#FA9500 backup/restore perf
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
what protocol are you using for backing up? CIFS? SnapDiff? NDMP? SnapMirror? SM2T? iSCSI? NFS?
Nfs.
Depends on many factors:
- How many volumes
- How many disks and what speed
- Block size (4k, 64k) and r/w ratio
- How many nodes
- How many files and directories
- How deep and wide those directories and files are
- ???
- profit
Honestly I'd get a sizing done by your account team through Fusion to get an idea.
Also, backups generally have more overhead. Assuming a straight copy using "cp" or something like XCP, you can expect a linear, predictable amount of performance because it's single or multithreaded.
Backups have more overhead because the initial copy may have to scan the backup, etc.
Also if you use a backup engine that uses snapshots, it will use Snapshot/SnapMirror tech which has a different performance profile.
So...the answer we can provide is...yes it will perform at some rate.
I understand. Thank you. That's why I was looking for any published benchmarks
For instance dell 9910 spec sheet claims a 75tb/hr max perf. In comparison where would fas9500 land without additional licenses? And maybe with snapmirror. Not looking at bluexp
How many maximum 60 drive dsc60 expansion shelves can fas9500 accommodate ? Does the racked appliance come as 42U?
each HA pair can handle 24 DS460C shelves, and you can have up to 12 HA pairs in a cluster (probably more with a PVR)