[Elm] Request feedback on new practice exercise dnd-character

[noble moth]

We have just released a new exercise on the Elm track: dnd-character https://exercism.org/tracks/elm/exercises/dnd-character . This exercise introduces two abstract concepts together: Random.Generators that are tested with fuzz tests and test distributions.
What we would love is to have feedback on the exercise, and in particular on the error messages. Are they understandable?
We are currently working on a random concept, so this feedback would help a lot.

[noble moth]

@arctic merlin I saw you solved it. Did you run into some error messages?
You sure do like point-free style BTW 😄

[arctic merlin]

Yep. I try to keep my Elm track at 100% 😁

The main trouble is that elm-test errors out for any and all Debug.todos in there. I had to do it all in one pass without any properly failing tests. I’m used to generators but a newcomer could lose the benefit of failing tests.

[stable breach]

I'm an Elm newbie, but I'm acquainted with the exercise (porting it at the moment for Racket). I'll take a look this weekend.

[noble moth]

@arctic merlin Oh, that's a big problem, I didn't notice it. This doesn't happen in every exercise, I wonder what the difference is. I'll try to figure it out and open an issue.

@stable breach Thank you 🙂