river cedar
The patch said it changed skill description.
• Epic Hero [Mecha Maniac - Theohein]: Fixed the skill description error of Theohein's battle skill [Small-scale Testing] at Skill Level 2 and Level 3. The incorrect upgrade effect [Damage +100%] has been corrected to be [Damage +10%].
You changed the damage. She does less damage since the patch.
Why did you do this? Aura was already underpowered. Now you just nerfed the only non exclusive damage dealer. Making Aura garbage without the exclusive.
errant quest
Dear Traveler,
We sincerely apologize for any inconvenience caused. According to our team's verification, there was indeed an abnormality in the previous numerical display, resulting in an error in the damage value of Theohein's battle skill "Small-scale Testing." We have corrected this issue in the latest version update, adjusting the damage value to the correct "damage +10%." While this may be disappointing for you, our goal is to create a fair gaming environment for all travelers.
We will continue to work on optimizing the game content to provide you with a better gaming experience. Thank you very much for your love and support for the game, and we wish you a pleasant time playing! If you have any other questions or concerns, please feel free to contact us.
river cedar
Firstly, don’t mislead us in the release notes. You didn’t just adjust the skill description. You adjusted the skill damage.
Secondly you have now nurfed this champion. We have good epics like Gerthin and Tonalnan. So who said this champion was doing too much damage? They were not. They are now useless along with all the other aura champions apart from the exclusive and Diantha.
It’s ridiculous how broken champions like rook are, and you now nerf an epic.
I now have a skilled up level 100 champion who is useless.
river cedar
If this game goes too far down the path of the exclusives being the only damage dealers people will quit.
ruby furnace
I have only ever heard people speak well of Theohein. Never heard anyone claim she was too powerful or strong, just always thought of her as a good champion.
As someone who uses a fair amount of dice but isn't lucky enough to get any exclusives champions like Theohein and Gerthin made playing the game fun. You could still do ok dmg keep up close enough on dmg races to feel like the game wasn't pointless.
Anyone who has learned any math can see the scaling issues with most aura champions why nerf one of the only ones who wasn't built to be terrible from the start, especially the only one available to all players.
This change can only hurt the game, you are literally letting the community know they should get exclusives or not bother playing.
arctic epoch
Agreed, there was NOTHING "Unfair" about theowin's damage. She was NOT overpowered. This is a terrible change with a damage type that is already very poor and underwhelming. Decreasing her damage was completely unnecessary.
hollow karma
So what about now that we have skilled up a champion who got nerfed ? It's like a wasting of epic scrolls. Can we hope a change in the next patch or if not, it could be nice to give us the possibility to get back our scrolls please.
river cedar
Scrolls back is nice, but the core issue for me is that we need non exclusive champions capable of doing decent damage. She was doing 3/4 of the damage of the exclusive, although the equipment on each was different so its not a direct comparison.
Now she does under half.
hollow karma
Totally agree but i've some doubt that they will move back to initial damage configuration
nova moat
As far as i know, player saw the +100% and reported it as they are used to heroes having a +5% and +10% to shield and attack etc so it was reported as a visual bug or something along those lines.
arctic epoch
But her actual damage was effected for real as he shows. And I'm now seeing myself.
nova moat
But her actual damage was effected for real as he shows. And I'm now seeing myse...
Which means its was always the mechanic and functioned as such on 100% but was the damage OP? Sorry havent used aura so dont know whats what
arctic epoch
Her damage was not OP though; that's the problem; not at all... she was a great DPS, sure, but no reason at all to nerf what she wasn't doing. It wasn't broken crazy damage for an Epic or anyone
ruby furnace
she wasn't even close to the top epic dmg, she was just a solid champ
in a subtype that is considered bad
river cedar
She brings nothing except damage, so she needs to do some
No buffs to her team, no debuffs etc
ruby furnace
and no subtype champions to boost her like gerthin/araces have
nova moat
Ive asked if the staff could talk to devs about doing a retake but im not promising anything
river cedar
Thank you
mortal ginkgo
Ive asked if the staff could talk to devs about doing a retake but im not promis...
To be fair to game balance = the book change was correct
What we're suggesting is that perhaps multiplier or the % max hp atk caps need adjusting as a consequence.
Clearly in testing they balanced the multipliers around the mistakenly high book value. This needs adjusting also (not just a bug fix to the book values!)
