#ONTAP Tools LUN size issue?

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

low portal
#

OTV version 9.13P1 seems to have an issue where if you try to create a datastore (I only tested iSCSI based) over 16TB, it complains "like in the old days"... if you then create the datastore at say 10TB, and afterwards resize it (with OTV) to say 20TB, it works OK... guess this is an overlooked bug or something?

#

This "might" be a problem if you would like to create a datastore of say 200TB... because I think there is still the good old issue with expanding LUNs over their original size (it is 10 times the original?)

hidden flume
#

ESXi used to complain about performance issues if the LUN size is over a certain point too. I don't remember if they ever increased it, but you don't want to exceed that.

low portal
#

The point is that there is a bug in the OTV software that does not allow you to create LUNs larger than 16TB initially... this will cause an issue if you wanted to create a LUN of way 200TB... you would not be able to do it because of the LUN resize "issue" where you can only expand your LUN by 10 times its initial size... granted this isn't an issue for us, but it might be for someone else...

tawdry mauve
#

I don't think the resizing is still an issue in recent ONTAP versions. For example my 9.14.1 cluster shows this:

cl1::*> lun geometry -vserver TEST
        Vserver Name: TEST
                Path: /vol/luns/test.lun
    Bytes per Sector: 512
   Sectors per Track: 0
 Tracks per Cylinder: -
Sectors per Cylinder: 0
 Number of Cylinders: 0
     Max Resize Size: 128TB
   Number of Sectors: 2097152
       Cylinder Size: 256MB
         Device Size: 1GB

Note the current size (I just created the lun with a size of 1gb) and the "Max Resize Size", which is 128TB

robust delta
#

Doesn’t ESXi have a limit of 64TiB anyway?

#

Try making a 64t lun

stone glade
tawdry mauve
#

yeah the limit for ESXi is 64T but that was not the issue here if I understood correctly? The question was about the 10x limit for resizing LUNs, which doesn't exist anymore

hidden flume
#

Honestly if it's a product bug I'd open a case so we can get a new bug filed

#

Technically we do have access to open bugs, but this needs to be tracked officially.