#jamesdahlen.nwi - trial and invoice

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

grizzled ferry
#

Hello, thanks for the question and ID. Checking in to it now

sturdy mountain
#

great!

grizzled ferry
sturdy mountain
#

ok, hope you can find a reason! that sounds suspicious

#

i am updating the subscription after initial invoice as suggested by bismark

grizzled ferry
#

Yep yep, I am curious as to why myself. As one of my colleagues says, our Billing can often seem to do something counterintuitive but then you look deeper and see why it had to work that way

#

Will look in to your thread with bismark in a moment as well. Basically what is the end goal of making this subscription update after the invoice?

sturdy mountain
#

customers wish to pre-pay for a subscription that starts later in the year

#

instead of using SubscriptionSchedules, he suggested an alternative using Trials

#

i need the subscription to recur yearly in August

#

but allow pre-payment

grizzled ferry
#

I am still a little bit stumped on this one. Will ask my colleagues and get back to you

sturdy mountain
#

ok

grizzled ferry
#

I see what it is now. So the default proration behavior of an update like this is to create prorations. So this update credited the user for the unused time in the year (which was all of it)

#

So, in future, just pass proration_behavior: none in your call that creates this trial and the user won't be credited