#Does it make sense to connect the two nodes in a FAS2750 via their SAS ports?
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
....if you look at "node run -command storage show disk -p" you have no secondary path without the cables attached, if you attach them, you "gain" an additional path... so the system does not complain about it, but does it make any difference in terms of performance or redundancy? It is not shown on the official "quick quide" for cabling... so go figure?
If you have no external shelves, MP-HA cabling to internal drives is optional (not shown) if the SAS cables are ordered with the system.
Source: https://docs.netapp.com/us-en/ontap-systems/fas2700/install-detailed-guide.html#option-4-cable-a-switched-cluster-ethernet-network-configuration
As I mentioned it works fine with or without, the question was if it makes any difference in terms of performance or redundancy...
Well yes, it's one path more redundant to your internal disks. But I agree that generally it's not needed. I can't remember any case where only the backplate died but the node stayed alive so you would need the additional connection to the partner node.
Regarding performance: If you're not using SSDs, no difference with or without the additional SAS cabling. If you have 24x SSDs internally I can imagine it's possible to find negligible peak differences during benchmarks.
I wouldnt really care. If you have the cables cable them, if not that's OK too.
If we install new systems we usually order two SAS cables with them (they cost nothing in a project) just for the theoretically higher redundancy.... but yeah, it's not really required anymore
We used to include them by default, dropped that at some point in the A200/FAS2600 from memory. There is no point imo
Well is does remove four red ports on the hardware overview that the customer doesn't have to worry about 😉 I guess you cannot disable the SAS ports like the network ports so they become black/gray... maybe a feature request 😉