.5, to know what "1 + 1" is.
going with 5.5
But what the sigma my usage is going down fast
Easy to set config.toml, model_context_window=400000
🤷
999999999999999 for unlimited context
(works real)
Yup, have fun with That! 👍
My guess is they just didn't bump the default values yet for the cli. Chill. Tomorrow is another day. ❄️
Just got GPT 5.5, Unlimited context, beter then Mythos! Found 54674856 exploits in google chrome.
Considering the fact that he has Mythos at his finger tips and was the most 'complex' investigation they've ever had, comparing to Mythos doesnt really mean much lmao
Just highlights the limitations of the models
He also claims he never looks at his code anymore either, so I guess thats a downside too, probably had no idea how his code works so relied entirely on the models to fix it
Thats why the code base was soup when ppl looked at it ahah
yeah lmao
I didnt actually look at it, i watched a couple of youtube vids about it while i was eating lunch
I didnt either but I just seen it all over X
I hate saying X, legit wish it was still called Twitter
They need add some more guardrails 😂
apparently elon owned x for a really long time before he got twitter
the domain name
Is GPT 5.5 any better like noticeably better
It will always depend on the task, you need to test on a task u did with GPT 5.4 before, and see for yourself
its hard to tell.
I think its a little better at orchestration, you still have to be careful with what it prescribes subagents, you basically have to curate the prompts for that part.
I havent had a chance to do any meaningful coding with it yet
So far it feels like it comes from the same base as 5.4
I just had it refactor one long generated file into about 50. Seems to have done a good job.
I am about to get it to write a few intergration tests, well see how it goes
Im more trying to test it on front end design for iOS right now
trying to refactor the onboarding for my codex app and make it nicer
it would be nice if the 'open file' dialog just showed a list of all files in the current directory instead of me having to know the name of the file
Hello GitHub Issues!
I'm interested in this as well, i know they focused on bringing it up on web tech design i wonder if it transfers to other platform ui frameworks.
I'm really wondering if I need to stop using the skills I imported from skills.sh and let it just do what it thinks it should do without skill guidance
im gonna say 'Just do what you feel is the best implementation for UX/UI' and see what happens without providing skills
I also feel like the animations and gestures are almost like too sensitive I feel like im flying through the cards or something, what can you do to better refine this. I want you to think it through thoroughly and do what you believe will really give that 'wow' and memorable UI/UX to the onboarding.
Lets see what comes of this
The queue feature in codex gotta be a top 5 feature bro
Like steering?
ah
But
Letting it queue a simple task, then queue it up to use browser to test it after, and then if it doesn’t work do a loop of fixing it etc
You mean cmd+enter
All good, just for anybody reading that wants to try it out might not know lol
Ah yeah
Taking extremely long time for Codex extension to load detail from task history item ... sometimes not at all.
Hello all, anyone have any info or recommendations to deal with the recent changes to rate limits on a Plus plan? I consume 5 hr window within a few prompts now.. :/
Unfortunately can't do that. :/
wait a sec ... which limits?
I believe they changed the rate limits to count by tokens rather than messages. It gets eaten up very quickly now.
For Codex
how many messages would you say you can do in 5 hours on plus
Note: On April 2, 2026, we updated Codex pricing to align with API token usage, instead of per-message pricing. This change was applicable to new and existing Plus, Pro, ChatGPT Business and new ChatGPT Enterprise plans.
Depends, if I'm on 5.4 Extra High only about 5-10 depending on how much Codex has to do.
See what you're consuming here: https://chatgpt.com/codex/cloud/settings/analytics#usage
Before that, I would almost never hit the 5 hr limit unless I was really pushing it, working across multiple conversations, etc.
Do you do image generations?
Nope.
I think he's noticing the change from the 2x plan.
I'm not using Fast mode either
I mean depending on how you're wording things you're way under what they're claiming, I was just asking about image gen cause they claim it uses limits 3-5x faster on average
ah I see, ok.
This is why people think it's per-message:
one day the model will have access to all of your history and it will be able to tell how you treated it in the past
mane, I dont wanna spend 100 dollars
lmfao
They wanted to stop users from burning through their weekly limits in a day, so they limited daily use. I would suggest as a plus user to not use fast mode, try to stick to the lower models (like medium), and change how you speak to the model to get the most out of your daily limit.
They measure it in tokens but they tell you about how many messages you might get within that 5h window.
yeah, I can't unfortunately.
