#bwurtz999-terminal-expand
1 messages ยท Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Awesome! Bear with me a moment while I pull that up.
You still there toby?
I am, consulting with colleagues.
thanks!
Apologies for the delay, we're still looking into this!
that can't be good haha
It's fine, I'm pretty sure this is just a backwards compatibility thing but I'm trying to test on my own reader
Yea mine does this too, and has no use of legacy sources at all
so unless this is causing an issue for you for some reason, i'd say you can safely ignore it
well based on what I can see in my logs it looks like this request was sent when it should have been a request to confirm the payment intent
pi_3JiIkTCXMuDrMdnf1t4d7qjr
the items had been added to it (total of 285)
and then this request came from the reader
this happens a few times per day for me
not a lot, but I'd like to figure out what is causing it
because then I get an error when I try to capture the payment intent because it doesn't have an attached payment method
That's going to be unrelated, i would expect
is this payment intent an example of that?
np ๐
thanks for looking into this
absolutely ๐ let us know if you encounter any problems as you go forward
I have a few years before I need to upgrade my readers, right?
you mentioned this was a backwards compatibility thing
I'm assuming for the new readers
I haven't heard about any timeline for that, so i would expect it to be supported until you're notified about any future change