#ashtray-wasp_unexpected

1 messages ¡ Page 1 of 1 (latest)

sand terraceBOT
scenic bridgeBOT
#

Below are links to other discussions we've had with you in the past week in case you want to review that information. If your question is related to one of these previous discussions, please provide a comprehensive summary of the current state and what you need help with now. We help many users simultaneously, so a summary allows us to resolve your issue as soon as possible.

sand terraceBOT
#

👋 Welcome to your new thread!

⏲️ We'll be here soon! We typically respond in a few minutes, but in some cases we might need a bit more time (e.g., server's busy, you've got a complex question, etc.).

⏱️ We close idle threads, which makes them read-only. Once a thread is closed it won't be reopened, but you can start a new thread if you have another question.

🔗 This thread will always be available, even after it's closed. You can find it again using Discord's search, or you can save this link: https://discord.com/channels/841573134531821608/1247898623656857712

📝 Have more to share? Add details, code, screenshots, videos, etc. below.

autumn smelt
#

Hello

#

Taking a look

#

If I remember correctly this is the expected behavior when using legacy ACH. With our newer ACH flow (on the PaymentMethods API) I don't believe the transfer is created until the PaymentIntent moves to succeeded. I'd need to test to be 100% sure though as I don't recall exactly off the top of my head. The best way to figure out what will happen in these situations really is to test it out in test mode.

#

I'll test since I do want to know the answer as well

devout vessel
#

Yeah, it was a legacy ACH method

autumn smelt
#

Yeah so with legacy ACH if the Charge ends up failing then the Transfer is automatically reversed.

#

If the Connected Account has already paid out this balance then their balance would go negative and then would try to be recovered via a debit to their external account

#

Let me check if I'm correct that this is not the same for our new ACH flow

#

Okay I was wrong... we do handle this the same for both ACH flows where a Transfer is created immediately. However, in both cases, the funds on the Connected Account aren't going to be available to payout until the normal time that the ACH debit would become available which would be after it moved to succeeded so really there shouldn't be a scenario here where the funds are already paid out on the Connected Account.

devout vessel
#

That's interesting. Thanks for conducting the experiments, I appreciate it!

I have no more questions here, thank you