#mike_docs

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

livid laurelBOT
#

👋 Welcome to your new thread!

⏲️ We'll be here soon! We typically respond in a few minutes, but in some cases we might need a bit more time (e.g., server's busy, you've got a complex question, etc.).

⏱️ We close idle threads, which makes them read-only. Once a thread is closed it won't be reopened, but you can start a new thread if you have another question.

🔗 This thread will always be available, even after it's closed. You can find it again using Discord's search, or you can save this link: https://discord.com/channels/841573134531821608/1260190316934467736

📝 Have more to share? Add details, code, screenshots, videos, etc. below.

errant rampart
fiery wind
#

That's it. There are only 42 countries in total?

#

for example "Brasil", "Argentina", "South Africa", "India"...

#

China

errant rampart
#

I suspect that Brazil isn't available for your platform country

fiery wind
#

What does it mean "isn't available for our platform country"?

#

How can I change it?

errant rampart
#

Can you share your OAuth URL here

fiery wind
#

you mean the client_id and state?

errant rampart
#

The full URL you're using

errant rampart
#

Any reaosn why you're using OAuth?

fiery wind
#

well, we've started with that. we are planning to use embedded components

#

and potentially to use api to preset the address

errant rampart
#

FWIW, I see an extensive list of countries (including Brazil) in the UI so not sure what is 'limited' exactly?

fiery wind
#

So even I don't see Brasil among the "42 selected countries" in the** Settings / Connect**, it can still be selected...? 🤷‍♂️

errant rampart
#

Those options are irreleant for standard accounts (they only apply to Express, as per the screenshot you sent)

fiery wind
#

omg - I can see it now. So standard accounts are always available in all supported countries, right?

errant rampart
#

If you use the OAuth flow yes you can't control the available countries

fiery wind
#

how would you recommend to change the onboarding to have maximal control but still keep Stripe's validation and negative balance liability?

#

we planned to use this settings

errant rampart
#

But you can't do that with OAuth, so you'd need to use the Accounts API directly

fiery wind
#

but it can still be Standard account, right?

errant rampart
#

Well in the world of the controller properites there's no concept of a 'standard' account. Standard account previously just mean an account that paid the fees, had full Dashboard access and was liable for disputes/refunds

#

Now you can have more granular control over that, so perhaps you want them to have full Dashboard access but the platform pays Stripe fees

#

You can still just use type: 'standard' with the API though yes

fiery wind
#

Ok, if I describe what we want achieve, would you be able to recommend right setup for us?

errant rampart
#

Is it not clear from the docs I linked? I'd recommend reading through that, and I can answer any Qs

fiery wind
#

We will definitely run though it however I would appreciate short description here and just some hints.

errant rampart
#

OK

fiery wind
#

give me a second I will write short summary

#

We develop B2B platform.

Onboarding flow:

  1. every new user register to the platform is a (Stripe) customer for us
    1a) country is mandatory on our platform
    1b) postal code is mandatory where available and/or required by Stripe taxes
    1c) address is mandatory only when required by Stripe taxes (some US states)
  2. user can opt-out to be also the a seller
    2a) connect to new/existing Stripe account
    2b) we need to know if the user uses same address as they used in steps 1a-1c
errant rampart
#

Not really sure what the questions are there. Most, if not all, of that info is collected during onboarding and available via the API in some scenarios

fiery wind
#

the questions are:
2a - if the user has no account yet can we control the account type and specifically the address (1a-1c)?
2b - according to another Q/A here the webhook on connected account update does not contain billing address so the customer in our system can have different address than seller on stripe

errant rampart
#

2a - if the user has no account yet can we control the account type and specifically the address (1a-1c)?
Yes, via Account creation. To be clear, in the optimal onboarding flow a new account will always be created

according to another Q/A here the webhook on connected account update does not contain billing address so the customer in our system can have different address than seller on stripe
As I said, in some scenarios information regarding the person(s) on the account is available via the API. But we don't collect a 'billing address' during onboarding, just the address(es) of the people/legal entities

#

So sure, seems plausible that they could pay with a card that has a different billing address to the address regsitered with the account

fiery wind
#

ok. it would be no problem but those "people/legal entity" addresses are part of the webhook payload so we can compare with the address used in our system?

errant rampart
#

Information about the person represented by the account. This property is null unless business_type is set to individual. After you create an Account Link or Account Session, this property is only returned for accounts where controller.requirement_collection is application, which includes Custom accounts.
https://docs.stripe.com/api/accounts/object#account_object-individual

fiery wind
#

All good until "... which includes Custom accounts". Does this mean that it works only with Custom accounts or all account types (including Custom)?

#

Frankly speaking we want to reduce our responsibilies to minimum and to my understanding the Standard account is the only way to achieve this. With Express or Custom accounts we have higher responsibilites, right?

errant rampart
#

It means those fields are only included in API responses where controller.requirement_collection is application, which comes back to the granular controls I was talking about

#

Yes, generally speaking standard accounts will have significantly less burden on the platform as they're ultimately responsible for their disputes, refunds, balance, etc

fiery wind
#

ok, can you please sumarize all docs we should go through step-by-step to have full scope of necessary information? thank you very much

fair haven
#

hi! I'm taking over this thread.

#

can you clarify what you mean by " full scope of necessary information"?

fiery wind
#

As I wrote before - we want to have control over the onboarding flow (steps 1a-2b) and still want to leave the reponsibility on the connected account. In case the user will create the connected account with different information than they used during registration to our platform we would block their account in our platform (not the stripe account of course) so they will not be able to use it.

fair haven
#

I still don't understand what is you question. do you want to get access to all field of the connected account, like individual that was mentioned earlier in the conversation? if so, you would need to use controller.requirement_collection: application to get access to these information.

fiery wind
#

At the beginning we planned to create the custom accounts via API so we developed lots of UIs for many stripe features. However later we decided not to use Custom but Standard accounts but still need to collect all possible information from the connected account (and to be informed in case of update via webhook). we would like to access as many information as possible but for the time being we need at least: full address of the business/person-registration (the real address of the company used during Stripe account creation). It would be also great to have access to the tax-registrations as we could display them in our UI so the user can have unified UX and UI for this part. I hope it helps to clarify our intentions and needs.

fair haven