pbd4757-launched [FULL] - [Homebrew] Revised Agendas (6p, 10VP, Milty)

[coarse scarab]

I have completed a first draft revision of the agenda deck, and would love to see what people think of it. The goal is to make the voting process more interesting, in particular by giving reasons to vote even if the primary outcome is a foregone conclusion.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZGhSnaflvzXXejmOpPpaAlEN401PbGk0XJPZwXNInGE/edit?usp=sharing

A few clarifications that may be needed going into this:
Many agendas reference the "runner-up", which means the outcome that received the second most votes. The runner-up will usually have some effect from the agenda, but does not count as being elected for the purposes of SOs/Riders/Future Sight.

In cases where there is a tie for an outcome or runner-up, the speaker decides as normal. However, this does not apply when an agenda references players that have cast more/fewer votes than you; ties simply don't count as either more or fewer in those cases.

There is actually a game currently going on to playtest this revised deck, but it ended up with enough players without me, so I figured I'd see if I can get another one going. 🙂

1. @coarse scarab
2. @lucid hinge
3. @storm sapphire
4. @granite pagoda
5. @dense nebula
6. @glad helm

[regal hamlet]

To launch a new game, please run the command /game create_game_button, filling in the players and fun game name. This will create a button that you may press to launch the game after confirming the members are correct.

[coarse scarab]

<@&1211178111182315590>

[lucid hinge]

I’ll test with you

I will be driving a lot on Friday and busy Thursday though.

[coarse scarab]

@storm sapphire Not using Envoys in this one, but you mentioned interest in agenda changes

[storm sapphire]

Iiinteresting. Yeah sure I'll sign up!

[coarse scarab]

3 down, 3 to go

[coarse scarab]

<@&947310962485108816> <@&1211178111182315590> need 3 more people

[storm sapphire]

Come in and lets play with better (hopefully!???) agendas!

[granite pagoda]

I haven't read anything, but sure, I'll give it a rip

[coarse scarab]

No worries, should be fine regardless. I was actually debating whether it would be more fun for people to go in blind, but since I'm a player too, this seemed the better option.

[dense nebula]

I'll play

I was just complaining that there should be a balance between the normal agenda deck and absol

[coarse scarab]

Great minds think alike, I guess 😁

[storm sapphire]

I'm not reading them ahead of time. This isn't super competitive, I'll be surprised 😄

[glad helm]

I'll try some new agendas out if you still need a 6th

[coarse scarab]

We do 🙂

[regal hamlet]

Cryypter used /game create_game_button game_fun_name: Agenda Fun player1: @cryypter player2: @aitchbars player3: @kime_yu player4: @spoconnor002archibald player5: @alibby1152 player6: @carrot5012

Cryypter pressed the [Create Game] button

Role and Channels have been set up:

pbd4757
#1274197839039430708
#1274197840784265399