I would suggest that the max hp% caps across the board for aura need reviewing potentially also as beyond the exclusive who has 100% base critical hit chance they simply output weak damage compared to most other types
nova moat
To be fair to game balance = the book change was correct
What we're suggesting i...
Thats why i linked this thread as i dont know enough to say whats what and that they should take a look again. Anything couldve gone wrong or miscommunication coulda happened aswell
ruby furnace
I would suggest that the max hp% caps across the board for aura need reviewing p...
its not the only part of aura that needs reviewing but yes aura as a whole needs looking at
but for this tread specifically, everyone was happy with theo as is, a reasonable dps that was useable by all. And for a "fair gaming experience" she is now a bad dps that does nothing else, in a subtype people already don't want to use unless they happen to be the lucky few with aemon.
I get translation issues, but that is a gross misuse of the word fair .
vale gust
its not the only part of aura that needs reviewing but yes aura as a whole needs...
idk why you feel this way. Aura is fine as a whole. You guys are looking at Vortex, which is not necessarily where aura is supposed to be best.
One thing that no one in this thread is considering is that maybe the nerf is considerate of unreleased content ie end boss. The fact that you want an aoe dmg school to be outright as good as a single target damage school at single target things is silly.
arctic epoch
There's nothing about her AoE damage that is "broken" and needing to be nerfed regardless. It's not about vortex; it's about her being nerfed for no reason, period.
vale gust
You don't know that it's no reason
That's your speculation
But aura is performing similarly well to wild with relatively similar comp on Vortex... does that also mean Wild should perform similarly well on AOE content? Cause I promise it won't
nova moat
Remember to keep things civil, keep calm and respectful
vale gust
I'll give you guys a perfect example - Talwer, Stega, and Nissa were all considered very subpar and underpowered last season, however all of them were excellent at end boss and integral to 200m comps, same with Vicana and Jalathea. On the epic side of things, units like Araces, Shink, Pargu were also very underwhelming for most content but were absolutely stellar at end boss.
How do you guys know that this nerf is not prudent?
Conversely, dauntless and IB absolutely demolished vortex and ST content all season, but both were completely useless at end boss....
Should every damage school and every dps unit be competitive at everything, or are trade offs and balance fair?
I understand frustration at communication, but knee jerk reactions are shallow and short sighted.
stark summit
@vale gust I agree with your entire post. Gotta look at the whole picture
ruby furnace
Its easy to feel that way about aura when the majority of how it is enabled is to do with the gain of its energy which is disabled while in blaze. So all gains during blaze are lost, that is a huge issue with aura. Also you are referring to legendary champs that were bad at most of the game but excellent at a very specific part of the season. That is in no way a comparison to essentially the epic version of an exclusive.
I made great use of araces in lots of places, I even managed to make some use out of hirvolm. Everyone gets lots out of gerthin. Theo was doing exactly as would expect from the accessible version of the exclusive, same role not as much dmg, but enough dmg bother with.
This thread isn't about aura as a whole, it is about how the Theo nerfs are a terrible precedent.
ruby furnace
One thing that no one in this thread is considering is that maybe the nerf is co...
It has been considered, if that was the case it would at the very least also mean an Aemon nerf. Targeting Theo specifically says more about making exclusives untouchably better than aura potentially being too strong at future content. Theo did a reasonable amount less than Aemon for the epic version before the nerf.
vale gust
It has been considered, if that was the case it would at the very least also mea...
I can agree with you that it is a slippery slope, and Theo here seems like an odd target. But to be frank, Aura ST potential should be nerfed, the same with Shadow. The difference between Shadow and Aura is just that the epics are no where near the same quality or lethality... Aura epics far out perform Shadow epics in dps, both ST and aoe. But conceptually, both Shadow and Aura are overperforming in single target.
It would be like if they made Burn dps on par with dauntless in S2. Currently burn, even with Aschetus and his arti, are no where NEAR aura in terms of st, and only slightly better in aoe, if at all.
This season Aura willd keep up with Wild on Vortex, and will completely eclipse it on all other aoe content. Theo nerf is just a drop in the bucket to mitigate that.
river cedar
I'll give you guys a perfect example - Talwer, Stega, and Nissa were all conside...
Nissa is garbage. Unless you need heal block in radiant. Yes she was good for one boss due to its specific design.
Theowin will do half the damage at absolute max the exclusive does in all content.