I probably would if I could.
I dont think we're officially on 'token' based messaging yet
chat gpt can update files in github from the regular chat
From what I read there
its stupid
Until they claim I'm moved over im gonna just assume im still message based
I dont know what 'upcoming weeks' are and if I've been migrated
@dense roverbest thing ive found is this but im on the 20 dollar plan
yeah I've been using this too recently.
kinda slow but gets the job done.
thats the only thing, the chats get long and laggy
That's such a farce. You consume tokens, that you buy with credits, which they estimate in messages.
What children just out of Marketing school dreamed up this nonsense?
I'm getting called for dinner .... that always makes me less grouchy.
Catch you cats later. 😺
Wear your slippers! Don't need you slippin in your socks and crackin a hip
only thing that sucks is it requires your repo to be indexed by github and apparently they don't index any file over 350kb
cant split the index up?
And you can't upload binaries.
I did see something where you dont even need a index anymore
depends, I'm currently working on a huge userscript, it's 600kb lol
One file, so.. yeah
My honest advice to you
but cant you ask ur ai to split the file up @dense rover
Hmm, this is helpful, also from the pricing page.
I suppose I could.. and then refactor it into the single file after each change
@dense rover Gemini has very generous free daily usage limits that resets DAILY not WEEKLY, do as much work as you can through that they have gemini-cli its honestly not a terrible model and can probably do most things, especailly since I see like SQL queries in your picture, use that for most thing, use GPT for the heavier lifting if Gemini is struggling at something
thats what I tell it to do, like for a command ill have a command called /hello and then another folder called hello with all the logic in that
thats just what works for me tho, everyone has their own flow
gpt5.5 not at codex, i see...
time for a long nighter
claudes
plus windsurf sub
claude max 20x?
nah, not worth paying anything more than $20
and I have this monster at my home
Cursor is a great alternative, so you get to choose which models, plus get one of the best harnesses (better than CC)
vibe coding

I dont let gpt and claude write code for me
TIBOOOOO
okay. personal choices respected.
I use them for deep research and brainstorming, without them any of my developments would take decades
AI is a fantastic accelerator when used effectively.
сlaude is very good with ghidra and frida, especially when it comes to themida
Is GPT 5.4 Now cheaper to use for codex now that 5.5 is out?
man they should do 2x 3x 4x plans
I wonder how many people dumped their usage thinking 5.5 would instantly reset
and are just screwed right now lol
the latest codex update rendered my previous sessions unusable ? Am I the only one ?
Calling all prop firms traders: Anyone tried automating their evals?
Just about to try GPT 5.5 now and updated my codex cli, you know what excites me more and makes me happier? The statusline for context used is finally not a bar gauge but an actual percentage instead 🥲 I'm happy.
Cat AI slop videos are my favourite thing on the internet
No reset here yet
That's because its fake
Figures 😖
I made it with gpt image 2 🥺
anthropic defcon 1 rn 😭 gpt 5.5 today beating opus 4.7 in alot of tasks, and then DEEPSEEK drops a open source model tonight that beat opus 4.6 max 💀
Competition is good, but low key, %#!% A\
I hate that they're so locked down, I can't use any other harness but theirs, I have to use THEIR app, and whenever they feel like it, they can say i did something and cut it off, not worth the headache.
and for what was it a month gaslighted us that opus was fine?
even though it was broken and it was set to medium mode default
and they reset the rate limits, on rate limit reset day to give back...?
i went through 10 bucks of credits on a broken adaptive opus 4.7 thinking for a project in a chat and it just didnt work
scam central
Yeah and even when they're wrong, they're right lol, and they never try to save any face with like resets or nothing its just like deal with it
Using 5.5 all day on one mega task, it's amazing.
