#theplay3r_api

1 messages ยท Page 1 of 1 (latest)

blissful notchBOT
#

๐Ÿ‘‹ Welcome to your new thread!

โฒ๏ธ We'll be here soon! Typically we respond in a few minutes, but sometimes we might take a bit longer if the server is busy or if you have a particularly tricky question.

โฑ๏ธ We close idle threads, which makes them read-only. Once a thread is closed it won't be reopened, but you can always start a new thread if you have another question.

๐Ÿ”— This thread will always be available, even after it's closed. You can find it again using Discord's search, or you can save this link: https://discord.com/channels/841573134531821608/1442622999864938496

๐Ÿ“ Have more to share? Add more details, code, screenshots, videos, etc. below.

rough cove
#

Hi there ๐Ÿ‘‹

All I'm seeing so far in the guide is that you would configure this in your Stripe Dashboard for your Platform level settings.

Can you elaborate on why you'd want to be able to change this programmatically for your Platform level settings?

dusk vector
#

We are taking care of transfers to connected accounts manually, eg. calculating how much we need to send and then in batches doing so.

Sometimes, we have transfers which can not be processed, eg. the connected account cant accept the trasnfer, doesn't have required details, etc., so we need to "hold on" to that money.

So we would like to keep those "on hold" funds that are supposed to be sent out to the connected account(s) in the future in our Stripe balance.

Due to automatic payouts, the only solution we see is setting the minimum balance.

rough cove
#

Gotcha! Sounds like switching to manual payouts may be a better fit. Then you can control how many funds you retain for each currency programmatically by controlling the creation of your Payouts.

#

Would that give you the level of control you're looking for?

dusk vector
#

Probably, but isn't there some kind of downside to using manual payouts? I vaguely remember seeing something like that and deciding to go with automatic instead.

rough cove
#

Hhmm, not that readily comes to mind.

#

I guess usually the downside is that you need to write code to manage the Payouts, but if you're already planning to write code it seems like it could be a good feature for the job.

#

Oh

blissful notchBOT
rough cove
#

You lose access to payout reconciliation, but that is probably fine since you'd manage the payout ledgers anyway.

dusk vector
#

Yeah, as long as it doesn't affect other reports, that should probably be fin.

So, just to make sure, in order to use manual payouts, the only thing I have to worry about is to not requesting a payout with bigger amount than what is currently available.

Which I would simply fetch from https://docs.stripe.com/api/balance/balance_retrieve ?

spare egret
#

๐Ÿ‘‹ Hi there, Toby had to head out so i'll be taking over.

#

That is correct, just need to ensure you aren't attempting a payout greater than your available balance.