#Vish-testing-dispute
1 messages ยท Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Hello ๐
Give me a moment to catch up here ๐
do you have a request ID I can take a look at for this?
This is a charge for Fraudulent Disputes: "ch_3KvGIWQfWrSDultJ0vMjsoCH"
This is a charge for Warning Disputes: "ch_3KvGHOQfWrSDultJ0oCezHYe"
Appreciate your patience
Still looking
Interesting.. Can't see why this would happen unless it is expected behavior which would be surprising
Let me ask a colleague to get more eyes on this
Yup. Seems like this is expected behavior as our docs say
With default account settings, charge succeeds, only to receive an early fraud warning.
So that doesnโt sound like it would create a dispute
https://stripe.com/docs/testing#disputes
Additionally, the charge would succeeds (as it did) and a radar.early_fraud_warning.created event should be fired. Letting you know an early fraud warning was created
https://stripe.com/docs/api/radar/early_fraud_warnings/object
https://stripe.com/docs/api/events/types#event_types-radar.early_fraud_warning.created
ok thanks
NP! Happy to help ๐
Again, grateful for your patience
Will this create a dispute later? or are all disputes created right away?
ok