I had like $400 in credits, I let my plan lapse and when I resubbed they were all gone, I Tried to ask the bot or whatever and it said nothing it could do
elevate to support
i think in terms credits cant be refunded
like ask for a human/agent/manager
its anthropic not charity
ok well if he paid for them and they dissapeared, I'll just chargeback
🤷♂️
I would, if I actually cared to use their product, but it just reiterated why I wanted to move away from A\
Most were promotional credits so I Wasnt too upset
if I knew I would have used them up before it lapsed
nigh infinite compute
every 2-4 weeks we get a new model
or new model update that improves it heavily
doesnt go thru reasoning effort hell
i stalk tibos twitter like a bird
question so the codex app and vs code not working same time ?
and we get double rls all the time it feels like
Sign-in failed: Port 127.0.0.1:1455 is already in use
If you looked at my first messages in here, I bashed OAI for like a whole day, boy was I opus brain washed
once pro x10 is over though i think im not going to renew lmao
i wish pro 5x would stay at 10x
🙏
try restarting your computer or findf what process is running on 1455
its cursor where i installed codex itself .
especially if its like half price, i would think half limits is fair
i think they might keep it lowk because if they can handle dropping a new model and giving these generous limits i wouldnt be surprised
probably a setting to change the default port
yes will investigate .. codex cursor wanna use different port ...
I wish they'd optimize 5.3 to hell like they did with spark and made it so cheap to run that it has its own RL
5.3 is amazing and smart
it's just not creative at all like 5.4
With 5.5 I'm gonna try to run Low thinking a bunch and see how it handles
the issue with gpt models is they suck at creativity because all the creativity training goes to gpt image-gen
it is nice having spark aswell for automations and routines in codex
Is the play to use image-gen to create the mock, and then feed the image to GPT as a 'recreate this in code' kinda thing
100%
like i was adding a focus timer to this one thing and took a screenshot of the ui i had currently, generated a sick ui for it matching my current ui, and then codex replicated perfectly
I feel like as long as you're feeding skills you should be able to run Low thinking with good results
Cause it shouldn't have to think too much
I do dream of the day 'auto' thinking exists though I'm so annoyed siwtching between them
were so back
the issue is the current implementations are just predicting how much tokens it would use and whats best for it
codex made vs image gpt made its so close ofc needs a little bit of adjusting but
Oooo
so yeah it does have some caveats but it def helps
Is gpt on the right?
yes
What about getting it to build a design template, like varying containers, fonts, font sizes, paddings, margins, basically building a spec and noting on the image so ytou have a full spec for your app/site
good idea
That would be pretty sweet to build out with 5.5 pro
two 5.5 messages took me from 100 to 30% on my 5h limit
im gonna try it and see what image gen generated
anthropic levels of session usage
plus?
what reasoning level
damn
i mean i fully expected a huge hit
since plus is only 20 dollars a month
but damn
how many lines did it write?
thats far more than 5.3
2000
and the result isnt even that good
ill have to do another session on 5.3 to fix these issues
I want you to create a design spec template for my new project, such as varying border radiuses, colors, paddings, margins, font specs, etc. with examples in the image, based on a neon glass morphism color scheme
Ofc it chose purple lol but it looks good
but could ask for something with a bit more color variation
as yeah ai is obsessed with purple
gpt 5.5 ability to work for like 20 minutes and one shot a feature gotta be studied
i prob mentioned before but i cant get over it
genius
gonna try my first codex overnight run wish me luck haha
bro did we get 5.5 on api?
ooo
do you guys work locally or cloud first?
not yet
bro what
Are we not getting a reset again? I burned thtough 50% in one day yesterday on $200 pro lol
It was a pretty awesome day
For real?
Hoops
I can't seem to get 5.5 yet on my codex. Still 5.4 on the terminal
im pretty sure they will im surprised it hasnt happened yet but maybe tomorrow so people can get a day to burn on it and then do it?
yeah what
yeah and -21,845
wow
wowwwwww
I had GPT 5.5 Pro Extended rewrite my plan into 48 pages
😂
connected to my codebase thru github
so it understands it in detail
5.5 pro??
and can give longer and arguably better planning without affecting my RL too
W
ye
Just give this to Codex and it won't stop until its done.```
You are not finished until the entire mega-plan is implemented.
Your first task:
- Create or update /docs/ADMIN_MIGRATION_MEGA_PLAN_CHECKLIST.md.
- Convert the entire mega-plan into a checkbox checklist.
- Mark each item as:
- TODO
- IN_PROGRESS
- DONE
- BLOCKED, only if impossible without missing credentials or external access
Execution rules:
- Do not summarize partial progress as completion.
- Do not stop after “materially closer.”
- Do not leave compatibility proxies, legacy aliases, fallback shims, duplicate stores, old routes, or temporary adapters unless explicitly listed as BLOCKED with exact reason.
- After each implementation batch, update the checklist.
- Continue working through the next unchecked item automatically.