If you want the exclusives twice as powerful as the other champ then I give you Raid Shadow Legends.
river cedar
This is crazy compared to Corrosion.
Rook is the most op champion in the game and he is aoe.
So he is the king of single target and will be the king of an aoe boss fight.
And you want to nerf Aura and Shadow??? Do you own rook or something.
vale gust
Nissa is garbage. Unless you need heal block in radiant. Yes she was good for on...
There's a lot of units that are garbage except for one boss. But due to the weighted value of the boss, it's actually the most important thing to be good at. I own Ozul and his arti.
I think there should be a clear difference in performance between units that are solely single target and units that are aoe in their respective sphere of expertise. This balance existed prior to s3, but with all 3 of the new damage schools it basically power creeps the entire concept.
river cedar
My Aura team was in the 90’s for rankings on Vortex.
The biggest creep is Corrosion, so it was strange you called out Shadow and Aura is all.
vale gust
They are all equally guilty of it. Corrosion is definitely alarming with how much it dominates Vortex, basically displacing even dauntless. But Rook himself is not more dmg than Ozul or Aemo at aoe, and he's really only part of the problem.
The fact that he's in an element with Oggok is what really seals it.
As someone who has Ozul, I'm telling you he is also v busted, even single target. And if necro were in a more favorable affinity, like with fire... especially with the introduction of Syn, it would be eye opening.
river cedar
I can agree all S3 is a power creep as I have said that before.
errant quest
Dear all Travelers,
We sincerely apologize for any inconvenience caused. Regarding the issue of the incorrect damage configuration of Theohein's battle skill "Small-scale Testing," we have corrected it to 10% yesterday to ensure a fair gaming environment. We understand that this correction may result in a reduction in the hero's damage output, so we have specifically applied for Oblivion Scroll as compensation for travelers who have upgraded this hero's skill before the bug fix. If you have upgraded this hero's skills, please provide your character ID. Once verified, we will send the compensation to your in-game mailbox.
Thank you for your continuous support and love for our game. We look forward to your reply.
river cedar
Hi Lydia
So is the plan for this game moving forward to have exclusives, without their artifact, do twice as much damage as the next best damage dealer in their sub type?
As that is what you have just done.
This is a dangerous slope. People will not play if the exclusives are the only way to compete with other players, and the exclusives are never in summon banners during the seasons.
nova moat
Hi Lydia
So is the plan for this game moving forward to have exclusives, without...
Please provide an explanation of what you mean
river cedar
What I mean - I posted a screenshot above of Theo’s damage post nerf where she does half of the exclusives damage. And I don’t have the exclusive artifact. I don’t even have a Lego damage artifact for the exclusive, I am just using the eyeball.
And the exclusives are never part of the in season limited champion summon banners so they are very hard for standard players to get.
nova moat
What I mean - I posted a screenshot above of Theo’s damage post nerf where she d...
Ok but theo is an epic isnt she? So stands to reason that an exclusive legendary does alot more than her? Or am i missing something
And yes the issue with exclusives not on a banner has been brought up, ill try to add it to my daily report
river cedar
Gerthin doesn’t do half of the exclusive
Same for many other sub types
Of course they should do more. But double? And who knows, triple or more with inspirations and artifact?
The other factor here is that the other aura legos are very bad damage dealers. Without the exclusive auras damage is now pathetic.
Lincos is a joke, his ult does 400% damage and his “buff” only works when the one ally he is buffing is yin blaze state. I.e. less than half the time
nova moat
Im trying to see if there is difference in damage when its singular target or multiple targets.
Though this would need to be a new ticket showing how other epic heroes do x damage with their exclusive hero vs theo and her exclusive.
Alot of testing will now need to be done to gather enough evidence to show that other epic damagers do X amount more that Aura etc and then that can be handed in to show what you mean. So one can always ask a CC to show the differences
Example
iB against singular targets with exclusive
Frost against groups
Poiseners groups
Dauntless singular
Aura groups
Etc etc etc
Only then do you have the statistics that you need to prove what you mean.
This is the most i can say to try help you
river cedar
I would love to test
But I don’t have test server
And training ground doesn’t allow you to choose the level of your heroes
And I don’t have all heroes
But yes a cc can test everyone
Which the devs should do as part of the design
river cedar
I am actually a test engineer as my day job, so I would be more than happy to test this all.
However, direct compares between sub types are no easy.
