#GiGStartr-API-concurrency
1 messages ยท Page 1 of 1 (latest)
I have some asynchronous processes creating API calls - in this case to paymentIntents - as well as some more "bulk" events. AM I correct in believing that in addtition to the rate limits there is no concurrency to an endpoint even if they are explicitly idempotent?
(no hurry)
Hello ๐
Thanks for your patience ๐ Still looking into this
(this is directly observed - you could like starting at event evt_3Kiji3AJ38Y8gLJy1UTeS4q7) _ ...still trying to rmember where to grab the acct
acct_1GCV49AJ38Y8gLJy
(btw, the events also contradict an answer from yesterday [and a github issue] - the node stripe-js library did retry a 429 API call)
So we don't have concurrency per endpoint no, but we do have a rate limit for concurrent requests which applies to all READs and WRITEs respectively
K. I'm using Firebase Firestore (which has a LOT of concurrency) along with Stripe (which does not), so needed to confirm. I already have event/promise driven concurrency and rate limiters, so easy enough; there's just one point in my Cloud Functions I need to single-thread (well, limit to one instance) to avoid hammering your API. I was pleased to see the 429 error retried, so that's another thing off my plate. Thanks all
Thanks for confirming. Apologies, I'm not super familiar with your previous thread but I'll make sure to check it out when I get a chance.