#arn4v_best-practices
slate marshBOT
👋 Welcome to your new thread!
⏲️ We'll be here soon! Typically we respond in a few minutes, but sometimes we might take a bit longer if the server is busy or if you have a particularly tricky question.
⏱️ We close idle threads, which makes them read-only. Once a thread is closed it won't be reopened, but you can always start a new thread if you have another question.
🔗 This thread will always be available, even after it's closed. You can find it again using Discord's search, or you can save this link: https://discord.com/channels/841573134531821608/1263571727213006908
📝 Have more to share? Add more details, code, screenshots, videos, etc. below.
shrewd frigate
Charges have a refunds property that is hidden by default and only shows if you specify to expand that field https://docs.stripe.com/api/charges/object#charge_object-refunds
So you can add that to your list of expanded fields. Refunds do also have their own balance transactions, but I forget if you can expand deep enough to get those as part of the same call here
tired surge
const invoices = await StripeAPI.invoices.list({
customer: customerId,
expand: [
'data.charge',
'data.charge.balance_transaction',
'data.charge.refunds',
],
status: 'paid',
limit: 100,
});
Ah got it! Thank you.
So I'd need to add 'data.charge.refunds.balance_transaction' here. IIRC up-to 4 levels of expansion is allowed. I think this would be valid?
I think that's correct
shrewd frigate
Ah I think we are one level too short. Our properties that contain arrays will have those arrays in a data property. So you would need to put refunds.data instead of just refunds which would mean you would need 'data.charge.refunds.data.balance_transaction'
Would you mind trying that in test mode just to see? A bit too busy to test myself now.
tired surge
Sure, no worries. Thanks 👍🏽