#eener_docs
1 messages ยท Page 1 of 1 (latest)
๐ Welcome to your new thread!
โฒ๏ธ We'll be here soon! Typically we respond in a few minutes, but sometimes we might take a bit longer if the server is busy or if you have a particularly tricky question.
โฑ๏ธ We close idle threads, which makes them read-only. Once a thread is closed it won't be reopened, but you can always start a new thread if you have another question.
๐ This thread will always be available, even after it's closed. You can find it again using Discord's search, or you can save this link: https://discord.com/channels/841573134531821608/1358661796491169793
๐ Have more to share? Add more details, code, screenshots, videos, etc. below.
Hi there, The card issuer determined whether to approve or decline the transations, so we will recommend providing as much information as possible (i.e., including CVC) to reduce decline rate.
We will only use this token creation just to determine the card funding type for a display in our app. Will it be okay to not provide it if it does not involve any transaction yet?
So you are not charging but only to collect the card information? You should then use SetupIntent, and when it is confirmed, you can look at the Payment Method's funding type
Complete reference documentation for the Stripe API. Includes code snippets and examples for our Python, Java, PHP, Node.js, Go, Ruby, and .NET libraries.
We are not creating the payment intent yet at that point so we thought of just retrieving the funding type using the card token creation. Will that approach suffice?
Yes, SetupIntent != PaymentIntent, it doesn't charge
Is it not advisable to use the token creation instead? Is the funding type in SetupIntent more accurate than in the created card token?
Not exactly accurate but Token is legacy and we are moving away from it
More of recommendation
Ok that will be noted for our future updates, but since we're using the token for now to just determine the card funding, is it fine to not provide the cvc at that point if we are not charging yet?
Yes, though I am pretty much on strongly discourage using token in 2025 ๐