#dai_unexpected
1 messages ยท Page 1 of 1 (latest)
๐ Welcome to your new thread!
โฒ๏ธ We'll be here soon! Typically we respond in a few minutes, but sometimes we might take a bit longer if the server is busy or if you have a particularly tricky question.
โฑ๏ธ We close idle threads, which makes them read-only. Once a thread is closed it won't be reopened, but you can always start a new thread if you have another question.
๐ This thread will always be available, even after it's closed. You can find it again using Discord's search, or you can save this link: https://discord.com/channels/841573134531821608/1281250075405979800
๐ Have more to share? Add more details, code, screenshots, videos, etc. below.
Below are links to other discussions we've had with you in the past week in case you want to review that information. If your question is related to one of these previous discussions, please provide a comprehensive summary of the current state and what you need help with now. We help many users simultaneously, so a summary allows us to resolve your issue as soon as possible.
- dai_best-practices, 17 hours ago, 26 messages
- dai_best-practices, 23 hours ago, 12 messages
Hello
Hi!
Hmm no I don't think updating to a $0 Price should reset the Billing Cycle Anchor as long as the Price is on the same interval.
Can you share an example Subscription ID?
Thanks, looking
Okay so you updated the current phase 0 to a $0 Price and nothing happened. The Billing Cycle Anchor did not change. The next Invoice though is when it moved to Phase 1 where you have a $18 Price and that was scheduled to start on 9/22 and you set proration_behavior: none so this charges the full amount at that date and now that is the billing anchor going forward. So this all seems expected to me.
Hmm but the interval between $18 -> 0 -> $18 has all been on the same monthly interval so i guess I would've thought the cycle anchors would've remained unchanged
But instead behaves exactly the same as when you provision trial instead of 0 unit amount
I see. Well is there an alternative approach to achieve the overall desired behavior?
I've also experimented with discounts which seems to maintain cycle anchors
Discounts are the only way that I know of