- Only say “complete” when every checklist item is DONE or explicitly BLOCKED.
- If context gets long, write a handoff section at the bottom of the checklist titled “Next Codex Resume Prompt” with the exact next task.
Definition of done:
- All admin migration items implemented.
- Legacy compatibility proxies removed unless truly required.
- Admin routes and components use the new architecture only.
- Dead code removed.
- Types pass.
- Lint passes.
- Build passes.
- Core admin flows manually smoke-tested or documented if not testable.
- Final response includes changed files, checklist status, test results, and remaining BLOCKED items only.
Begin now by auditing the repo against the mega-plan. Then implement the remaining items until the checklist is complete.```
Its in my custom instructions
Codex is the goat at long codebases
That uses codex limits though
since when lmao
my rl didnt go down at all for 5hr or weekly when i did that too
Gemini is translating this weirdly.
wen prod
I hope soon (like Friday 24th)
anyone using codex for frontend?
Only alongside image generation
Ctrl + Up arrow on mac is more handy than cmd+tab convince me im wrong
Not with the 182376123198 apps I have open
But do agree
can u tell me a bit more about that?
On it's own, I don't really rate codex's front end skills especially compared to Claude. However, with Images V2 it is more than capable.
Before using image generation:
After:
How are you using image gen to do front end skills?
Before Images V2:
Feeding into GPT Image and then having Codex use it as a base design?
After:
Yep!
I'd love if you could share the prompts you use 😄
You can tell this mimics the overall design asthetic Codex forces itself to do
the rounded corners
and messiness
Nested boxes in nested boxes in nested boxes
Ha - the prompts are embarrisingly bad which is a testament to how good images v2 is
look unprofessional
Sweet. Well atleast it's no longer 'incredibly' unprofessional. That's progress
Nice chin
i oculd recognise that man everywhere
no
u have one ?
no
same, did you find how to use 5.5 yet?
Yes,the codex update works fine now
Interesting. The 200 pro plan is not actually 20x. I had a 100 plan (5x). It had 8% weekly left. I then upgraded to 200. Now I have 52% weekly left. It should be much more if 200 is 4* the 100 plan. But pro 200 is just 2 * pro 100. No benefit to a pro 200 plan Vs 2 pro 100 plans despite the pricing page saying that you get much more usage included in pro 200.
so how much x is it
The 100 plan is 10x currently due to it being 2x.
Normally 100 plan is 5x, 200 is 10x.
Until the end of may, 100 is 10x, 200 is 20x
weird, model list isn't showing it for me
Is your codex on the latest version?
yea, 0.124.0, i even reinstalled the npm pkg
The new session should actually show it.
Ask your agent to investigate.
Is that mentioned on any official openai channel? The pricing page does not say this.
My cli also no longer says 2x usage that message disappeared earlier
Awesome thanks!
Yall think 5.2 is better or 5.5 is better in codex
On the checkout page if 5x is chosen it mentions promo 10x till may 31st, but interestingly 20x doesn't show this promo message which makes me wonder if they will keep it after may 31st on 20x
No message for me. It doesn't mention any of this on the checkout page.
The very final page where you pay?
I've been on 5.2 exclusively but today trying 5.5 and so far so good. 5.4 and 5.3 dont work for my workflows but so far 5.5 seems good.
5.4 idk it sucks
So does 5.3
I never get there because my card is linked so I just use the upgrade button and I get automatically charged.
a lot more token usage tho
So
5.2 is actually reasonable
Maybe first time sign-up goes to checkout page but I've not seen it in many months
5.2 is never not reasonable it's so freaking good 😊
Yeah
please who else is getting this "Your account was flagged for potentially high-risk cyber activity. Requests may be slower while additional verification is applied. To regain faster access, apply for trusted access: https://chatgpt.com/cyber or
learn more: https://developers.openai.com/codex/concepts/cyber-safety" i already verified why am i being shown this
ah fair enough, yeah when I looked at that page on another account about last week that's what I was seeing 🙂
so hoping 20x stays 20x after May 31st
for doing frontend UI work, I think 5.5 is an improvement. I've noticed it's more observant of minor issues (assuming you instruct it to check screenshots) where 5.4 or previous generations would miss them more often and I'd have to say "hey look again at XYZ"
yo, I don't know if I'm going crazy or what, but my current perception is that gpt-5.5 (high) uses less usage limit in codex than gpt-5.4 (high) did. Either they increased limits on plus or it is really more efficient or more adjusted to my prompting style, or by chance I am just giving it simpler tasks now (I don't think so). Or I am imagining things.
not sure, as a pro 20x user I'm not noticing a massive increase in consumption here, 5.5 high effort. GPT-5.5 is meant to be more efficient on output tokens, even though it's priced higher
anyone testing gpt5.5 yet ? How much diff token usage when compare with 5.4 ?