The other thing to remember is Wild and Corrosion for example, the exclusive is boosted by having other people of the same type in the team.
Theo and her exclusive don’t boost each other at all.
Also, I have more than proven what I originally posted.
I originally reported that Theos damage was nerfed, which wasn’t stated in the release notes.
I have also shown that she used to do approx 3/4 of the damage the exclusive does, now she does at best a half.
vale gust
Gerthin doesn’t do half of the exclusive
Same for many other sub types
Of cours...
Gerthin only does half of Bells damage for sure. Plus, Belle and Gerthin do not synergize well together. The way every other comp works is you have two enablers/sub dps and one main dps. As an example, in Shadow, Ozul does more than 3x Aspalta's damage, even when she's built to be pure dps.
Lincos does not require the recipient to be in blaze state, it only requires HIM to be in blaze state
Just as Gerthin and Belle are not designed to be played together, the same can be said of Theo and Aemon
open patrol
what's the TLDR this is too much to read
river cedar
Gerthin only does half of Bells damage for sure. Plus, Belle and Gerthin do not ...
Of course you don;t run them together, i know how it works
river cedar
Lincos does not require the recipient to be in blaze state, it only requires HIM...
No that is not correct. Test it
river cedar
Just as Gerthin and Belle are not designed to be played together, the same can b...
That is the problem, aura there is almost 0 synergy without Diantha
river cedar
Gerthin only does half of Bells damage for sure. Plus, Belle and Gerthin do not ...
Yes but Aura has no enablers.
If Theo boosted the exclusives damage it would be fine. She does not.
vale gust
Additionally, it still ignores the fact that we're talking ST. If you compare Theo's damage to a similar IB team - say Bleddyn Nord Gerthin vs Theo Careth and Narz... Theo would do almost as well as Gerthin.
Now if you did the same test vs aoe, Theo would completely dominate Gerthin's dmg
You're missing the point. Theo and Aemon are not designed to be played together
The same way Gerthin and Belle are not designed to be played together
river cedar
We are talking about the epic vs the exclusive. You are trying to change the topic, and saying incorrect stuff re lincos
river cedar
You're missing the point. Theo and Aemon are not designed to be played together
Your missing the point, Aura doesn’t have enablers
vale gust
Narz and Cath are both enablers
river cedar
Enablers don;t boost the damage by 5%
vale gust
The disparity between Gerthin and Belles dmg is the same as Theo vs Aemon
river cedar
There enables are crap
vale gust
Cath boosts ulti dmg by 40% and Narz is Lincos lite...
river cedar
And their enablers do no damage, unlike the other element enablers
river cedar
Cath boosts ulti dmg by 40% and Narz is Lincos lite...
Lincos is a joke. See the link above. He is broken
vale gust
It's not true at all though. Again, you're using ST mechanics to justify a complaint against an aoe dmg school
Cath and Narz both do similar dmg to Nord and Bleddyn so
And they enable Theo/Aemon so idk what the problem here is
The dynamic is literally the same, except aura can keep up with IB ST with similar comps, the same can not be said conversely
river cedar
I’ve had enough of this garbage. Let’s all hope we pull exclusives or deal no damage. Not listening to your babble any more
vale gust
You realize that Cath Narz and Theo is doing similar dmg to Gerthin Bleddyn and Nord right now? I single target?
It's like you're just skimming over the fact that it's doing a LOT more st dmg than it should to begin with
No ofc an epic is not gonna compete with an exclusive in dmg wtf
river cedar
I never said they should. I said 50% is too little, especially as once the exclusive is empowered and has their artifact is will be more like 3x as much.
Also, theowin is a pure damage dealer, she doesn’t boost the exclusive. So she should do more damage than an enabler.
vale gust
If you paired Belle with Bleddyn and Gerthin, Gerthin would do less than half of Belles dmg and only slightly more than Bleddyn...
river cedar
Bleddyn enables one person so that is a stupid comparison
You need to compare them as two separate pairs
vale gust
You're missing the conceptual point, these teams are designed to be played 2 enablers 1 dps.
Not 1 enabler 2 dps
So you're getting less out of Aemon by running her with Theo
And you're getting less out of Theo by running her with Aemon
And again, you STILL have not touched on the fact that you're comparing ST only lol
Which is not what the dmg school is designed for to begin with
river cedar
That iss because that is your arguement. I am comparing the epic and the exclusive. And so ST vs AOE is irrelevant as they both do aoe
I am well aware. I have ranked top 20 both seasons.
