#Mich-ACH

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

subtle knot
fluid basalt
#

the platform is then charged $4 for failed transaction by Stripe.

subtle knot
#

@fluid basalt not in any direct way, but you can probably do it yes, for example by using Account Debts (https://stripe.com/docs/connect/account-debits) or by reducing the amount you transfer on any future payments(or increasing your application fee) so you make the money back that way)

#

but Stripe will not directly charge them no, the payment object is on the platform so that's where the fees go

fluid basalt
#

in the case of failed transaction, Stripe will charge the platform right?

#

for $4 in case of ACH transfer

#

ah understood. just saw the answer

subtle knot
#

if it's a Destination charge the platform pays all the processing fees yes

#

oh when you say customer you mean the end-customer, the one you're actually debiting

#

sorry, I thought we meant charging the connected account

fluid basalt
#

nope nope it's charging the end customer (i thought that's what we call the customer)

subtle knot
#

but then no, you can't really charge the customer something like this. What is this $4 by the way? I'm not in the US so I don't really know how ACH works.

fluid basalt
#

for failed transaction Stripe charges $4

#

$15 for dispute case

#

isn't that the case?

subtle knot
#

yep I knew about disputes, I didn't know there was an ACH payment failure fee, but makes sense

#

but ok then no, you can't charge the customer that

#

if you're worried about it you can charge the customer some larger amount to cover your cost of doing business(including the risk of paying your payment processor for the chance of a failed payment).

fluid basalt
#

there's a risk of them not using us anymore. it's not exactly ideal..

subtle knot
#

ultimately it's a cost of doing business so it's something to factor into your business decisions of how you price your product

#

anyway this channel is mainly for API/technical questions, happy to help with those!

fluid basalt
#

yep i'm here to find a technical solution to that