#tavana_unexpected
1 messages ¡ Page 1 of 1 (latest)
đ Welcome to your new thread!
â˛ď¸ We'll be here soon! Typically we respond in a few minutes, but sometimes we might take a bit longer if the server is busy or if you have a particularly tricky question.
âąď¸ We close idle threads, which makes them read-only. Once a thread is closed it won't be reopened, but you can always start a new thread if you have another question.
đ This thread will always be available, even after it's closed. You can find it again using Discord's search, or you can save this link: https://discord.com/channels/841573134531821608/1291508527491317781
đ Have more to share? Add more details, code, screenshots, videos, etc. below.
Hello! Can you give me the ID of the Payment Intent in question so I can take a look?
pi_3Q5Ze3FEVywGTFh70k7oIsEM
When you created this Payment Intent you specified an existing Payment Method, so there was no need for the Payment Intent to go into the requires_payment_method state; it already had one.
It also succeeded immediately because, when you created it, you told it to also immediately attempt to confirm itself.
Can you tell me more about what you're trying to do?
So for this duplicate payment intent ( pi_3Q5ZdyFEVywGTFh71fhQhfvH ), it went to requires_payment_method because I didn't provide an existing method? The underlying problem I'm trying to solve is to understand why our system issued 2 duplicate charges when it should've been one.
Yeah, have a look at the creation request for the first Payment Intent you mentioned: https://dashboard.stripe.com/logs/req_yC71MO0rhXUm96
Then compare it with the creation request for the second one: https://dashboard.stripe.com/logs/req_8AkWilPQikDkyX