How can I use @browser-use? Even if I open up a browser it can't connect to it. Anyone got this running and can share how?
not sure on actual numbers, but pro 20x consumption feels more or less the same, no huge difference here on high effort so far
Also not seeing a big diff in usage compared to 5.4 yet, on xhigh. But only been a few hours and some long running sessions are still on 5.4..
Ok, let's stay with 5.4 until 5.6 coming 😅
figured it out, I needed to reinstall the browser-use plugin
Why was there no usage reset?
Since updating Codex to the latest version, browser/network checks no longer work from CLI.
Errors:
- sockets:
Operation not permitted - DNS:
Could not resolve host - Playwright/Chromium crash:
sandbox_host_linux.cc:41 ... Operation not permitted
This now blocks external hosts, localhost, and real page/API timing tests.
Looks like a regression introduced by the latest Codex update.
do we still got no gpt image 2 in codex cli?
you should have the image_gen tool in cli
it was just a skill, doesnt generate image without api key, as the last time i checked
yeah but the skill has instructions to use the image_gen tool
are you using the latest version of cli?
"Default built-in tool mode (preferred): built-in image_gen tool for normal image generation, editing, and simple transparent-image requests. Does not require OPENAI_API_KEY."
subscriptions have access to this tool
let me check
yes, it seems its possible when you dont specify a model, thank you. two days ago it was asking for a key in every way
no worries 👍
did you update
latest version of CLI?
just updated and it said 5.5 is available, but still not in model picker..
thanks for the tips tho, one step closer
strange, try logging out and back in maybe
logged out and in and still not appearing
i asked 5.4 to change config file to 5.5 and it worked
I’m I crazy, 2. ?
u are not crazy, i didnt look close enough lol
i guess i assumed the first option would be the newest model
thanks yall
🦊 🎓
ah I didn't check the screenshot, I had assumed you had no option, but glad to hear it
5.5 x-high doesnt actually consume that much usage
im surprised
it's not like a 2x on my codex usage
same for 5.5-high <-> 5.4-high, it's similar
ye wth. bro be trippn
so anybody use 5.5 to create AGI yet?
When I open Codex app it arrives to 100% CPU. What can I do to solve. It begins today thats weird.
what even is 'real'
overrated
pretty sure if we benchmark reality it would sit below claude 4.7
Okay then AGI is not possible with current architectures
What specs do you have?
Just use cli
16 RAM Win 10 and i7-6700
What’s CLI?
codex
Cool Language Interface
Your cpu is really old unfortunately not much you can do
But that week I use it and perfect
Today it opens a los of processes
Try delete it and reinstall, maybe you can clear out some old stuff
OAI software is really bad though
tui is pretty decent imo
I do it. Mybe can be today update
yea i burned my usage in anticipation of 5.5 release and no reset
what is this
scam
I have similar, 6 processes for what? I jusat opened it
is 5.5 good
No no. When I open codex. Create 20, 24, 27, 20, 22, ... etc
im still use 5.3 codex
yes, it responds with some humor to insults now
Updating, we'll see
im saying for coding
yea me too
huh
you dont insultcode?
how? like "bro, this idea is dumb, implement it yourself"
I reboot and reinstall a lot today
actually?
no but CC does this seriously 😄
gpt rarely pushes back on bad ideas from my experience
Just use the chatGPT website for your project, you'll need a new computer eventually (or use Linux)
⚠ Selected model is at capacity. Please try a different model.
well that's new
to maintain my main business and building two new ones that build on it, plus a very speculative project that will either work great or be a monumental waste of time
guess we won't be getting any more resets they prob used all their capacity with images-2
- thanks image v2
cool
what do u do
i made a cool tool
and tried to monetize it
not ONE download bro
😭✌️
💔💔💔💔
my main business is a mix of e-commerce and consumer saas with a few hundred k customers
“few hundred k”
you manage it alone?
