#1cyFir3-
jagged fractal
pi_3LNssGL9KGvziCdn08wMPbqt
quick mist
Yes you were right it's 0.085, but 1.04 is also 1.044 actually
Putting it down:
As if the charge was 16:
((16 * 3.4) + 50) / 100 = 1.044
As if the charge was 13.5:
((13.5 * 3.4) + 50) / 100 = 0.959
So the gap is 1.044 - 0.959 = 0.085 ----> 0.08
jagged fractal
When I calculate like that, I also have another incorrect case. pi_3LNbTmL9KGvziCdn0VRYJ2zQ
Here is the calculation.
((10 * 3.4) + 50) / 100 = 0.84
(2.5 * 3.4) / 100 = 0.085
0.84 - 0.085 = 0.755
The actual fee refund is 0.75 which should have been 0.76.
quick mist
Why? I think 0.755 should be 0.75 for round down
Btw don't calculate on 2.5
calculate on the "as if". As if full charge (without rounding) and as if captured charge (without rounding) and take the gap
((10 * 3.4) + 50) / 100 = 0.84
((7.5 * 3.4) + 50) / 100 = 0.755
jagged fractal
So the rounding is not up but down?
What if the result is 0.689, is it 0.69 or 0.68?
quick mist
should be 0.69. I meant it's down if it's 0.xx5, but up for 0.xx6 to 0.xx9
jagged fractal
I see but I tried another case.
(((325.16) * 3.4) + 50) / 100 = 11.55544
If I round it down, it should be 11.55 but the actual is 11.56
quick mist
11.5554 should be 11.56, isn't it? because 11.5554 is technically > 11.555
jagged fractal
Ok, I've got it. Now, I understand how it works. Thank you so much for your explanation.