#amirasol_api
1 messages ¡ Page 1 of 1 (latest)
đ Welcome to your new thread!
â˛ď¸ We'll be here soon! Typically we respond in a few minutes, but sometimes we might take a bit longer if the server is busy or if you have a particularly tricky question.
âąď¸ We close idle threads, which makes them read-only. Once a thread is closed it won't be reopened, but you can always start a new thread if you have another question.
đ This thread will always be available, even after it's closed. You can find it again using Discord's search, or you can save this link: https://discord.com/channels/841573134531821608/1313993142688813157
đ Have more to share? Add more details, code, screenshots, videos, etc. below.
Below are links to other discussions we've had with you in the past week in case you want to review that information. If your question is related to one of these previous discussions, please provide a comprehensive summary of the current state and what you need help with now. We help many users simultaneously, so a summary allows us to resolve your issue as soon as possible.
- amirasol_api, 1 hour ago, 5 messages
Sorry I had to step out earlier and missed the window.
No worries! Looking into this now.
Any chance you have a request ID from one of your request that succeeded handy? I can also set up a repro if not
Yes, hang on
This is no Link + 3155: pm_1QSOrkGO3Swz33UpjWKPAS5p
And Link + 4242: pm_1QSP0SGO3Swz33Up7G3J0WDl
Sorry, you asked for request ID.
No Link + 3155: req_BHbhzujoZYz5g4
Link + 4242: req_hRu4HQUPs4MScg
Thank you! I was actually able to get the request ID from the IDs you shared. Looking into the specifics of your question now.
I guess Link + 4242 isn't relevant here because it does not require authentication.
FYI I'm working through some things on my end, but still have this on my radar
Thank you!
Ok, looking through your requests it looks like you're doing everything correctly, and I think I've been able to reproduce the issue.
Let me check with some colleagues to see if I'm missing anything here
Thank you!
Ooooo, turns out this is a known issue. From the looks of the bug report it's limited to test mode only.
Oh, so in live mode it should work?
So it should work fine when going live, but it's definitely not a good developer experience.
Yep, that is the case. Live mode should work just fine.
Oh, alright. Thank you for helping me with this!
Yep, no worries! I'll let our team that manages Link know that another developer found this issue in the wild. Thanks for your patience as I worked through reproducing it and have a lovely day!