#jumpinj_invoice-taxrate-expansion
1 messages ยท Page 1 of 1 (latest)
๐ Welcome to your new thread!
โฒ๏ธ We'll be here soon! Typically we respond in a few minutes, but sometimes we might take a bit longer if the server is busy or if you have a particularly tricky question.
โฑ๏ธ We close idle threads, which makes them read-only. Once a thread is closed it won't be reopened, but you can always start a new thread if you have another question.
๐ This thread will always be available, even after it's closed. You can find it again using Discord's search, or you can save this link: https://discord.com/channels/841573134531821608/1463995723891605706
๐ Have more to share? Add more details, code, screenshots, videos, etc. below.
Below are links to other discussions we've had with you in the past week in case you want to review that information. If your question is related to one of these previous discussions, please provide a comprehensive summary of the current state and what you need help with now. We help many users simultaneously, so a summary allows us to resolve your issue as soon as possible.
- jump_schedule-extraphase, 2 days ago, 22 messages
Hi ๐
Based on the request, it looks like you are referring to the Invoice object, correct?
The total_taxes property is not expandable on the Invoice object.
Correct I am trying to retrieve an invoice object. Is there a reason it is not expandable? I don't see anything in the documentation to suggest it is not. I could be missing that though.
We label evey property that IS expandable in our API reference doc. Since that property does not have the label, you cannot expand it.
Gotcha, then I go to the question of why is this one not expandable? Particularly since it was with the old api format.
You would need to make a separate API call using the tax_rate ID. As to why it isn't expandable, that is not something we would know here
jumpinj_invoice-taxrate-expansion
I don't presume this would get fix in the near future, but do you take features requests here?
Hi there, taking over for @prisma tapir as they had to step away. If the feature request is making that field expandable, I can file that feature request and link it to the account you provided in your example request
Yes that would be the request is to allow that field to be expandable.