#philthegr81_unexpected
1 messages ยท Page 1 of 1 (latest)
๐ Welcome to your new thread!
โฒ๏ธ We'll be here soon! Typically we respond in a few minutes, but sometimes we might take a bit longer if the server is busy or if you have a particularly tricky question.
โฑ๏ธ We close idle threads, which makes them read-only. Once a thread is closed it won't be reopened, but you can always start a new thread if you have another question.
๐ This thread will always be available, even after it's closed. You can find it again using Discord's search, or you can save this link: https://discord.com/channels/841573134531821608/1230224146819055647
๐ Have more to share? Add more details, code, screenshots, videos, etc. below.
Hi, can you share the object id for this behavior so I can take a loser look? Here's how you can find a request ID: https://support.stripe.com/questions/finding-the-id-for-an-api-request
Actually, there is no object ID as of yet. The customer caught that it was going to bill them the full amount on the Stripe session page we redirected them to, and alerted our support department before going through with it. I can masquerade as the customer and do a screen capture of the order of events, if that would be helpful.
Without seeing an explicit object this is hard to say. However, from what you described, if the subscription was on a trial I would not think there would be a proration as there was a trial, if I'm understanding what you're explaining correctly. Could you potentially mimic this behavior in your test mode so I can further look?
Certainly! One moment, let me replicate this.
OK, I've replicated it. There isn't an associated API request with this action, as it was done through a Stripe session page. I do have the associated event: evt_1P6dusKHPFAlBzyyxDZtKDrA.
๐ taking a look
Yeah this just isn't how it works
You will never see proration generated from a trial period
And proration in general is not backward facing.
It solely looks at the current state of the Subscription
So it doesn't take into account that prior to the trial period there was a separate billing period that was paid.
Ah, well. Thanks for verifying this for me.