gpt 5.5 give me a business idea that is a mix of e commerce and customer saas
yea built it alone and run it alone, its over 10 years old though
bit annoying because it relies on paid ads too much
pays the bills but wont pay for a lambo, so.. looking for new shiny objects
think i need a bigger machine
Put it on pragmatic personality
Hmm have it on "none" right now
I got this error on codex on windows when trying to use browser use, What could be the issue?
whoa codex app on windows has browser now.
desktop app
it's impressive but it has some limitations. I'd love it if I could use it in a headless state too, as well as adjust viewport size, like I can with Playwright CLI
like so I can have it test a webpage's UI to see how it behaves as mobile viewport, tablet, etc
I hope this gets added soon tbh (nvm it did)
The in-app browser feature?
Great i was sad it only worked on mac but glad they added it to Windows 2 now
codex is agents mode
what trailer?
openai's new release youtube video
which one
the one that has agent mode in codex window
link?
hah the irony is real
Yeah but did you go read the docs and find out about it?
my guy. these agents are for chatgpt, and they are for business/edu accounts only.
you can do the same in codex using automations
ok then, you probably should go read it a bit closer and better
... yawn
You talking about this thing?
yes
that's chatgpt in teams, not codex
thank god finally someone with knowledge!
Was just going to say, I'm using Teams
wow, this guy XD
so I need Teams to access this feature
If you actually read the doc about it you will see
duh
the ironic part is you calling out someone else for asking for a link to the vid.
Then coming in here and asking..
Then claiming to have read the doc where it is literally in the first paragraph.
I recommend forgetting this conversation every took place. There are much more enjoyable things to focus your attention on. 😛
wen gpt-5.6
Probably not going to happen. I'm betting on 6.0 before that
Although they'll probably change naming scheme again
I'm scared for the next release
I think we are going to keep seeing the price squeeze and i like having all my usage
gpt-5.5.1
The price for 5.5 will probably drop a bit when next version drops
did model pricing ever drop?
I... am assuming?
dont think so 😄
my guess is spuddi is probably a gigantic expensive model, it will be pointed at curing cancer and things like that. 5.5 models will keep upgrading as 'usable' models for the time being
you feel offended but its not my fault, I have described feature A and explained that it is posted on place B
do not ask me to search for it on place B and post it on here, I have provided enough context
They are incredibly usable though. 😛
you are being ridiculous @cedar skiff @turbid axle
for sure, plenty smarts, just make them faster and cheaper I say
I don't care about faster. Cheaper though
does anyone know how much usage u get if u pay 20$ for api compared to 20$ plan?
I mean, not faster? you want faster..
dont feel like model intelligence is the bottleneck for me tight now
They are supposed to be the same
more like workflow + costs
tight tight tight
I dont get people that complain about the pricing becuase
- They can simply use older version
- New thing being pricier is something natural, that's like how everything is
In a few years things today will look like a horse and a carriage vs a car. We move quite fast, faster than say PC updates along the years. besides if we keep with the 3-5% upticks in reasoning every 2 month's or even 4, in 2 years it'll be a different world indeed.
pricing isnt that bad. just hurts on new projects where its not paying for itself yet
I'm still waiting for an offline model I can use as good as say 5.4-mini, on hardware costing less than 10kUSD
are you on the 100+ dollar spectrums?
(I am too)
Yea, like the game I've been working on for a year. 😂
Takes time to make back the money, if ever
I think your project paying itself is a very difficult challenge
making money is very difficult
Lowkey Mac minis are the way to go
I do not think making AI should necessarily help you to achieve that task (making money with your products)
making money is more than just writing a good software
I've yet to find a model that can do it.
loki
i have 2x pro right now, probably 3rd soon. according to ccusage/codex i couldnt justify API pricing yet though
all of these vibe coded start ups and stories of making millions bucks with AI, are often just bait to sell these "online lessons"
It's easy to make money if you don't care about your customers one bit.
what is the process of your usage like?
are you making a product?
yea complex data analysis product, and building custom agent tooling for it
i have pretty strict workflow with post edit linting etc which tends to use more tokens
ironically i handcoded the business/product that pays for all of this and barely do anything in it with agents beyond some maintenance
I guess you are using it because it is still cheaper than using someone?
I think in that sense, you "made" money
yea the stuff im working on i would have to raise VC to even think about hiring and attempting it
People are really expensive, but a bit more "self propelled" than AI. 😛