#sandyk - charges vs payment intents

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

vernal island
#

Hello, apologies for the delay in reply to this question. There are other functionality advantages I believe, I will check our docs on this.

#

Is there any particular reason you are considering updating or is this part of the research in to if you should?

thin arch
#

Thanks @vernal island ! This is part of researching into whether we should switch

thin arch
#

@vernal island I guess a more specific question is this - the payment intent api "Declines payments with incorrect card details or no funds" and "Declines payments with bank authentication requests". These are current capabilities on the Charges Api as well?

vernal island
#

Sorry I dropped off this for a bit, was jumping between a couple other threads.

#

What doc are you reading those on? I want to make sure I am not assuming what they mean

thin arch
vernal island
thin arch
#

got it, thank you! One last question and I don't know if you would know this or is in this chat's purview. Are there any US payment regulations that would require the use of the PaymentsIntent api? It seems like this is only for European countries - requiring 3D authentication on card payments

"These APIs help you handle dynamic payments (for example, additional authentication like 3D Secure) and prepare you for expansion to other countries while allowing you to support new regulations and regional payment methods." <-- what are these "new regulations and regional payment methods" as it applies to the US?

source https://stripe.com/docs/payments/payment-intents#apis

bitter thorn
thin arch
#

thank you 🙏