#mark-reckard_unexpected

1 messages ¡ Page 1 of 1 (latest)

dusty crescentBOT
#

👋 Welcome to your new thread!

⏲️ We'll be here soon! Typically we respond in a few minutes, but sometimes we might take a bit longer if the server is busy or if you have a particularly tricky question.

⏱️ We close idle threads, which makes them read-only. Once a thread is closed it won't be reopened, but you can always start a new thread if you have another question.

🔗 This thread will always be available, even after it's closed. You can find it again using Discord's search, or you can save this link: https://discord.com/channels/841573134531821608/1365343134245982400

📝 Have more to share? Add more details, code, screenshots, videos, etc. below.

obtuse pike
#

Hello

#

Can you share the PaymentIntent ID you are testing with?

rapid flame
#

pi_3RHU43CMpnBh61hX1HVMEfMW

obtuse pike
#

Thanks, looking

#

Yeah this does look like a test mode quirk -- I agree that the Charge should move to failed here and the refund should be canceled.

#

I'll file a ticket internally so we can get this behavior to mirror what happens in live mode here.

rapid flame
#

Ok awesome. Do you have an estimate for when this behavior might be changed to mirror live mode? Obviously you have no real idea, but just trying to get a ballpark. Weeks? Months?

#

We're considering deprioritizing this async refund work for a few sprints, so the timing here impacts that decision. And I totally understand if you can't give me an answer.

obtuse pike
#

Yeah sorry I really can't say -- that will depend on the priortization of the Eng team.

You should be able to just mock responses here to get the expected behavior.

rapid flame
#

Yeah we can mock expected behavior locally and in spec at least for now. Might just have to make and refund some real payments in a production sandbox as well. Thanks again for the information here