#mattcomroe_api

1 messages ยท Page 1 of 1 (latest)

round gladeBOT
#

๐Ÿ‘‹ Welcome to your new thread!

โฒ๏ธ We'll be here soon! Typically we respond in a few minutes, but sometimes we might take a bit longer if the server is busy or if you have a particularly tricky question.

โฑ๏ธ We close idle threads, which makes them read-only. Once a thread is closed it won't be reopened, but you can always start a new thread if you have another question.

๐Ÿ”— This thread will always be available, even after it's closed. You can find it again using Discord's search, or you can save this link: https://discord.com/channels/841573134531821608/1503494823980568717

๐Ÿ“ Have more to share? Add more details, code, screenshots, videos, etc. below.

Below are links to other discussions we've had with you in the past week in case you want to review that information. If your question is related to one of these previous discussions, please provide a comprehensive summary of the current state and what you need help with now. We help many users simultaneously, so a summary allows us to resolve your issue as soon as possible.

mossy zealot
#

Hello hanzo; good to see you again! Hope you've been well.

undone sparrow
#

Hello ๐Ÿ‘‹
Are you saying you only received partial funds re-instated?

#

I don't believe we have a test card that can do partial amount reversal

round gladeBOT
mossy zealot
#

hi! sorry; i got pulled away for a second.

#

yes.. we had a live example of a dispute starting off for the full amount but only had a partial amount reversal when the dispute was "lost". PaymentIntent was pi_3Sw0WmBnxMPxdETu2DW5u23P

small tundra
#

Hey Matt, Hanzo had to head out i'll be taking over the thread. As he pointed we don't have any sort of test card that could reproduce, but i'll look into the PI and see if I can come up with any ideas.

mossy zealot
#

i didn't see any options for disputes other than for the full amounts with the test cards that are listed on your help docs... was hoping maybe you had a sneaky way to simulate this for testing.

#

i tried to "replay" the event evt_1TI7JbBnxMPxdETuOO6THvMp back to our lower environment via the CLI but i think the event is both too old now and also i was getting permissions error for the rk_live_xxxx key i was using... so that turned into a bit of a dead end.

small tundra
#

is this for testing your webhook handling?

mossy zealot
#

correct.

#

somewhere in our webhook handler for that event is a bug, because it sent back the full amount instead of the partial. i guess whoever wrote it up initially was never accounting for that possibility.

small tundra
#

hmmm. Still seeing what I can come up with. I do see we've had this requested before so I can at the very least add your name to the list. Thinking it might be possible to mock up the scenario by using the real example as a template and sending the json via curl to your endpoint.

mossy zealot
#

sounds like a plan.. i've got Postman to handle that sort of thing which i think can also do the security signing or whatever happens that our endpoint validates. if that's the workaround i have to do that's fine.. i was just hoping for a test that the QA folks could run without having to run curl commands or set up Postman for.

small tundra
#

Yeah, I think that's the option available at the moment. : ( I'm adding your voice to those who would like to be able more options to test these scenarios.

mossy zealot
#

hey, that's great! if enough people want this very specific test maybe we'll get it. ๐Ÿ˜‰

#

but for now; i'll work on replicating that webhook event. it would be useful to set up a local framework for that anyway.

#

thanks very much for your help! I appreciate you!