Many teams can one better with one dps and one enabler.
If I had Cath I would try her.
Lincos is broken if you bothered to read the bug report
vale gust
It's not irrelevant because the gap between Aemon and Theo would be less in an aoe situation...
Lol, because you say that Lincos is bugged that means he is? Lydia literally told you he's not bugged that's how he's designed
Maybe you should try to time Lincos ult to synergize better
Also, if you don't have Cath then you can't really comment. Again, this is literally identical to the dynamic between Gerthin and Belle
Or Araces and Asch
Or Shagrol and Nastjenka
At this point you're just complaining about the design of the game.
No one complains that Belle does twice as much dmg as Gerthin, and no one is trying to field them together
Instead of complaining how things are designed, why not just play to the strengths of their design?
Like ulting Lincos when Aemon is empty blaze
river cedar
You said this, 100% wrong. “Lincos does not require the recipient to be in blaze state, it only requires HIM to be in blaze state”
river cedar
Like ulting Lincos when Aemon is empty blaze
Of course he will boost her then. But he will do nothing for the minute she stays in blaze
And your wrong again. No equipment, the gap is bigger in aoe than ST
vale gust
Of course he will boost her then. But he will do nothing for the minute she sta...
That's not true, he can also apply his accomplice to her
If he is blazed and she is empty and he does his ulti, then Aemon will get 35 energy and an accomplice attached to her
Which is exactly how it's intentionally designed, for their ults to be staggered
river cedar
You use him then and see how it works out for you
vale gust
I did use him. With Theo and Carth. He had the interaction I'm describing with Theo
Carth buffed her ult dmg
river cedar
You are missing my point entirely.
For people without the exclusive, which I am lucky enough to have, each damage type needs a decent epic dps. Like gerthin, tonalnan etc.
I am simply saying Theo compared to the exclusive seems to weak.
If she was like this from the start maybe it wouldn’t have been noticed, by the stealth nerfed her.
vale gust
You said this, 100% wrong. “Lincos does not require the recipient to be in blaz...
It's not. He can apply his accomplice to Aemon or Theo if they are not in blaze
river cedar
I know they are not designed to be used together
vale gust
I'm saying that the disparity between Gerthin and Belle is the same disparity between Aemon and Theo
river cedar
Good on you. I don;t have Belle so no idea
vale gust
The dynamic and disparity between Theo and Aemon is the same as any other epic dps and their exclusive counterpart
This is how it's designed
And in fact, in the case of Shagrol vs Nastjenka, Nasty J outperforms Shagrol by a staggering amount
river cedar
Why would you compare to Shagrol. He doesn’t;t get boosted. Compare to Shaltar.
Ridiculous comparison
vale gust
Schaltar's counterpart is Ivellios. Shagrol and Nastjenka are both enablers
river cedar
Nastjenka’s ult does more damage with allies. Shaltar has no such thing.
vale gust
... Schaltar's entire kit is based around allies enabling his dmg with their basic attacks
His ult applies a buff to the team that makes him do deriv damage on a set chance when allies do a basic attack
Maybe you should work on understanding game and unit mechanics before complaining about them
river cedar
Nastjenka’s ult does more damage with allies. Shaltar has no such thing.
That should have said Shalgrol who you are comparing
river cedar
Nasty is boosted by her allies. Shagrol is not. It’s not a reasonable comparison.
It’s a stupid comparison
vale gust
And Aemon has a lot more utility than Theo...
Nastjenka is designed to be a direct upgrade to Shagrol, the same way that Tharivol is designed to replace Nimbus, the same way that Belle supercedes Gerthin, the same dynamic between Aemon and Theo
river cedar
In your option. Interesting you ignore Shaltar. He is the epic alt, not Shagrol.
You part of the design team?
vale gust
Schaltar is the counterpart to Ivellios. Shagrol is counterpart to Nastjenka. Nimbus is counterpart to Tharivol.
Lincos counterpart is Narzilla, Diantha counterpart is Cath, Aemon counterpart is Theo
Bleddyn counter is Shinnah, Belle counterpart is Gerthin
Zhorak counterpart is Nord
ruby furnace
I don't want to be apart of this crazy argument, but gerthin is much better than 1/2 of bel dmg.
Also I would love to see the design team showcase how to use Aura without Aemon. Then replace all of those showcases with Aemon and fail to justify the discrepancy.
