#nacho_timestamp-milliseconds
1 messages ¡ Page 1 of 1 (latest)
đ Welcome to your new thread!
â˛ď¸ We'll be here soon! Typically we respond in a few minutes, but sometimes we might take a bit longer if the server is busy or if you have a particularly tricky question.
âąď¸ We close idle threads, which makes them read-only. Once a thread is closed it won't be reopened, but you can always start a new thread if you have another question.
đ This thread will always be available, even after it's closed. You can find it again using Discord's search, or you can save this link: https://discord.com/channels/841573134531821608/1245051069554364490
đ Have more to share? Add more details, code, screenshots, videos, etc. below.
nacho_timestamp-milliseconds
@left hull you need to make sure that your timestamp is not more than 5 years in the future.
I saw the error message
but I have been creating subscriptions that ends in 20 years in the future
Gotcha, we recently made a change that validates the timestamp properly. We had a bug where we allowed milliseconds instead of seconds and we fixed it last week I think.
did that changed? when? is there any publication explaining it?
I'd recommend reaching out to our support team about this: https://support.stripe.com/contact
no, it's not that
before there was a check that the subscription does not end in more than 20years in the future
so I had to make sure that didn't happen
but now I see it was made much more lower than that and we were not notified in any way
Yes I think it's because of what I said. We added validation for unix timestamps and I think it caused this issue. That's why the best next step is to reach out to our support team: https://support.stripe.com/contact
ok, thanks, I'll make sure our product team reaches out to them but can you help me finding a workaround?
e.g. create the subscription without the cancel_at timestamp would make it work?
yes
I consider that I could have been helped better in this situation, the opposite experience as I always had when asking for help in this channel; the problem is still not solved and the answer were short and helpless