#How Many Study Methods Have We Learnt Till Now?
32 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
I have used pomodoro which is pretty good.
The feynmann technique ive used as well. Feynmann's technique is a really good one for understanding the deeper concepts and stuff.
2 minute rule 🗿
what is 2 minute rule?
i think it is feynman technique and chunking, it is exceptionally good for understanding concepts and remembering terms
Interleaving. example of interleaving
we have someone studying for 4 hours in 1 hour sessions lets say he/she has to study two topics that are connected to eachother. an interleaving approach would be to study 30m topic1 and 30m topic 2 in all 4 sessions instead of session 1 and 2 being for topic 1 and 3 and 4 being for topic 2. this means that throughout our studying we will be able to make more connections between the two topics
Geet Bajao
Shuru Hojao
~ Said By someone intellectual
(means play the song and start working)
i believe this works
I just show up to the exam and write down Inshallah and leave
real
700mg caffeine
No pen
15 minutes of studying
"Bismillah"
wht is bro saying
Bro is secretly the topper
Bro is high.
Retrival Learning and Spaced repetition from book Make It Stick by Peter C Brown.
He means he writes Inshallah on the paper i.e 'indeed if Allah wills '
that was not really the intent of the question
Then what is it
irrelevant now
was not a question for you either
Yes right
Mnemonics for memorization + immersion for foreign languages
Parkinson's Law + Pomodoro Method works great, you guys should sometime take the time and effort and try it
Thenks
well well well
cornell method, SQ5R study techniquee
I've learned; past papers, mind mapping (both tree and grind),
||btw promodoro is not a study technique, it is technique for focus aka deep wok ||
It’s worth noting pomodoro is not deep work. Both related. Kinda opposite goals
elaborate
Not much to elaborate on. To be honest with you. I just said it for people who don't know and might get confused. At a surface level though. Deep work isn't just regular study. Like pomodoro it's a disinct method, based off of Cal Newports book of the same name. The main difference is length of time. The reason why pomodoro is effective is because of urgency. The false deadline makes you faster in a literal sense via an adrenaline rush. This is the same reason why it's possible to cram a lot of content into just a few hours. Pomodoro is basically saying 'let me cram right now' and if you're doing so before the exam it's really useful. The keyword to look up is: Parkinson's Law. Deep Work is focused on having you spend as long as needed on a task until it's done. Urgency isn't in the equation and that's the point. Sometimes you don't necessarily have a strict deadline or maybe you want to stay in flow for as long as possible because you don't know when you can again.
So the main difference is urgency. But there are other things such as the exact things you wanna focus on, time limits for each so you don't burnout, or exact times to use each session for optimum focus.
I believe both sessions are just as good but they have specific tasks they are better for. When I'm studying for example my priming block is exclusively pomodoro. For study however, making flashcards, questions, or reading my textbook, I use deep work, because my deadline won't be for days and I'd rather 'batch' everything I need in that single session, which might take 4hrs+
there are more differences but you can find youtube videos about which one is better for you
Hehe
Deadlines help a lot