There is a difference between a subtype with the exclusive being better and a subtype where the exclusive feels necessary.
I can put more effort in to gearing and understanding and get completely dwarfed in dmg by people who just happen to get an exclusive. Not talking multiple inspirations and exclusive artifacts, just the base champion. In a game that daily and weekly scores the comparative damage you do.
The difference between Theo and Aemon was just right before the nerf.
Also getting the epic scrolls back is in no way compensation. Not even worth looking up my ID for.
vale gust
You can use the Oblivion scroll on a leggo
mortal ginkgo
But aura is performing similarly well to wild with relatively similar comp on Vo...
I mean flora is destroying aura so thats not the case - Aura **REQUIRES **Aemon to be able to get anywhere near enough damage and i'd argue without the exclusive artifact its really sub par to most comps especially in the new season 3 types with corrosion and shadow.
I will also add the whole concept of aura was in blaze being badass boss killers with max hp contributions. THe max hp is so insignificant that its largely just "does blaze let me deal more damage" aka i hit 3 times with aemon. The max HP being capped aggressively makes it weak and forgettable as a feature of aura.
Narzilla's a3 is super underwhelming dealing 11k damage on a 5000 attack build up to 6 times. So her ult is only 66k damage versus any legendary hero hitting and that assumes in blaze state. Careth's passive gives you 1 40% increased ult which is really quite weak versus an overall atk up or cdmg up (you get with someone like zhorak or tolnanen passive). Theo is dealing 620% vs 800% tolnanen (thats before his passive stacks) so is severly weakened. Gerthin Battle is 490% vs Theo 240%. The aura multipliers are underpowered to make teh Blaze Max HP a thing and that doesnt scale enough.
So Aura as an archetype is designed as a dual state mechanic where maximum damage is achieved in Blaze but in reality the additional max hp makes the non-blaze multipliers weaker to support htem but are not contributing enough damage to make it worthwhile and with "generators" only existing in legendary form of Diantha or Lincos you simply cant sustain blaze in a large enough period.
Compared to IB - Nord (rare) is able generate good crystals for your DPS. In Wild you have multple epic and rare champions generating wild stacks for the primary epic dps. In rally you can have an epic buffer and multiple allies replicate and generate rally stacks. Corrosion has 2 really good epics to generate and deal corrosion damage. In Shadow - Taldie is probably better at generating shadow then some of the legendaries in the right setup.
In my opinion Aura is Weak and is in the same book as Thunderbolt. Without Perkunte/Aemon, the archetypes have incredibly weak epic and rares that simply make the entire archetype sub-par and not worth using (just like poison too to some extent).
mortal ginkgo
Dear all Travelers,
We sincerely apologize for any inconvenience caused. Regard...
where do we send the Character ID?
errant quest
where do we send the Character ID?
You can send it here or to our In-game Customer service channel.
mortal ginkgo
You can send it here or to our In-game Customer service channel.
1513497769882117120 thank you
spare sleet
1513779240463372288 @errant quest - thanks
river cedar
Pretty telling when even cc’s are asking for a scroll that this is a shockingly bad change
ID - 1627917400817575936 - thanks…
river cedar
I mean flora is destroying aura so thats not the case - Aura **REQUIRES **Aemon ...
Finally some common sense - well said
spare sleet
Pretty telling when even cc’s are asking for a scroll that this is a shockingly ...
Rather be refunded the XP at this point of the season but hey-ho!
solar pewter
You can send it here or to our In-game Customer service channel.
1722352296827234304 thankyou @errant quest
river cedar
Rather be refunded the XP at this point of the season but hey-ho!
Would rather Aura wasn’t nerfed….and yes the hundred levels into a champion who I probably won’t use now also hurts.
spare sleet
@errant quest Thank you
hollow karma
Hello @errant quest I would like to kindly ask you to return my scroll from Theowin.
ID : 1742899981635081216
Name : KhazadDum
Thanks 🙂
atomic chasm
@errant quest Hello Lydia, another one who scrolled Theo before the nerf...
I think you'll already have me there, but I'll leave you the ID:
Thank you 
flint minnow
Hi @errant quest, me too! Scrolled Theohein because of the 100% scroll atk bonus...
ID: 1558252313758336000
Thanks!
tawny karma
@errant quest I’m another that had scrolled her before she was nerfed
1480565184704261120
Thanks
